The IT crowd requir...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] The IT crowd required - NAS purchase

17 Posts
15 Users
0 Reactions
53 Views
Posts: 2400
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Morning! Clicking LaCie drive means I need a new backup solution, and was thinking that Easter gives me time to set up a NAS. Synology DS215j with a brace of WD 3TB looks a good bet at just over £300 for our Mac-based backup & streaming requirements. Anyone with warnings/poor experiences here?

(Had thought of a Time Capsule, but they seem less reliable and more expensive.)

Thanks!


 
Posted : 20/03/2016 9:34 am
Posts: 665
Free Member
 

Yeah they seem good. I bought the 415 a week or so back to replace a WD my book world.


 
Posted : 20/03/2016 9:39 am
Posts: 77347
Free Member
 

For backup purposes I'd just get an external drive, unless you've got a compelling reason not to. What benefit is a NAS giving you?

Also, what happens to your backups if your house burns down or you get burgled?


 
Posted : 20/03/2016 9:58 am
Posts: 20
Free Member
 

Personally ,and this depends on how much storage you need, I'd get a single drive NAS, such as a Synology 115. And a separate, portable hard drive, such as a WD Passport, to back up to and store away from your house.

Cheaper and offers better disaster recovery.


 
Posted : 20/03/2016 10:15 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Synology works really well for backup and streaming in particular. I use it to host all video and audio, and it's streamed to 3 macs, 2 TVs running plex, 3 amps using dlna clients. Works really well, and has done for 4/5 years.

You can have a time machine client on the NAS.

As said you need an offsite backup solution also if you want to keep data that's important to you, but this is not an argument to not get the massive benefits of a NAS.


 
Posted : 20/03/2016 10:19 am
Posts: 2400
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Was thinking NAS, so that it could be a Time Machine target for the MacBooks' automated back-up, plus allow the AppleTV to use it as a streaming source. Appreciate that it's at risk in a burglary/house fire, but I keep the photos backed up on a pocket drive every so often and leave that at work.

Edit: posted whilst mynamesnotbob was replying - thanks.


 
Posted : 20/03/2016 10:28 am
Posts: 8612
Full Member
 

Also thinking of getting a NAS but it's more for local sharing (and moving the kids' ridiculous video library off my laptop HD) than backup.


 
Posted : 20/03/2016 11:05 am
Posts: 65918
Free Member
 

I'd start with Illmatic, still his best.


 
Posted : 20/03/2016 11:07 am
Posts: 11
Free Member
 

For backup purposes I'd just get an external drive, unless you've got a compelling reason not to. What benefit is a NAS giving you?

Also, what happens to your backups if your house burns down or you get burgled?

Well, if you are doing it properly it means you have your files stored on a resilient filesystem like ZFS that protects against corruption as well as device failure. Add to that your files are now accessible to multiple devices the extra expense definitely becomes worthwhile.

If worried about data-loss from fire or theft then choose from a plethora of cloud backup services too.

Job done 😀


 
Posted : 20/03/2016 2:13 pm
Posts: 2874
Free Member
 

Our Synology Diskstation with a couple of 3TB WD drives has been operating for about a year now. Used for backing up our laptops and desktop plus music and film streaming. Highly recommended. No dramas it just works


 
Posted : 20/03/2016 2:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I use a single drive nas for streaming and storing media etc then have a just cloud account for photos, home video and documents auto updated daily from laptop and 2 x phones. I can handle losing films as easily replaceable but having an off site backup for photos is peace if mind. Cost is around £30 a year.


 
Posted : 20/03/2016 2:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Set up a DS215j a couple of weeks ago, no dramas although only have 1 drive at the mo. Done what mynamesnotbob said, streaming audio and movies plus personal and shared drives for the household. Works fine with Chromebook, PC, Humax, Android & Chromecast. Not tried any silly Macintosh nonsense.


 
Posted : 20/03/2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I use a synology for time machine as well as media, great bit of kit and been very reliable.


 
Posted : 20/03/2016 5:41 pm
Posts: 28
Free Member
 

For backup purposes I'd just get an external drive, unless you've got a compelling reason not to.

One external drive per device in the house that should be backed up ? Wouldn't a centralised solution accessible to all devices be a better solution, not to think of serving media/making files available on the go to mobiles, etc ?

It is time to make the leap to client-server architecture.


 
Posted : 20/03/2016 6:45 pm
Posts: 3652
Full Member
 

I've got a QNAP TS212. It's a few years old so there may be a newer version of it out now but I've had no problems with it. It's accessed by iThings, android devices, a windows laptop, a Mac and a 'smart' TV and it all works pretty easily.


 
Posted : 20/03/2016 7:19 pm
Posts: 5012
Free Member
 

Who is best for cloud based file storage? I really need to sort out something for photos. Around 65gb


 
Posted : 20/03/2016 11:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Google is about £1 a month for 100Gb.


 
Posted : 20/03/2016 11:44 pm
Posts: 665
Free Member
 

I use it for backups of photos / vids other content from laptops and (try to) back up off site too.

I used to have a 2 disk mirrored 2*1TB set up. You have more than 1 disk so that when 1 disk fails you don't lose any content and just plug in another drive.

Off site is poss but for big photo /vid files it would take ages to upload and download every time you wanted to edit them with a standard ADSL connection.


 
Posted : 21/03/2016 9:15 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!