You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more
Today my cycling coach suggest the 16 Personalities site to me to learn a little about myself. Holy cow its spooky accurate. I thought the initial summary was me to a T - I'm categorised as a Logician - and although I didn't need to be told I'm an introvert, amongst the educational sub topics it then lends to the outcome I've just learned much about my traits just by reading the Introversion section.
The basic principle of world studies science is that there's 16 personality types in the world.
Anyway - have a go its pretty good of you like this kind of thing: https://www.16personalities.com
I assume that's the standard Myers Briggs thing....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers%E2%80%93Briggs_Type_Indicator
Think I was ISTJ last time I looked (prob 30 years ago now).
My kids introduced me to it a few weeks ago. Scarily accurate.
I'm a Sentinel apparently.
Virtuoso here!
ISTP-T
I used to be ISTJ - Logistician but things change with age.
I assume that’s the standard Myers Briggs thing….
Its not the same, have a go.
I’m a Sentinel apparently.
Yes my Role is Sentinel, I'm just reading that now, it pretty much describes how I work but also why I get irritated with people that interrupt my schedule for the day 😀
Its a bit of an emotional journey and I'm amazed at the closeness to reality of the examples. Full disclosure: ISTJ-T
Yep Myers Brigg
ENTJ "Commander"
I've done so many of these. Myers Brigg, Clifton Strengths, Keirsey etc.
My favourite was Kobayashi Maru
I didn't reach you get bored easily with online psych tests
"Entertainer", which is bollocks frankly. But there's some parts of the entertainer profile that do apply to me at least.
Virtuoso here. I haven't read all the results yet, but the introduction is pretty accurate.
ISFJ-T, need to re read the report to see if it suggests what I could work on to deal with a couple of work issues I'm having with new role/boss
Adventurer who’s barely left the house in over a year! Some of the text was accurate, other bits not so much. Kinda reminds me of the techniques employed by clairvoyants and confidence tricksters. Fling enough common denominators and vague phrases around and some of them will stick and hit a chord causing people to forget the bits that didn’t stick and go “Oh my God! This is so true”
'Sex machine' apparently 🤷
Campaigner...bits of it are me, bits of it are frankly bolloxs
Looks like Myers-Briggs to me and spits out the same answer* that it has in the past - usual generic stuff.
Although I thought that the "romantically clueless" comment was cutting but sadly accurate.
*INTJ. Or "architect".
INTJ. Strategist. Fits pretty well.
Wow, uncanny. Got me perfectly. Being Architect INTJ-T I'm already analysing how it works and how I can improve 😆
Although I don't think I can do much with 'romantically clueless' 🤔
It’s bollox. Perhaps.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/my-brothers-keeper/202002/in-defense-the-myers-briggs
Apparently I'm a Logician 🤷
Virtuoso
ISTP-T
Going by their description of what that is ,..I'd agree.
Logician
INTP-T
At least not a c**t then 😆 😆
INFP-T. I'm a mediator, which means I'm a daydreaming flake without an ounce of logic.
It’s bollox. Perhaps.
I think the real question is 'Is it of any real use?'. Been around for decades and not exactly transformed the world.
Interesting for a week or so whilst you read about your 'type' and then you just go back to getting on with life and forget all about it....
At least not a c**t then 😆 😆
If I ever make an online personality test I may we'll have it spit that out every so often just to mess with people.
"You're an Architect!"
"You're a Virtuoso!"
"You? Nah, you're just a wazzock, mate"
Horoscopes for the modern era.
That's weird as that's exactly what I was going to post 😳
Interesting for a week or so whilst you read about your ‘type
A week ? More like About 15 seconds tbh
H, architect INTJ here too, despite it apparently being rare. Reading through the details, some seemed about right, other aspects not so much. About as (in)accurate as reading a horoscope.
Edit- completely missed the comments above which said pretty much the same thing, sorry.
STW is now some kind of teenage lassie's mag from the 90s
Ahh clairvoyance. The art of insinuation. While we reduce our core to the bare minimum. An Edwardian party trick. Identify with a character from Shakespeare, it’s just as accurate and frankly more fun.
Edwardian party trick.
Exactly, it is a trick, it feeds you questions to self describe yourself, no suprise that you then think the outcome is an accurate description of you. The only suprise is that people still fall for it.
INTP last I looked, which was a while ago.
My favourite was Kobayashi Maru
Cheat.
Exactly, it is a trick, to it feeds you questions to self describe yourself, no suprise that you then think the outcome is an accurate description of you. The only suprise is that people still fall for it.
I like knowing my personality problems to six decimal places.
INTP last I looked, which was a while ago.
... and now ISTP according to that site, so either I've changed or its results are questionable.
Done this sort of a thing with work a few times, the basic psychology is fine - for use by psychologists, i to describes tendencies an biases rather than absolutes. In the hands of the management consultants it becomes "you're the boss so you're a red and you're the admin do you're a yellow and in accounts you're all blue.....". It's useful if you know how to use it, if not it's pretty much horoscopes.
Pretty much my thoughts.
Question: "I like to be impulsive" [yes|no]
Conclusion: "Well, your personality type [is|n't] impulsive!"
I find it a curious diversion but I'd never hang a work hat on it. (Typical INTP...)
Virtuoso tonight apparently, who knows what it will assign me on another day.
It'd be better if it was D&D alignments.
INFJ apparently....good in bed, aloof and quite masculine...note to self, must tell husband... 🙂
As a little test: I did it, and then got my wife to fill it in based on how she thought I would answer. Same result both times. (INTP) So it isn’t just feeding back a self-description.
Defender
Interesting reading the strengths and weaknesses. It all rings true.
As a little test: I did it, and then got my wife to fill it in based on how she thought I would answer. Same result both times. (INTP) So it isn’t just feeding back a self-description
Poor women is clearly suffering with Stockholm syndrome.
Adventurer apparently, I can’t really see that tbh.
ISTP-T What am I supposed to do with the results?
Does me asking that question tie up with the results?
My virtuoso profile says "building the useful and the superfluous for the fun of it"
That's a load of balls I don't build things for the fun of it, I make things that have a purpose. I never make superfluous things and I have no idea why others do, what's the fun in something that doesn't work, make things for function please otherwise it's a waste of resources.
Just appears to be labeling your personality traits,based on your own choices cant see why some are opposed to that 😕
I don't think it's anything like a horoscope.
I did this previously in an organisation I worked for - as did most of the management team. It did actually make a difference as we "learnt" a bit more about each others traits, preferences, styles. There were a few job transfers and role changes as a result and things did work better for a while.
You can argue that it's all woo-woo, that the more observant might have gleaned this kind of stuff through other means, or that other methods would have worked too/better but I did see some benefits, particularly in how my manager dealt with me (and I him).
As I said above though, I don't believe it's fixed forever and we'll have traits in our assigned type and the other types to a greater or lesser extent.
Logician - INTP, apparently like Bruce Banner. Anyone who's met me after the cat has woken me up at 3:30am again will attest to the accuracy of that.
As others have said, it's all made up (Myers Briggs especially) with little scientific backing, but then as an INTP I would say that.
Madame laughed so much at my profile I insited she do it too and then she didn't laugh quite so heartily. Now I know why I never got jobs where the selection process included one of those tests back in the 80s. I'm a protagonist apparently and Madame a consul.
Madame didn't watch me do it, but I watched her and was only surprised by/disagreed with one reply she made - but made no comment as I didn't want to influence.
Virtuoso, which is a nice word.
For those who really don't see the point -
These things are useful to people who need to work with you or maybe need to analyse you. And they can be useful to you if you're looking to make changes.
Similar questions are asked if you ever do any mental health counselling or therapy. They ask the same questions every week to check on progress.
Virtuoso here too. I'm happy with that 🙂
Virtuoso, definitely more assertive than turbulent. Really quite accurate for me in most instances
DezB
Full MemberThese things are useful to people who need to work with you or maybe need to analyse you. And they can be useful to you if you’re looking to make changes.
Sure, but my results were so far off it'd be useless for any of that. And even if other people are getting good results, the fact that it can be so wrong means you can't really trust it in general.
I asked the interviewer (FTSE 100 company) why I had to do one when they're notionally bollocks, and got told that they (the interviewers) don't actually get to see the results until after they've made a decision and that it was more of a curiosity thing than anything else.
Where I work ~25% of us fall into the "serious personality problems" profile of INTJ compared to about 2% of the general population. Which I thought was interesting. Anyway, they gave me a job so denigrating their recruitment techniques in the interview didn't cause too much damage.
These things are useful to people who need to work with you or maybe need to analyse you. And they can be useful to you if you’re looking to make changes.
Their use is, at best, as a placebo to hang the real change onto, which is people realising change is needed and making an effort.
If as many people were as "intuitive, analysing and thinking" as the woo tells them, that would be rather obvious to them.
mountaineer intk2 - which is a joke lived in one of the flattest parts of Kent my whole life.
Architect - puts me in the same group as Elon Musk, Moriarty and Seven of Nine, which is nice
A lot of these questions if not all are the same in the Autism/Asperger test that was floating about on here a while back so basically nothing has changed in my mind palace
I'll stick with more scientifically accurate methods thank you very much
Where I work ~25% of us fall into the “serious personality problems” profile of INTJ
I used to work in a similar environment, and I'm ENFP...(ie a human) it was err...interesting
Don't go to much o. The results of these test. The results and depend a fair amount o. Your mood at time of taking. Also if you get transfix with the idea that I an X and X do / don't do Y then you can become the definition or stop yourself experiening / trying things because you have the analysis in your mind
Entrepreneur apparently. I’m not. What’s the test-retest validity asks this ENFJ/INTJ depending on the day of the week?
Like horoscopes, every profile is positive. Why don’t they just say you’re an introverted, judgemental, geek who likes doing sums and taking control of matters, and can be quite outgoing when the need arises?
The results and depend a fair amount o. Your mood at time of taking
Take it a few times, average it out. The questions in the full tests are designed to try and do that within the scope of a sitting, but of course come back on a different day and you may vary a little. If you vary lots then either you don't know yourself very well or you're telling porkies for one reason or another.
IME, most folk who take the the angle "what a load of bollocks" are those least interested in making any life improvements...
Why don’t they just say you’re an introverted, judgemental, geek who likes doing sums and taking control of matters, and can be quite outgoing when the need arises?
That wouldn't do very much for buy-in, would it? 😉
Full disclosure, I'm an introverted judgemental geek who likes sums and taking control of matters and can be quite outgoing when the need arises.
Well if you ask someone 100 pressing questions you're likely to get an answer yes... doesn't means it's factual or defines you.
Apparently i'm an executive..
My profile didn't say "won't bother reading all the blurb though as doesn't give a toss"
IME, most folk who take the the angle “what a load of bollocks” are those least interested in making any life improvements…
or are the people who realise buying magic beans isn't the best option for making real life improvements.
Campaigner
Enfb A and T
Some accurate info. I'd say your probably best doing it a couple of times.
IME, most folk who take the the angle “what a load of bollocks” are those least interested in making any life improvements…
when the analysis has a flaw then there is a problem and it can't work for everyone! Do they offer a money back guarantee for the "self improvement" sell.
I wouldn't say it's a load of bollocks, it just has one of my characteristics completely wrong, no matter how many times I do the test, it still rates me that way because the test cannot return the correct analysis. It's result is somewhat correct but with a major flaw.
Maybe they need a 17th personality?
Reading through the other personality types they all have something I relate to that isn't quite included in my own, so yeah maybe it has got more to do with horoscopes, clairvoyants and lazy people management.
Exactly, it is a trick, it feeds you questions to self describe yourself, no suprise that you then think the outcome is an accurate description of you. The only suprise is that people still fall for it.
And then combines it with an overly flattering description, which engages people's confirmation bias.
Try reading some of the other personality types, see how many you "connect" with.
IME, most folk who take the the angle “what a load of bollocks” are those least interested in making any life improvements…
IME, the people who buy into them are the most interested in making life improvements, but the least effective at actually doing anything about it.
I am an Architect.
they call me a butcher....
I remember doing this in work, pre my ASD diagnosis.
we had a business something or other person in doing them to try to streamline something or other...in the business.
He was up against it with some. those headstrong opinionated types, who came out of the test just as that, were the ones who said it was rubbish, which proved the point.
me, well, he got stuck on the 'how do you feel about that' questions, when my response was either, give me more context or , I don't feel anything either way (as I've not got enough information to formulate an idea of what an appropriate response should be)
I think he left worried that I was a psychopath. I'm not, I'm just an android.
I did a Myers-Briggs 4 years ago and it came out as ESTJ but some were mild characteristics and other components were very strong. I guess if I'd have done it 10yrs ago the results would have been different as I would think and behave differently at work.
Where this is of value is a thing called "the grip". The essence of this theory is that when people are really stressed they behave in the opposite way to their profile. So an extrovert will become introverted etc. I used this at work when one of my guys was really struggling on a project and it helped me identify that he needed more support. It doesn't work for everyone though
Advocate INFJ-T
"According to our surveys, Advocates are the most likely personality type to...
...enjoy “people watching”
...have fears they know are irrational
...say modern human beauty standards are unrealistic
...go to great lengths to avoid stress
...re-read an e-mail after sending it"
Yep.
I was searching for this yesterday, but my google fu was failing.
Advocate INFJ-T
“According to our surveys, Advocates are the most likely personality type to…
…enjoy “people watching”
…have fears they know are irrational
…say modern human beauty standards are unrealistic
…go to great lengths to avoid stress
…re-read an e-mail after sending it”Yep.
Those all seem *massively* generic. I don't believe that they're exclusive to 1/16th of the population.
Those all seem *massively* generic.
A better test would be to real all 16 descriptions without knowing your type then try and identify it from those.
Reading your answer is very open to confirmation bias...
Virtuoso.
Seemed pretty bang on. GF agreed, so can't be that far out.
As an exercise I did the same test in German and came out as an assertive entrepreneur. The questions were worded slightly differently and seemed to be focused more on work (not surprising given the questions were written for Germans), but the analysis is not far off that for a virtuoso.
I must've been doing something right given I'm self employed and work with my hands. It also confirmed a few things I knew already which might help the GF understand how ****ing lucky she is to be with me.
lovewookie
Full Memberthey call me a butcher….
Well played
Virtuoso.
Seemed pretty bang on*. GF agreed, so can’t be that far out.
*Was that before or after the chocolate and second bottle of wine?
🤣😂😜🙃
I often get songs appear after phrases/words. this one was the first, and seemed appropriate 😉
Spin
Free Member
Horoscopes for the modern era.
yip.
Was that before or after the chocolate and second bottle of wine?
Two bottles of wine and the choclit bars.
She's been with me long enough that not much shocks her.
At a previous employer, we had a HR droid who pushed these on us (I think she'd been on a course and got a certificate or something).
I wrote a script to fill in answers randomly (I rolled it a few times to make sure it didn't just spit out a DGAF profile).
In the follow up meeting, there was much gushing about how I fit the profile *SO* well, and all the characteristics were such a perfect fit.