What photo editing ...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] What photo editing software?

18 Posts
17 Users
0 Reactions
72 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Can someone please recommend me a good bit of software for editing photos which would allow a novice to begin tweaking stuff without [i]too[/i] much difficulty?

I'm using a Mac.

I am currently using iPhoto to rather crudely tinker with brightness levels, but suspect there are more effective programs available!

If it's cheap then that's a definite bonus...


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 3:03 pm
 Bez
Posts: 7371
Full Member
 

Snapseed?


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 3:05 pm
Posts: 2801
Free Member
 

GIMP 2.8


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 3:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

snapseed seems to be aimed at photos taken with mobile phones??

Will have a look at GIMP, seem to remember download a copy years ago but never really doing much with it.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 3:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

For raw files or JPGs? Editing or just processing/developing? If you want low-cost raw processing, then check out Darktable (free). Nowhere near as intuitive as Adobe's Lightroom, but a fairly powerful processor nonetheless. Personally, I think that Lightroom is good value and great software.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 3:21 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Seashore http://seashore.sourceforge.net/The_Seashore_Project/About.html


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 3:22 pm
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

Lightroom is superb.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 3:40 pm
 Bez
Posts: 7371
Full Member
 

What's the difference that makes Snapseed no good for other photos? I've only used it on iOS/Android, but it's available on MacOS and surely a photo is a photo?

I use Lightroom, which is excellent and well worth the money IMO if you take plenty of pictures, but it's not really cheap in absolute terms.

Wouldn't personally recommend Gimp as being suitable for beginners' photo editing; YMMV of course.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 3:45 pm
Posts: 1538
Full Member
 

Lightroom seems like a good bet for you. We use it for all of our batch processing.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 4:18 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

paint.net is free and does all the basics.

http://www.getpaint.net/

(I do like snapseed on my phone/pad though - very nice app)


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 4:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I like gimp and use it a fair bit but its more a graphic design package than a photo editing suite.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 4:42 pm
Posts: 3427
Full Member
 

Another vote for Seahorse


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 4:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What limitations of iPhoto do you think you've reached?


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 5:03 pm
Posts: 91000
Free Member
 

Photoshop Elements, available for £50 if you shop around. It's full Photoshop with a few features missing, for 1/6 the price.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 5:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Lightroom 4 on a mac ....works really well
Gimp seemed fragmented ....
Agreed iphoto doesnt flow feel logical

Still miss photoshop after switch to mac but light room works for 95% of the work
28 day demo on lightroom from there website not on app store


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 6:31 pm
Posts: 14146
Full Member
 

I do most of my simple stuff in Picasa. In fact I don't do any complicated stuff. RAW processing is done with the Sony bundled software and the rest in Picasa, with the odd pic chucked through photomatix for tone mapping


 
Posted : 12/03/2013 11:11 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Kinda related...

http://videoscope.qrclab.com/

Quanta Research Cambridge and MIT researchers collaborated to develop software that amplifies color changes and movements in video that are invisible to the naked eye. The software allows you to 'see' a person's pulse by magnifying the color of the person's skin, and to 'see' a person breathing by amplifying the subtle changes in movement.


 
Posted : 12/03/2013 11:17 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Lightroom here too.

As you're on a Mac, you could try Aperture also, but as I still do most of my photo editing on a PC, I've stuck with lightroom, which is exceedingly good for efficient workflow and powerful editing if you don't need layers. All it needs is CA fill and slightly better brushes for dodging and burning.

The trouble is, Adobe know that too, and would rather you spent considerably more on photoshop


 
Posted : 12/03/2013 12:16 pm
Posts: 10315
Full Member
 

Lightroom if you want to process lots of photos in the same way and quickly. Photoshop elements if you want to 'tweak' individual photos occasionally but in more detail than Lightroom


 
Posted : 12/03/2013 12:35 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!