[Closed] the royal baby, diana and facebook.....

The internet is plauged by people posting bollix ... 😳

wtf.

You're the one who is spreading it.

It's actually quite nice I might post it on FB

Thanks for sharing, that's really rather amusing

Makes my heart melt. Just lovely.

Truly she was the People's Princess.

[img] [/img]

...are the top 3 things I currently couldn't give a turd about?

I cant read it for the tears , is there an audio version?

is there an audio version?

There is. Read by Brian Blessed.

I wonder why this film is banned?

In addition to the disdain of the royals after splitting from Charles, remember her work trying to ban landmines~ Clinton was set to sign a treaty banning them, though he changed tack after her death

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_did_Diana_Princess_of_Wales_help_ban_land_mines

http://www.nytimes.com/1997/09/18/opinion/america-absent-on-land-mines.html

she also received threats from defence minister Nicholas Soames

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/28297/Accidents-can-happen-Warning-to-Diana-from-Prince-Charles-s-friend

and of course, Jimmy Savile pops in for good measure:

http://www.****/femail/article-565179/Jim-fixer-Is-Jimmy-Savile-just-fantasist---truth-stranger-fiction.html

jive, you sure you don't know kaesea... working on a joint project...

I wonder why this film is banned?

I can only assume that it's because it contains Piers Morgan.

I wonder why this film is banned?

As it was funded by Al fayed I can only imagine the truth it can tell. If there was one objective rational source of information on this incident i would go to it is the grieving father with the axe to grind.
Good source of unbiased information

CHEERS

jive, you sure you [s]don't know [/s] aren't kaesea...

Ftfy

I tell you what, that there Junkyard is certainly very good at this arguing business... a handy life skill.

Regardless of funding, the facts remain...

They posted it as a ridiculous pisstake yes? Please.

I tell you what, that there Junkyard is certainly very good at this arguing business..

A good friend buys all this so I enjoy the debate on it.
I am sure there will be some truth in one of them but I dont know which one and many are incredulous to be fair. JFK would be my bet if I had to gamble.

Regardless of funding, the facts remain

http://www.theonion.com/articles/royal-baby-born,33171/

Praise or sarcasm I cannot decide so Chapeau

Truth be told, I'm struggling to decide too, but I'm feeling nice, so take it as praise 😉

Warms yer cockles dunnit, bless 'em

Thanks Alpin for my lol of the day.

When do we get our extra bank holiday?

aaaaaaagggggh make it stop.

I'd rather shut my bits in a car door than have to listen to more drivel.

Oooh its called George <gun to own head> BLAM.

George is a beautiful British name. A proper royal name too.

Not sure about Louis though. Who thought of that ffs ?

The most read story on the BBC this morning was 'Royal baby yet to be named' or similar...does that really need a whole article?

Is the baby called George ?

Should have been called "George Spencer Hewitt Henry Windsor" to cover all angles

Not sure about Louis though. Who thought of that ffs

[img] [/img]

Only to family and close friends crankboy. You and other loyal subjects will know him as His Royal Highness Prince George.

Or George the **** for short (uses many of the letters of cute)

Or George the **** for short (uses many of the letters of cute)

So he's only a few hours old and he has already a questionable personality ?

Some folks are just born that way 😀

Nevertheless, lets give him the benefit of the doubt... maybe he'll be the 1st Royal to condemn war?

Yes, some of you are.

So he's only a few hours old and he has already a questionable personality ?

Do you really care?

Little baby for a nice couple; some people need to get a grip.

Do you really care?

Well I'm fascinated to learn that he's already a "****" despite only being alive for a few hours, most of which presumably involved sleeping, with occasional breaks for feeding.

He looks quite innocent :

[img] [/img]

Said it before but... I'm not a royalist - in fact more republican than anything and I begrudge the cost the civil list represents. However, it really takes a special kind of person to resent a small baby or be cynical about how joyous the arrival of a new baby is to new parents, their family and friends...

Yes, there is too much pointless media coverage, no he isn't any more special than any other baby, but ranting wont change it. Best to ignore it, work positively towards the changes you want in society or accept the society you live in...

Oh and George is a great name! It's the name of my late and second favourite uncle, the name of my favourite Beatle and the second name of one of my sons.

ivehoneyjive - Member

she also received threats from defence minister Nicholas Soames

I'd imagine that anyone in close proximity to Soames would be worried they were about to be eaten

Nice to have Kaesea back though.

*wanders off to start zionist conspiracy theory thread about the middle east*

[i]However, it really takes a special kind of person to resent a small baby or be cynical about how joyous the arrival of a new baby is to new parents, their family and friends[/i]

I think its the media circus surrounding it that gets folk's backs up.

Personally I am delighted fro them
However I dont need the media circus nor care any more than when two other complete strangers have a baby

Camped outside for weeks when the announcement would not even be made at the hospital and then updating me constantly about the fact they have no information what so ever to tell me

I think that's what I was saying 😉

Whats become clear over the last week is that the royal family do actually perform an essential public service.

They give the terminally bewlidered, and hopelessly naive simpletons something to coo over. And temporarily distract the Daily Mail reading classes from spittle-flecked rants about illegal immigrant lesbian single mothers on benefits.

And of course, they are invaluable to the survival of the ceramics industry

[img] [/img]

I think that's what I was saying

You missed one Binners

The "Diana conspiracy test" is also a brilliant way of finding out whether you are dealing with a nutjob or not

OK, I admit it, I forgot about the ceramics industry and their mugs.

Maybe that's what saw to the Greek economy 😆

I wonder why this film is banned?

[img] [/img]

binners - Member
Whats become clear over the last week is that the royal family do actually perform an essential public service.

They give the terminally bewlidered, and hopelessly naive simpletons something to coo over. And temporarily distract the Daily Mail reading classes from spittle-flecked rants about illegal immigrant lesbian single mothers on benefits.

^^this!
I had to deal with my mum telling me about the royal baby names last night, I kept pretending I didnt know what baby she was talking about but it didnt stop her

Who banned it?

Film classification folk I assume

But...I heard on the news that someone heard on the news it was a black baby?

They give the terminally bewlidered, and hopelessly naive simpletons something to coo over.

Luckily more enlightened punters on a mtb forum simply ignore the media circus and refuse to even comment on this piece of overblown non-news.

I would say calling a baby a **** is pretty uncalled for.

I doubt the baby cares about random comments posted on a mountain bike forum,it is just you wanting to be a precious little darling about it.

ernie_lynch
George is a beautiful British name. A proper royal name too.

Wikipedia
In Germany, the name has been popular since the Middle Ages, declining later use. In Britain, despite being St. George the patron of England since the fourteenth century, the name did not become popular until the eighteenth century following the accession of George I of Great Britain.

George 1st, the German king of England.

Not sure about Louis though. Who thought of that ffs ?

George 1st's middle name was Louis (Well, he was Georg Ludwig to start off) and this chap might have something to do with it....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Mountbatten,_1st_Earl_Mountbatten_of_Burma

"Mountbatten" ???

That sounds well foreign to me. Not surprised he was called Louis.

George on the other hand, is a Beautiful British Name.

Nice to have Kaesea back though.

Like all good conspiracy theories, I don't think this is actually true. I can see a bunch of stuff relating to their site access and their profiles are different enough for me to believe they're two distinct people.

Theoretically it's possible that they are the same person and Kaesae has been very clever about it, but, well, I'll leave calculating the likelyhood of him being clever about something as an exercise for the reader.

I don't know why but the name mountbatten makes me think of battenberg... might have nip to the co-op for some now with a nice cup of tea.
carry on btw 🙂

I don't know why the constant comparisons with Kaesae. Kaesae started highly popular threads and provoked challenging debates, however [i]unusual[/i] some of his views were. He was clearly a different person. And yes Cougar, I think there was a reasonable possibility that Kaesae could be [i] clever about something[/i], but well done for including a little dig at him, despite the fact that he can't defend himself. Still, Kaesae was constantly bullied and ridiculed on here, so at least your comment is in keeping with that spirit.

Film classification folk I assume

I would say calling a baby a **** is pretty uncalled for.

TBH though I think Charles should have encouraged his sons to be gay, so that at least he was actually as ecofriendly as he makes out to be.

http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/environment/birth-of-royal-baby-pushes-human-population-beyond-sustainability-2013072376562

I was bored...

[URL= http://i551.photobucket.com/albums/ii450/LeeWilliams1976/yeehaw_zps07e52ade.jp g" target="_blank">http://i551.photobucket.com/albums/ii450/LeeWilliams1976/yeehaw_zps07e52ade.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL]

I'm going to send the design to the Frampton mint and see if they want to print them. I reckon I should make a fortune.

I think this is lovely.

[img] ?351[/img]

Specially as Prince William has such an impressive head of hair.

I presume the newspapers doing the gushing are the ones who criticise North Korea for their ridiculous outpourings over their unelected rulers.

(courtesy Mark Steele)

All hail the grand and glorious * family and their contributions to the military might of our great nation.

Why was it they changed the family name in 1917 again? *s 😆

Orf with his head and feed the corgis on his entrails!!

is there an audio version?

There is. Read by Brian Blessed.

I prefer the version read by Joe Pasquali.

I think this is lovely.

If they do a tea towel version then I'll buy one. You can always judge a person's nature by the tea towels they own.