Todays car insuranc...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Todays car insurance conundrum

9 Posts
6 Users
0 Reactions
54 Views
Posts: 43345
Full Member
Topic starter
 

My wife has a car.
It is not currently insured.
It is taxed and MOT'd.
My van insurance states that I am covered (3rd party only) to drive any vehicle not owned by me with permission from the owner.

So - can I drive my wifes car?

If so - why does there have to be a valid insurance policy in place for it when it comes to getting it taxed?


 
Posted : 29/11/2013 12:08 am
Posts: 4643
Full Member
 

The law's changed and under continual insurance you're now required to insure any vehicle that us currently taxed.

Your third party cover may cover you, but you can be pulled for not complying with the above.


 
Posted : 29/11/2013 12:13 am
Posts: 43345
Full Member
Topic starter
 

[quote=hot_fiat ]The law's changed and under continual insurance you're now required to insure any vehicle that us currently taxed.
Your third party cover may cover you, but you can be pulled for not complying with the above.
I knew it was too simple 😆


 
Posted : 29/11/2013 12:16 am
Posts: 39449
Free Member
 

You cant.

The car has to be insured by the owner for you to be able to drive it insured by your policy. Otherwise we could have a fleet of uninsured cars under the mrs' name and i could insure a cheap car f/c 🙂

Also youll flag on police anpr as uninsured.

You also wouldnt be able to park it in a public place.


 
Posted : 29/11/2013 12:16 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

The equivalent clause in my insurance says I can drive any car with the permission of the owner [i]as long as it is otherwise ensured[/i]. i.e. can't drive a car that doesn't have it"s own insurance, even though that insurance doesn't have to cover me. If that makes sense.


 
Posted : 29/11/2013 12:18 am
Posts: 4643
Full Member
 

The C-I fines are now automatic and pretty punitive (£1000+) as well as seizure of the vehicle, (even if it's not on the public highway) supposedly with very little lee-way. In some circumstances the vehicle can be destroyed.


 
Posted : 29/11/2013 12:22 am
 sbob
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The car has to be insured by the owner for you to be able to drive it insured by your policy.

This isn't necessarily true.

You also wouldn't be able to park it in a public place.

But this is.


 
Posted : 29/11/2013 12:45 am
Posts: 39449
Free Member
 

Aye your right if its a traders policy.


 
Posted : 29/11/2013 12:47 am
 sbob
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Not all policies have the "as long as it is otherwise ensured" clause, I know most of mine haven't (I've used about six or seven different insurers over the years).

The law's changed and under continual insurance you're now required to insure any vehicle that us currently taxed.

Not quite true. The simple way of looking at it is either SORN or tax and insured, however there isn't actually any legal need to surrender your tax when declaring SORN.

Apparantly.


 
Posted : 29/11/2013 1:19 am
Posts: 4170
Free Member
 

The real problem is not just that you can't drive it, but your wife has to declare it SORN, ie, off the road. If she doesn't she could be proscuted and I think it could be confiscated. The law is intended to make it difficult for people to who don't insure their cars, but it has a daft side effect for law abiding people who are changing cars or are temporarily uninsured and not planning to use them.


 
Posted : 29/11/2013 7:43 am

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!