[Closed] Working your contracted hours... And feeling guilty!

I dont unless someone's life depends on it. That never happens in my field so I never work more than my contracted hours. Never have done in any other job either.

We are mad. Somebody will be along shortly to shout off about their great work ethic working a billion hours a day. Country on its knees and wot not.

I'd rather work at quality time with friends and especially family and have less money.

We?

I tend not to unless I'm behind due to my own doing.

A few of mates say it's expected of them though.

If you can't get all your work done in your contracted hours then you are obviously not very good at your job.

Or Bruce, doing someone elses job for less than they'd be paid....

You should try working hours in Singapore or Hong Kong. Insane.

I never work more than I'm contracted, when I get into work at(Royal Mail) 6.30am each day there's at least a dozen other lads who've been there for at least an hour. They're also the first to complain when we're told that due to early finishers we have to absorb another 1 or 2 rounds.

You work to live you don't live to work.

Like BruceWee says, if you can't do your job in the time given then you can't do your job.

Worked at a job i loved for 6 years,lived 18 miles away, cycled in or train every day got there always 10 mins early, and left dead on time, muppet from up the road would arrive 25 later than start time, and go ten mins befre end time,.

Guess who got thought better of, it wasnt me.

I don't know any teachers that only do their contracted 35 hrs.

I'm not saying it's not possible but it is difficult to do the job properly in that time.

That said I know a few teachers that act like martyrs on account of the hours they claim to work.

Or somebody has left and you have to pick up there workload.

In which case, you can do your job, just not your job and somebody else's.

If you can't get all your work done in your contracted hours then you are obviously not very good at your job.

That's not true of every job.

I don't see what is wrong with work your hours either. You trade your skills, knowledge, experience and time for money. Increase the hours you work devalues your product. I don't mean walk out on the dot, I finish what I'm doing, maybe that will take 5 min maybe 30-40 min but I don't make a habit of hanging around.

If however you are paid to achieve X task then working longer hours is reasonable, however the flexibly need to go both ways and if you're ahead of target then you should be free to go "early".

Mostly I work my contracted hours but there are usually a few weeks in the year when workload demands 60+ hours to meet deadlines. I am quite happy to work extra when necessary but employers who expect you to work extra all year are taking the piss.

I worked hard for many years - easily doing over my work hours. I got paid well, I got promoted etc. In the end, I had a falling out with my boss - who lied and schemed to save his skin.
I lost - so all the effort was wasted. However I got a new job, nicer (but smaller) company
And I still over work my hours. I am mad ...

I was talking (independently) with s Belgian and [u]a Spaniard[/u] this week, and they think we are mad..

I get paid to think not be a machine.

Well, there's one hell of a lot of Spaniards who don't work at all. Their economy is proper doodoo at the moment

apart from the odd trip to other factories (especially in other countries), where I do the journey in a mix of their time and mine, I mostly work my hours, give or take half an hour or so over a week, and nothing more.

the job I do 99.5% of the time means "no deadlines" - it gets done when it gets done & then it's handed over to the users to test. That's where the whole thing slows down, usually.

The UK is obsessed with long hours. Apparently our new CEO has commented that people only seem to do their hours and not work late every night, don't think he's too impressed. Personally, I only get paid to do 37.5 hours, so that's all they get...

Not that I think long hours are any more productive, in fact I think I'd achieve more in less hours and there's a fair amount of studies on this.

Some interesting reading:

http://www.salon.com/2012/03/14/bring_back_the_40_hour_work_week/

http://pennyhaw.wordpress.com/2011/11/20/the-longer-you-work-the-more-productive-you-are-not-so-say-experts/

We?

I used to work in places where you were seen as a shirker if you didn't do (unpaid) overtime. No one used to leave when they should as the bosses would comment the next day - just snipey remarks, but you knew it was being noted.

I had one place where great pressure was put on me to assist production to meet a target over a weekend, often only being asked (told) late on a Friday and it was unpaid with promised days in lieu that never materialised.

I used to resent it & do the min hours I could get away with.

Now where I work, it is not expected of you to work longer than you have to, people never make snide comments and heap pressure on you.
I am much more productive, am more willing to stay late if need be & enjoy going into work.
Who'd have thought it...?

northernmatt - Member
You work to live you don't live to work.
Like BruceWee says, if you can't do your job in the time given then you can't do your job.

Sorry, that's balls! Just maybe your employer is too demanding and has too high expectations...

I don't begrudge extra time, but I claim it as time off in lieu/overtime, without fail, and it's my time- my terms. Doesn't seem that controversial but it came as no surprise to find that the sort of boss that expects you to work extra hours is also often the sort of boss that expects to not pay you, or ask you, or ever give you time off in return. The same sort that reacts with horror if you ask for a day's holiday.

The bottom line is you're paid to work, and that's not a good link to break. If you expect people to work without pay, you can't exactly complain if you pay people and they don't work.

What I found really interesting is the people that say they "have to" work overtime, and that they can't claim it. A colleague of mine in my last job in the bank couldn't be convinced this wasn't true- we were all either clocking off at 5pm, or claiming the overtime, she was working early every day, taking short lunches, and never claimed a bean. And what was weird about that was that she was really aggrieved about it. How dare they make me!

There does seem to be a something for nothing culture in this country, a contract is a contract. A bit extra now and then is ok as long as there's quid pro quo. Which fortunately is how it works where I am currently.

Note it all they want if it became expected id up ad find another job.

I work my contracted hours , trned down a blackberry and unless im on call my works mobile is off. My boss understands this . He has my personal mobile to get in touch if its important ( sometimes its unavoidable to contact me at short notice or in the middle of the night due to the 24 hour nature of my work)

When im working on an install or project ill do whats needed to deliver but i will take it back when its quieter

We had engineers that would work till 8-9 pm at night for no extra money - always thought they were mad but noted who they were so i knew who to call when shit hits the fan.

Following on from the sick note thread, why in the UK do we feel more compelled to work more hours than our contracts say?

I was talking (independently) with s Belgian and a Spanisrd this week, and they think we are mad...

Try working in the states. If you only do twelve hours a day you get sacked.
I've never worked in a culture like it. Luckily my company was run by rabid slave drivers so I was used to it.

The way I see extra unpaid hours is... if you want to progress within the company, you're probably going to need to put a bit extra in. If you're happy with your position then do your 37 hours and leave on the dot.

If you're happy with your position then do your 37 hours and leave on the dot.

Yep, not interested in a career any more, just getting a decent wage for standard hours....

I only ever been in a salaried position once when i left college/uni and was offered a job without having to apply for it through my ex thermodynamics tutor who recommended me for a position as a design/test engineer, i was paid very well for a 25yr old straight out of college (£35k + bonus) but i quit after 6 months due to the folk i had to delegate to as they were sub-human and the fact that it was "expected" of me to do 2 extra hours a day unpaid, sorry but no amount of money is worth me working any more than i absolutely have to.

Something for nothing culture?

Where'd that come from. Surely that's what your employers are after by doing extra time for nowt?

I'm currently in a fairly peeved mood regarding being asked to work on my days off because we need to cover another department. No extra money, no extra benefits, just do it.

It wouldn't be so bad but when we get e-mails telling us that we'll be taken to task if we don't do it right (which none of us actually know what we're doing. When I say other department, i mean we don't do what they do in the same way they don't do what we do) it kind of puts you in a bit of a mood.

edit: I'm not ad-versed to doing a bit extra, but I used to work 50-60 hours a week and only get paid for 35 and I said I would never go back

BruceWee - Member

If you can't get all your work done in your contracted hours then you are obviously not very good at your job.

You can't actually think that's true surely?

I work extra time if doing so allows me to achieve a delivery ive underestimated. With good planning this is minimised but you always end up with little push around a delivery. Other than that I prefer to stick to 40 hours a week which leaves me with enough energy to live.

try working in the States

Some places in the States wok long hours I believe, but those I have experienced work rather shorter than here.

BruceWee - If you can't get all your work done in your contracted hours then you are obviously not very good at your job.

Obviously? Really? Are you in a low skilled sort of a job?

My company's getting better though at selling work with sensible estimates as expecting us consultants (poor me 😉 ) to do what it takes to get the job done isn't ideal.

Generally believe that after a point the productive output drops so fast it's not worth staying.
On the other hand walking out the door when there is still stuff that needs sorting is fairly petty and does nobody any good in the long run.
Flexibility works both ways and every job is different.

Obviously? Really? Are you in a low skilled sort of a job?

Well it feels pretty low skilled to me but apparetntly you should really have a masters in engineering to do it. All I've got is a BSc and yet I seem to muddle through without ever doing unpaid overtime.

OK, let me try to revise my statement.

If you can't get all your work done in your contracted hours then you are obviously not very good at your job. If you are good at your job and you still can't get all your work done in your contracted hours then you are obviously not very good at realising you are doing more than one person's job.

Practice this phrase in front of the mirror:

Lack of planning on your part does not constitute an emergency on my part. I'm going now, bye.

A weak point, badly made

A previous place I worked had a paid overtime culture induced by suppressing basic salaries. It backfires: psychologically you work less intensively, less intelligently, to stretch the work to fit the time. Managers don't plan properly and commit to incredible deadlines because you can always be made to work longer. And you feel obliged, and are made to feel obliged by peer pressure, to consistently sacrifice your personal/family time regardless of actual productivity or the achieve-ability of the goals. The result was years of stressed-out nagging managers, tiredness, failure and low morale.

This is very wrong for business, professionally and personally, in my opinion.

Lack of planning on your part does not constitute an emergency on my part. I'm going now, bye.

As above, it depends on your role, and your ambitions

If your role isn't that demanding, and you have limited aspirations, then go for it. If however you would like a promotion at some point, or not to be at the top of the list if where you work is contracting, I'd say it's pretty unwise not to work reasonable overtime

If you feel that you're being asked to do too much, and resent this, then do something about it by speaking to your boss or jumping ship.

I work I'm academia. I also work considerably longer than my contracted hours. This year I got a promotion. Two other people who don't didn't. Moreover, in science I'm competing with people in other institutes, both for grants and on project delivery, but also in terms of building an international network of collaborators that will allow mr to move on and take a more senior role elsewhere in due course. The advantage of academia is that your achievements in terms of grants won and publications is very public, so most things you achieve in your job also directly enhance your own profile.

My contract is 39 hours, I do 50 weekly. And it's not because I "am not good at my job". It's because the company runs 24 hours a day, 364 days a year, and does not have the right amount of staff to cover, so expect us to do more.
Am I too stupid to see that I am doing more than one persons job, no. But, in the current economic situation of this country, it would be very foolish of me to start creating hassle about the problem and causing my self unnecessary issues in work, I know my boss, I know his attitude, and I know how low he can stoop.
So yes, poor planning on my bosses part does not constitute to an emergency on my part, but do I want to rock a boat that already is unstable? No.
It's slightly unfair to label someone a poor worker because they do more hours than their contract...

Sometimes i read threads on STW and think to myself

"yup, you're doing OK my boy.... your priorities and life is totally in order"

This is one of them threads 🙂

Guys guys guys... working more than contracted for 0 pay ? WTF are you thinking....

There does seem to be a something for nothing culture in this country, a contract is a contract. A bit extra now and then is ok as long as there's quid pro quo. Which fortunately is how it works where I am currently.

This.

Not:

If your role isn't that demanding, and you have limited aspirations, then go for it. If however you would like a promotion at some point, or not to be at the top of the list if where you work is contracting, I'd say it's pretty unwise not to work reasonable overtime

If your boss doesn't value your skills and achievements you deliver in a 37hr-ish week, find another one. "Working long hours" is not adequate reason or a measure for promotion by itself. That has been drummed into you at some point.

My contracted hours are 9-5 m-f plus whatever else is reasonably requested by my employer. That's what it says in my contract so for me staying late within reason isn't doing more for no pay, it's doing what I'm already paid fairly well to do. I knew what the job involved when I got into it, and although I'd like an assistant to pick up some of the excess work I'm not in a position to rock the boat if I value the rest of my career.

Highg5 makes a good point.

What your opinion on the same question but adding the parameter of being highly paid or not?

i.e. I would have thought those earning an average wage might be less inclined to put extra hours in than those earning say, over £40k a year.

True or not?

not for me.

Kryton57 - Member
Highg5 makes a good point.

What your opinion on the same question but adding the parameter of being highly paid or not?

i.e. I would have thought those earning an average wage might be less inclined to put extra hours in than those earning say, over £40k a year.

True or not?

No in my world.

Only twice in the last 5 years have i left even 1 min past my contracted finishing time. I have Overtime sure, no worries, but i get paid for it. I have 24x7 callouts, but i also get paid for that. 1 call that last 10 seconds is 2 hours pay... i can live with that.

I'm contracted to work 7.5 hrs mon-fri

Some days I do 12, other days I do 4, it really depends on the workload that day.
I don't add them up at the end of the week/month/year because we don't need to log in and out of work so there's no data to use.

Bottom line, I've no idea if I'm over or under my contracted hours.

I should mention mine is paid overtime, not unpaid.

I'm a contractor, I get paid for 7.5 hours a day even if I work for 10. A 'professional' day is what they call it. Ha, no chance except if the poo hits the fan on something, but even then I'll take the time back.

The OP was about guilt and yes I do feel some guilt, which I shouldnt, for doing only my hours, but I tell myself to MTFU and go home, so it passes, usually the guilt fades once I'm on my bike on the way home.

Sometimes the hardest thing about work is to manage your manager. Setting their expectations, and keeping the contract, isnt always easy to balance.

I'd rather work at quality time with friends and especially family and have less money

^^this, and...

If you work more hours to get a job completed on time I would ask if the firm are prepared to flex the other way at slack times or when you need to get off. If not, then it's contracted hours only in my view.

I can tell you that no one feels guilty in my family business where i work. The entire factory staff are ready to leave by 16:50 and they stand around doing nothing until around 16:55 and leave. A girl in the office lives half a mile from work and she's late 9 times out of 10 but will still leave on time.
Whilst of course, i work 10 hour shifts 8-6 and just watch everyone walk over the company showing zero respect for my family.
Woah, sorry...rant over.

If I want a job where I work normal hours I'll have to move out of consultancy, any other option will pay a lot less, and be less interesting, so I put up with staying late when I'm needed. Some of my colleagues do work a lot of extra hours and get are more likely to get the promotions which is fair enough.

My job changes over the year, so one week I might work all the hours, but a few weeks later I'm taking it easy, generally, it probably evens out and i do what's in my contract. Where I previously worked that certainly wasn't the case and there was an expectation from (middle) management that you worked more than your contracted hours.

It's not unreasonable to stay late if you spend many of your contracted hours wittering away on a web forum.

chakaping - Member
It's not unreasonable to stay late if you spend many of your contracted hours wittering away on a web forum.

PMSL. *reports highly offensive post to Cougar*

Whilst of course, i work 10 hour shifts 8-6 and just watch everyone walk over the company showing zero respect for my family.

I don't understand why not wanting to work unpaid overtime is lack of respect?

footflaps I'm guessing he's referring to the slight arrivals / not making up the time whilst attempting to keep the family business afloat.

joshbosh - its your family - the problem is with management not the staff, there's plenty around that need jobs, it might help to remind your staff of that and the fact that if the business isn't profitable - what do they think your options will be?

You need to be the guardian of the gate so to speak - put your foot down.

Kryton57 - You're totally right in what you're saying. My fiancée always says the same [i]"well if i was you i'd tell them to get on with the f-in job"[/i] but i don't know why, i find it very difficult... i don't really want to be their friend but i also don't want to be their enemy.
My mum is the boss, my late grandfather founded the company. I'm also the youngest person here so instantly people will have slightly less respect for me.
You're also right in saying there's plenty of people who need work, but it's very hard to just sack someone in this country isn't it? It's also hard to find good people in little old Brecon.
The next 2 weeks will be the hardest, the boss is away and it's just me vs them!

Generally I’ve noticed there seems to be more and more of a long hours culture in the UK. Being constantly knackered and working 50+ hour weeks is seen as almost some sort of modern virtue”, and it’s quite easy to get sucked into it, it’s not such an issue if you have a home life that accommodates it and actually enjoy your job, but as soon as the work / life balance has to shift for whatever reason (Kids are a common cause) it’s interesting to see how an employer deals with that.
For my own part I moved companies primarily so I could do almost exactly the same job but in a nicer atmosphere, with less of a long hours/presentism culture and half the commute, simply to improve my work / life balance, and stress levels, I’m coming up for a year since that move and I know I made the right decision. I do work a bit beyond my contracted hours now and then, but this accrues as TOIL by default, so a couple of extra hours a week, over the course of a month gains you an extra days leave, and I normally knock off at lunch time on Fridays having done my hours, without an eyelid being batted... I realise now just how awful my previous employers really were...

I remember talking to an older colleague about long hours not so long ago and how the work place had changed over his ~35 years. It struck me that it’s really been the presence of computers in the workplace that has driven a lot of it. The fact that we can individually do more in a day with these tools means that, far from reducing the hours we work by making us more efficient, the expectation has become that workers can achieve exponentially more and more, leading to people working longer hours to keep up with the unrealistic expectations of poor managers...

If you can't get all your work done in your contracted hours then you are obviously [S]not very good at your job.[/S] Being asked to do too much

I had a wonderful meeting a couple of months ago with a planner who seemed to believe we could do a pretty substantial job in under a year, he was eventually asked to show us the resource profile (for those not into this stuff it’s basically sets the work to be done against personnel’s contracted hours) I had a resource allocation of 400% which basically meant he thought I could work 160 hour weeks for a year, He’d got my manager at something like 1600%. That Schedule was significantly changed, but it highlights the problems caused by unrealistic expectations...

being paid more than say the average wage doesnt change the goalposts in the slightest. Not one iota. Maybe people on lower money think it does, oooh he earns more so should work more, but I dont see any evidence. Earning more just means more experience / skills in a given field so the market pays more.

most of us, once we get to about 30 dont have a career, we have a job - discuss? 😉

joshbosh - they'll continue to have less respect for you if you let them walk over you. You are not their friend, you are thier boss. I asl appraciate your age comment - experience and maturity counts for a lot in these situations.

The best way to arm yourself is not to undermine your conversation; stick to the facts, ask for an explanation so you can consider any issues, and don't mention anything they are not interested in. IE, sit the latecomer down and day something like

"I've noticed a regular pattern of you turning up late for work, for example on Thursday at 9:10, last wedenesday at 9:15 (etc). I'm sure you appreciate the start time is 9:00 and I am paying you to work X hours. Could you explain why this is?"

- listen to the excuse, which may be valid - ie dropiing the kids off to school, traffic etc and discuss a viable alternative, ie start at 9:15 but end at 5:15.

Then you explain it isn't acceptable to trancend <the agreed hours> and if it continues you reserve the right to monitor the employess performance. Please try to fix it.

Give them an opportunity over an agreed period, let them know you are aware of it and that it isn't acceptable. Write that down as the "fix" and get them to sign that they agree to it.

Stage 2 after the agreed period - "If you can't do the job / abide by the rules, I know someone who can fulfil the job I'm asking to be done, would you like to continue doing that job?

Legally, get it all in writing, evidence based non compliance and the performance measure that they agree to (by signiture) then when that person is fired, there's no comeback.

Maybe it's about lack of a sense of ownership / personal relationship to the firm. It's [b]your[/b] family company, not theirs.

You work to live you don't live to work.

100%. Get this the wrong way round, and you've ****ed up. Both my wife and I could easily work more hours in the week, but as we have relatively small living costs, we can both afford to have more free time, which is far more valuable than money. We appreciate that we're both in a very privileged position though, and that countless other people have no choice but to work for far more hours.

On of the problems is that employers are constantly trying to squeeze more work out of less people, and the hours allocated simply aren't enough. And the further down the pecking order you go, the more employers take the piss.

Kryton57 - unfortunately i'm not the boss. I've just worked here as a standard employee for 6 years but i live with the boss.
As much as it pains me to say - my mum is too soft and has been since she took over as MD from my granddad many years ago. They all know that very little will happen when they under perform. Although we do have performance reviews coming up and i will be pushing her hard to bring up the things that i see on a day to day basis that she doesn't, they'll start being on time again for 3 months and then slowly they'll fall back to how they were before.
It's a pointless argument here really, i have rose tinted glasses on but the real problem is probably management. Still, just because the management aren't threatening to fire you every time you're late that doesn't mean being late is ok does it?

ti_pin_man - Member
Sometimes the hardest thing about work is to manage your manager. Setting their expectations, and keeping [s]the contract[/s], isnt always easy to balance.

Spot on Joe, my boss came from a job where 70+ hour weeks were the norm and almost looks at you like your slacking if you only do 50.
In reply to the statement

If you can't get all your work done in your contracted hours then you are obviously not very good at your job.

Josh bosh, not always a question of being harsh to sort things out.

Willing obedience is better than forced. Although sometimes forced is required.

I can tell you that no one feels guilty in my family business where i work. The entire factory staff are ready to leave by 16:50 and they stand around doing nothing until around 16:55 and leave. A girl in the office lives half a mile from work and she's late 9 times out of 10 but will still leave on time.
Whilst of course, i work 10 hour shifts 8-6 and just watch everyone walk over the company showing zero respect for my family.

Sounds like none of them are particularly motivated. Is there a reason for this? Lack of ultimate employment progression? Low wages? Low development ceiling? Is it their fault or yours?

I'm in a similar position to you (I manage a section of the family business). We're lucky to have a great team, but they aren't cheap (there are one or two here who actually draw larger salaries than I do, even though I am 'senior' to them, but they work more hours than me)! And we are quite flexible with working hours; one guy wanted to go on holiday recently, which ate into his normal holiday allocation, but we agreed for him to do a certain amount of work whilst away, to make up for it, and some extra hours when back here. I appreciate not all businesses can operate this way however. But we feel that treating our staff well leads to a happier workplace and a more successful business. It's an ethic which has proven to work well for us. I've had to tell people to stop work and go home more than once! But such dedication doesn't come by accident, it has to be carefully engineered. Work hard, and you reap the rewards. If the rewards aren't worth the effort, then people won't put any in.

thx1138 - quite right. Unfortunately we're not in the position to pay more money, we're barley breaking even right now. Problem is, to get more money, we need more orders, to get more orders, we need a good sales team.

Then why not offer incentives, such as a team bonus if the reach or exceed a particular target for the next month/quarter/year etc? Give them something to be motivated about.

As others have said, it sounds like more a failure or management (your family) than it does with the workers. And something that may be very difficult for you to face, is the reality that you might not actually be the best people to lead the company. One of the problems with inherited positions is that the inheritors might not share the enthusiasm, motivation, skill, knowledge and indeed aptitude needed to run the company, that the founders/predecessors had. Are you in it purely out of a sense of familial duty, or because you genuinely have a love of the work/interest of how the company succeeds? Is your heart really in it? If the answer to that is 'no', then maybe it's time to step aside and let someone who is sufficiently passionate/skilled take charge.

*puts helmet on*
I work in the NHS. For the last 4yrs, in my bit, anyway, we have been losing highly qualified staff and having the posts going to "savings" (for what? Christmas??). We are now at a stage where our part of the service is only being maintained by goodwill and a disregard for the working time directive (by both staff and management). Sure, a degree of "flexi-time" can be accrued but it rarely gets taken within the alloted month and is, usually, lost. Most of my qualified staff put about 4hrs/week in, extra, as unpaid, I often do a bit more than that.
Things are now deteriorating as talk of "reprofiling and downgrading" begins to surface and the enormous amount of goodwill that the staff have shown is, effectively, thrown back in their face. We've tried our best to help the Trust get through a bad time and this is the reward for it.
Goodwill is about to do an Elvis.

thx1138 - i'm not the boss.
yes im passionate about the job and so is my mum but she can't afford for people to just up and leave and neither can we afford bonus's.
I'm afraid i don't believe you need incentives to do your job

joshbosh12 - Member
thx1138 - quite right. Unfortunately we're not in the position to pay more money, [b]we're barley breaking even right now[/b]. Problem is, to get more money, we need more orders, to get more orders, we need a good sales team.

Add reputation, motivated / interested and productive work force. Have a word with the ne'er do wells. Then have a team meeting about barely breaking even, find a performance measure and a reward. Incentives don't have to be about money - a member of the telesales team over the other side of the office got every afternoon on Friday's in March off because he hit his weekly target every week in January.

Whats the line of business out of interest?

I'm afraid i don't believe you need incentives to do your job

Really? Do you really believe that? Then accept that your staff will do the bare minimum needed to get paid then, and take every opportunity to do as little as possible. sorry, but this attitude marks you out as unsuitable to lead a business. Without incentives, there is no reason why the staff will put themselves out for your company; they will work for their own benefit and not yours.

I've worked in jobs where I was basically 'cannon fodder'; instantly disposable and replaceable by employers who didn't care about their employees. Several of those companies have either folded or suffered serious problems. They didn't offer me any incentives, so I saw no reason to give them my best. I did the minimum I had to, picked up my wages and looked for something better. Most other staff I worked with did exactly the same.

I'm afraid i don't believe you need incentives to do your job

Really?

You're not fit for purpose, does your mum [the boss] know that's how you manage employees?

You need incentives, money in the pay packet is usually only a short-term incentive.

I'm afraid i don't believe you need incentives to do your job

😯

I'm not sure what you mean by his tbh. If there's no incentive to do a job, it doesn't get done! There has to be a reward system somewhere.

That might be improving ones pay packet, it might be the warm glow of getting the job done and done well. It might be positional gain. Otherwise stagnation and apathy beckon. But all of these things require managing from the top down.

THX - he's admitted to be youn(ger) and experienced.

Us experienced middle managers could give him the benefit of our experience with some advice maybe?