Well, this sucks...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Well, this sucks...

26 Posts
21 Users
0 Reactions
93 Views
Posts: 33325
Full Member
Topic starter
 

http://phys.org/news/2012-11-astronomers-massive-unusual-black-hole.html


 
Posted : 30/11/2012 12:39 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I find cosmology and all that STUFF endlessly fascinating, that there is something else to be endlessly fascinated by just goes on the pile of endlessly fascinating stuff! and this thread won't get its dues, because i think that sort of stuff is just fabulous but boring and meaningless at the same time!


 
Posted : 30/11/2012 12:54 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

mind ****.


 
Posted : 30/11/2012 1:11 am
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

God is SOOO amazing!


 
Posted : 30/11/2012 8:55 am
Posts: 45504
Free Member
 

😯
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 30/11/2012 9:23 am
Posts: 2462
Free Member
 

At 17 billion solar masses, the black hole weighs an extraordinary 14 percent of the total galaxy mass

😯


 
Posted : 30/11/2012 9:28 am
Posts: 4143
Free Member
 

Ok numpty question time.

Other than my wife's bum ... Is that the biggest single "thing" in existence?

Obviously our own Sun is minuscule in comparison to that SMBH… but how do the largest stars compare? Are they still really really really small sat next to that?


 
Posted : 30/11/2012 9:39 am
Posts: 91000
Free Member
 

Is that its event horizon in that pic?


 
Posted : 30/11/2012 9:41 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How do you weigh a black hole?

Our puny ape brains can never fully comprehend the universe.


 
Posted : 30/11/2012 9:42 am
Posts: 41642
Free Member
 

Obviously our own Sun is minuscule in comparison to that SMBH… but how do the largest stars compare? Are they still really really really small sat next to that?

I guess so, on the basis that a black hole has to start off as a huge star, then sucks things in and gets even bigger, it must be bigger than a big star.

Also a star is wayyyyy less dense than a black hole, but i've no idea if one could be that big.

[cosmology brain fart]
Surely we should have expected the biggest black holes in the smallest galaxies? How do we know the Galaxy wasn't big to start with and has already been sucked into the black hole making it the biggest?
[/cosmology brain fart]


 
Posted : 30/11/2012 9:45 am
Posts: 22922
Full Member
 

[img] [/img]

or in terms we can all understand "an area the size of Wales"


 
Posted : 30/11/2012 9:48 am
Posts: 28475
Free Member
 

How do you weigh a black hole?

You can measure the effect it's having on things outside it, such as gases.


 
Posted : 30/11/2012 9:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

At 17 billion solar masses, the black hole [b]weighs[/b] an extraordinary 14 percent of the total galaxy mass

Aaaagh! 👿


 
Posted : 30/11/2012 9:55 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

We're all DOOMED!


 
Posted : 30/11/2012 9:58 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well, this sucks...

And round the back it (possibly) blows


 
Posted : 30/11/2012 10:00 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

One of those moments when you realise just how small we really are. I really think as a human race we should make space exploration much more of a priority, imagine what other cool stuff we'd have found if we spent half the money that's been spent on wars in the last 70 years on space exploration. I know this makes me sound like a stupid idealist but its one thing that really bugs me.


 
Posted : 30/11/2012 10:02 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Our puny ape brains can never fully comprehend the universe

+1

My Pop has a good effort at 'conceptualising' it all - I fail after 17 seconds of discussion with him.


 
Posted : 30/11/2012 10:03 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No it doesn't.


 
Posted : 30/11/2012 10:04 am
Posts: 13594
Free Member
 

One of those moments when you realise just how small we really are. I really think as a human race we should make space exploration much more of a priority, imagine what other cool stuff we'd have found if we spent half the money that's been spent on wars in the last 70 years on space exploration. I know this makes me sound like a stupid idealist but its one thing that really bugs me.

Until we get Warp speed sorted, we'll just be watching it all (millions of years after things happened) from our little perch on Earth....


 
Posted : 30/11/2012 10:05 am
Posts: 4143
Free Member
 

a bit like watching your first brickie then Footflaps 😆


 
Posted : 30/11/2012 10:07 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

It's stuff like this that blows my mind...

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 30/11/2012 10:35 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yeah I agree with the space travel thing. We need to get our asses in gear. We're progressing slower than ever - we need another victorian era steam revolution, but in jet propulsion and space travel.


 
Posted : 30/11/2012 1:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

58 years from the first power flight to the first space flight, and then only another 8 years till the moon landing. That is some rate of progress, but little in the 40 odd years since.


 
Posted : 30/11/2012 1:32 pm
Posts: 5114
Full Member
 

According to the scales used by most bike manufacturers this sucker only weighs about 34lbs.


 
Posted : 30/11/2012 1:35 pm
Posts: 33325
Full Member
Topic starter
 

imnotverygood - Member
According to the scales used by most bike manufacturers this sucker only weighs about 34lbs.

😆


 
Posted : 30/11/2012 7:54 pm
Posts: 33325
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Other than my wife's bum ... Is that the biggest single "thing" in existence?

Obviously our own Sun is minuscule in comparison to that SMBH… but how do the largest stars compare? Are they still really really really small sat next to that?


Ro5ey, that's a damned good question, actually. It's swallowed many, many stars and other debris, but I guess it has to be classed as a single 'object. Trouble is, many galaxies appear to have black holes at their core, but who knows how big the damned things can actually get? A really old one could quite possibly have consumed it's entire parent galaxy, thus having a mass of tens of millions of stars, and a radius of a large solar system, or bigger, possibly, but with nothing left for it to swallow, there wouldn't be any x-radiation emitted at the Swartzchild radius to give the game away, only gravitational lensing when another stellar object passes behind it. The biggest stars are vast, the largest known is VY Canis Majoris:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VY_Canis_Majoris
Houns, another good question; I guess it's the event horizon, but, really, who the hell knows! 😆
Unlike some people, I find this sort of thing endlessly fascinating, and hardly boring.
Discussing the results of some game of Wendyball, on the other hand, has me wanting to open a vein...


 
Posted : 30/11/2012 8:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So speaking in plain terms they've found evidence of a Big F-off Black Hole. Everyone knows that Big F-off is the biggest unit of measure in the universe.


 
Posted : 30/11/2012 8:25 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!