The White House Bal...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

The White House Ballroom

60 Posts
35 Users
14 Reactions
1,766 Views
Posts: 23107
Free Member
Topic starter
 

 

 

I have no idea how he has been allowed to do it, but it got me thinking… What other public buildings would benefit from a TrumpianExtension™?

 

I think that The Tower of London would benefit from a series of flumes.


 
Posted : 21/10/2025 10:09 am
Cletus reacted
Posts: 30093
Full Member
 

I wonder if Downing Street still has all Johnson's glam up features.


 
Posted : 21/10/2025 10:13 am
Posts: 12482
Free Member
 

I wonder if Downing Street still has all Johnson's glam up features.

I would think it would be covered in Israeli flags these day.


 
Posted : 21/10/2025 10:16 am
Posts: 8819
Free Member
 

Wrestlemania ring in the Capitol?


 
Posted : 21/10/2025 10:22 am
Posts: 30093
Full Member
 

That's being installed in the Lyndon Baines Johnson Building for Linda McMahon I suspect.


 
Posted : 21/10/2025 10:27 am
Posts: 56564
Full Member
 

A gravy wrestling ring instead of the despatch box in the houses of parliament 

IMG_0881.jpeg


 
Posted : 21/10/2025 10:55 am
Posts: 6209
Full Member
 

Chequers could do with a "Gracelands" make over surely seeing as it looks so old and tired.


 
Posted : 21/10/2025 11:04 am
Posts: 4420
Free Member
 

I wonder if Downing Street still has all Johnson's glam up features.

Hope so.  Who'd want to live in a place full of stuff from John Lewis?  Imagine the embarrassment when people found out that your armchair only cost £2000


 
Posted : 21/10/2025 11:08 am
Posts: 30093
Full Member
 

Chequers could do with a "Gracelands" make over surely seeing as it looks so old and tired.

Johnson was going to build some treehouse thing in the grounds (not sure he was planning for it to be a tourist attraction after he'd gone, but you never know).


 
Posted : 21/10/2025 11:31 am
Posts: 6688
Full Member
 

I'd like to see Windsor Castle get a cage with a swing for Andy to be gloated on by the public. 


 
Posted : 21/10/2025 11:38 am
fossy reacted
Posts: 20169
Full Member
 

Posted by: kelvin

Johnson was going to build some treehouse thing in the grounds

Add that to the list of wildly overenthusiastic infrastructure projects he pushed forward: Boris Island (airport in the Thames thing), Garden Bridge, bridge / tunnel to Northern Ireland, 40 new hospitals...

Treehouse in the grounds of Chequers...

Guess it would have been good for his 6 / 7 / 8 /9 children.


 
Posted : 21/10/2025 11:40 am
Posts: 11961
Full Member
 

Posted by: Harry_the_Spider

I have no idea how he has been allowed to do it

He won the election, became the President, and then gets to decide stuff. Not saying he's making good decisions, but it's because he won the election.

As far as the ballroom goes, there are much more important things to worry about than that.


 
Posted : 21/10/2025 11:44 am
Posts: 3257
Free Member
 

Posted by: Caher

I'd like to see Windsor Castle get a cage with a swing for Andy to be gloated on by the public. 

Pretty sure the Tower has some good contraptions that could be borrowed for that particular installation. I know a few yeoman warders so I'm sure we could make it happen...

 


 
Posted : 21/10/2025 11:46 am
Posts: 5484
Full Member
 

As far as the ballroom goes, there are much more important things to worry about than that.

That maybe so - but sometimes it can be something like this that brings a man down


 
Posted : 21/10/2025 11:47 am
Posts: 7618
Free Member
 

The images are an good pictorial representation of his respect for the office, traditions, and peoples of America.

He literally doesn't care as long as it makes him look better in his distorted world view.


 
Posted : 21/10/2025 12:00 pm
CountZero reacted
Posts: 790
Free Member
 

I’m sure it’ll be as tasteless as we can imagine.  But I note (i) many presidents over the years have remodelled various parts of the White House, and (ii) if it were in the UK we’d still be debating if we shouldn’t hold a public enquiry as to whether it may even be possible to contemplate the possibility of doing the work.


 
Posted : 21/10/2025 12:06 pm
Posts: 2022
Full Member
 

Stonehenge is looking a bit dull nowadays. Maybe gold plate the stones and build a golf course and massage spa around it?

That guy Andy something likes money and golf and is not busy - I am sure he would be up to being the manager of it.

 

 
Posted : 21/10/2025 1:04 pm
Dickyboy reacted
Posts: 32265
Full Member
 

Posted by: onehundredthidiot


The images are an good pictorial representation of his respect for the office, traditions, and peoples of America.

He literally doesn't care as long as it makes him look better in his distorted world view.

It's also not the action of a bloke who is going to move out in 3 years.

It's a shocking waste of public funds

 


 
Posted : 21/10/2025 1:09 pm
Posts: 6209
Full Member
 

Taj Mahal needs more bling doesn't it?


 
Posted : 21/10/2025 1:14 pm
Posts: 23107
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Maybe, when the time comes, they'll display the Epstein List in there like the Bayeux Tapestry.


 
Posted : 21/10/2025 1:17 pm
Cletus and AD reacted
Posts: 790
Free Member
 

It’s being paid for by Trump and his mates - naming rights no doubt to be offered.


 
Posted : 21/10/2025 1:40 pm
Posts: 77347
Free Member
 

Trump has expressly forbidden anyone from taking photos of the demolition.

So here's a video.

https://bsky.app/profile/cwebbonline.com/post/3m3oetlytss2x


 
Posted : 21/10/2025 2:26 pm
Posts: 1114
Full Member
 

Ball Room, was this a Clinton thing?


 
Posted : 21/10/2025 2:59 pm
reeksy reacted
Posts: 9201
Full Member
 

Posted by: crazy-legs

Add that to the list of wildly overenthusiastic infrastructure projects he pushed forward: Boris Island (airport in the Thames thing), Garden Bridge, bridge / tunnel to Northern Ireland, 40 new hospitals...

 

Garden Bridge was actually a pretty cool idea that, if delivered well, would have been ace


 
Posted : 21/10/2025 3:09 pm
Posts: 6209
Full Member
 

Garden Bridge was actually a pretty cool idea that, if delivered well, would have been ace.

I'm pretty sure the £50M + spent on not building it could have been put to much much better use elsewhere in the country.


 
Posted : 21/10/2025 3:29 pm
Posts: 7033
Free Member
 

Posted by: nwgiles

Ball Room, was this a Clinton thing?

Clinton did not have relations with that room.

 

As an aside, at this stage in Trump's presence in the presidency, I'm by default assuming the company doing the demolition & build are his?


 
Posted : 21/10/2025 3:40 pm
Posts: 5222
Free Member
 

Posted by: Dickyboy

I'm pretty sure the £50M + spent on not building it could have been put to much much better use elsewhere in the country.

I'm sure the Mone's could put it to good use...


 
Posted : 21/10/2025 3:56 pm
Posts: 13134
Full Member
 

Given I'm not a US tax payer and don't GAF about a nation that elected Trump....I do think it's going to provide some excellent laughs for future presidents. This is Donald Trump commissioning it here so it's going to be in the worst possible taste. As a future leader you'll be able to take VIPs on televised tours of your gaff and all piss yourself at the shite decor in the Trump ball room. Chip bits off and donate it for charity raffles just to engage the orange one in his retirement home somewhere. Selfies with a horrific gargoyle or chandelier. Use it for parties for immigrants. The list will be endless.   


 
Posted : 21/10/2025 4:15 pm
Posts: 3943
Free Member
 

He’s just making money from it. The donations to fund it will be a tax write down so the tax payers will fund it and it’s probably being built by one of his companies. So the us taxpayers gets a ballroom and trump makes lots of money from it


 
Posted : 21/10/2025 6:43 pm
Posts: 77347
Free Member
 

Posted by: mrmonkfinger

Clinton did not have relations with that room.

 

Just held his balls there.

 


 
Posted : 21/10/2025 8:18 pm
Posts: 1670
Free Member
 

Posted by: franksinatra

Garden Bridge was actually a pretty cool idea that, if delivered well, would have been ace

Was that the one that Joanna Lumley didn't want to let cyclists use?

 


 
Posted : 21/10/2025 8:51 pm
Posts: 6257
Full Member
 

I do think it's going to provide some excellent laughs for future presidents.

Yeah I'm not sure Trump's factoring that in to any decisions.


 
Posted : 22/10/2025 4:24 am
Posts: 20675
 

Are there not planning restrictions in America like we have here? Given how difficult making changes to some unremarkable, but still grade 2 listed, buildings is,  you’d think there’d be someone to step in if some bellend wanted to mess about with one of the most recognisable buildings in the world?

He’d just fire them, and install some one with a less discerning eye for taste, but still. 


 
Posted : 22/10/2025 4:52 am
Posts: 20675
 

Are there not planning restrictions in America like we have here? Given how difficult making changes to some unremarkable, but still grade 2 listed, buildings is,  you’d think there’d be someone to step in if some bellend wanted to mess about with one of the most recognisable buildings in the world?

He’d just fire them, and install some one with a less discerning eye for taste, but still. 


 
Posted : 22/10/2025 4:52 am
Posts: 32265
Full Member
 

Posted by: convert

Given I'm not a US tax payer and don't GAF about a nation that elected Trump

Given that we have politicians modelling themselves on the orange shitgibbon and his antics, I think that might be an overly optimistic approach


 
Posted : 22/10/2025 6:47 am
Posts: 4579
Full Member
 

He's just carrying on the fine work that the Redcoats started in 1814.


 
Posted : 22/10/2025 6:54 am
Posts: 1243
Full Member
 

Posted by: tomhoward

Are there not planning restrictions in America like we have here? Given how difficult making changes to some unremarkable, but still grade 2 listed, buildings is,  you’d think there’d be someone to step in if some bellend wanted to mess about with one of the most recognisable buildings in the world?

He’d just fire them, and install some one with a less discerning eye for taste, but still

Yes, in theory there are. This (BBC) report talks about the National Parks Service having some sort of oversight, but "something, something Woke, something, something DEI" would doubtless kick in first.


 
Posted : 22/10/2025 8:47 am
Posts: 13134
Full Member
 

Given that we have politicians modelling themselves on the orange shitgibbon and his antics, I think that might be an overly optimistic approach

 
What I meant was - It's not my money he's spaffing and if it's mostly the money of people that voted for the orange shitgibbon I'm not going to lose too much sleep about the waste. 

 
Posted : 22/10/2025 8:55 am
Posts: 23107
Free Member
Topic starter
 

He's building a mausoleum for himself. The 21st century equivalent of a pyramid. 


 
Posted : 22/10/2025 8:59 am
Posts: 8819
Full Member
 

No Pharos?


 
Posted : 22/10/2025 9:08 am
Posts: 837
Free Member
 

Wonder if Melania's got secret plans for an extra patio out the back? Seems like the perfect opportunity


 
Posted : 22/10/2025 9:09 am
Posts: 20169
Full Member
 

Posted by: Harry_the_Spider

He's building a mausoleum for himself. The 21st century equivalent of a pyramid. 

I reckon he's been to Windsor Castle and a couple of other royal buildings on his two state visits and gone home thinking "I want me some of that but more golder-er"

It'll be an absolute tat-fest. Like when the Allied forces reached Saddam's palace and found gold and marble fittings everywhere, gold-plated AK47s. It's the tackiest of tack. 


 
Posted : 22/10/2025 9:41 am
Posts: 65918
Free Member
 

The metaphors are just amazing though, the white house is being demolished and the Constitution is closed to the public


 
Posted : 22/10/2025 2:30 pm
Posts: 77347
Free Member
 

Apologies if I've fundamentally misunderstood US politics but,

Isn't Trump's increasingly deranged behaviour exactly why they (still) have the Second Amendment?


 
Posted : 22/10/2025 2:47 pm
Posts: 8819
Full Member
 

I think it's the reason they have the 25th amendment (and yes, I did have to search for that one)


 
Posted : 22/10/2025 2:53 pm
Posts: 33325
Full Member
 

Posted by: Harry_the_Spider

Posted by: Harry_the_Spider

 

I have no idea how he has been allowed to do it

 

 

He won the election, became the President, and then gets to decide stuff. Not saying he's making good decisions, but it's because he won the election.

He hasn’t, but as far as King Drumph is concerned, he can do anything he wants, whenever he wants, and won’t take no for an answer, going ahead and demolishing the East Wing is him saying, effectively, “now what are you gonna do, hmmm?”

Same as allowing Texas to demand the Shuttle Orbiter to be removed from the Smithsonian, despite it actually belonging to NASA, and who gifted it to the Smithsonian, which is not a Federal entity. 


 
Posted : 24/10/2025 1:26 am
Posts: 33325
Full Member
 

Posted by: Harry_the_Spider

He's building a mausoleum for himself. The 21st century equivalent of a pyramid.

Well, if he suddenly disappears, it won’t be the patio they’ll be looking under…


 
Posted : 24/10/2025 1:28 am
Posts: 33325
Full Member
 

Posted by: MoreCashThanDash

It's a shocking waste of public funds

It ain’t the public who’s paying for it. It’s businesses who are coughing up the money, like dangling keys in front of a toddler, to keep his tiny little mind occupied so he doesn’t go an another deranged rant telling them they’ve got to shift entire manufacturing plants from Asia to America overnight.


 
Posted : 24/10/2025 1:33 am
Posts: 7086
Full Member
 

Posted by: nwgiles

Ball Room, was this a Clinton thing?

I heard it had a humidor 

 


 
Posted : 24/10/2025 5:38 am
Posts: 22922
Full Member
 

He won the election, became the President, and then gets to decide stuff. Not saying he's making good decisions, but it's because he won the election.

As far as the ballroom goes, there are much more important things to worry about than that.

the various phases of the building of the Whitehouse seem to be attributed to presidents  - the collonades we Jefferson apparently. The East Wing, depending on context, is attributed to either FDR or his wife, in that amongst other things it houses the First Lady's office and wider department reflecting an expansion in that role during Elenor Roosevelts tenure. But the building is mostly the 'visitor centre' part of the complex - it's where you arrive if you take a public tour. But it also serves the purpose of of hiding a great big underground bunker as it was built at the dawn of the Cold War. So while presidents get involved in choosing some of the prettier elements and cut the ribbon at the end it seems to me presidential terms are too short for any sizeable changes or additions to be conceived and executed during one (FDR served 4 terms but he could only have expected to serve one at a time). The east wing expansion was probably, really an initiative of the military and the building you see is really  just there to hide their infrastructure.

The key difference here is unlike previous presidents (even unlike his own previous term) Trump is doing very little 'president' work - he presents the impression of doing work - signing things that look like work and holding them up to the camera - but he's all but stopped attending all the functional elements of government  - he's signed a record high number of presidential orders but actually delivered a record low volume of legislation. He should be at twice weekly national security briefings - he's attended 5 since January. He's got time to involve himself in this because he as withdrawn from much of the actual role of 'president'

the National Parks Service having some sort of oversight, but "something, something Woke, something, something DEI" would doubtless kick in first.

theres also the trifling issue of the government being in shut down - so there functionally is no National Parks Service or any other agency with oversight at the moment

 

 

 


 
Posted : 24/10/2025 5:47 am
Posts: 32265
Full Member
 

Apparently the Presidential bunker is being worked on as part of the redevelopment. 

It might not be being paid for by taxpayers dollars, but it is being paid for by Big Business, and such a "gift" presumably results in favours* in return.

Leavitt had caused a bit of a fuss in the US having stated that the ballroom is Trimps priority at the moment. Not the shutdown, not the loss of access to food, or health care.

*there is some speculation that Trumps cancellation of sending ICE and the NG into San Francisco was due to the Silicon Valley peeps not wanting any of that shit in their backyard.


 
Posted : 24/10/2025 7:51 am
Posts: 77347
Free Member
 

Posted by: nwgiles

Posted by: nwgiles

 

Ball Room, was this a Clinton thing?

 

 

I heard it had a humidor 

So, a place for to hold balls and fat cigars?


 
Posted : 24/10/2025 11:38 am
Posts: 77347
Free Member
 

Posted by: maccruiskeen

The east wing expansion was probably, really an initiative of the military and the building you see is really  just there to hide their infrastructure.

I'm not saying you're wrong - it sounds like you know what you're talking about and I don't have the first clue -but surely if you were building a secret military base then the dead last place you'd want to build it is as a semi-detached to what's left of the Whitehouse?


 
Posted : 24/10/2025 11:42 am
Posts: 906
Full Member
 

Looks like the demolition may have taken out quite a bit more than the initial images showed: 

 

 


 
Posted : 24/10/2025 11:45 am
kelvin reacted
Posts: 8819
Full Member
 

Yup, looks like it is the whole of the East Wing. So much for not touching that part of the building.


 
Posted : 24/10/2025 11:49 am
Posts: 77347
Free Member
 

Aside: I've been to the Pentagon.  During the Cold War the USSR believed that "The Pentagon" was the bit in the middle rather than the infrastructure around it.  Though she didn't say so explicitly, the tour guide strongly implied that this was in no small part due to propaganda/misinformation spread by the USA.

It's a hotdog stand. 

Workers at the Pentagon used to joke that they had the most heavily guarded hotdog stall in the entire world. 😆

(Incidentally, should you ever find yourself in DC, I'd recommend the tour before Trump decides to turn it into the Hexagon.  It's an astonishing place for many reasons beyond the ones you'd immediately expect.)

 


 
Posted : 24/10/2025 11:50 am
Posts: 30093
Full Member
 

Unless it's in the near future... there are no tours currently because of the "shutdown".

Public servants aren't being paid... while they watch the White House being literally torn down to satisfy the vanity of their... er... King?


 
Posted : 24/10/2025 12:04 pm
Posts: 3943
Free Member
 

Posted by: MoreCashThanDash

It might not be being paid for by taxpayers dollars, but it is being paid for by Big Business, and such a "gift" presumably results in favours* in return.

It is paid for by us taxpayers as those donors will offset it against their tax bil


 
Posted : 24/10/2025 12:29 pm
Posts: 30093
Full Member
 


 
Posted : 24/10/2025 4:06 pm
Posts: 22922
Full Member
 

I'm not saying you're wrong - it sounds like you know what you're talking about and I don't have the first clue -but surely if you were building a secret military base then the dead last place you'd want to build it is as a semi-detached to what's left of the Whitehouse?

I guess where it needs to be is the fewest number of steps from the Oval Office possible. It’s not secret it’s just there because militarily you need to have a place of safety for the president and cabinet 

 

it is also of course the place Trump fled to prior to his ‘holding bible upside down outside a church’ episode during his first presidency 


 
Posted : 24/10/2025 5:15 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!