[Closed] Working from home - a societal change?

BBC News - Coronavirus will transform UK work and travel, says AA
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-52137968

Humans need interaction, a regular place of work with the mundane conversations over a coffee etc is good for your mental health.

Also face to face contact in business is essential as phonecalls , Skype etc don't quite capture the tone, subtext etc that you can pick up on in a real meeting

I hope so.

In my mind, it work make more sense for the majority of work to be done from home, avoiding travel time, pollution and use of resource. A bit like the previous norm of WFH 1 day a week, maybe go into an office 1 day a week or even less.

Humans need interaction,

I agree. Interact with your friends and family, use the commute time to do this.

a regular place of work with the mundane conversations over a coffee etc is good for your mental health.

Disagree.

Humans need interaction, a regular place of work with the mundane conversations over a coffee etc is good for your mental health.

Our bike club has been having a Saturday coffee morning over Zoom, and I'm not the first to be orgnasing a "lads night in" with Zoom either.

Also face to face contact in business is essential as phonecalls , Skype etc don’t quite capture the tone, subtext etc that you can pick up on in a real meeting

As a travelling salesman where this kind of thing is deemed essential, I'm doing OK using Teams with Video.

Besides, my OP isn't referencing a total lack of f2f, just a changed toward more jobs and a greater desire to WFH.

I used to do the usual 9-5 with a commute. Didn't really have a problem with it but I eventually landed a job that allowed greater flexibility and a short commute. Total life changer. I've now moved to complete flexibility and WFH. So much better. I hope people will learn from this and seize the opportunity to make some changes. As for meetings, I agree they are better face to face, but now I actually look forward to them. Makes a nice change.

WHAT DOES THE FUTURE LOOK LIKE AFTER THE CORONAVIRUS?

while i agree with el_shalimo to an extent...

I'm loving it despite having to remote control my main computer i am WAY more productive without distractions (i'm really tied to my computer for the modelling I do). I find emails and skype was more direct and concise than face to facemeetings an I am able to manage my time better.

In the past it was only really allowed on the odd occassion as it was considered that i needed to be sitting infron of my desk.

I'll be doing it more oe I will be looking for another employer.

I work from home and it does provide some flexibility. The  thing to consider is that it doesn't work for everyone, e.g. butcher, baker, candlestick maker etc.

Another thing is the liability and duty of care aspect for the employer. I'm not saying it's not a good idea, I am merely pointing out that for some it's not an option and for others it may not work for the employer. At times we need to remember that STW is not representative of wider society.

ElShalimo
Member
Humans need interaction, a regular place of work with the mundane conversations over a coffee etc is good for your mental health

Yes - I struggling to agree with this too. Often the conversations/interactions in the work place can be bad for your mental health .. the office cliques, bitching & back stabbing could be avoided completely.

What I meant was just chatting to colleagues over a coffee, obviously the arseholes are to be avoided at all times if possible.

I don’t think the automatic consequence is you’d be socially isolated.

There’s a good chance a large shift to home working would (alongside some big environmental benefits) change local communities in a very positive way.

You’d still be able to socialise over a cup of coffee, but it’d be in the local cafe.

Hopefully a lot of companies will see that they can trust a large majority of their employees to WFH if they wish to for the majority of the week. It'll have environmental benefits due to less commuting, people will get more free time with their family and the costs associated with running large office blocks can be reduced. I would imagine a lot of offices could work with a single day per week set aside for face-to-face meetings, different days for different departments to spread the load and so on. You'll always get a few people who need the structure of an office environment to actually get anything done but for the rest it would be great to keep the option of WFH if it suits them.

What I do know is that it's unlikely we'll go straight back to how things were pre-lockdown in a hurry. Be interesting to see what new solutions come out of all of this.

I already WFH two days a week. Although I’m generally flexible on if I take the second day or not based on commitments in the office.

A lot of what I do is easier face to face (semi-agile working product owner), so I’d have to mix it up a bit.

I actually enjoy the commute when I’m cycling - gives me a chance to get some exercise in that I just don’t seem to find time for when I’m at home.

What this might do is change my mindset that I have to “earn” my wfh time by being more productive.

Or you could use a local, shared office space.
Means you can get out of the house, and sit in an office if you want. And chance for some social interaction etc.

Personally I can’t stand it. I don’t mind doing it 1 day a week, but the lack of social interactions and not getting a change of scene each day is a problem. For certain work I’m also more effective face to face, so it’s not ideal. I hope it doesn’t become the norm.

Hoping my civil service employer will realise we don't need to be in the office 5 days a week. Two days in the office, one or two days at home, the other day (or two) out on visits, would tick so many of the government's own boxes 🤦

I'd be happy to get every Friday WFH - I work at a Uni, in a Financial role, but none of the Academics are ever around on a Friday, so I'm not in meetings. It's a good day to catch up with work, but I don't need to be in with VPN. Might see if this is possible going forward.

Love it. Way more productive, no kids or wife to bug me whilst home. I thrive on isolation, being in the office I find pretty unpleasant.

The idea that people need to do business face to face is one of the great fallacies of our time, perpetuated by middle aged men who think seeing the whites of your eyes rather than listening to what you've got to say means you have the measure of someone.

Working from home has the potential to provide such a benefit for the environment with the reduced commuting, building and running of massive offices and pointless trips to see clients that I'm amazed Extinction Rebellion haven't been on every news programme trying to convince companies to use this as a test to initiate big steps towards working from home being the default once the Covid crisis is over.

I'm lovng it and hoping It'll continue after lock-down. I can see going into an office once every two weeks for end/beginning of sprints being useful, but even that, with some practice could be done away with.

I worked for a company from 2000 to 2015, the last two or three years wfh 4 days a week. Then I got made redundant. Worked at three other places since then, no wfh.
Back in August I started with company A as a contractor, wfh occasionally then with Covid19 it ramped up to full time wfh. Contract ended on Tuesday last week, but tomorrow I start back with them as a permanent employee. Again , wfh full time. I love it. Especially the evening commute, no M1/M62/A650 nightmare

Downside is that MrsD is also WFH at the moment and she has acquired my office, so I’m working from the kitchen table with two mental cats chasing each other for a good 4hours every day. That is somewhat distracting

@munrobiker - it depends on your business. In my role technical conversations are much easier face to face. You can then draw on paper the proposed solution or formulae. Many people think visually so being able to interact directly is so much easier. I work with people from all over the world and there are cultural issues to think of too. Us westerners usually think in a more linear way whereas our friends from South Asia or the far East have a more circular way of.thinking, possibly more holistically. It's amazing how quickly.you can solve problems being face to face.

I do agree that for some roles you don't need to be in the same room to work efficiently

I can’t do my job at home, it would be great if all you that can carry on WFH, it’s made the roads much quieter on my commute 😁

Its struck me using myself as an example that if this doesn’t stay pretty much the same, I/we could (maybe) end up considering looking new job that fits around that perspective

I have been looking for a new job, or more accurately a new way of earning a living using my skills for month or so prior to all this. One of my no compromise points is WFH at least two days a week, preferably more. I am finding it is making a significant difference when I look for work unfortunately.

My employer is a prime example. I am the only non contractor doing in my job. All the contractors get to WFH when possible. Me, never allowed.

@munrobiker – it depends on your business.

And on the person.... For your above situation I have been doing screen sharing, also I have a movable web cam that I point at paper or objects. My partner has a stylus input to write thing on documents by hand live. While there are business that can't be done from home many issues are more to do with the person.

I don't mean to single you out but as I may be reading between the lines here but here we go...

I find many people who either like working in The office or work better working in the office can't understand how and or why people can work from home effectively.

I'm the opposite to what your suggesting. I work at home, I quite like it but I also understand the value of my trips to other offices to interact with people. They're very productive and client meetings tend to be face to face too.

I think there's no one size fits all solution

You do need to consider the environment at home and whether people have the space to WFH effectively. There are a heck of a lot of people in this country who work in offices who are quite low paid doing repetitive administrative stuff. Employers are now rubbing their hands thinking that they can give all these people a laptop and they can WFH. Unfortunately the standard issue laptop comes with a 13" screen and is an ergonomic disaster. Do I want to spend 8 hours a day sitting on a dining chair using a piddling laptop when I'm used to a decent office chair with a height adjustable desk and 2 20" monitors? Are wages going to increase enough that everyone can afford to buy a bigger house so they have space for a home office? There's no way families of 3-4 living in a typical 2-3 bedroom house have the space to do this.

This is part of the employer's responsibility, they have a duty of care to ensure that you are working without risk, be that insurance, posture etc.

I work in education, teaching via internet is seen as great new hope by managers. These past two weeks have been mental. Students think we are on constant call messaging consistantly (close to harasment). Managment also, i knpw of one teacher who has to ring all students who dont enguage with the online learning.
Students dont like the way of working. Trying to teach CAD and CNC remotley is not easy, dispite the perception that young people are tech savy quite a lot cant download and install some software (or so they say 😉).

It's lonley and managment can push through ideas and ways of working without discussion of fear of backlash because we are effectivly split up. An example is they want evrryone to work through August dispite having to work harder now re preparing lesson resources.

The students dont like it, at least some of mine have said so. Enguagment is really bad for lower level groups.
Not totally against it, it has some applications for some parts of units but not a lot in engineering.

You have to think of students as well, for some we are the safe place away from bad homes, other we provide the only social interaction they have.

There are lots of things that are not being considered at the moment.

It's just not enough to say 'remote working isn't any good'. Make it good. The amount of human time and effort wasted along with the vast environmental damage is just too great to give up on this.

**** commuting.

We are trying to come up with ways to make our job better and more effective remotely. Everyone should do this.

Re socialising, we have had several optional sessions where we log in and just chat about nothing in particular over coffee. It's worked really well.

I hope not. Small house, two kids and wife at home with nowhere out of the way I can work. It’s semi open plan downstairs too. Also quite noisy, making phone calls difficult.

Cramped in to a small corner of the dining room using a crappy Argos dining table as a desk. Serious back, neck and wrist ache with random foot cramp thrown in. Not everyone lives in your typical STW middle class house.

If I could afford a house with a dedicated office space/room then I’d love it. Unfortunately that’s not happening though and would also necessitate purchasing a better/more expensive internet connection.

Inviting groups of primary school kids back to my house to put wetsuits on before taking them canoeing in my back garden pond might raise a few issues...

As long as you've written the risk assessment lister, it's fine....

I'd started to informally WFH 1 day a week in Jan. I find it's pretty intense, I definitely take fewer breaks and I would say I'm more productive but busier. Of course, that's tainted by the current situation. My commute is only 5 miles and I was able to off-road commute so thhat wasn't an issue for me. Was about to move another 10 miles out though, at that distance I think it would be.

I think we've tested Teams well and haven't had any significant issues, other than a colleague with frankly awful network speeds. I miss the factory and my colleagues, plenty of whom are friends as well - nearly 20 years in a company will do that. For me, some WFH and some time in the building would be a good balance.

God hope not. In my job my customers are feeling the pinch more than us so it is not business as usual. When business as usual returns we'll be back to normal and that god for that. We're social beings and business is a fundamentally a social interaction. You aint going to do business with someone you don't trust and you can't build trust via email or conference call. At some point you need to see the whites of the eyes and build a non-business relationship with the person.

I think more working from home will happen as businesses have invested in the infrastructure and once its there it will be used...and there are some benefits for individuals to suit their lives outside of work...for example those with kids, dogs, who live further afield from their workplace and have a big commute. But I can't wait to get back to normality and working in the office interacting with people and not an email. You glean so much more from a five minute face to face corridor conversation with someone over a whole day's worth of email tennis.

I've been home based for around 15 years. I wouldn't go back to office based unless my office was no more than 5 minutes walk away.

I often meet up with colleagues or direct reports in coffee shops "halfway", and do (did) still travel to meetings but not every week. Sometimes only once a month.

Does the social interaction enough for me and my team members.

I hope this is a change to more home/flexible working for many, particularly for environmental and personal time reasons as much as anything.

I travel to London a bit for work and it always seems crazy that thousands of people are going that way to work, while thousands of people are going in the opposite direction for work.

Another thing to factor in is that every person working from home using the VPN is a potential info-security risk. Scams, phishing etc will increase and the company is at risk.

There are so many factors to consider that blindly saying we all need to do it is frankly utter crap.

Outside of IT consultants I'd hazard a guess that only 5% of the country's workforce could work from home. Manufacturing, food growth-transportation-processing-transportation-storage-transportation-sale,etc. The service workers that man the shops, restaurants, cafes, the trades that service the factories, shops, restaurants, cafes, etc.

You get the idea.

I've only ever had one job where I could work from home. I say home, I lived in the pub-brewery.

It might change the way business is done, no more intercontinental flights for paper clip salesmen, but it won't change society.

At some point you need to see the whites of the eyes

Is this you?

Cramped in to a small corner of the dining room using a crappy Argos dining table as a desk. Serious back, neck and wrist ache with random foot cramp thrown in. Not everyone lives in your typical STW middle class house.

It needn't be expensive. I have an Ikea tabletop in the corner of my bedroom with a chair someone gave me. Comfy as. Work bought me a monitor, keyb and mouse as they were obliged to do. My wife has a tiny desk bought for £20 or so that goes in place of a bedside table, her clothes are now in baskets under the bed or in the wardrobe. Her computer was £70 off Amazon (refurb office PC) and the monitor was £50. Ok so our bedroom has room, and I appreciate some houses are smaller still than ours.

Outside of IT consultants I’d hazard a guess that only 5% of the country’s workforce could work from home.

I reckon more lke 20-30%. See all those big office buildings? Those.

There are so many factors to consider that blindly saying we all need to do it is frankly utter crap.

<span style="font-size: 0.8rem;">Yet no one said that. </span>

I have to admit I’ve changed my mind.

For nearly 10 years I’ve been consulting on distance working with clients as the ‘future’.

The benefits are many, take millions of cars off the road during rush hour. Reduce the need for business to maintain expensive buildings, allow people to live wherever they like, not within commuting distance of work. Which could fix out housing problems. Not losing 30, 60, 90 minutes a day commuting etc.

The technology has been around for years and years, but it now better than ever and secure enough for sensitive data.

We’ve been working from home for 3 weeks now full-time, all our data is cloud based. We don’t need an expensive cloud solution SharePoint / Teams has everything we need, I think 90%+ of businesses could do the same.

We schedule 2 video calls a day, there’s only 4 of us as the moment, 3 of us enjoy it, but the boss hates chit-chat so it’s all business and boring.

The thing I have to admit it I HATE it.

Some of it is because I wasn’t prepared to suddenly WFH full-time even though I used to do it quite a bit. I can’t work from a laptop full-time so I’ve got my desktop and dual monitors on my dining room table, it’s comfortable but there’s no escape, it’s always there staring at me ‘work’ is just there, looking at me. If this became permanent I guess we could move away from the city to somewhere cheaper to buy and get an extra bedroom to make an office. Also trying to work and keep a 5 year old happy is hard work.

Really though, I miss just being in the office, it’s a ‘selfish’ time for me, in work I have time to think and concentrate but we have a laugh sometimes, being home on my own is boring when I’m on my own or stressful when the kids are home, I’ve got great kids but my 5 year old doesn’t want to know Daddy is on a conference call, she wants a drink or to play etc.

As so many others have said to me when I’ve been waxing lyrical about remote working, it’s perfectly possible technically, but mentally I’m finding it really hard.

No room or internet in the bedroom unfortunately. Nowhere to put a table either. House just isn’t big enough to accommodate unfortunately. Will be okay short term and I’ve taken my chair from the office already.

Another thing to factor in is that every person working from home using the VPN is a potential info-security risk. Scams, phishing etc will increase and the company is at risk.

There are ways to make everything as secure as it would be behind closed doors.

There’s a cost, but it’s nothing like the cost of bricks and mortar.

You aint going to do business with someone you don’t trust and you can’t build trust via email or conference call. At some point you need to see the whites of the eyes and build a non-business relationship with the person.

Horseshit. Of course you can trust people by speaking to them on the phone. I haven't met a client of mine that I'm currently dealing with- why would I? They pay me money, I do the work. I've not met anyone at Chain Reaction and I trust them to send me stuff.

As I say, this is a myth perpetuated by middle aged men who want to meet someone, see if they're cut from the same cloth as them and let their gut feelings sway their opinions about their competence rather than listening to what people have to say and judging them by their work, not their personality.

^^spot on Munrobiker. It’s a myth that needs killing off. Old fashioned horse shit. I have colleagues who I don’t like as people, but are bloody good at their jobs. Same applies to some customers and suppliers too. If I picked suppliers and customers based on whether or not I’d looked in their eyes I don’t think it would make bugger all difference. If I picked some because I personally liked them I’d probably be our of a job.

@P-Jay - it depends on the sector. Take insurance or banking, the fines, reputational risk etc could affect the credit rating which will affect their ability to get credit, which has an impact on their ability to conduct business.

It's very different for Mrs Miggins pie shop.

Nothing is ever as simple or straight forward as we'd like it to be. The point I've tried and possibly failed to make, is that it is very dependent on what you do,your home situation, your company's approach, your peers, your staff, your boss etc

Really though, I miss just being in the office, it’s a ‘selfish’ time for me, in work I have time to think and concentrate but we have a laugh sometimes, being home on my own is boring when I’m on my own or stressful when the kids are home, I’ve got great kids but my 5 year old doesn’t want to know Daddy is on a conference call, she wants a drink or to play etc.

But don't forget that under normal circumstances they'd be in school.

I get your point and I do sympathise, but this comes down to adjusting your approach. You can train kids to respect your 'office' wherever it may be. Mine have always been drilled on this.

You aint going to do business with someone you don’t trust and you can’t build trust via email or conference call. At some point you need to see the whites of the eyes and build a non-business relationship with the person.

Of the dozen or so suppliers I use on a near daily basis I’ve met exactly one of them in person who came to us and another puts on an annual ‘conference’ that’s a bit of a big party thing with a wedge of brainwashing thrown in (they do give away great socks for riding thigh so big-up Sophos for that). The rep for one of my biggest suppliers works from home in Miami.

I only go to clients if I need to discuss complex options and that’s only because, at least until now, few were willing to invest in video conferencing. Too many bad memories of spending £5k on a glorified webcam and needing a room set aside for it.

@P-Jay – it depends on the sector. Take insurance or banking, the fines, reputational risk etc could affect the credit rating which will affect their ability to get credit, which has an impact on their ability to conduct business.

It’s very different for Mrs Miggins pie shop.

I know these are strange times but with little or no notice we’ve set up secure remote working systems for Solicitors, Finance Companies and Accountants. Even the courts are working via Skype for Business.

I was working from home in 2005 when I worked for RBS. My friend who works for HSBC is working from home right now.

The idea that data is safe because you can lock the door of the building the server is in at night is very out of date now.

But don’t forget that under normal circumstances they’d be in school.

I get your point and I do sympathise, but this comes down to adjusting your approach. You can train kids to respect your ‘office’ wherever it may be. Mine have always been drilled on this.

Yeah, more than anything the stress of the whole Covid thing isn’t helping either.

I know we both live in some of the more expensive bits of Cardiff - were you ever tempted to move further out of the city to get more space for your money?

I'm sure this will phase in for many public sector organisations where they've been forced to run big expensive offices that they can't afford (local authorities etc) and we,re already seeing it, problem is for the smaller private firms that have gone out and bought their own office, then tarted it up right fancy like my employer (electrical contractors) they just want to see bums on seats to justify the layout and be dammed with the cost of running the place. I reckon most of the office could WFH at least 2 to 3 days a week but they'll not have it and maintain that we need to be office based to handle the ridiculous quantity of drawings we print (which could be marked up using a decent PDF marker instead of hand marked) plus the good old "collaboration".

My last employer let me (under duress) WFH 2 days a week for nearly 4 years which was great but then one day when we got bigger and I wasn't the only engineer any more they pulled the rug, stating they couldn't have a lone maverick out of the office when everyone else was in...more like they buckled under the pressure of the other lads claiming I was just tossing it of at home.

The other thing to factor is if you have apprentices or office juniors that need mentoring, this means that remote working just won't be an option whilst their training is required.

I've been WFH for a few years now.

Pros?
Work/life balance is massively improved. I can take my kids to school. I don't have to take time off for deliveries/plumbers etc
Reduced costs - commuting, office space, eating out, etc
Improved focus - I do more work without someone just popping past my desk
Flexibility - I have a global role. If I was I an office/commuting, I'd resent the 0500/0600 calls with Australia, or the 1900 calls with California. As it is, it works. I just fit my day around them. Late call? Lie in. Early call? Finish early, go ride.
Travel - When I'm away for a week or two, I don't resent it, I know I can catch up on home time when I want to.

Cons?
Human contact - It can be lonely sometimes. All of a sudden, those five words with the postie are vital!
Knowing when to stop - If work is just there, you need the self control to stop.

The pros outweigh the cons by a lot.

Now, I know not every job can WFH, but the vast majority of every office building in every major city could, or at least could for four days a week or something. Do you really need a 400 seat office in the City at £1,000,000s a year? Reduced commuting impact, better employee performance and engagement. What's not to like?

I don't have a 1.1MW servo hydraulic ring main or the associated structural test lab in the garage, but even I'm hoping I can finally get a few days at home to catch up on reports whilst the technicians do the day to day rig running.

A lot of the design engineers at my customers have been successfully wfh for the last month or so.

And do people really need to video call everything? Just finishing a chunky 6 month project that had 1 meeting at the customer and then everything else by teleconf (voice only) and uploading data / photos / video of work as we did it. There was always a plan for them to visit our site to witness some tests, but the need never really materialised.

Before Covid 19, I was having some beers with some mates who have reasonably different jobs.
Those of us like myself, who can't work from home (trades or services) couldn't understand why the chap who did coding stuff was moaning about an hour's commute to sit at a computer all day when we all have a computer at home. Apparently the boss liked to see the staff.
Another chap, high up IT consultant of some sort, apparently the day rate charged is so high that customers demanded a physical visit.

Finally a Manager in telecoms who stated, he needs to be in his office as do his team or they just aren't productive.

The other thing to factor is if you have apprentices or office juniors that need mentoring, this means that remote working just won’t be an option whilst their training is required.

From March 2019 I’ve been mentoring a sales graduate.  In that time we’ve been in the same building 4 times she’s doing quite well.

I worked full time from home for 10 year - towards the end of that I had some issues with it. I’ve been back in an office for the past 5 years and much prefer it. But the past 3 weeks have been ok despite kids being at home and sharing an office with Mrs OTS. As an agile coach (amongst other things) co-location and face to face communication are hygiene factors, but the latest tools are almost negating those. When this is over I’m going to stick with 2 days WFH.

Edit And WFH is saving me around £180 per week (train ticket + lunch + coffees).

i don't think it's one size fits all, at all. and it would be a damn shame to 'force' people to change how work is done.

I've had the option to WFH for years - many of my colleagues WFH 4 days a week. in all honestly, it's a pain in the ass, if you're trying to organise things. you can warble on for ever about how easy it is to talk over the internet etc, but IME much more 'sorting out' gets done when people are actually there, working stuff out. Sure, some jobs get done more productively, by some people, at home, and I'd hate to work in a place where it wasn't allowed, but I disagree that's its a perfect solution all the time.

From a more practical point of view, access to the servers, or sending print-quality digital assets around, half of the company i work for would need our employer to stump up to somehow significantly improve our individual homes' internet connection. It's very difficult for a lot of my colleagues to do their job properly at the moment.

Personally, I'm less productive at home (more distractions), I have my work space in my living space (which I don't think is healthy), there's no commute to switch into and out of work mode, and living alone/being single, means I basically don't see anyone at the moment. It's shit.

Maybe I'm lucky that I count virtually all my colleagues as friends, and some of them as some of my best friends. I get that. But if my office closed for good, for me it would mark a massive decline in my standard of living.

TLDR not everyone is the same, not everyone's situation is the same, nothing is a one-size-fits-all solution. If WFH works for you, have a medal. It doesn't work for everyone.

I was working from home as soon as laptop computers and dial-up access became a thing. I was in IT so it was a pretty natural fit. Over the years, one day a week became two, then three, then it was a case of only turning up in person when really necessary - maybe a meeting every couple of weeks or so. We worked in teams that first covered the UK and then had international folk too. I always had a spare room, so domestic arrangements were easy. I was much more productive when WFH. In particular, I regarded my previous commute time as work hours and as I could schedule most of my work to fit in with lunchtime rides or short-term childcare, I could choose quieter times to work too.

One additional side-effect is that we cut down on paper massively. With no office printer and no way to quickly get printed material out, everything became electronic really quickly.

It has since always amazed me that more folk didn't do it but most of the reluctance seems to come from Managers who don't trust their staff.

 this is a myth perpetuated by middle aged men

Shoot me down, but I always found the managers most reluctant to enable WFH to be women.

I work in oil and gas.  When hurricane Harvey hit Houston it wiped out the majority of our HQ and so all of a sudden everyone was working from home over there for almost 9 months. What they found was it was great to begin with but over time productivity fell.  I've been working from home for 2 years and have had quite a few chats with people and HR as well on this topic....

I think the pros are obvious but here are some cons....  In the end a lot of it is behaviours and just because you're at a desk (home or office) doesn't mean you are working.....

It's much harder to install corporate culture on someone remotely (you can debate if this is good or not but it's a recognized issue).

It's much harder to discipline someone remotely. Strong performers do well but mixed performers might not get early intervention.

Getting a new team to "jell" is harder.

It's harder to "walk the deck" and pick-up on issues before they blow out of proportion.

So I think a mix is best. Home working some of the time but recognize a need to bring the team together in person on occasion.

I've been working from home (IT) for the last two years. Small organisation who were mostly in an office in London. I was the only IT person, so I didn't really have a team as such.

I had to decided to move on. Because I lived by myself and have a long distance relationship I was just getting too isolated. I was talking to a pal yesterday and realised I haven't made a single friend at work in that two years. I did save a lot of money and get a lot of work done though.

So I think one of the issues of WFH longer term would be building camaraderie in a team, especially if some folk worked in an office together before WFH - new starts would find it difficult to integrate.

Outside of IT consultants I’d hazard a guess that only 5% of the country’s workforce could work from home.

I reckon that’s A pretty low estimate, lots of paper pushers 🙂

A benefit of WFH is that it would really spread the work out across the country instead of concentrating it at the usual suspects.

So actually working local to where you live would become more of a thing than 1-2 hours commuting.

I think you’d get some more business along the lines of WeWork so you may pop into an office To work if you wish but not necessarily with everyone from the same firm.

The current situation will possibly be a catalyst some companies will find it works to their advantage and will roll On with it after this is er overish others will just go back to the good old days.

which could be marked up using a decent PDF marker instead of hand marked

What you want is DesignReview check it out.

In my last job I worked from home every Monday and found it no less productive than being in the office. Maybe a little more productive given the lack of distraction. Since the move to full WFH, I’m still functioning well (all my work can be done remotely) but, despite the lack of distraction, I’m really suffering from the lack of contact with actual people.

Yes, they can be annoying. Yes, they can be distracting. But... it is often far easier and more effective to go and Physically see someone and talk over stuff if you need changes made or input.

I’m due to start a new job soon and it looks like I will be WFH immediately. I’m going to lose a lot of time that I could be using to build relationships with key teams, simply because I can’t take a jug of coffee and a plate of fika round to them to say hi and discuss stuff.

But yes, I can see this being a big change across the board. If people can be trusted to work from home, and the workers actually hold that trust, then why not? It’s only the need for people/managers to have a physical presence in a physical office that is stopping this. I think it will certainly show up but poor managers and people that cannot be trusted.

Maybe have just the one day a week in for team stuff, or Cut down the size of offices to local clusters of co-working instead of large offices. It’s certainly going to make Zoom/Teams/whatever seem more essential to a company

As other have said WFH for most people doesn't mean WFH all the time, it can vary from 1/2 days per week to all the time to 1 week at home 1 in office, to several months at home then a Mon the in office to complete parts of a project that need physical presence. Plenty of scope for variety.

I think it will certainly show up but poor managers and people that cannot be trusted

In my job hunting I am using this as a big test as to how the company regards its staff.

So I think a mix is best. Home working some of the time but recognize a need to bring the team together in person on occasion.

like someone said up there, it’s not the same for every one.  But I suspect with the current scenario proving it can be done and the much wider use of video meetings people like me would re-consider a Teams meeting before getting out of bed at 5:00am in London to be in Birmingham by 10.   The thing that prevented me was not at my end - but my customers staff who worked in one building at desks are now suddenly capable of working with laptops and Teams from home.

TDLR: there’s much greater option to work from home now and I think it’ll be more prevelant

I live on my own and have wfh for the past two years. I can hand on heart say that it’s been far from great for my mental health. You need some form of interaction and without careful monitoring you can end up losing the plot a bit.

The ideal is 2-3 days a week from home. Might be different for those with families but for me it didn’t do me much good at all.

Flange, +1 - me too

I've been working 2 day from home for the last couple of years. despite that, going to five days a week has been a struggle and particularly the end of last week.

When everything goes back to some semblance of normality, I think I will probably move to 3 days a week at home. big change I've made is to work 6.30-3pm, means I get an hour or so in before everyone else gets up, stop for breakfast and then done by a decent time.

Mrs Kilo works from home at present, half the lounge is her office at present (relatively small Victorian terrace house) I find it extremely irritating, it’s our home not an annex for her employers. I find the sound of typing strangely annoying, piles of documents scattered around on the floor and bloody conference calls bug me. Sooner she gets back to her office the better.
Apparently a lot of the younger staff are finding it tougher, their social life revolves around their workplace relationships a lot more than the settled middle age types.

What Flange said here too. Living on your own is great, until this forced working from home arose. Here’s an example of how (quite literally) mental I’ve been going...

Sky TV’s adverts have been gnawing away at my mind!
I had a bike ride yesterday and feel ok now, but seriously, that’s how this was effecting my by Friday last week! It ain’t good.
And it’s not just the lack of contact, miss riding to work too. Doing a pointless loop out of the house at lunchtime just isn’t the same.

It's definitely a courses for horses situation.

Somebody already mentioned if but I'm not sure why the need for so much video conferencing when voice works so well most of the time.

Those people struggling with the lack of interaction - can you not see friends in the evening? I try to keep my work and personal life very seperate and don't socialise with colleagues except for the Christmas do. I'd rather socialise with people I choose, rather than people I'm thrown together with.

I agree with Flange too.

You can still choose which ones to socialise with.

How did you meet your existing circle of friends? In many cases you'll have been "thrown together with" them at school, college or uni. or through some club that you joined.

Those people struggling with the lack of interaction – can you not see friends in the evening?

You sure about that question?