We have 'car brain' in the UK

You could establish that by researching no further than this - alleged 😉 - cycling forum...

What about bike brain ?

this – alleged 😉 – cycling forum…

There is absolutely nothing alleged about this cycle-buying forum...
Oh, you said "cycling" 😳

Interesting read.

While I'd not disagree with the overall study, comparing car fumes to cigarette smoke is pretty stupid. Most folk would agree that the former has some utility whereas the latter does not.

Now check out the threads with people removing EGRs and mapping for performance, Scotroutes. That's just like smoking: throwing away money for a tiny temporary kick whilst deliberately poisoning all around you more than necessary.

One poster used to brag about smoking out cyclists if they dared to venture onto the same roads as him and God forbid, ride along side each other.

I've always found the pro car anti bike attitudes on this forum surprising.  Any suggestion of taking a bit of space in our cities away from cars and give it to bikes and pedestrians is jumped on as is any suggestion of removing the subsidy from cars.

I’ve always found the pro car anti bike attitudes on this forum surprising. Any suggestion of taking a bit of space in our cities away from cars and give it to bikes and pedestrians is jumped on as is any suggestion of removing the subsidy from cars.

Calm down dear. Those views are definitely from a minority. The forum is overwhelmingly in favour of cycling/public transport development and less car usage.

@Edukator - edge cases though, hardly affecting the survey?

@tjagain - there are significant structural issues around removing access to motor vehicles, some of which aren't really apparent to folk who live and work in large cities. Any generic solution to increase motoring costs would have to take these into account and I don't see any political party even starting to think about them. Low Emission Zones aren't really much of a start regarding cost, though they are at least addressing some of the health issues.

Saw that study the other week in the G.

The UK is incredibly car centric.

In Germany I wouldn't even think about taking the car for a journey of <10km. In the UK it seems people jump in their cars to drive <1 mile to the shop.

My sister and her fella were bemused when I said I didn't need picking up from the station and would walk the three miles home.

Completely different mindset, although it's not helped by the shite infrastructure and town planning.

Nice four lane road through town where you can drive at 40 mph.... But where are the cycle paths? Or even footpaths?

It's crap.

More cash - just a noisy minority then? 🙂

Scotroutes - fully accepted hence I always argue change would have to be incremental and rural areas may need some special arrangements

its just the general tone.  Even something as simple as presumed liability which is widely used all over europe with no issues

I agree with what you're saying Alpin, but the average Geramn car covers more KM per year than a UK car and indeed almost any other European country. And it depends where in Germany, junior in Berlin doesn't feel the need for a car but friends near Heilbron have long commutes and use the car for everything except buying the morning brötchen. Germany is car commuter land.

Possibly.... But the country is much larger, hence greater distances. Same goes for France.

I reckon more km are covered by bike or by foot per capita in the Vaterland than the UK.

The UK is, imo, inherently unhealthy and a lot of that has to do with its reliance on cars.

I reckon more km are covered by bike or by foot per capita in the Vaterland than the UK.

Absolutely. Again it's regional. When I lived in Munster it was bicycle lend, bikes everywhere pretty much like Holland. But Heilbronn, no more bikes than London and a hell of a lot more Audis. Bizarrely it's the frozen north where I've ssen the most bikes and the sunny south the most petrolheads.

What helps is the infrastructure. There's no reason not to ride a bike in Munster but in Hamburg they're still favouring cars along the right bank of the Elbe to the irritation of the local cyclists. At least teh local TV joins in with slagging off the petrolhead local authorities, can't imagine that in Birmingham UK.

In Germany I wouldn’t even think about taking the car for a journey of <10km. In the UK it seems people jump in their cars to drive <1 mile to the shop.

My neighbour routinely and pretty much every other day, drives to the nearest shop, it’s 0.65km, to walk there is 0.32km.

He’s fit and healthy, and regularly walks along the coast with his dog to the next village at 4.8km. Usually gets picked up by car, rather than taking the train back…

there are significant structural issues around removing access to motor vehicles, some of which aren’t really apparent to folk who live and work in large cities. Any generic solution to increase motoring costs would have to take these into account and I don’t see any political party even starting to think about them. Low Emission Zones aren’t really much of a start regarding cost, though they are at least addressing some of the health issues.

You're right that there is zero national picture or strategy - Blair's Government looked into road pricing briefly, the RW press went mental and the idea has been hiding in the background ever since, the elephant in the room that no Government has ever had the balls to address again. BUt they're going to need to do something because revenue from fuel duty and "road tax" will fall dramatically as the shift to EV and hybrid increases.

CAZ are a very piecemeal and confusing addition to the plan - again Government kicked the can down the road and left it to local authorities to implement their own measures for combating air pollution so you've got some that apply to all private cars, some that only apply to vans and further confusing eligibility stuff around engine type - so lots of people get caught and fined and that breeds resentment.

More cash – just a noisy minority then?

Always, on this forum - whatever the debate and whichever side they are on

Lolz

drives to the nearest shop, it’s 0.65km, to walk there is 0.32km.

Whilst over in the UK I picked up my nephews from school. It's a 10 minute walk there.

Never again. Absolute carnage with all the cars. Some folks were driving despite us walking past their houses. Idiots.

If there were a tax/tariff system in place that penalises you for using the car on journeys under a specific distance or at particular times I would be all for it.

The UK's car dependency, lack of other infrastructure and the general population's attitude towards transport are just some reasons I can never see myself returning to the UK to live permanently.

Any suggestion of taking a bit of space in our cities away from cars and give it to bikes and pedestrians is jumped on

There's a difference between not wanting it, and pointing out where it might be difficult. You seem unaware of this difference.

Cardiff council is trying to do the right thing but it has a very limited budget and is facing criticism on all sides whatever it tries to do. It's currently building a huge new PT network rather than build major cycleways, which is probably the better choice at the moment given the realities in the ground. That I acknowledge that doesn't mean I'm anti bike, of course.

I wasn't intending to have a 'them Vs us', it was more interesting that UK attitudes to risk and vehicles was so pro-car... So many people just cannot see it.

Molgrips - the only reason why its "difficult" is because it takes space away from cars.  You cannot have good cycling infrastructure unless you do take some space from cars. thats the bit you don't seem to understand 🙂

I wasn’t intending to have a ‘them Vs us’, it was more interesting that UK attitudes to risk and vehicles was so pro-car… So many people just cannot see it.

I've said it before on here and elsewhere (as have others).

In no other area of life would anything about private motoring be acceptable.
One "accreditation" session - that then covers you for life.
No further training, almost zero consequences for "mistakes", we'll let you dispense highly flammable liquid unsupervised, untrained and unattended, no logbooks, no records...

If there were 5 deaths a day on the railways, the entire system would be shut down, overhauled, there'd be MDs in jail, massive fines...
5 deaths a day in aviation and no-one would ever get on a plane.
5 deaths a day on the roads (UK average) and everyone is just like "yeah, whatever" - in fact it almost goes to the opposite extreme to blame pedestrians and cyclists for "being in the way".

Molgrips – the only reason why its “difficult” is because it takes space away from cars. You cannot have good cycling infrastructure unless you do take some space from cars. thats the bit you don’t seem to understand

I understand that very well. I would dearly love to see a redesigned city. I have actually planned out in some detail how I would achieve this in specific cases. My wife and I redesigned Newport Road, the major artery in the east of Cardiff, and daydreamed about how wonderful it would be*.

The problem is that it's not my city to change. The council is answerable to the people who live here, and persuading them to get out of their cars and onto bikes is going to be extremely difficult. This is the part that you don't appreciate. You could have the best cycleway in the world on Newport Road but there's no getting away from the fact that most people riding along it would be faced with a big hill at one end.

I personally would love your vision for a city, but that's not enough - you have to get everyone else to like it. You seem to think that if only you can just shout loud enough everyone will see the world the same way as you, but sadly that isn't the case.

* The ideal solution we came up with was dig and cover tunnel under the current road way, with underground car parks. Then the current roadway could then be pleasingly landscaped and you could add lots more shops and parkland. This would of course be terribly expensive. People will still want to drive into town from places that are too far away. I mean you can't expect a family of four to cycle in from Newport on a Saturday for some shopping. This is why I think that public transport is the solution, rather than cycling. But you still have to find a way to actually stop people choosing their cars, and that's going to be really difficult. What do you suggest?

TL;DR I'm not anti-bike, most people on here aren't anti-bike, but most people in the UK are and that is the issue.

Have you seen the youtube film " how the dutch got their cycle lanes"?

It explains very well how to do it and car drivers are the minority( in terms of number of journeys)  in most cities but get 90% of the travel spend and 90% of the road space

If every other country in Europe can do this what is so special about the UK that we cannot?

What do you suggest?

Ive said this many times. Over time ramp up motoring costs ( actually remove the subsidy)  and put the money raised into alternatives.  Public transport and cycling

town planning also takes a huge role.

Over time ramp up motoring costs ( actually remove the subsidy)  and put the money raised into alternatives.  Public transport and cycling

That's the wrong order. You need to fix public transport before you raise motoring costs.

Have you seen the youtube film ” how the dutch got their cycle lanes”?

Yes I have.

The main thing I took from it was that it took many years for them to get their cycle lanes.

We need to make a start, but it will be several years before we'd see results

If every other country in Europe can do this what is so special about the UK that we cannot?

It's like saying if most people aren't alcoholics, then why are you?

In the Netherlands this happened IIRC in the 80s. At that point in the UK two-car families were rare, cars were relatively expensive. That would have been the time to do something about it, but we didn't - we had Thatcher - so we cultivated the car-loving attitude. Un-cultivating that is going to be really hard.

A key reason in my view is city planning, as I've said before. The average daily distance for cyclists in the Netherlands is 3.4km for men and 3km for women. From here, where I live, there is absolutely nothing worth cycling to within that distance. Because this giant shitty suburb was planned that way in the 80s. It was planned for people to use their cars to get around. To change that now you'd have to undo the bad decisions that have been made for the last 40 years.

Better public transport is going to be a much better starting point. I think the two go hand in hand. If you are young, you don't have a car; if you can get around easily and cheaply without a car you will delay buying one (as you see in London) and then you don't automatically think of getting in the car as soon as you step outside. Then you will be able to start integrating bikes into the mix - in my view.

One thing that varies a lot between countries is the relationship between people and their governments. What people expect their governments to do, and what they see them as can be very different. So beware of drawing to many parallels between other countries. We don't need a Dutch solution to the problem because a Dutch solution is unlikely to work. We need a British solution that British people will support.

Do you really think plopping a load of cycle lanes in Edinburgh and taking up roads will have the majority of people happily jumping on bikes without any backlash?

Over time ramp up motoring costs

Do you think you'd get enough votes to get that enacted, if you were a party leader? Really?

Vote for me! I will ramp up your cost of living and make your life harder!

Scotroutes is right.

Bread....

Bread is another reason I couldn't return the tip UK. Who thinks Hovis is acceptable?

White bread. Had there ever been anything so sad? Even the tiger baguettes at tesco were crappy white bread.

Seriously, get your scheiß together.

Cambridge has a very ambitious plan to have subsidised bus travel, more cycle paths and charge motorists to drive into the city.

I think it woukd be amazing but it is far from universally welcomed.

I think this is apparent in the perceived move toward EV's - why has this become so fixated on electric cars, and the (more complicated?) associated infrastructure, when other vehicles are available?

Shouldn't the drive toward electric vehicles be fronted by electric bicycles/tricycles/cargo bikes rather than assuming you just replicate what is already fubared and electrifying it?

Other vehicles are obviously necessary and need careful consideration, but personal transport at the moment seems to be predicated on electrifying the status quo - why?

Shouldn’t the drive toward electric vehicles be fronted by electric bicycles/tricycles/cargo bikes rather than assuming you just replicate what is already fubared and electrifying it?

How long do you think people commute?

Mostly not that long, but in many instances the kind of distances that would be very doable on an e-bike.

Why, how long do you think people commute?

My wife is an anecdotal example - commute of ~ 3 miles in , then that back.

She bought a 'proper' bike and used it... a bit. Mostly took the car, found as many excuses to as she could. To provide some context i have always commuted by bike whatever the weather and i think she thought she should be doing more.

She bought an e-bike, and now only uses the car if it's forecast to honk it down.

Why did you ask me that question?

I think the biggest problem is the way cyclists are targeted by the media. Over the years, I've noticed a massive up tick in aggressive driving after a Clarckson or some other RW troll gets traction with a preposterous article.

Grant Schapps came out with his licences and speed limits for cyclists garbage on the front of the DM as a dead cat during the sham election, for a month or two after that I've never seen as much aggression and abuse.

Unfortunately, as a Manchester resident I can attest that the limited infrastructure put in place over the last few years has only made cycling more unpleasant. More uncomfortable, slower and more dangerous overall,

we've done the 'why do the new cycle lanes feel like the washboard section at a bike park?" question on previous threads, (turns out they don't steamroller the tarmac up here, they bash it flat(ish) with the back of a spade),

That's partly why one asks why the focus is on EVs being ECars?

If the future looked ebike shaped, it would necessarily knock on to the kind of infrastructure that our ^perennially argumentative brethren have been hitherto banging on about.

We really need to reframe the entire thoughtscape.

If there were a tax/tariff system in place that penalises you for using the car on journeys under a specific distance or at particular times I would be all for it.

I have suggested something before.
A flat tax of, say, £10 (vary it accordi to car type/emissions?) which is paid on each day the car is used. Remove/reduce fuel duties to make cost neutral.
The half mile commute trip which my colleagues make has now become very expensive, the long journey where the car really is the only option, less so

We need a British solution that British people will support.

I think I'm at the point where I'm a little less optimistic. Ultimately we have been hooked on cars for so long that the solution will I think involve being forced, rather than people supporting it. Cars will become very expensive, I mean way more expensive than now, at which point cycling (perhaps more realistically, ebikes or similar) will become the only option for many people. Cycling as a sport has of recent years had something of a renaissance, and look where we are still at, in terms of day to day use.

As many posters have alluded to, its the attitudes out there. The general public's attitude toward cycling is simply not favourable. Public transport infrastructure has been allowed to crumble away. Cars are still cheap. A generation or two are now completely unused to moving themselves around and are addicted to the ease of driving. Other schoolparents thought I was mental for making my own way back from town (3 miles away) rather than driving. And I'll admit I usually drive to town.

Costing people out won't work. They'll just max out their credit cards.

If you want people to use cars less, you have to offer a more attractive alternative. Good luck with that.

And our first go at that alternative is "the very exact same - but electric."

What happens next? Slightly smaller electric cars?

As a society, we're still in the first doubling down phase.

If you want people to use cars less, you have to offer a more attractive alternative. Good luck with that.

It's as if any worthwhile societal change requires up front investment for long term gains....

If you want people to use cars less, you have to offer a more attractive alternative. Good luck with that.

or make cars less attractive?  It needs to be a combination of carrot and stick.  Car drivers paying for their parking on public land would be a useful step.  Cars monopolise public space to the detriment of all.

Electric cars are no solution.  Indeed they may well make congestion worse as the marginal cost per mile is lower than an ICE car so there is even less incentive to leave the car at home for short trips

It will take a generation to change things but it needs the political will to start.  Our dysfunctional and not fit for purpose UK political setup actively works against this.  Once again the key is actually sort out our political system

Indeed they may well make congestion worse as the marginal cost per mile is lower than an ICE car so there is even less incentive to leave the car at home for short trips

Indeed and it's worse for long trips. Since I've had an EV I've increased my annual mileage because:

Less guilt
It costs buttons to run once bought
It's so easy and pleasant to drive

I walk and bike just as much but use the car more for trips to the mountains and sea.

I don't think you will cost people out of using a car but you can make it less atractive and alternatives more attractive:

I use the train for long trips but it's always more expensive, objectively I'm stupid. Public transport and pedestrian/cycle infrastructure needs to be subsidised by a car tax per mile x weight. Every car must have a government supplied black box/meter like a water or electricity supply.
Riding a bike in town is life and health threatening - more dedicated space is needed
Cars need automatically restricting to the speed limit and the e-bike speed increasing to 30kmh, or the car speed limit in town reduced to an automatic 25kmh like the e-bikes.

Yup.

The people shouting for cars to be more expensive seem to forget (or not care, because it doesn't affect their perfect little world) about the many thousands of tradesmen and small businesses that rely on their vehicles for work.

Of course, higher motoring costs affect consumers also - you can't stick everything on trains.

Whilst I agree, getting unneccesary car use reduced is a good thing, the way it's implemented needs to be properly structured and judging by past events in all areas of day to day living, I don't trust the government to come up with a constructive and fair method

many thousands of tradesmen and small businesses that rely on their vehicles for work.

Of course, higher motoring costs affect consumers also – you can’t stick everything on trains.

Make allowances for those that need to carry materials.

It used to annoy the crap out of me when working in London. Had to leave at 5:15 to make it onto site for 6:30 because traffic was so bad along the A12/M25/A13. Mate and I are carrying our tools. Most other people are sat alone in their car to get to their job.

You'd probably find that if the roads were not so congested with cars that delivery costs would fall. Transporting by road wouldn't be fraught with traffic standstill twice a day and drivers would cover more ground in their allotted time.

Cars are more expensive, fuel costs are up, new cars cost a lot more than they did and the second hand market is nuts, insurance costs only go one way. Cars are not cheap. Credit is the only thing making them affordable for most.

As above sort public transport, start with rail and that includes the unions. It's been almost impossible to use the rail network with confidence for a long time. The strikes have made that a lot worse and its expensive and inconvient. We've done a few long trips over the last year by car we would have prefered to have used the train for but couldn't rely on them not being cancelled.

Make allowances for those that need to carry materials.

You'd hope, wouldn't you?

I don't trust that to happen though

@alpin "Make allowances for those that need to carry materials." no we don't, because everyone has an excuse why they are special, "need to carry tools", "I'm an important politician", "security", "Tarquin has a medical condition", "I've a cold and didn't want to spread it around" and that's before you get to the chancers who register themselves as a tradesman and put a toolbox in their car just so they can make the same claim. My granddad was a carpenter and he never had a car he still managed to get to work for 40 years, a combination of liftshare, company vans and public transport. It needs to be made easier for tradesmen to use public transport too. Some of it involves a wider change, how often do you employ a company for some work on your house and it turns up they travelled 30 40 50 even more miles to come? That needs to stop, especially common trades.

Make allowances for those that need to carry materials.

That's not dissimilar to the clarion cries from all the people opposed to any traffic restrictions of "but what about... tradespeople/the disabled/the elderly/those carrying fridges and and cellos and 65" TVs..."

Miraculously, they seem to lose all their care for those things as soon as they themselves have unrestricted driving privileges.

But there's an element in there of "how can anyone possibly carry anything at all without a car??!!!"

It has to start with good PT in my view.

@alpin “Make allowances for those that need to carry materials.” no we don’t, because everyone has an excuse why they are special, “need to carry tools”, “I’m an important politician”, “security”, “Tarquin has a medical condition”, “I’ve a cold and didn’t want to spread it around” and that’s before you get to the chancers who register themselves as a tradesman and put a toolbox in their car just so they can make the same claim. My granddad was a carpenter and he never had a car he still managed to get to work for 40 years, a combination of liftshare, company vans and public transport. It needs to be made easier for tradesmen to use public transport too. Some of it involves a wider change, how often do you employ a company for some work on your house and it turns up they travelled 30 40 50 even more miles to come? That needs to stop, especially common trades.

This is the f-you, I'm alright attitude I was talking about

People with complete ignorance as to what some people do for a living and why they travel

One of the biggest problems is the planning system. Local roads are controlled by councils, and all cycle lane decisions seem to come down the whims of a local councillor even if the council themselves are in favour, and most seem to be quite anti-cycling. Though they usually say something "I'm all for cycle lanes, but not here as it gets in the way of cars or car parking".

They put in a cycle route between shoreham and hove here, except a big chunk in the middle was missing, because a councillor (also a taxi driver) voted against it.
https://www.theargus.co.uk/news/18669000.plan-link-hove-shoreham-cycle-lanes-vetoed-leader/
The middle bit was the busiest most unpleasant section. The end bits were then used very little and got ripped out.

The road is now a traffic jam every morning.

They are now planning a tiny 5 mile section and fuss that's being made is absurd. People genuinely seem to think there's a conspiracy in *favour* of cycle lanes.
https://www.theargus.co.uk/news/23262579.cycle-lane-connect-brighton-hove-shoreham/

It takes years and years with endless consultations to get even shortest shared pavement route put in.

@TheArtistFormaerlyKnownAsSTR My point is that we shouldn't make allowances for people who need to travel for work, because if it's for work, they get paid for it and travel is a part, there's no problem in increasing the cost of travel for these people, because they will pass that cost on to their customers, by increasing the cost of travel, you ensure that I end up employing more local tradespeople where possible because the local tradespeople suddenly become cheaper, if there is no local alternative then I just end up paying more, and the true cost of all this transport is reflected in the end bill. At the moment the cost of that travel is either being paid by everyone in taxes,kicked down the road in terms of future generations having to clear up the mess or is already being paid at least partially by customers for having a tradesmen sitting in traffic. The cost to end users of reducing traffic an pollution won't just come in direct costs in running a car, it comes in paying for other people who's services they engage having to use cars. With any luck some of those costs may be mitigated by their being less traffic and so people who need to use them can get to their place of work quicker and therefore cheaper.

For example, Munich City has a scheme where tradesmen can register and they get to park wherever necessary for their job. Other individuals have to pay at the meter.

Something similar could be introduced for commuters travelling into congestion zones.

My granddad was a carpenter and he never had a car he still managed to get to work for 40 years, a combination of liftshare, company vans and public transport.

So he still relied on private cars, then? Did he have tools to carry?

And as much as I would have liked to travel by train to my jobs, there's little chance of me lugging a van load of tools by hand onto the 17:32 train at Liverpool Street....During rush hour. My chop saw alone weighs 30kg,then there's the stand and my drills, hand tools, materials, etc.

I used to envy the electricians who could turn up using public transport.
They sat on the train watching episodes of the Office of reading a paper.

To reduce car dependancy it needs significant investment to improve the cycling infrastructure and public transport provision.

This significant investment will require long-term commitment from the government. But the government are not bothered about long-term commitment as thats not what wins elections.

It really needs all political parties to have a commitment to long-term goals, so if there is a change in government, then the new party in charge will still continue with the commitment.

It shouldn't only be for cycling infrastructure and public transport improvement. If there was political party agreement to inprove the NHS, police, fire brigade, civil service, environment, education etc, then it would continually improve the country and we wouldn't be in the state we are in. But this thinking doesn't win elections, so we end up with short-term poorly delivered projects that aren't fit for purpose.

I used to envy the electricians who could turn up using public transport.

Then they get to site and find out that their tools have been nicked

@mahowlett - oh, if only it were that simplistic, but it really isn't. Comparisons to your grandad may work in some circumstances, but in the real modern world it's not always so straightforward.

I could tell you about what I (and many others in my line of work do), but that would seem rather 'woe is me'. So I'll use HS2 as an example. Do you think that the many thousands of specialist contractors utilised on that build, live on the doorstep, or that if they have to travel, they can just whack their prices up at the drop of a hat? Not happening

We need to start with the 'short journey' car users. The type that 'pop' to the shops that are within walking distance.
It needs to be unacceptable to drive your child to their school 'because it's safer'.
A local school near us has a row of faux 4x4 sitting outside every school term morning and afternoon.
A child is far safer walking or cycling to school, or the shops or to any other activities. They would concentrate better in the classroom, get much needed exercise and sleep better.

Firing up a stupidly sized car on our tiny packed roads for a short journey is madness.

Then they get to site and find out that their tools have been nicked

TBF, the site im thinking of they were doing the 2nd fix and snagging... A 12v Fischer Price drill and some screw drivers in a bag.

TBF, the site im thinking of they were doing the 2nd fix and snagging… A 12v Fischer Price drill and some screw drivers in a bag.

Lolz

I've had agency 'sparks' turn up on site with no tools.

"Where are your tools?

In my shed

Erm, so what did you think you were doing today?

Dunno"

This despite being told exactly what they were doing in telephone interviews

or make cars less attractive? It needs to be a combination of carrot and stick. Car drivers paying for their parking on public land would be a useful step.

There's two problems here.

First, it needs enforcing. We can't / don't enforce the infrastructure we already have, let alone making "parking on public land" chargeable nationally. It might work in city centres but, well, you should come here one lunchtime and tally up the amount of I'll Only Be a Minute-ers on the double yellows outside the chippy.

Second, again, fine in city centres but it'll be the death knell for already dying Northern town centres. I've spoken about this before but the hassle of putting a bit of cardboard in your window on a free disc-based parking scheme was enough to empty Accrington town centre, let alone charging for parking there.

Arguably on the latter, the answer might be to make people want to come to the centre for reasons other than charity shops and betting shops, like say an attractive recreational area. But that would require more budget than Hyndburn Borough Council likely has to spare.

Every car must have a government supplied black box/meter like a water or electricity supply.

What would you do about people driving over on the €⭐ from mainland Europe?

It needs to be unacceptable to drive your child to their school ‘because it’s safer’.
A local school near us has a row of faux 4×4 sitting outside every school term morning and afternoon.

I used to drive past a school on my commute. I generally missed the scrum due to timing (I was on flexible hours) but occasionally I forgot and got it wrong. 'Chaos' didn't even begin to describe it. I've never seen such a concentrated display of self-righteous privilege, zero ****s given about anyone bar themselves and their cotton wool cargo. They made the local minicab drivers look like the embodiment of courtesy.

Again though, part of this is an infrastructure problem. There needs to be a parents' car park separate from the school and an exclusion zone around the school itself. Maybe those automatic bollards like they have on bus lanes in Manchester, give a transponder to the residents who live inside them.

We need to start with the ‘short journey’ car users. The type that ‘pop’ to the shops that are within walking distance.

Electric cars is actually going to make this much worse

They are *much* easier to drive in a 'quick nip' fashion

Unlimitedly torquey, go-kart in their one pedal ability, completely silent, small nippy things, super-light steering. I can honestly see people who move to electric from ICE, who would usually walk a few mins to the post office (for example), now just hop in their EV because it's effectively an 'instant car' - no more starting up a chug chug chug engine, using a heavy gearbox, making noise, etc. It's now just open, sit, zip off. Great, but also not at all good.....

Once again I am reminded how lucky I am to live in Cardiff as school run bedlam is much rarer (bar a few places). My kids' primary school was probably 80% walking traffic, and the high school is still not bad. There are a few cars but on the odd occasion I have to do a car drop-off it's really not bad at all. No issues parking and the school traffic is only a small portion of the overall traffic on the road.

Is this because the people of Cardiff are naturally virtuous? No, it's because both areas were built and planned in the 60s and 70s so that the schools served the communities they were in properly. The only school on our side that has traffic problems is a lovely big new site that is set slightly apart from the surrounding houses. That place has a big queue of cars every morning.

I think I have seen the ultimate 'car brain' this morning - nearly outside a secondary school, alongside a university. A group of 5 school children cross a one-way side road. The car in front of me turning left into the side road and basically drove at them, stopping less than half a meter from them with a sudden application of brake.
The driver then moved off and pulled in to a parking place within a few car lengths. I pulled alongside and suggested that his move was dangerous and aggressive - while noting a car seat in the back of his car.
.
He told me that the children should not be walking to school, as it was dangerous and what did they expect? Followed by a stream of insults...

While I’d not disagree with the overall study, comparing car fumes to cigarette smoke is pretty stupid. Most folk would agree that the former has some utility whereas the latter does not.

I think that's exactly the point the survey makes, people are far too quick to absolve cars of their faults because they're cars. To the extent that the general rule of thumb for H&S is you're 10x more likely to die whilst commuting by car than is deemed an acceptable level of risk working on something like an oil refinery.

And for nuclear it's 100x, yet we* don't placard the M6 to prevent cars being used until all the safety issues have been resolved.

*apart form insulate Britain and just stop oil

If you want people to use cars less, you have to offer a more attractive alternative. Good luck with that.

15% of journeys less than a mile are done by car.
and about 75% of journeys between 1 and 5 miles are by car.

How much more attractive than "basically free" and "will actually improve your health and quality of life" do you need to make walking?

What would you do about people driving over on the €⭐ from mainland Europe?

The same as they do for Brits (or any other nationality that isn't their own), plenty of countries have various tags and systems you have to buy or sign upto before you're allowed on their roads.

I think that’s exactly the pint the survey makes, people are far too quick to absolve cars of their faults because they’re cars.

Yep. Our obsession with cars has a lot of parallels with the Americans and guns (and we know that relationship is crazy)

Is this because the people of Cardiff are naturally virtuous? No, it’s because both areas were built and planned in the 60s and 70s so that the schools served the communities they were in properly. The only school on our side that has traffic problems is a lovely big new site that is set slightly apart from the surrounding houses. That place has a big queue of cars every morning.

+1

Stevenage is like this

The best cycle network (literally - look it up) in the country. Completely segregated car+-width cycle network around the entire town (city). Under or alongside every single major road.

And funnily enough, a large majority of the kids to all the schools walk in, or ride a bike in. Or a bus if from another town. I went to one of the schools - I was from another town so got he bus. But there were *very* minimal car drop offs. HEAVES of kids walking out at the end of the day. The school were also very hot on making sure the coaches were up to scratch and affordable because the school had a large catchment area.

15% of journeys less than a mile are done by car.
and about 75% of journeys between 1 and 5 miles are by car.

When people own cars, it's going to be difficult to encourage them to not use them, which is what all those short journeys are about. For example, from my house into town is about an hour each way by bus, or about 15 mins by car - and I live on a bus route. Once you've bought and insured it, it's too easy to just pop in.

What we need is to make it viable for people not to own them in the first place. I think the main reason we have car brain is that we feel we need to buy one as soon as we can and then once it's there it gets used for everything.

How much more attractive than “basically free” and “will actually improve your health and quality of life” do you need to make walking?

Obviously it's not attractive enough, because people aren't doing it. Maybe something to do with the fact that it's physical work?

For example, from my house into town is about an hour each way by bus, or about 15 mins by car – and I live on a bus route. Once you’ve bought and insured it, it’s too easy to just pop in.

And by bike? 😉

And by bike?

For me, about 30 mins if I get a move on about 6.5 miles. For my wife and kids - who knows, but I don't thin it'd go very well. Partly because of the distance but partly because of the shit roads and they aren't even all that bad as urban roads go. But they are in no way suitable for kids and unfit middle aged people.

For me, about 30 mins if I get a move on about 6.5 miles. For my wife and kids – who knows, but I don’t thin it’d go very well. Partly because of the distance but partly because of the shit roads and they aren’t even all that bad as urban roads go. But they are in no way suitable for kids and unfit middle aged people.

Thus proving that if you banned cars:

The roads would be suitable for public use
Your whole family would be fitter
We wouldn't have another thread about your cars breaking down

Umm..

Actually banning cars immediately would be really nice, we could tootle gently down the flat smooth dual carriageway into town, that would be awesome. But I don't think my wife would make it to work. Then again, without cars we could take the M4 which would be good, if I could grab a tandem before they all sold out I could probably help get her there. Kids could cycle to school without cars on the roads, they know the way.

More seriously, the kids could cycle to school now but the route would take them through rough areas, and I don't fancy sending two young girls through those places on nickable bikes. And there's a direct bus.

(tongue in cheek, we all really love another molgrips car saga)

Ban cars for a month and see what happens and then learn from that. I was hoping that we would get something positive out of the pandemic but a LOT of companies are now insisting people are back in the office more days than not so traffic is back to pre-pandemic levels where I live. So many people worked so happily at home for two years yet that doesn't seem to factor into it.

So many people worked so happily at home for two years yet that doesn’t seem to factor into it.

I think a lot of those cars you see now are driven by people who simply didn't work at all during the pandemic and had to be paid to stay at home. Which is clearly not sustainable.

we live about 3/4 mile from the village infants school, which has about 300 pupils in it. I'd say two journeys (either droppoff or pickup) a week are by car, and its not because we need a car to get there, its because the next thing on the agenda (eg swimming lesson at the local pool which is 5 miles away, has no public transport and is fairly hostile on foot) needs a car for access. And I say that as a cargo-bikist - my wife isn't going to pedal a 60kg bike with 2 20kg kids on it around.

it only takes 1 journey per week per kid to absolutely snarl up the roads near the school, as, unsurprisingly happens.

"For example, from my house into town is about an hour each way by bus, or about 15 mins by car – and I live on a bus route. Once you’ve bought and insured it, it’s too easy to just pop in."

And by bike? 😉

Can only answer for myself here - but that would be 20 minutes in, 1 hour walk back and the need to purchase another bike. So quite an expensive and time consuming proposition.