You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more
It's Friday, I've not asked recently, but any chance of some Kylie pictures. TVM
Kylie? Grannyporn
Kylie? Grannyporn
Nah, she is younger than me!
yossarian - Member
Kylie? Grannyporn
Whatever floats your boat. But I defo prefer Kylie!
Kylie Bax?
[img] 
[/img]
Wallace 1492, thank you very much 😀
Droooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool............
No problem Pig Hitter. Is her label showing?
Is her label showing?
Not sure, could do with another picture for comparison purposes, honest 😉
She is old and used ... 🙄
[b]Chewkw[/b] That is both weird and rather offensive... 👿
Do you mean you only find young virgins attractive? ❓
You not got Google Pig Hitter?
LIKE
Stoatsbrother - MemberChewkw That is both weird and rather offensive...
Do you mean you only find young virgins attractive?
Nope. I rather them single and not attached as I don't like looking at someone else "property".
You not got Google Pig Hitter?
I was at work at the time and [b]'Access Denied'[/b] for anything with a hint of skin on it, at home now and all is well!
A toast to Harry the Spider.
He took one for the team, brightened up "Kylie Friday".
I don't like looking at someone else "property".
Phew! That's not offensive at all then.
For a moment there I was worried you were going to get all mysoginistic. 😀
GrahamS - MemberI don't like looking at someone else "property".
Phew! That's not offensive at all then...
I always thought one of the gender has to be more submissive once they agreed to be with each other ... 😆
For a moment there I was worried you were going to get all mysoginistic.
If they are my type and do not belong to someone else then I like them but sometimes they can do my head in ... arrghhh ... 🙄
What is offensive
1. Chaps admiring an lovely looking lass
2. Chap regarding a woman as used property
Puts PC into perspective don't it?
If they are my type and do not belong to someone else then I like them......
Lucky girls.