Which small sporty ...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Which small sporty (200+bhp) car?

62 Posts
40 Users
0 Reactions
217 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Had a Land rover Discovery, was too expensive fuel, tax etc, stopping distance of a boat but otherwise lovely car. Cashed that in for a Mini Cooper S with JCW kit and the black chilli add-ons. A Mini with 210bhp, so a bit quick.

These aren't actually my cars, but my mums, but she doesn't 'like' the Mini and has asked me for suggestions...well, I'm 19 so my experience of 'fast sporty small cars' is limited, but I've had a go in this Mini and I think it's 'king quick, my suggestions were:

Mazda RX8
Nissan 350Z
Ford Fiesta ST? Maybe a Focus ST?
Audi TT

Pros/Cons? Other suggestions? Are Mazda RX8s really as quick as they look on paper? Got about £6000 spendings...

Thanks


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 7:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ford Fiesta ST doesn't fit into your list at all there, way out of its league (it cant even compete with comparable sized cars from other manufacturers)

Are you really wanting a coupe or a hot-hatch? Also, there's a reason why RX-8s are dirt cheap


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 7:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Yeah I wondered about RX8s and why they are so cheap, enlighten me? I drive a Vectra so speed is just a word to me...

She's not specific really, open to suggestions...Any nice Mercedes to be had for 6K?


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 7:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Once drove a prodrive rx8, in fact spanked it on a Mazda freebie day, it was quick but not that quick. One of the most fun cars was a Clio sport, keep it on the limit and its a blast. Tts are dull! Never driven a focus st so can't comment, been an impreza owner for 8 yrs now and there's little that will live with them for the same money.


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 7:42 pm
Posts: 166
Free Member
 

Alfa mito or gulietta cloverleaf?


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 7:44 pm
Posts: 1930
Free Member
 

Honda S2000.


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 7:45 pm
 br
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The Mazda is cheap for a reason, they eat fuel like it is going out of fashion.


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 7:46 pm
Posts: 91000
Free Member
 

That's quite a lot of power, you could still have plenty of fun with less.


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 7:47 pm
Posts: 2020
Free Member
 

Yeah I wondered about RX8s and why they are so cheap, enlighten me? I drive a Vectra so speed is just a word to me...

Google how much the engine rebuilds cost and you have your answer 🙂

I like the 370z, but its quite a big car....1700kg, iirc. Not sure if that fits your requirements.


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 7:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

bradley - Member
Yeah I wondered about RX8s and why they are so cheap, enlighten me?

Drink fuel, drink oil (intentionally mind you), if it's been spanked from cold the engine can be looking at a rebuild from as early as 40k miles (but you wouldn't probably find out until it's buggered), no low grunt so need to rev the tits off it to get anywhere, once fired up you need to let it warm before you can switch it off again. Think there might be more too, basically the 350Z would be a better option in every way


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 7:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Honda S2000 is a good one. They do look nice too. Will send that one her way.

Is the issue with RX-8s the fact that the rotary engines longevity is a crock of s*** and low MPG? If so then fair enough, not worth it really.


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 7:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

RX8 is a lovely car but rports of engin life being 60,000 miles are nt good. Rotary engine is a great idea but they dont make many of these for good reason.

Audi A3 sport?


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 7:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I think she's likely to go with a TT, ffs. They already have an Audi Q5, although through my dads work, but Audis are SO overpriced imo.

I wish she would be sensible and go for the 350Z or something different to a TT.

I suggested a sporty A3 but mum and dads response was that they're not 'sporty' enough, not fast enough basically. My dad wont admit it but he's having a mid-life crisis 😀


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 7:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Renault Clio V6....
[img] [/img]

They are superfast, limited edition, virtually hand built, and great fun to drive. Look hard and you'll find a phase 1 (the drivers car).

SB


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 8:06 pm
Posts: 5042
Free Member
 

civic type r.
focus st.
golf vr6/r32


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 8:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Look hard and you'll find a phase 1 (the drivers car).

wrong way round, ph1s werent even regarded as being as good as 172s. ph2s (like you've pictured) is where it's at - hence the sizeable price difference


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 8:38 pm
Posts: 33325
Full Member
 

Well, if they want [i]fast...[/i]

[img] [/img]
[img] [/img]

Of course, it might be just a [i]teensy[/i] bit outside their budget... 😆


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 8:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Had the Honda S2000 and still wish that i still had it.It is the type of car that, if you were going to the local paper shop then you would go the long way round, even if it was another 20 miles or so.
Great fun with rear wheel drive and a sublime gearbox but scary in the wet,also eat rear tyres.


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 9:06 pm
Posts: 6257
Full Member
 

And so the


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 9:09 pm
Posts: 145
Free Member
 

330i? How about an '06?

http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/bmw/e90-3-series-05-11/bmw-3-series-e90-330i-m-sport-2006/1042548

Trying to change at the moment as I really fancy a Golf Gti edition 30


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 9:09 pm
Posts: 4331
Full Member
 

Edit: Re read the OP!

Civic type R?


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 9:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Nissan Juke R?

Might be a snippet over budget though....


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 9:42 pm
Posts: 20561
Free Member
 

Does she want to rag it in corners or just a bit of kick now and then? If the latter then an Astra VXR would be a hoot. Scary in bends though.


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 9:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Mazda 3 MPS?
Swift, (about 265bhp) cheapish and not too bad looking......


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 9:44 pm
Posts: 20561
Free Member
 

They have a great Bose stereo in them 🙂


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 9:54 pm
Posts: 6257
Full Member
 

And so the

obligatory RX-whatever bashing begins. Carry on, clueless pub bores. Yes, I know your mate's brother once shagged the sister of a bloke who had one that needed a £6000 engine rebuild twice a year. Keep on believing that, keep trotting out the "oil-guzzling, torqueless, fragile bankrupty machine" line, keep the resale values low, and then the ones of us who do a bit of research, the ones who actually know a bit about the rotary engine will always have a vast array of tremendous, practical, cheap sports cars at our fingertips.

Well.... maybe not practical....

PS - OP, have a think about the Vauxhall VX220 - it's a Lotus Elise for Ford Fiesta money.


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 9:56 pm
Posts: 20561
Free Member
 

Flying Ox - have you looked at how much they are then? They are around the same as an Elise last time I looked.


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 9:58 pm
Posts: 6257
Full Member
 

Flying Ox - have you looked at how much they are then? They are around the same as an Elise last time I looked.

Blimey, the S1 Elise has dropped a fair bit in price since I last looked!
The VX220 shares the same platform as the S2 Elise though, which are on average about £15k compared with the £10k VX220. Yes, there are £10k S2s, but then there are £6k VX220s.


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 10:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

the ones of us who do a bit of research, the ones who actually know a bit about the rotary engine will always have a vast array of tremendous, practical, cheap sports cars at our fingertips

feel free to enlighten us in the art of RX-8 buying. I would honestly be interested to know if anything in my own post was off the mark


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 10:22 pm
Posts: 6257
Full Member
 

Well they hardly "drink oil" for starters, and the oil they do burn costs about £4 a litre. What's the problem with that? You want figures? I'd say about 500mL/1000 miles. That's a conservative guess with the mileage, too. I get about 3000 miles/L from mine.

Any engine spanked from cold will be suffering. That's not a trait unique to rotary engines. And it's disingenuous to put an arbitrary mileage on when an engine might lose compression. It always seems to be somewhere between 30-40,000 miles, eh? Want to hazard a guess at how long a 231bhp 1.3L piston engine would last?

No low grunt? You driven many? It's as fast off the mark as any n/a car I've ever driven. And can you give me a real-world situation where this percieved "lack of grunt" presents a problem?

You mention "revving its tits off" like that's a bad thing. It has a 9000 rpm red line and it's a sports car. It's meant to be fun. Fun doesn't involve changing gear at 2,500 rpm, at least not in my book. Do you bemoan sportsbikes for having 14,000 RPM redlines?

Yes, there are compromises involved, not least the pretty dire fuel economy, but what gets my goat is the constant, inevitable nay-saying that puts potential owners off. They're great cars that would suit a great many petrolheads. They just need a slightly more diligent approach to care and maintenance than your average diesel Golf, that's all. The ones that are looked after last for a lot longer than the "pub limit" of 40k miles. But I suppose that doesn't fit with the hivemind opinion, does it?

If you're after my buying advice, apart from checking for the usual suspension knocks & rust as you would on any car, I'd spend £1k on an eBay non-runner. Trailer it to DM-Motorsport or the like and get a full rebuild and port - should cost somewhere between £2500 and £3000. You've now got a warrantied, brand new engine - with a lot more of the fabled "bottom end grunt" - and a brilliant chassis for £5k less than a bottom/middle-of-the-market 350Z. Then just keep on top of the oil and coolant levels, and make sure the ignition components are changed every 30,000 miles. It's not hard, really, but so many ex-owners just treated them like common-or-garden shopping cars and that's not how to do it. Hence the ridiculously low prices.


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 10:43 pm
Posts: 6686
Free Member
 

That V8 Atom is sublime, saw one in Edinburgh and just looking at it was epic....


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 10:48 pm
 iBaa
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

+1 for the Type R, but the EP3 is better than the newer one


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 10:53 pm
Posts: 17728
Full Member
 

No low grunt is true, isn't it? The torque output of an rx8 is very low, so yes, no low-end grunt.
From memory, I think they have 110lb ft or something (could be completely wrong). My Ibiza has 228.

The rx8 though revs to buggery, so gets it's performance that way.

I'd love to have one (although I'd actually really like an rx-7).


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 10:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How many folk that ask this question want to buy something for a grand off Ebay to then get it taken to so&so on a trailer, to then get i...

Woah! He just wants to buy a car! Not get one he's never driven, FIXED!


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 10:55 pm
Posts: 6257
Full Member
 

I never said they don't have "poor" low-end grunt. It's just that I can't see how this presents a single valid argument against the RX8 other than in Pub Top Trumps. In the real world they're remarkably quick off the line, low torque or not.

And it's the 7 I've got 8)

Do it 😈


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 10:59 pm
Posts: 6257
Full Member
 

I was asked for buying advice. That's what I'd do. You can always spend £6-7k on one already sorted. Just buy from the owners' club, rather than eBay/Autotrader/Pistonheads.


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 11:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I was hugely tempted by an RX-8 lovely cars, I could not give one that bit if extra thought that's needed in ownership (talk to real owners not hearsay) but ultimately the boot wasn't suited to my needs. The interiors are really nice and I didn't find a lack of low end grunt in the ones I test drove. Absolute bargain for the money, as usual someone you have just met will tell you their TD-what-now is quicker uses less oil & can seat someone 7'2" in comfort, hope you saved up for the 12,000 mile complete engine rebuild and all that.


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 11:02 pm
Posts: 13134
Full Member
 

And those clever little half rear doors look good and make getting into the back dead easy too.

BIL has one and in comparison to my Clio 197 it feels far more plush and sports car like to be in.


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 11:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Apologies for the bullets that follow, using phone so sparing words.

1. Not a problem as such, just something that you don't have to do with the competitors - see Fox stanchion thread.
2. What I found when looking up info indicated that rotarys are more susceptible to damage than 'normal' piston engines. I believe that they variable rev-limiter was introduced on the face-lift models to help combat this?
3. 0-60 times don't equal grunt. A powerful Diesel engine is the polar opposite, but torquey feeling bit doesn't necessarily post low figures. Indeed, as long as you're in the right gear at the right time it isn't a problem - my own car isn't much different!
4. Didn't moan about it being able to rev high, but many people do like having power available lower down the rev range. This is something that the S2000 was often criticised for too.
5. Agreed, you mention "the ones that are looked after" should last. IMO any modern engine should last a lot longer regardless of care and attention (within reason obviously). And jeez stop being so tetchy, I drive a £3,000 182 so am used to speaking to people about my choices too.
And your very last point: unfortunately they were sold as shopping carts that you could then go tearing around the countryside in, so people were bound to treat them as such.

Cheers,
Legend


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 11:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"Sporty"? Cheap?
Leon Cupra.


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 11:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Mazda MPS is a good, fairly sensible choice.
Honda Type-R is the purists choice
Megane Renaultsport are really great cars to drive

Mini, Focus, Astra, Alfa and loads of others all have similar cars, plenty to choose from.
RX-8 is potentially brilliant, but they don't like short journeys. You have to warm them up, otherwise it might not restart when you try to. If you never do short journeys its fine. Really need to be revved to be quick though.


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 11:10 pm
Posts: 8392
Free Member
 

Merc SLK, a 320 in a MK1 or whatever you can get for your money in a MK2. Fast, more of a cruiser than a pocket rocket though.


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 11:11 pm
Posts: 13134
Full Member
 

"Fast" is such a catch all term though- fast high speed cruiser, fast off the line push you back in your seat, fast around the corners....


 
Posted : 01/02/2013 11:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Fast is very vague though but I never said fast lol. Any small car with 200+bhp is gonna thump you back in your seat and accelerate nicely out of corners, same as the Mini. The Minis issue is it's a 160bhp car but with an extra 50bhp, nothing else upgraded it seems. Gearbox isn't very nice, brakes are poor, run flats are awful grip!

My mum is going to look at an Audi TT 2003 plate with 66K miles tomorrow for £5500 with 'all the extras' and I think has every intention of buying it, shame because I emailed her an 05 350Z with 57K miles and some 'extras' that looked really nice for £4250!? HELLO??????????

Thanks guys, I will probably update you all later this afternoon after she comes round with dad to show me the new TT -.-


 
Posted : 02/02/2013 8:09 am
Posts: 1
Free Member
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

£6k won't get you an R34 GTR...


 
Posted : 02/02/2013 8:38 am
Posts: 13134
Full Member
 

but I never said fast lol.

Err, yes you did.

not fast enough basically.

Horribly patronising I know but maybe a TT is the right car for her. MK1 TT is imo a bit of design classic, plenty of grunt (so is very "fast" in that respect) and feel like a sports car inside. The fact that it is not the last word in cornering might not be an issue for a middle aged lady.....who probably won't driving it like too much of a nutter or take is to track days etc. It's got a nice middle aged friendly badge - all good.


 
Posted : 02/02/2013 8:38 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

My apologies convert. She wanted something sporty/quick/small so I guess a TT fits into this category but I know for a fact it's her badge snobbery not allowing her to get into the Nissan or Honda 🙁 350Z seems a much better buy.

Oh well I'm sure I'll still get a go in whatever it is for an hour or so :p


 
Posted : 02/02/2013 8:41 am
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Clio 197
500 Arbath


 
Posted : 02/02/2013 9:04 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

hora - Member
Clio 197
500 Arbath
POSTED 8 MINUTES AGO #

500 Abarth with 200bhp+ for £6k?


 
Posted : 02/02/2013 9:15 am
Posts: 13164
Full Member
 

Audi [s]A[/s][b]S[/b]3 [s]sport[/s]


 
Posted : 02/02/2013 10:23 am
Posts: 6926
Free Member
 

Alfa GTA:[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 02/02/2013 10:32 am
Posts: 1305
Free Member
 

I had an RX8 231bhp for exactly a year.
Enjoyed driving it. Handled superbly on B roads etc.
It was 57 plate bought from a main dealer with less than 40k on the clock for a Smidge over £6k in August 2011. Lost £3k p/x a year later with 48k miles.
Only let me down once due to a flat battery. Commuted daily, short journeys, long journeys no worries.
Got rid cos I needed something more practical and 17mpg is not a long term proposition.
And £475 tax.
Having said all that I enjoyed owning and driving my 1.7 puma more. Kept that for 8 years. Able to be driven at 90% regularly without worries. 120bhp/ton is quick enough for the public road IMO.
Cars like the ones in this thread need track days to do them justice.


 
Posted : 02/02/2013 10:57 am
Posts: 261
Full Member
 

Impreza WRX or mk1 STI?
Pretty compact epsecially the mk1s and certainly sporty. Thirsty though.


 
Posted : 02/02/2013 12:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ooh Clio v6, very nice. Don't they try to kill you every
time you drive them though?


 
Posted : 02/02/2013 12:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

2nd hand Elise?


 
Posted : 02/02/2013 2:48 pm
Posts: 122
Free Member
 

How about an Audi s3 mk1 you should be able to get one for less than 6 k, 210 bhp Quattro recaros etc a lot nicer and more practical than a tt. You can also chip it to over 250 bhp
Not as involving a Subaru but a nice quick car


 
Posted : 02/02/2013 6:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm not sure how a Skyline or an Impreza fits into the small car category. The only thing I can think of that matches what you ask for is a clio 197, give or take a few bhp. With whatever exhaust is the best bet for an extra 10hp or so, surely this is what has to be on the shortlist? It'll possibly come with an uprated exhaust and also a few other subtle tweaks I would have thought.


 
Posted : 02/02/2013 6:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Interesting how peoples thoughts vary. I have had the disappointment of driving a Clio 192 Sport, the most disappointing hot hatch ever for me.
The Mazda 3 MPS is a good shout but a real handfull in the wet and they eat front tyres. They dont take the miles or age very well in my opinion.
Focus ST, nice easy to drive fast car. Seat Leon FR likewise. Volvo C30 T5 R design is a lovely smooth car let down by its miniscule boot.
Based on availability on your budget Focus ST or Seat Leon (maybe even a Cupra).
For me I think I would favour.....Aerial Atom too 😛


 
Posted : 02/02/2013 9:57 pm
Posts: 188
Full Member
 

Leon Cupra
BMW 130i
350z


 
Posted : 03/02/2013 1:30 pm
Posts: 34
Free Member
 

RX-8s cost the price of a kidney to Tax, in excess of £400!

Someone already said that above ^^


 
Posted : 03/02/2013 2:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Suggsey - Member
I have had the disappointment of driving a Clio 192 Sport

understandable, you should try a 182 or a 197 instead 😉

Having actually now read the OP properly (a rarity on STW) I see the car is for Mum - chances of influence are approximately zero.


 
Posted : 03/02/2013 7:10 pm
Posts: 20561
Free Member
 

The Mazda 3 MPS is a good shout but a real handfull in the wet and they eat front tyres

I bet they do - we have the 2.0l Sport (just 150bhp) and that gets through a set of fronts in about 12k - and that is with pretty careful driving. Apparently it is an inherent fault due to the suspension set-up. Another thing to watch with the Mazda (around 2006-08) is DSC faults - it is well documented but Mazda have refused to repair under warranty. It cost us about £1200 to have ours repaired/upgraded.


 
Posted : 04/02/2013 10:18 am

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!