The James Webb spac...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

The James Webb space telescope

368 Posts
92 Users
5 Reactions
2,453 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

zx970
Full Member
“Being deployed to an L2 orbit beyond the Moon so out of range of any human or indeed robot servicing mission”.

I don't get how it could be out of range for a robot tbh. It has a docking ring, so surely if it did go belly up they could at worst just send a ship out and tow it back if worst really comes to worst.

Same with when it runs out of fuel in ten years, why not just send up a fuel ship to dock with it?


 
Posted : 05/01/2022 5:10 pm
Posts: 13916
Free Member
 

I don’t get how it could be out of range for a robot tbh.

Yeah.... If the telescope has got there then something can do so also Shirley.


 
Posted : 05/01/2022 5:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

to be honest I suspect they have these kinda contingence plans. If not, I want a job at NASA. 😆

Guess it works well for the narrative though, so why not I guess. Nothing wrong with a bit of harmless drama added to the story.


 
Posted : 05/01/2022 5:24 pm
Posts: 10539
Full Member
 

1. The PAF isn't designed for in-space docking, it's just designed to hold the payload to the launcher and is often jettisoned after separation anyway.

2. In its currently deployed state, the PAF is/would be completely useless as a docking point as a.) its covered by a deployed solar panel and b.) you'd have to maneuver around the fragile sun-shield to do anything at all with the optics. Hubble was essentially a KH11 modified for celestial observation and as such is designed to be loaded, unloaded and potentially reloaded into the SS - by comparison, it is VERY robust.

3. The JWST spacecraft wasn't designed to be refueled in space, so there's likely no simple method for topping up the tanks. They may well be at the core of the structure. This was certainly the case for Bepi-Columbo.

4. ANY robot mission would have to be designed from the ground up to deal with EVERY eventuality all on it's own as the communication delay could be disastrous should they lose control of the robot. It wouldn't be cheap or easy to do this. You might almost be as well building another JWST and sending a new one out there. All of the design and launch specifics are now known.


 
Posted : 05/01/2022 5:37 pm
Posts: 9135
Full Member
 

Has it found anything interesting yet ?.

A distant rock perhaps 🙂


 
Posted : 05/01/2022 5:39 pm
Posts: 17779
Full Member
 

Er, no, it's still spreading its wings.


 
Posted : 05/01/2022 7:16 pm
Posts: 1013
Free Member
 

I still really, really hope it works.


 
Posted : 05/01/2022 9:02 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Now the sunshield is properly deployed and the secondary mirror down and in place they can do some science with it even if the primary mirror does not deploy properly. Just won't be as much science as with the full mirror.

But yes, I also hope it fully deploys and works as expected...


 
Posted : 05/01/2022 10:18 pm
Posts: 20561
Free Member
 

Same with when it runs out of fuel in ten years, why not just send up a fuel ship to dock with it?

They have already stated that the onboard fuel will last longer than the initial estimate of 10 years as the Ariane launch was so accurate it put it into an almost perfect flightpath with very little additional correction required.


 
Posted : 06/01/2022 9:50 am
Posts: 13916
Free Member
 

ANY robot mission would have to be designed from the ground up to deal with EVERY eventuality all on it’s own as the communication delay could be disastrous should they lose control of the robot. It wouldn’t be cheap or easy to do this.

I believe a certain SpaceX have managed just that already with the Dragon.
And if running out of fuel means end of life for the JW then what is there to lose if the robot got it wrong (other than a few $m obvs) 🙂


 
Posted : 06/01/2022 3:15 pm
Posts: 65918
Free Member
 

sharkbait
Free Member

I believe a certain SpaceX have managed just that already with the Dragon.

Dragon 2... But it was built to do a fairly limited set of missions, and was following directly in the footsteps of Dragon 1 so it was more a case of making a previously human-interacted process autonomous, much easier than a first-ever mission to a distant satellite.


 
Posted : 06/01/2022 4:02 pm
Posts: 17779
Full Member
 

Anyway it may be that in 10 years time we will have something better. Just to emphasise a point made earlier though, it has been stated that due to the excellent job Arianne did the fuel is expected to last "considerably longer" than 10 years.


 
Posted : 06/01/2022 5:08 pm
Posts: 17779
Full Member
 

The first of the two primary mirror "wings" has been successfully deployed. Second one tomorrow which then completes the major deployments. The rest is "just" fine tuning.


 
Posted : 07/01/2022 8:35 pm
Posts: 45504
Free Member
 

Come on, so close...


 
Posted : 07/01/2022 9:39 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

deploying the mirror.... 35


 
Posted : 08/01/2022 3:26 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

80 degrees


 
Posted : 08/01/2022 3:27 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

deployed!!


 
Posted : 08/01/2022 3:28 pm
Posts: 45504
Free Member
 

Oh yeah!


 
Posted : 08/01/2022 4:21 pm
Posts: 17728
Full Member
 

The mirror! Is that so it can take selfies?


 
Posted : 08/01/2022 4:56 pm
Posts: 17779
Full Member
 

Latched. All done!!


 
Posted : 08/01/2022 6:21 pm
Posts: 259
Free Member
 

That's great news about the mirror, so stoked about this thing.

Perhaps someone who is better informed than me can explain something. When the telescope is orbiting L2, with the sunshield at its 'back' at all times, what parts of the sky will the mirror see? Can the mirror change orientation vis-a-vis the sunshield or is it fixed in position as per the images on the NASA website? If so then it will never be able to look along the earth-sun axis? Or earth-sun plane I suppose would be more accurate.


 
Posted : 08/01/2022 6:30 pm
Posts: 1384
Free Member
 

It will never face the Sus as the heat (black body radiation) will affect/ Interfere with the highly sensitive instruments.
There are even parts on the design to counteract the "push" from the sun's rays.

It's designed to look in areas of total dark and look for very distant and faint objects.
Think deep field view turned up to 11

If I'm wrong please correct me.


 
Posted : 08/01/2022 6:47 pm
Posts: 259
Free Member
 

Understood it won't look towards the sun, but can it look directly away from it, in the earth sun plane? Or is it always pointing at L2, or always away from it? I'm not really clear on that.


 
Posted : 08/01/2022 7:04 pm
Posts: 4675
Full Member
 

It can see all of the 'sky', but not all at the same time, and it takes a year to get 100% coverage.

See this video from Scott Manley:

How NASA's $10 Billion Origami Telescope Will Unfold The Early Universe - YouTube


 
Posted : 08/01/2022 7:13 pm
Posts: 1617
Full Member
 

Edit: just watched the video and erased my mistake.


 
Posted : 08/01/2022 7:22 pm
Posts: 259
Free Member
 

@richmars thanks for the link, very helpful.


 
Posted : 08/01/2022 7:24 pm
Posts: 6874
Full Member
 

Wonders what (for giggles) it could see from L2 if it pointed back at earth. Guessing we pump out way to much IR For its sensitive instruments.


 
Posted : 08/01/2022 7:30 pm
Posts: 33325
Full Member
 

Wonders what (for giggles) it could see from L2 if it pointed back at earth. Guessing we pump out way to much IR For its sensitive instruments.

It would effectively be blinded by IR from the sun, which is why it’s oriented so that it’s always facing into deep space.


 
Posted : 08/01/2022 8:18 pm
Posts: 20561
Free Member
 

Well done everyone - Amy is on her way home to see her recently fostered little girl and I’m picking up the in-laws from the airport on Tuesday. Looking forward to hearing much more about events of the last couple of weeks on the drive back home. Unbelievable.


 
Posted : 08/01/2022 9:40 pm
Posts: 7751
Free Member
 

Amazing and unbelievable!!!
I don't have the vocabulary to do justice to this.
johndoh, your sense of pride shines through - as it should!
Imagine the scene in Amy's house in about 10 years time...hi mom/mum/mummy,what did you do in the 2020s?
Oh, nothing much...


 
Posted : 08/01/2022 10:42 pm
Posts: 1013
Free Member
 

Yay.


 
Posted : 08/01/2022 10:50 pm
Posts: 1101
Full Member
 

Has anyone come across a suitable video for a (very bright) 5 year old?
The Smarter Everyday ones are good but aimed at older kids who've done a bit of science at school already


 
Posted : 09/01/2022 8:49 am
Posts: 17779
Full Member
 

There is a load of stuff on Webb Telescope Resources which may be suitable for you to help explain, but not direct reading/viewing for a 5 year old I would have thought.


 
Posted : 09/01/2022 11:40 am
Posts: 20561
Free Member
 

johndoh, your sense of pride shines through

Absolutely - I have known my wife's brother since he was at Uni studying 'space' and he went off to LA to follow his dream. I remember going to the cinema with the family to see Apollo 13 and he was really excited as he got chatting to someone sat near us who happened to actually have been at Mission Control when it happened (we live in Harrogate so very close to the USA Menwith Hill station where this guy ended up working). He then met Amy at Northrop Grumman and they have both been working on the JWT project for the last 10 years. Now the long wait for the first images....


 
Posted : 10/01/2022 10:09 am
Posts: 6874
Full Member
 

johndoh, your sense of pride shines through

+1. Thrilled for you all


 
Posted : 10/01/2022 10:16 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

This is pretty cool - someone has built an exceptional 1:7 model of the JWST...

https://stargazerslounge.com/topic/384283-jwst-model-scale-17/


 
Posted : 11/01/2022 10:13 am
Posts: 4271
Free Member
 

My (almost) 4 year old son has been captivated by JWST, asking for updates each day on what has folded out.

I absolutely love how this kind of thing is multi-generational nerd-fuel.


 
Posted : 11/01/2022 10:24 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

When JWST is orbiting L2

i've got a stupid question...

there's nothing *at* L2, how can anything orbit around it?

various images/animations show the telescope orbiting an empty point in space, how does that work?!?

?


 
Posted : 11/01/2022 11:33 am
Posts: 6874
Full Member
 

L2 is a ‘ring’ around the sun and the balance point is dependent on the position of the earth as it orbits the sun.

It’s a convenient place to park because it’s gravitationally stable / balanced and therefore uses minimal fuel to remain parked.

IGNORE - I lied. L2 is more complex than that. ^^^ is a description of L1 but the principles are probably broadly the same. https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/faq/88/what-are-lagrange-points/


 
Posted : 11/01/2022 11:39 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Fantastic explanation of Lagrange points here:


 
Posted : 11/01/2022 11:42 am
Posts: 33325
Full Member
 

Update on the telescope’s working life says it’s been effectively doubled, to twenty years, due to the pin-point accuracy of the launch. Incredible work by everyone involved in the project!

https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/330401-nasa-completes-webb-deployment-confirms-doubling-of-expected-lifespan?source=flipboard


 
Posted : 11/01/2022 7:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Fantastic explanation of Lagrange points here:

that is a great video, thanks for sharing.

still not sure i get it, but i suppose that's why we name these things after the clever sods who *do* understand them..!

it did feel very exciting to look at the moon yesterday, and realise that JWST is somewhere over *there*...

(i know it's further than the moon, but that's the right direction at least)


 
Posted : 12/01/2022 10:26 am
Posts: 33325
Full Member
 

I find it interesting that Lagrange points are now being discussed on regular news programmes and in print, whereas previously about the only other form of literature where you’d find references was in science fiction stories!

Lagrange, or ‘libration’ points, as I believe they’re also called, are something I’ve been familiar with for years, as handy places to park installations or stations, because they’re naturally stable, and require relatively little fuel to keep whatever it is in place.
I’m really looking forward to seeing what JWST produces, although the images aren’t going to be what many people are expecting, compared to Hubble, which is mostly visible wavelengths, and not infrared.
Can you imagine the jostling and so on going on to try to get the first access to the ‘scope! 🤣


 
Posted : 12/01/2022 11:33 pm
Posts: 4170
Free Member
 

there’s nothing *at* L2, how can anything orbit around it?

That puzzled me too, but I found the answer. Look up 'halo orbit'


 
Posted : 12/01/2022 11:37 pm
Posts: 20561
Free Member
 

I’m really looking forward to seeing what JWST produces, although the images aren’t going to be what many people are expecting, compared to Hubble, which is mostly visible wavelengths, and not infrared.

I assume they will be able to re-interpret the infra-red images as broad colour spectrum images relatively easily?


 
Posted : 13/01/2022 10:23 am
Posts: 1467
Free Member
 

Can it take selfies?


 
Posted : 13/01/2022 10:47 am
Posts: 17779
Full Member
 

All motors and actuators on the mirror segments have been tested and are working. Now a 3 month job getting all the segments focussing together as one mirror.


 
Posted : 13/01/2022 11:00 am
Posts: 20561
Free Member
 

Aligning the primary mirror segments to form one large mirror means each segment “is aligned to one-five-thousandth the thickness of a human hair”

:-O


 
Posted : 13/01/2022 11:08 am
Posts: 20169
Full Member
 

I find it interesting that Lagrange points are now being discussed on regular news programmes and in print, whereas previously about the only other form of literature where you’d find references was in science fiction stories!

BBC had a Flat-Earther on yesterday (day before?) and justified it by some pathetic excuse around treating all views equally / impartiality etc.
Morons.


 
Posted : 13/01/2022 11:09 am
Posts: 106
Free Member
 

I assume they will be able to re-interpret the infra-red images as broad colour spectrum images relatively easily?

No different in principle from any other false colour reprocessing. In a sense when looking at very ancient galaxies that'll actually mean shifting the colour back into the visible range where it started out (having been redshifted to IR on the way here).


 
Posted : 13/01/2022 11:14 am
Posts: 6874
Full Member
 

“Windows up, grab those sunnies, and don’t let the seagulls steal ya chips!”

Webb got parked.

https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbLaunch/whereIsWebb.html


 
Posted : 24/01/2022 11:24 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

first "calibration" image recieved


 
Posted : 11/02/2022 8:26 pm
Posts: 832
Full Member
 

Image and explanation on the NASA blog here


 
Posted : 12/02/2022 9:23 am
Posts: 2434
Free Member
 

Interesting read. Just made me wonder how long it takes to transfer 54gb of data over such a long distance? And how do they do it?


 
Posted : 12/02/2022 10:07 am
Posts: 6874
Full Member
 

Can it take selfies?

Yes!!

This “selfie” was created using a specialized pupil imaging lens inside of the NIRCam instrument that was designed to take images of the primary mirror segments instead of images of space. This configuration is not used during scientific operations and is used strictly for engineering and alignment purposes. In this case, the bright segment was pointed at a bright star, while the others aren’t currently in the same alignment. This image gave an early indication of the primary mirror alignment to the instrument. Credit: NASA


 
Posted : 12/02/2022 11:10 am
Posts: 45504
Free Member
 

^ isn't that just smile inducing? Amazing science...


 
Posted : 12/02/2022 11:33 am
Posts: 2042
Full Member
 

Still looks like a cross between Blockbusters* and Paradroid*

*oldies only relevance ;D


 
Posted : 12/02/2022 11:44 am
 poah
Posts: 6494
Free Member
 

can I have a P please Bob


 
Posted : 12/02/2022 7:34 pm
Posts: 1384
Free Member
 

Watched a video on the first images, am I right it took a selfie?


 
Posted : 12/02/2022 8:58 pm
Posts: 10315
Full Member
 

Watched a video on the first images, am I right it took a selfie?

Yep.  Look about 5 posts up ^ for a bit more info


 
Posted : 12/02/2022 9:44 pm
Posts: 1384
Free Member
 

D'oh!
🤦 just spotted that


 
Posted : 12/02/2022 9:53 pm
Posts: 1384
Free Member
 

D'oh!
🤦 just spotted that


 
Posted : 12/02/2022 9:55 pm
Posts: 41642
Free Member
 

Interesting read. Just made me wonder how long it takes to transfer 54gb of data over such a long distance? And how do they do it?

Bandwidth Vs latency.

It'll take 5 seconds for a signal to reach earth.

But in terms of the rate you can transmit the data that doesn't degrade like it does down copper wire or fibre.


 
Posted : 12/02/2022 10:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Seems it's got an 8mbit connection(theoretical 28mbit) according to that, so about 1mb a second download.


 
Posted : 13/02/2022 3:01 am
Posts: 2434
Free Member
 

5 seconds for the signal to travel 1.5 million Km’s is mind blowing. At 270gb per day they can transfer data from that distance at not to dissimilar speeds to what we (my company) transfer between two UK datacentres. (We could transfer it faster, but cost constraints mean we don’t)
Pretty interesting stuff. We’re transferring about 380gb of data per day.


 
Posted : 13/02/2022 2:01 pm
Posts: 10315
Full Member
 

That video could have sent us the information about 10x faster than it did 🙁

but still good to know


 
Posted : 13/02/2022 7:49 pm
Posts: 4271
Free Member
 

Check out the alignment images!

https://twitter.com/NASAWebb/status/1504121946056888322?s=20&t=QzZZXu7Av-Gluf2lMOuB4A

So cool.


 
Posted : 16/03/2022 4:08 pm
Posts: 17779
Full Member
 

Ooh it's getting close.


 
Posted : 16/03/2022 8:14 pm
Posts: 33325
Full Member
 

I read an article about it earlier this evening, with a large version of that photo, and it’s stunning, the galaxies that can be seen in the background, and the crispness of the ‘starburst’ effect of the target star just beautiful.


 
Posted : 16/03/2022 10:15 pm
Posts: 1891
Free Member
 

Why is there a starburts effect? I thought they were caused by the diaphragm of a conventional lens. I don't understand what causes this?


 
Posted : 17/03/2022 12:02 am
Posts: 9136
Full Member
 

It looks beautiful, so I don't care. 🙂


 
Posted : 17/03/2022 12:59 am
Posts: 45504
Free Member
 

Ooooh, hello. Focus/image phase all good, onto other instruments.

I bloody love science like this.

https://www.space.com/james-webb-space-telescope-alignment-complete


 
Posted : 29/04/2022 8:10 am
Posts: 11381
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 05/05/2022 10:13 am
Posts: 45504
Free Member
Posts: 45504
Free Member
 

I have to say, I'm rather excited to see the images in a couple of days time...


 
Posted : 09/07/2022 9:29 pm
Posts: 3003
Full Member
 

Yes, can't wait. Some of the images from Hubble have been amazing but this should be another level...


 
Posted : 09/07/2022 9:43 pm
Posts: 422
Full Member
 

Not that I’m in any way envious, but my wife has been invited to view these first Webb images at the local planetarium on Wednesday morning!


 
Posted : 09/07/2022 10:22 pm
Posts: 20561
Free Member
 

Not that I am in any way proud but my brother in law and sister in law helped get thing off the ground and into space.


 
Posted : 09/07/2022 10:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

SMACS 0723
[img] [/img]

WASP-96b
Imaginary Picture of WASP-96 b 😆
[img] [/img]

Southern Ring Nebula
[img] [/img]

Stephan’s Quintet
[img] [/img]

Carina Nebula
[img] [/img]

Seems to be the current image standard for the announced targets, will be interesting to see the difference. Not sure we'll get an image of an exoplanet. 😆

I think these are right, if not, correct me.


 
Posted : 09/07/2022 11:22 pm
Posts: 20561
Free Member
 

Info on the live streaming event happening at 14:30 GMT tomorrow...


 
Posted : 11/07/2022 3:25 pm
Page 3 / 5

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!