Watch for upcoming ...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Watch for upcoming 40year old

44 Posts
28 Users
0 Reactions
167 Views
Posts: 0
Full Member
Topic starter
 

hello STW crew,
Im thinking about getting him indoors (aye right) a nice watch for his upcomng 40th, ive read loads of threads on here though most suggestions are outwith my budget. I've seen two i like, as you are mostly men, what one would you prefer that wont require me to sell a kidney............

[url= http://www.watchshop.com/mens-rotary-vintage-automatic-watch-gs02518-06-p99928002.html ]watch 1[/url]

[url= http://www.watchshop.com/mens-rotary-vintage-automatic-watch-gs02375-01-p364.html ]watch 2[/url]

cheers

 
Posted : 17/07/2011 10:38 pm
Posts: 2977
Free Member
 

A lovely idea!

Personally I prefer simple watches, with a utility feel, so something like this would be more preferable:

[url= http://www.watchshop.com/mens-wenger-battalion-watch-72326-p99933073.html ]Wenger Watch[/url]

You need to prime a mate and get him to subtly ask over a beer or two as to what kind of watches he prefers. Maybe his mate can pretend to have a similar budget.....?

 
Posted : 18/07/2011 4:47 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

mikertroid+1

I prefer a watch you can tell the time with at a glance. That Wenger looks good.

 
Posted : 18/07/2011 5:32 am
 CHB
Posts: 3226
Full Member
 

http://www.christopherward.co.uk/sale.html

 
Posted : 18/07/2011 6:07 am
 CHB
Posts: 3226
Full Member
 

http://www.christopherward.co.uk/nnc15skkr.html

 
Posted : 18/07/2011 6:09 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks for the suggestions, i'm drawn to the skeleton watches, but i see what you mean about not being able to see the time..........
watches are for posing no!??

Ideally I would get a mate involved but he's in canada for 2 months with work, actually he'll turn 40 when hes over there, I won't be able to subtly find out.

 
Posted : 18/07/2011 6:52 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

For a 40th you want something that won't date, a timeless style. The skeleton ones look a bit novelty to me. I would much prefer the Wenger.

Ohh, and get the back engraved if you can 😉

 
Posted : 18/07/2011 8:28 am
Posts: 2977
Free Member
 

Watches that look like they're designed to last are key. Simple is best.

Don't go for one YOU like, it'll only end in an uncomfortable moment!!

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 7:31 am
Posts: 859
Full Member
 

+1 on Christopher Ward

[url= http://www.christopherward.co.uk/sale/preview/mens-half-price/c15swk.html ][/url]

Got one of these and they're a beautiful watch, and a bargain at that price.

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 7:58 am
 ski
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Out of the two you mentioned I prefer the first one.

But to be frank, that Christopher Ward one looks great to me.

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 8:07 am
Posts: 496
Free Member
 

whatever the style of watch, go for sapphire crystal glass and in 10 years time, you'll still be able to see what style of watch it is 8)

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 8:30 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
Topic starter
 

thanks all
i vaguely remember him telling me that he had been given a knock off patek philippe skeleton watch, he's not getting a real one of them! thats why I quite liked the them.

i do like that christopher ward one.....

decisions decisions.

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 8:59 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The Wenger looks good .The two you like look like your best going out watch rather than for everyday use

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 8:59 am
Posts: 587
Full Member
 

I can't check the links to the Christopher Ward watches, but be aware that they don't expect the silicon straps to last more than about 18 months, and new straps cost £30+ every couple of years...

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 9:07 am
 CHB
Posts: 3226
Full Member
 

Think this one wins for me today:

http://www.christopherward.co.uk/review/product/list/id/32/category/270/

(Self confessed CW fan...have bought 3 this year since discovering them).

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 9:45 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yeah I like that one too - a nice compromise between skeleton and classic style.

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 9:49 am
Posts: 129
Free Member
 

As said above, watches are a [b]very[/b] personal thing and I'd be very worried about buying something he wouldn't like. A Patek Philippe skeleton (even a copy) is a very different object to a Rotary.

At that sort of budget it will be difficult to find a good mechanical/auto watch but the Christopher Ward ones look like good value. Have a scroll down to [url= http://www.timefactors.com/precista.htm ]PRS-5[/url] which has the skeleton back as a compromise 😉

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 9:59 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Are you even sure he'd like a watch? I haven't worn one in over a decade and I'm 52 🙂

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 10:00 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
Topic starter
 

ha, good point.
im sure he will like a watch, its not something he would buy himself, so thats why i want a nice decent keepsake. Which i might get engraved, but then that makes it definitely non-returnable.

hes also getting a telly, he should be happy enough 🙂
the first plan was to take him on a weekend break to Ny or something, but with him being out in canada thats been sidelined.

The suggestions are all good, i like CW with the black face. Its good to get alternative male points of view.

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 10:57 am
Posts: 10567
Full Member
 

£160 is an awkward amount to spend on a watch. It's never going to be a classic heirloom, and it costs 8 times what a perfectly reliable and good looking Timex or Casio does.

If you want to make him happy, spend it on expensive underwear (for you, naturally).

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 11:07 am
Posts: 16025
Free Member
 

A jeweller near me is selling vintage Omega watches (1950s) from about £300. Ok, so that's twice the budget, but a fraction of the new price, and they look far more elegant to me. Worth saving up for, IMO.

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 11:21 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

£160 is an awkward amount to spend on a watch. It's never going to be a classic heirloom, and it costs 8 times what a perfectly reliable and good looking Timex or Casio does.

There is a point to be made there. I wouldn't spend that amount on a watch (I flit between no watch and cheapo rubbish) but I am seriously considering spending £2,500 on a Tag which would be a lifetime forever watch that would be passed on to family when I kark it.

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 11:25 am
Posts: 1846
Full Member
 

I was going to recommend vintage also.

Here is an [url= http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/FAT-LUGS-OMEGA-SEAMASTER-VINTAGE-WATCH-SWISS-ORIGI-DIAL-/170657692584?pt=Wris****ches&hash=item27bbfdbba8 ]Omega[/url].

Tissot, Enicar, Favre Leuba are worth a look. It is important to check case size on vintage watches as they can appear small compared to modern trends if you are not careful. Also consider if you would be happy with a manual wind as the link above or wether automatic would be best.

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 11:28 am
Posts: 10567
Full Member
 

I have 2 watches - one which is the same age as me, which I'm wearing now, and it's the only inanimate object I have any real sentimentality for - and a £20 Timex.

I was going to get a £10 Casio, which I prefer, but I can't tell the time on a digital without my glasses.

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 12:01 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
Topic starter
 

i see what you are saying, which is why sale stuff is key!
i dont think he would be interested in a watch at 2k, or near that tbh, but i think he would be happy with a decentish keepsake to mark the event(and his telly)

the undie suggestion has merit!!
personally im happy with my 60 quid animal watch that i bought with my first uni grant check in 1996. Been through more straps than triggers brush had handles, scratched to bits but has travelled with world with me and will do always 😀

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 12:12 pm
 dti
Posts: 532
Free Member
 

seiko divers mechanical - will last forever

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 1:52 pm
Posts: 129
Free Member
 

I am seriously considering spending £2,500 on a Tag which would be a lifetime forever watch
Wouldn't be my first choice for an 'heirloom' but each to their own.

Which model?

Sorry just being nosey 8)

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 3:19 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

seiko divers mechanical

+1 - or a Citizen - eg [url= http://www.citizenwatch.com/CUK/English/detail.asp?Country=CUK&Language=English&ModelNumber=BN0070-09E ]Linky[/url]

IMO the Ward watches are all copies of much more expensive watches. The beauty of a Seiko or a Citizen is that they are not trying to be something they are not, while at the same time being suitable for proper outdoor use and looking good while dressed up too. Will last forever.

Not my main watch, but I do have one of these and love it.

[url= http://www.watchshop.com/mens-citizen-divers-automatic-watch-ny0040-09ee-p17081.html ]Another Link[/url]

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 3:57 pm
 dday
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Could I suggest:
http://www.amazon.com/Zenith-96-0529-4035-Tourbillon-Titanium-Chronograph/dp/B001K3IXW8/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1305630931&sr=8-2

The reviews really sold me! 🙂

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 4:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Seiko Kinetic...the one on my wrist right now is 20 years old, no battery's or service in that time, and even the strap is original 😉

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 4:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Victorinox had some nice at a good price

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 5:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

but I am seriously considering spending £2,500 on a Tag

do some more research - Tags are overpriced and often very ordinary inside.

A SS Rolex Sub. would be better, or an Omega Speedy as long as it has manual Lemenia type movement.

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 6:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have 2 tags, and like they said, probably overpriced, but I love them. Don't think I'll be buying another any time soon though 😉
Both grand carreras, although different models, for the record

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 6:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I nearly bought a Carrera as the wife liked it, but the movement inside was well basic for the price. Prob only matters if you were to go to a horology meet and have them all laugh at you with a Tag on your wrist.

They also had the reissue Carrera - the copy of the original Heuer one, but she wouldn't let me have that as it was too small!

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 6:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I know nothing of these things, I'm a pure aesthetics man 😉

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 6:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You can see the movement in the back of the CW ones you are looking at.. I really like mine if thats any use.

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 7:03 pm
Posts: 9440
Full Member
 

. Prob only matters if you were to go to a horology meet

You have no idea how unlikely the possibility of that occuring is in my case.

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 7:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I am seriously considering spending £2,500 on a Tag which would be a lifetime forever watch

I was told by a student who was a PA that her boss had the same Tag as me. I doubted this very much, but she reasurred me it was true.
Her boss, Spanish president of LVMH, my supplier some dude in a bar in Malaga.
For the OP, fly to Malaga, buy a cheapie, have a holiday and don't worry about pretence.

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 7:15 pm
 GJP
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I bought myself this at the weekend. In real life it is a stunner and my third seiko watch purchase in as many months. All in all seiko make some very nice and affordable, in relative terms, watches

[url= http://www.seiko.co.uk/products/seiko/c/other_seiko_watches/m/ska271p1 ]Seiko Kinetic[/url]

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 7:26 pm
Posts: 2977
Free Member
 

Yes a Seiko or Citizen Automatic divers would be a legendary choice. I'd go for Auto over Kinetic, however my Seiko Kinetic has been faultless. It's just I prefer the auto sweep of my automatic.

Slightly above budget but a great watch:

[url= http://www.casioonline.co.uk/Watches/G-Shock/Aviator/GW-3000B-1AER/ ]G-Shock[/url]

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 7:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'd go for a Seiko the Christopher Wards are interesting but I'd be happy with something like this and it will last and wont need servicing or any of that.

http://www.seiko.co.uk/products/seiko/c/other_seiko_watches/m/ska487p2_ska487p2

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 8:10 pm
 GJP
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]druidh - Member
Are you even sure he'd like a watch? I haven't worn one in over a decade and I'm 52 [/i]

Until about 3 months ago I had been the same. Not even really sure what triggered me to buy one, but they are bloody addictive little things once you start 😆

 
Posted : 19/07/2011 9:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

God damn it I knew I shouldn't have opened this thread......now I have a Christopher Ward C15 alligator watch heading my way to add to my ever increasing watch colection since my wife left me 😆

 
Posted : 20/07/2011 12:33 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's an addiction I came very cose to getting a Seiko I don't need last night.

 
Posted : 20/07/2011 9:29 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

When I got my speedy I noticed on watch forums people talking about a watch being their OWN (one watch nirvana) - it was their ultimate watch they were saving or swapping their way towards - they thought that once they had that watch it would break them of their addition as their would be nothing they wanted more. Like junkies and an ultimate fix.

The speedmaster was the cheapest OWN I could see, so I put it on my shortlist and bought the moonphase version, and it seems to be working.

 
Posted : 20/07/2011 11:07 am

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!