You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more
So there was a chance that, for this contract, you would have no expenses paid for?
No hotel or food at all?
But yet you signed the contract.
Maybe next time ask a few more questions.
I don't know how much money I spend on food at home, if that answers your question?
Well you certainly sounded like you knew earlier.
As it happens, you've no idea.
Bit of a turnaround.
Totally pointless thread really now isn't it.
I'm out
Thank f*** for that 🙂
So there was a chance that, for this contract, you would have no expenses paid for?
No. I knew a lot of people who worked there quite well; I had worked for them before on a contract; and I was told verbally that expenses were reimbursable generally speaking.
But this isn't what the thread's about. I think the wording might be wrong. That's why I asked for useful thoughts and opinions, which some people gave. And for some reason you came on and started an argument. Not sure why tbh.
Totally pointless thread really now isn't it.
Yes, it's turned into another 'isn't molgrips stupid' thread. That keeps happening doesn't it?
Yes, it's turned into another 'isn't molgrips stupid' thread. That keeps happening doesn't it?
It does seem to be a common theme yes.
Maybe you should look for a common element in all those threads to see if you can figure out what's causing the phenomenon ?
Odd, that...
Molgrips I don't get lunch paid either regardless of whether there is a canteen or not. They reimburse everything else, early start breakfasts / late night dinner etc as well as when away properly.
This is for an extremely large bank so I don't think it is an uncommon scenario.
I can't be bothered to read all 5 pages, but for once I agree with Molgrips.
As someone who spent most of their life travelling, this has pi55ed me off for the best part of +20 years. In fact expenses as a whole pi55 me off, especially as there are usually differing rules depending on how high up the corporate ladder you are.
Mind you, now I'm working in the Public Sector and can claim 67 pence per mile for business miles. Never worked anywhere before that paid more than HMRC's 'guidelines', and worked at many that paid less.
67p? Jammy git, I get 15p! 🙂
Maybe you should look for a common element in all those threads to see if you can figure out what's causing the phenomenon ?
It's people. They are the problem. They are all weird.
In fact expenses as a whole pi55 me off
Stop claiming them then 🙄
That'll teach 'em.
It's people. They are the problem. They are all weird.
Try being a bit more specific.
The answer is there if you look for it.
So what, you're saying I'm weird?
Well.
I'm just spotting the common elements in those threads.
And this complete non problem, and the following badly thought out arguments are fairly strange.
It isn't a problem, you're right. I didn't post a problem thread.
I am weird though, I suggest you get used to it 🙂
think like an MP and if HMRC question your expenses use an MPs expense claim morality ...you can easily afford caviar on your chips instead of vinegar
anyway, while this is all fascinating, i've got two dogs to walk in the sun, before heading for the airport for a few days work in scandanavia, where i will 'luxuriate' in the 30GBP/day sustenance allowance i negotiated in to the contract. breaky is provided by the hotel, and there's a site canteen, which is free to me...
30 quid? Trust me, you'll be out of pocket 🙂
anyway, while this is all fascinating, i've got two dogs to walk in the sun, before heading for the airport for a few days work in scandanavia, where i will 'luxuriate' in the 30GBP/day sustenance allowance i negotiated in to the contract. breaky is provided by the hotel, and there's a site canteen, which is free to me...
30 quid? Trust me, you'll be out of pocket
out of pocket? ****ing bankrupt more like! it is incredibly expensive up there!
On-site catering facilities = a canteen
or
On-site catering facilities = a kitchen that you can use with fridge and microwave
If the latter then the policy makes more sense.
Can I raise a practical question at this point?
If you could have your lunch written into a legally binding contract, but it has to be the same thing every day, what would you have?
I'd have a chicken tikka kebab, on naan, with everything on, delivered to my desk every lunchtime. It's got to be from Hunters Barbecue though. Or equivalent standard
You.....?
Roast beef and Mustard baguette from Krusties on Newgate Market in York.
Bag of salt and vinegar McCoys
A Twix and a can of Mango Rubicon.
Can I raise a practical question at this point?If you could have your lunch written into a legally binding contract, but it has to be the same thing every day, what would you have?
I'd have a chicken tikka kebab, on naan, with everything on, delivered to my desk every lunchtime. It's got to be from Hunters Barbecue though. Or equivalent standard
does this come with free onsite paramedics for the impending congestive heart failure
My company offers the following for outside staff
5-10 Hours = £5
Over 10 Hours = £10
Also if you have to buy an evening meal extra £15
If out very early you can also claim £5 for breakfast
These amounts have all be agreed with the taxman and are typical for permanent outside staff
[I]If you could have your lunch written into a legally binding contract, but it has to be the same thing every day, what would you have?[/]
Nandos
Nandos is certainly the same whatever you order, so a good choice really.
[i]If you could have your lunch written into a legally binding contract, but it has to be the same thing every day, what would you have?[/i]
I am going to remember this for next time I change jobs. 😀
It's going to be quite a complex contract...
[b]FOR THE LOVE OF GOD!![/b]
119 posts since it was first said, and no-one has pointed out....
It's fickin' SUBSISTENCE allowance, not sustenance!
It's fickin' SUBSISTENCE allowance, not sustenance!
So you're saying the Molgrips should be growing his own lunch? I'm not sure about that, sure, if you have an allotment or a large garden that might be feasible, but in this case?
Travelling for work is a hassle and all meals should be covered IMO. Minor payment for the hassle of being away.
How the hell did mol grips first world problem of making his own lunch or refusing to come down from the dizzy heights of pret a manger get to 6 pages?
In Nandos now, actually. I love the fact that whilst you can easily blow through the expense limit in a hotel restaurant, you can go nuts in a normal takeaway and still come in well under.
My contractual lunch would be a burrito from Tortilla with the chicken, no rice, extra beans, cheese, hot salsa, jalapenos and lime. Fab
How the hell did mol grips first world problem of
making his own lunch or refusing to come down
from the dizzy heights of pret a manger get to 6
pages?
Are you sure you're not new here? 🙂
Well yes I am, but this takes the biscuit of stw-ism. Still, he's happy now with his Nandos and bottomless soft drink. I hope he's eaten enough so he won't need lunch tomorrow.....
I would have it written into my contract that molgrips had to pay for his own food, and that food would be sandwiches. real sandwiches. made of sand. and witches.
I've been paying to eat for years... Obviously in the wrong job!
Reminds me of a woman in work trying to claim an extra 100 miles expenses because she had to drop off her dog at her sisters house on the way to a training course...
The first world problems of people with a ridiculous sense of entitlement is always worth a laugh
It's not a ****ing sense of entitlement!
It's the weird and unexplained discrepancy.
The real problem on these threads isn't me, it's you thick bastards completely misunderstanding.
At the risk of sounding repetitive ... Have you considered Gregg's Molls? You can get a five pack of sausage rolls that may leave you in a position where you can probably still pay the mortgage.failing that.... Have you thought of getting Bob Crowe to negotiate this deal for you. Tube drivers only work 45 minutes a day you know? Then go for lunch at Claridges
Bob Crowe sounds good. Or I could just fraudulently claim because no-one checks.
Having racked up over 150 nights in hotels just in one year on more than one occasion the cost of been away isn't a joke. And if you've also lots of travel too, it can get very expensive - especially if you've a restrictive expense policy.
And if you've a family you don't really save anything by not been at home and if you don't want to spend the entire night sat in your room, it's going to cost.
I always use to reckon that companies/HMRC needed two different expense policies, one for folk that might have had a couple of nights a year and one for folk who spent their life on the road.
The real problem on these threads isn't me, it's you thick bastards completely misunderstanding.
I must have misunderstood when you suggested you were going to be out of pocket when it later turned out that you hadn't the faintest idea wether you were or not.
Probably my fault for reading what you posted and presuming you had thought it through though 😉
It's the weird and unexplained discrepancy
you pay for your own lunch at work during working hours when you're not traveling, why should they pay for your lunch during your working hours when you are traveling?
that's what my employers says, and it makes sense to me.
Our 'team' (of two) has to source our own training as our role is a little random - and we got a bit of a frosty response when the training we found took most of our office's budget . . . . Felt a little bad but am now keeping my head down as the train tickets to get there have come in at £550!!!
I will be getting two nights in Brighton though, so im sure I'll cope 😀
Molgrips is misunderstood. Who'd have thought!
you pay for your own lunch at work during working hours when you're not traveling, why should they pay for your lunch during your working hours when you are traveling?
Cos it costs about 80p at home and £3 or more for something when I'm out.
Just take a packed lunch then?
Cos it costs about 80p at home and £3 or more for something when I'm out.
So it's £10 odd "lost" then (ish)
And you've saved on buying five days Breakfast and Dinner.
And you think you are "out of pocket" somehow ?
I wonder why sometimes people think your threads are a bit..... Pointless ?
I'm amazed that mol actually manages to cope in the real world at all. The list of minor things that send him into full "woe is me" introspective guff is awesome. Its like adrian mole grew up (well got older) and got a mountain bike 😀
IMO I don’t think there is a discrepancy in your companies policy.
To justify lunch as an expense it would have to be necessary due to being located away from your normal workplace to pay in excess of what is considered 'normal'. It is perfectly reasonable for them to assume that if a temporary workplace has a canteen then you would use it and therefore the amount you would pay is a ‘normal’ amount*, if you chose not to then that is entirely your choice and not a result of the travel. If the temporary workplace does not have a canteen then you have no choice but to buy lunch elsewhere which is likely to be more expensive, and in these circumstances they have agreed to reimburse you.
The fact that you make a sandwich on a normal day is neither here nor there; you still have that option available.
* I've had this [i]discussion[/i] during a HMRC audit when contracting at a company that had a works canteen. I didn't use it and bought sandwiches which I claimed for and apparently wasn't entitled to.
He just needs a woman. He'll be fine then.
full "woe is me" introspective guff
Eh?
Are you happy yet that you are not being left out of pocket by the overall situation?
Or have you suddenly worked out that five days Breakfasts and Dinners at home cost you less than £10.
Cos it costs about 80p at home and £3 or more for something when I'm out.
So it's £10 odd "lost" then (ish)
But if you are out for 5 days and work pay for your other meals you are actually getting 15 meals for £15 if you buy your own lunch .Compare that with the how much do you spend on shopping thread and you are quids in compared with most people !!
[b]Compare that [/b]with the how much do you spend on shopping thread and you are quids in compared with most people !!
He would.
but despite appearing to be bothered about the money, he's got no idea how much he spends on food at home. 
Not sure calling everyone thick bastards is going to get the best response....
These threads take a familiar path:
Molly asks partial question
Several people respond
Molly argues the toss revealing a little more (maybe)
Several people respond
Repeat to fade...
One thing I've made my mind up about from some of these types of threads is that I'm quite relieved that:
a) I don't employ some people here
b) I don't work with some people here
c) I don't work for some people here
I reckon Samuri would be quite good to work for, except I have no idea what he does and I suspect that my skills aren't transferable.
I'm just waiting for the OP to reveal that he's based his whole argument on something a colleague told him rather than the actual rules.
We can then see him wielding his sword of justice/righteous indignation and attempts to retrieve 2 years worth of lunch money across 15 threads during the next 6 months until even he loses the will to live and gives it up as a bad lot.
Find out the actual rules? Molgrips is too busy flexing his muscles.
You get an extra dimension to molgrips threads when you see what his wife posts on mumsnet 🙂
HTF did this go to over 200 posts?
I think the bloke is quite right to be pissed off. If your company sends you away from home they should cover all of your reasonable living expenses.
I can only think that the people who don't see this never travel for work at all.
I have had jobs where I lived on the road, and I agree that your costs should be covered. The problem is that we haven't even begun to establish the facts i.e. Molgrips may be able to claim most of his lunches, but just has to suck it up the odd week he is in the London office.
The other thing is, expenses aren't free money to the company. So if they have done the sums, and they aren't willing to spend extra money where they are running a staff canteen, so be it. Their money, their rules.
[img] 
?identifier=2f58ddcb4c9f30e1ac2a6edb90189d95[/img]
Needs a woman? Not sure that would work if he makes this fuss over lunch imagine how he'd reactnto spending money on something really important - like shoes 😀
I know this is based in Shandyshire but could this be solved by having
breakfast dinner and then tea
rather than
breakfast, lunch and dinner?
[i]I know this is based in Shandyshire[/i]
We focus on the important things down south, dontchaknow.
[img] 
[/img]
Phew, that's a relief, people power!
If your company sends you away from home they should cover all of your reasonable living expenses.
And it would appear that's exactly what's happening in this case.
In fact, from the figures already mentioned by the OP. Its entirely likely that they are more than "covering his expenses" and he's actually in profit at the end of the week.
Happy days eh ?
I may have missed this but are these London offices a client site or just the OP's company at a different location?
This thread is STW at its best. 7 pages of nonsense but I just can't help having a peep now and again 😆
I shall attempt some constructive contribution though. I have worked away from home for many years, often only 2 or 3 nights away at a time, but usually in places where it is impractical to bring my own lunch from home. In those circumstances it is perfectly reasonable to expect work to pay reasonable expenses to cover lunch. Whether the expense policy does or not is another matter and frankly the issue of how much I have spent on providing breakfast and dinner at home versus claiming on expenses should be irrelevant. In true STW fashion it has become one of the stickier parts of this pointless debate.
Keep it up team 😉
wwaswas - Member
I may have missed this but are these London offices a client site or just the OP's company at a different location?
From the IR:
[i]Benchmark system/rules
Under the benchmark system, HMRC has set advisory scale rates for particular day subsistence expenses that it will accept for all employers. As long as the employee has incurred subsistence expenses while travelling on an allowable business journey, employers will be able to make tax and NICs free subsistence payments up to the advisory rates without agreeing them with HMRC. Employers wishing to use the benchmark scale rates for subsistence payments will simply need to notify HMRC of their intention by ticking the appropriate statement/box on form P11DX before starting to use the system. The rates that can be used will be:
Breakfast rate (irregular early starters only) - A rate of up to £5.00 may be paid where a worker leaves home earlier than usual and before 6.00 am and incurs a cost on breakfast taken away from his home. If the employee regularly leaves home before 6.00 am because, for example, he works an early shift he would not be entitled to use the breakfast benchmark scale rate.
One meal rate (Five hour rate) - A rate of up to £5.00 may be paid where the worker has been away from his home/normal place of work for a period of at least five hours and has incurred a cost on a meal.
Two meal rate (Ten hour rate) - A rate of up to £10.00 may be paid where the worker has been away from his home/normal place of work for a period of at least ten hours and has incurred a cost on a meal or meals.
Late evening meal rate (irregular late finishers only) - A rate of up to £15.00 may be paid where the employee has to work later than usual, finishes work after 8.00 pm having worked his normal day and has to buy a meal which he would usually have at home.
If the employee is paid an allowance under the five or ten hour rule, the late meal allowance could still be paid if he finishes work after 8.00 pm and buys a meal that he would usually have at home. However, if the employee regularly finishes work late because, for example, he normally works the afternoon or evening shift, he would not be entitled to use the late evening meal rate.
Particular issues and exemptions
Payments in excess of the benchmark rates
The benchmark rates are the maximum tax and NICs free amounts that could be paid by employers who choose to use this system. An employer could pay less than this rate if it wants to do so. If a higher amount is paid without agreeing a tailored scale rate with HMRC, the excess should be subject to tax and NICs.
Qualifying conditions
Benchmark scale rates must only be used where all the qualifying conditions are met. The qualifying conditions are:
• the travel must be in the performance of an employee’s duties or to a temporary place of work
• the employee should be absent from his normal place of work or home for a continuous period in excess of five hours or ten hours
• the employee should have incurred a cost on a meal (food and drink) after starting the journey
Early starter and late finisher rates
The early starter and late finisher rates are for use in exceptional circumstances only and not intended for employees with regular early or late work patterns.
Tax and NICs free scale rate payments must be limited to three meal rates in one day (or 24 hour period). A meal is defined as a combination of food and drink.
Where employees are required to start early or finish late on a regular basis, the over five hours or over ten hours rates could be paid provided all the other qualifying rules are satisfied.[/i]
Show this to your employer Molgrips, and meet in the middle by buying a lunch less than £5.
Job done.
A rate of £5/£10 [b]may be paid[/b]
Not [b]must[/b] be paid.
that is a big difference.
irregular early starters only
All the mentions of irregular in there imply that if it's as part of your normal work routine, such as on a 3 month placement?) you wouldn't be entitled to the possibility of tax-efficient expenses?
Not [b]must[/b] be paid.
Indeed. For any expenses not paid, you can claim back the tax you paid on the salary used to buy it.
and frankly the issue of how much I have spent on providing breakfast and dinner at home versus claiming on expenses should be irrelevant. In true STW fashion it has become one of the stickier parts of this pointless debate.
And it probably wouldn't have become such a big part of the debate, if the OP hadn't made out like he was enduring some sort of great expense because of it.......
Well no. I'm a home-based worker, so they should pick up the tab when I'm sent away. This is normal, and they do it - except for this one quirk. Which, as previously mentioned, costs a non-trivial amount of money.
The "non trivial amount of money" has ranged from £130/month to £8/week (by his own estimations)
If it's so "none trivial" then possibly knowing what it was, to the nearest £100, would be a start.
I'm a home-based worker
Work paying for your home broadband too?
Meanwhile, somewhere in Leeds, the cheesecake has gone 🙁
[IMG] 
[/IMG]
Healthy today bearnecesities.
I dunno how that HMRC stuff applies when you're in a hotel. We get more than that for hotel meals.
I am at a client site by the way, not my own company. The client are paying the expenses for the project.
But the point is not about the cost of lunch, it's the canteen thing. The company thinks lunch is an acceptable business expense, which is why they (and the client) reimburse it, but it's not clear why this does not happen when there is a canteen. The canteen is presumably subsidised, so the client is paying some of the lunch cost, but why not the rest?
Work paying for your home broadband too?
No. I may be able to claim something back for that but I won't because I would have broadband anyway so it's not really a cost of working.
Are you an employee or contractor?
Don't say temporary employee
So what's for molgrips lunch today?
Thinly sliced cold shoulder served with a salad of egg on face, hard cheese, sour grapes, with a schadenfreude dressing and a choice of raspberry fool or Eton Mess for pudd, and a nice can of bitter lemon.
Not really. Half of last night's cheesefest for lunch 😀
[IMG] 
[/IMG]
Should I be slightly concerned Molgrips gave me some excellent and so far working dietary advice, but then pigs out in Pret himself?
Do as I do etc 😉 😉
aP - Member
So what's for molgrips lunch today?
Thinly sliced cold shoulder served with a salad of egg on face, hard cheese, sour grapes, with a schadenfreude dressing and a choice of raspberry fool or Eton Mess for pudd, and a nice can of bitter lemon.
Excuse me while I wipe my keyboard.... 😀
*eats whole meal pitta and houmous for lunch*
*claims £5*
Let's take a flyer and google:
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=claiming+lunch+on-site+canteens
The first result is:
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/eimanual/eim21673.htm which leads to http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/eimanual/EIM21671.htm
You would probably need a tax person tell you if the problem is tax relief on tax relief, but as you have special powers you can probably figure it out yourself.
And more:
http://www.contractorinfo.co.uk/index.php?q=node/209
Job related living expenses if you are working outside reasonable commuting distance. You cannot claim for lunch if you are working at an office/site with a canteen
Either way - they are not out to ruin your life specifically. There is a reason.