Help me decide which of two specific cars to buy (BMW content)

Someone will be along soon and tell you to buy a van/another car not mentioned above

I suppose my question really is, is a two year fresher car 'better'?

Is the insurance cost similar / a factor?

Id go for the newer one. Less flashy, not an 'M' so less chance of others wanting to race you/be ****s around you, presumably cheaper insurance, likely cheaper spare parts, and more ULEZ proof in the future (presumably)

Have you considered a Berlingo 😆

pics please

You know you don't have to spend the 2K scrappage on a car right?

It's yours to spend how you like ..... New bike !!

milage much different? Service history?

Realistically the newer one for me (if the choice is those two) I won't notice the 20hp difference, Flasher trim; who cares? £40 tax is only going to go up, plus it's ongoing cost, but the cream leather and wood trim aren't my faves either. Tricky

Given that you keep cars for a long time, you might as well go for the euro 5 one to buy a bit more time. See if you can get one without the cream leather and wood though...there must be one out there somewhere.

Cream leather and wood are both instant NO from me - so combined it's a NO squared. Plus the other has more power, better trim, better colour. No brainer.

Realistically the newer one for me (if the choice is those two) I won’t notice the 20hp difference, Flasher trim; who cares? £40 tax is only going to go up, plus it’s ongoing cost, but the cream leather and wood trim aren’t my faves either. Tricky

Exactly!

Cream leather and wood and both instant NO from me – so combined it’s a NO squared. Plus the other has more power, better trim, better colour. No brainer.

Also exactly. So confusing!

I assume they’re both petrol?

At that age and mileage, I’d buy whichever was in the best condition, but would probably er towards the Euro 5 one for future proofing.

Interior colour wouldn’t bother me. Mud shows up just as much on black interiors as on light ones.

At that age / mileage I would choose primarily based on condition.

They're such similar specs that I doubt it will make much difference once you're used to it.
Does the Euro 5 make a difference for future ULEZ within the likely timespan you'll have the car? I assume that that the future ULEZ plans are published somewhere.

Personally I wouldn't go for any 4 cylinder bmw from that era. They'd probably be fine but general consensus is to get a 6 cylinder N/A as that's what bmw are really good at and renowned for. Running costs will be very similar but the sixes are much less prone to going bang, also a much nicer drive.

So that's either 325i or 330i, preferably the N52 versions which are slightly older but more reliable.

At that age / mileage I would choose primarily based on condition.

👆

And stuff selecting a particular make - other manufacturers and models are available....

I have said on here before - I went to look at a Fiesta for mrs_oab and parked next to it was a mint Mazda 323f with full service history for 13 years in one name, in date order, from same garage, all neatly in a folder on passenger seat...The thing was unmarked and had oil changes every 5k for all 113k of it's life. We bought it for £600, rant it for nearly two years and it cost a service, a tyre and an MOT - and then sold it for £650...

Option 2 - it won't have M Sport suspension and low profile run-flat tyres that on BMW seem to be made of wood.

Option 2 – it won’t have M Sport suspension and low profile run-flat tyres that on BMW seem to be made of wood.

A helpful thought, thanks

And stuff selecting a particular make – other manufacturers and models are available

That is the downside of searching online, where the search begins with make and model. I haven't looked anywhere in person yet

You know you don’t have to spend the 2K scrappage on a car right?

It’s yours to spend how you like ….. New bike !!

for 2 grand? don’t be silly!

Newer and cheaper to run every day of the week to me.

Neither sounds like it’s going to set your world on fire, so go with the least pain option.

They are both 4cly 2 litre engines, I would research both engines carefully as I think that engine at around this time is known to be a bag of nails in a lot of cases.

And you are looking to spend £3k in order to 'save' £1.6k? That's a lot of daily charges before you end up paying for repairs on a car you have no knowledge of. I would stick with what you have got personally. They will both cost money to run, but you know what has and hasn't been done on your current car.

so I was going to keep it and suck up the charge – except TFL is generously giving me £2k to scrap it. So I am looking for a new car.

I wouldn't scrap a car I love and had owned for years just to make a few quid theoretical "profit" buying another old car which at Euro 5 (at best) can't be compliant with many ulez anyway. It seems you tend to keep cars a long time so you'll never realise any "profit" anyway.

So I'd say keep it and suck up the charge.

Are you anticipating any bigger bills for the current car?

As johnners, I'd minimise trips, consider routes and costs and possibly keep the current car

£2.5k will buy a lot of ulez charges

I love how people think an M-sport is akin to say an M3 or an M5..

I've had my chuckle... Carry on! As you weren't.

325i https://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-details/202308120713646

330i https://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-details/202307229940016

Z4 https://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-details/202307300228526

630i https://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-details/202305067088600

A little (?) over budget, but...

CLS AMG Shooting Brake https://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-details/202306238879425

If you love BMWs of an older era and really want to change, I’d be looking for a 6 cylinder as mentioned above.

I had a E46 330i and although I love my 320d, really regret selling that car.

BMW pseudo wood is really nasty

Cream leather - you really want to move on and look at something else.

Plenty of BMWs around

I'm another one in agreement with Johners. Presumably the current car is an E46 6 cylinder? If it's looked after it'll just keep plugging away. It doesn't owe you anything, whereas anything newer will depreciate just sitting there.

I've got an E91 320d, so same basic model as the 2 you're looking at but a bit older. Its been a solid car (I've had it 14 years/110k miles, now on 197k). I'd say both would be a bit undergunned assuming they're normally aspirated petrol. My 163bhp lump is not quick, but being a diesel has buckets of torque which masks the fact quite well - the petrols wont have that, so you'll be wringing their necks to get anywhere. Mine's an M-sport and is worth it for the seats - I hated the ones in the SE I tried, slid all over the place. The stock M-sport ride was both wobbly AND harsh, but a spring and damper swap, plus a decent geo and it's now much better controlled and at the solid end of comfortable, even on 18" wheels. (If either of the ones you're looking at have 19" wheels, run away - they crack; and budget to replace run-flat tyres with proper ones).

I had a E46 330i and although I love'd my 320d, really regret selling that car.

+1

You’re right I already have an E46 six cylinder. Would I really be disappointed with a 10 year newer 4 cylinder?

I don’t ever really drive fast but I do like how the power is applied really smoothly whether I’m moving from the lights or accelerating on the motorway. I guess I would lose that…

I'd buy whichever had best MOT history and condition but I'd be 100% sure there weren't any glaring issues with the engine/drivetrain (I don't know anything about BMW's) as touched on by posters above

I had a 325i (6cyl) e91. I did love it, but it wasn’t fast, and that’s 220bhp iirc. So I don’t think either of the cars you mention is going to be particularly nippy. I’d still have the M Sport if possible because I think the internal trim is nicer (I had SE).

The 6 cyl e9x cars have better trim by default that their 4cyl counterparts which is worth considering if you are looking at one of those.

Oh, and my e91’s engine just suddenly went pop in a cloud of smoke one day. I sold it to a guy who was going to try and fix it, though DVLA records suggest he failed. They’re not indestructible.

How long is the £2k scrappage available for? I'd be holding out for better options. I had an E46 330ci for 10 years, nice car but can't say I really missed it (after I switched to a Skoda Octavia estate). Took some time to get used to the lack of torque but you quickly adapt your driving style. Not saying you should go down the sensible estate route for your needs but I'd personally look at other options for something you only drive occasionally and don't care much about the performance of, especially if the BMW option is a 4cyl 3 series.

I have a non m sport 3 series. It broke and I was given a 2 series (the people carrier one) with m sport suspension.

My car was in Edinburgh, I live in Nottingham. I drove the loan car up 500 miles on motorway and a road.

It was the most uncomfortable car I've ever been in.

So get a non m sport suspension car!

Size of the wheels makes a massive difference to the cost of tyres. When it's time to replace mine,I'll be going for the smallest wheels fattest tyre combo for comfort and cost.

Option 2 – it won’t have M Sport suspension and low profile run-flat tyres that on BMW seem to be made of wood.

I've changed to non runflats, cheaper, slightly nicer ride and slightly quieter.

As above - I'd do some research into the 2.0 petrol engines in the E9X cars. I really wanted another E91 last year but the wife put her foot down and said no to another 3l petrol for bimbling around town etc (fair enough) so started looking at the 2l versions and whilst I'm sure it'd have been fine, there are a lot of red flags warning people away from them.

Ended up with a similar vintage (2011) C-Class with the 1.8T engine and its a really nice thing.

Ended up with a similar vintage (2011) C-Class with the 1.8T engine and its a really nice thing.

I'll look into the Merc - thanks.

My head has been turned by the 3l BMW option but it might be a bit excessive for my needs.

I have owned a few older three series and tbh i would go for M sport every time now for the spec you get from the M sport - I have always had 6 cyl diesels and wouldnt have anything else but friends have the 4 cyl and get on fine with them.  I recently switched to a 2011 five series tourer and I have to say for biking and other activities is a great car - much more room inside, comfier drive and they are cheaper than the three series - worth considering.

I’ll look into the Merc – thanks.

I'm dead pleased with it. Rock solidly built, loads of nice stuff which I don't think BMW 3ers of that era had (auto high beam, soft/auto closing boot, lots more of them have xenons and nav (albeit out-dated) as standard etc).

That said, the styling of the E9X series wins hands down mostly especially with the estate and coupe versions vs the Merc alternatives.

Other option if you want a coupe, A5? Loads around and pretty cheap...

1.8 turbo merc's of that age can stretch the timing chain and jump a tooth courtesy of crap tensioners. Cost about £1k in non London to fix.

But yeah great engine power delivery wise adn will do 30ish mpg around the doors and 40 on a motorway run.

The 1.6 Kompressor engine (supercharged not turbo) only has single tensioner and is less likely to fail apparently.

Cream leather would be a show stopper for me.

However, this suggests you haven't found the right car yet. You could get a Euro 5 with black leather for the same cost?

Why do you want a coupe for skip runs & carrying bikes 🤷‍♂️

Until a couple of months ago I had a e91 330d.
Good car, lat of the BMW, BMWs if you know what I mean. They have progressively got less BMW as time goes on. (I have a g20 3 series now). More dull and inert, plus uglier.

The M-sport trim is the one to go for. The seats are better. You want the pro nav and cic iDrive, xenons are a must. The halogen lights are like candles in a black hole.
Mine was black with oyster leather. Really lifts the interior, the black leather makes it dark and gloomy.

I’d personally avoid 4 cyl bmw. At the age they are now service history and condition tump everything else. A LOT of them are total dogs and will be costly to run.

it won’t have M Sport suspension and low profile run-flat tyres that on BMW seem to be made of wood.

Hell yes! I had to pick up a BMW from a young-ish chap in Bristol a while back, it was one of the sportier versions but I can’t remember what, but it had the sports suspension and low-profile run-flats. I asked him why he was getting rid of it, and he said it had been a big disappointment and he hated driving it, it was noisy and uncomfortable, and he was replacing it with a Mercedes, which I’d driven a similar model to earlier that day, and which I’d enjoyed.
I’d barely got a couple of hundred yards along the road and I’d discovered what he meant. The suspension was far too firm for the state of the roads, and along with the run-flat tires it crashed and banged and tyre noise completely drowned out the radio at anything other than stupid volumes.

I’ve never been a fan of BMW cars, although a few I drove were OK, but that one was an abomination!

Don't know a massive amount about them but the 4 cylinder engines always seemed to have a bad reputation. Unless London has different standards too, the newer 6 cylinder engines are ULEZ compliant (mine was), and I'm only talking a couple of years newer.

Personally I'm not sure I would buy an older BMW again. Great cars but probably the least reliable I've owned. Had a love/hate relationship with mine.

My 2006 E91 330i is ULEZ compliant 🤣

Well I asked a question, and I listened to your answers, and yesterday I bought a 2010 (E92) 330i M Sport. Fingers crossed it doesn't throw up too many gremlins.

Thanks for your help.