 You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more
[url= http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/7192900/Harriet-Harman-in-the-running-for-Rear-of-the-Year-award.html ]Clicky[/url]
This bit of the article made me chuckle...
Perhaps some of Labour's backbenchers have decided to get behind her in the competition
Get behind her....
[img] 
[/img]
Fnaar, fnaar, etc.
🙂
[img] 
[/img]
"Wide load"
###SHUDDER###
This bit of the article made me chuckle...
The whole article made chuckle. I knew that the Sun had of course covered the Wizard Jeans Rear of the Year "story", but I had no idea that the Telegraph had too.........oh, how the once mighty have fallen.
This also amused me too : [i]"who is known for her staunch feminist views"[/i] ........ Harman a "staunch" feminist ? 😀
And no, as far as I am aware the Telegraph is wrong - Harman has not called for page 3 to be banned. She has said that calenders of nude women should not be displayed at workplaces - same sort of rule as this forum applies actually. I wonder if Telegraph readers can work out the difference.
The sad thing though is that the Telegraph was once a half decent newspaper ........before that convicted criminal got hold of it.
Rear as in arse?