You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more
How does this contact-tracing app work?
I mean GPS is typically accurate to around 5m. So it could easily put 2 people in the same location, even if they were up to 10m apart.
It also detects Bluetooth, but IME the range of that varies widely and I don't think it would be capable of measuring distance from the signal?
Am I missing something?
It's not GPS. It's basically Bluetooth with the app announcing itself and listening for other devices. If two phones (call them Bob and Jeff) detected each other yesterday and Jeff discovers that he has Covid then Bob can be alerted. Distance isn't relevant, if two bluetooth devices can communicate then they're close enough.
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/05/05/uk_coronavirus_app/ explains the theory and why the UK's implementation of a good idea is pretty terrible.
Distance isn’t relevant, if two bluetooth devices can communicate then they’re close enough.
My Bluetooth stuff works at a fair distance, it varies from device to device. However, it's never less than about 5m if clear line of sight.
How can that be considered close contact?
The point is to identify people who have been in proximity to each other.
You can't use GPS because you'd need to constantly track an individual's location, which has horrific privacy issues, will consume all the battery life, and won't work inside.
The Google/Apple approach is unique IDs that are swapped over Bluetooth. If two phones are near each other then the IDs are swapped and a proximity is logged. Yes this isn't perfect: I can sneeze on a door handle and then you use the door an hour later, but it's better than nothing because it does track everyone that you bumped into when walking around the supermarket.
First results of basic testing of the NHS app has shown that it’s failed on every level, which really doesn’t surprise me at all, taking into account the previous history of an interconnected system for all hospitals and doctors surgeries to be able to access a patient’s records regardless of where they were was dumped after years of effort and tens of billions squandered on it. I’ll possibly install the Apple/Google app, but I really don’t trust the Government-backed NHS app worth a damn.
I’ll possibly install the Apple/Google app,
My understanding is that Apple/Google have co-operated on the backend but you still need a regional app to use it. So, it's the NHS app or no app.
My understanding is that Apple/Google have co-operated on the backend but you still need a regional app to use it.
Yep, they just wrote the BT API.
Good article on the underlying methodology and security principals in the API:
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/28/apple-iphone-contact-tracing-how-it-came-together.html
From a government that was won on the back of dodgy data practices, no thanks.
I'm all for a tracing app but not something that has cummings finger prints on it
From a government that was won on the back of dodgy data practices, no thanks.
I’m all for a tracing app but not something that has cummings finger prints on it
Agree with this, from what I have read there is no chance this app will be going anywhere near my phone/data.
Only slight caveat if I stick it on my old work phone as a burner phone with a pay as you go sim with dummy personal information.
I'm not even sure that the NHS app uses the A/G tracing API? (Because they don't want to follow the privacy rules) The whole point of the A/G API is that it works in the background ALL THE TIME, whereas the NHS app has to be open/running on both phones in order to register a "contact".My understanding is that Apple/Google have co-operated on the backend but you still need a regional app to use it. So, it’s the NHS app or no app.
’m not even sure that the NHS app uses the A/G tracing API?
If it can run in the background then it probably has to as there wasn't a way for a background app to run BT (other than play music) in iOS prior to the new API.
I wouldn't be surprised if the NHS app doesn't work technically. I understand that the new Google / Apple API is required for apps to do the bluetooth comms with other phones. These are generally blocked by Android / iOS because of privacy concerns. I can't find anything written down on this, but on Radio 4 WatO today the interviewee said that the developers had 'a workaround' for this. That doesn't sound robust enough to be rolling out as a national app.
My Bluetooth stuff works at a fair distance, it varies from device to device. However, it’s never less than about 5m if clear line of sight.
How can that be considered close contact?
Because the 2m thing isn't a magic barrier.
If I'm sat in a room with someone all day within bluetooth range, I'll probably catch whatever they have. If I cycle past someone coming in the opposite direction on the towpath then the odds of transmitting anything are slim/none.
It's also not meant to be 100% accurate, if someone has symptoms, they could get tested once there is capacity, then if positive they can alert all the people their phone thinks they've been near and they can get tested. They can probably also write out a list of family members and friends they've been to the pub with, and ask their employer to send out an e-mail saying someone in the building has it, please get tested, etc and then you're most of the way to a complete list.
The principle being that if most people with the virus can know they have it, and can isolate themselves then transmission rates should be very low anyway. The hope is that the level of infection is controlled in the thousands and contact tracing is relatively straightforward, rather than hundreds of thousands and not having a clue who has it and who hasn't.
On balance I probably would download it, it could save someones life. But the implementation and privacy issues are just bonkers when there is a better way.
Opps, UK cocks up yet again...
Comment Britain is sleepwalking into another coronavirus disaster by failing to listen to global consensus and expert analysis with the release of the NHS COVID-19 contact-tracking app.
On Monday, the UK government explained in depth and in clearly written language how its iOS and Android smartphone application – undergoing trials in the Isle of Wight – will work, and why it is a better solution to the one by Apple and Google that other nations have decided to adopt. It has also released a more technical explanation.
Unfortunately for folks in UK, while the explanation is coherent, calm, well-reasoned and plausible, it is likely to be a repeat of the disastrous “herd immunity” policy that the government initially backed as a way to explain why it didn’t need to go into a national lockdown. That policy was also well-reasoned and well-explained by a small number of very competent doctors and scientists who just happened to be wrong.
Here’s what happening: there are broadly two types of coronavirus contact-tracing apps; those that are centralized and those that are decentralized. The first takes data from people’s phones and saves it on a central system where experts are trusted to make the best possible use of the data, including providing advice to people as and when necessary.
The second, decentralized approach, as set out by Apple and Google, puts users in more control of their information, and alerts them automatically with no intervention from a third party. Apple and Google have also banned apps that use their decentralized and anonymized API from accessing location services to track and identify people, despite pressure to do so. And they have said they will only allow one app per country, or state in the US.
Both types use Bluetooth to detect other nearby phones also running the software. Thus, when someone catches the coronavirus, people can be warned if their phone was within 6ft of that patient's phone for more than a few minutes.
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/05/05/uk_coronavirus_app/
TLDR: It doesn't work.
@footflaps I thought that was the whole point of the criticism of the NHS app - it DOESN'T run in the background?If it can run in the background then it probably has to as there wasn’t a way for a background app to run BT (other than play music) in iOS prior to the new API.
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/05/05/uk_coronavirus_app/
TLDR: It doesn’t work.
Great link thanks @footflaps.
Hey I posted that link in the first reply 🙂 The NHS app is DOA.
1) Absolute Bluetooth radio strength (RSSI) is a poor method of measuring distance, exponentially more so on Android due to vastly more diverse hardware platforms. Rather, you can only really tell if you’re getting closer / further away by looking at change data. The Bluetooth SIG itself advises you not to do it: https://www.bluetooth.com/blog/proximity-and-rssi/ [EDIT: I've just realised this article is 5 years old so this may no longer be current advice.]
2) Bluetooth doesn't work like that. iOS outright forbids background apps from continually broadcasting Bluetooth IDs and (later versions of) Android restricts it to a few minutes. You'd either need to go through Apple's / Google's locked-down API or expect everyone to be walking round with their phones on and unlocked.
Their claimed workaround for this is that it can still listen in the background and respond to other device broadcasts, so that rather hangs on a sort of 'herd immunity' from people walking around with Android 7 or lower devices.
3) Bluetooth doesn't understand walls. Is it going to flag up that I've been within 2 metres of my next-door neighbours when I haven't even left the house? False positives aplenty.
4) Unless they're only allowing post-test reporting, the risks of abuse out of either malice or devilment are high. Little Johnny fancies a couple of weeks off school; a corporate employee takes a stroll around a competitor; someone attaches a phone to their cat or dog and lets them out to play. This will absolutely happen without proper control, I saw a video the other day about a guy with a wheelbarrow full of mobile phones causing traffic jams on Google Maps for the lols.
5) It's being developed by Faculty - formerly ASI Data Science. They’re heavily into AI and machine learning and whilst they might not be inherently evil they’ve been working for Cummings and his Machiavellian schemes since at least his Vote Leave days.
I'm not one for conspiracy theories but it does rather beg the question as to why you’d go to data mining specialists in order to ask them to write a Bluetooth tracking and recording application. For this reason I'm out.
My understanding is that Apple/Google have co-operated on the backend but you still need a regional app to use it.
My understanding is that the UK isn't using the Apple / Google APIs at all.
you expect people to actually read the thread before commenting? Are you new here? 😉Hey I posted that link in the first reply
I’m not one for conspiracy theories but it does rather beg the question as to why you’d go to data mining specialists in order to ask them to write a Bluetooth tracking and recording application. For this reason I’m out.
Exactly this. Google and Apple co-operated to make both the privacy (it's actually anonymous) and technical (the OS can listen constantly on behalf of the app)) issues disappear. There is no good reason why the NHS would instead build their own.
whats to stop someone saying they have the virus and symptoms on their app and go around spreading false positives?
Hey I posted that link in the first reply 🙂 The NHS app is DOA.
Cripes I'm sorry! Thanks for your other posts on this thread too. It's a fascinating subject to me because I'm a developer and would never (nowadays) consider trying to make a workaround for something that the app shouldn't be allowed to do - so I'm intrigued to see how this plays out.
Senior figures told HSJ that it had been hard to assess the app because the government was “going about it in a kind of a hamfisted way. They haven’t got clear versions, so it’s been impossible to get fixed code base from them for NHS Digital to test. They keep changing it all over the place”.
With an application as important as this, and with such major privacy implications, your project delivery has to be state of the art, from start to finish. Comments like this just confirm it's government amateur hour again.
It's going to be a PITA when people get the here, (large national power station) and there's the first confirmed case. Because we're basically all at work, (a combination of local managers who don't trust us to work at home plus genuine reasons to be here at least some of the time) everyone is going to get the message to isolate until they can get tested all at the same time, leading to 90%(?) absence for a couple of because we all routinely mingle about.
Agree with this, from what I have read there is no chance this app will be going anywhere near my phone/data.
your data being exactly how much more important than peoples lives?
Agree with this, from what I have read there is no chance this app will be going anywhere near my phone/data.
Won't go on my phone, battery only lasts a day if I stick it on flight mode when I'm out the house! Keeping it out of sleep it goes flat in under an hour.
your data being exactly how much more important than peoples lives?
Things don't stop being bad because there's something potentially worse. I'd rather have a kick in the bollocks than cancer but that wouldn't make me pro-bollocksbooting.
In any case, I have serious doubts that this is going to 'save lives' as it currently stands.
your data being exactly how much more important than peoples lives?
Unfortunately totally irrelevant as the UK app is simple not going to work at all.
No doubt Apple/Google will be painted as the baddies in this even though they've been saying "work with us if you want to make something that actually functions" from day one.
Some interestImg detail here based on facts. I know right..
It’s a long read but goes into the right amount of detail.
TL/DR it’s fine, I’ll be using it.
Given the governments record on IT systems, data security and deals with the likes of Cambridge Analytica etc then there is no way this is going on my phone.
The fact that it wont work makes me even more suspicious of the whole thing as it means its being done for 1 of 2 purposes
1. The most likely, its another government cock up or PR stunt designed to keep the masses happy and think they have a competent government in charge
2. The more foil hat version, it works but not for the publicly stated purpose
Option 1 is far more likely so there is no point installing it
Some interestImg detail here based on facts. I know right..
NCSC inside knowledge ( https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/blog-post/security-behind-nhs-contact-tracing-app)
That's the paper that the Register article from the 2nd post dissects, including pointing out that
"Despite what the NCSC has continued to imply, the app will not, as it stands, work all the time on iOS nor Android since version 8. The operating systems won't allow the tracing application to broadcast its ID via Bluetooth to surrounding devices when it's running in the background and not in active use. Apple's iOS forbids it, and newer Google Android versions limit it to a few minutes after the app falls into the background."
This quote sums it up for me 🙂
---
Senior figures told HSJ that it had been hard to assess the app because the government was “going about it in a kind of a hamfisted way. They haven’t got clear versions, so it’s been impossible to get fixed code base from them for NHS Digital to test. They keep changing it all over the place”.
---
The Bluetooth foreground issue seems to be the only point of any substance in the Register article. Don’t get me wrong I really like them and trust their judgement most of the time, but this just stinks of click bait.
Interesting times.
Some more details from Wired:
https://www.wired.co.uk/article/nhs-contact-tracing-app-data-privacy
This quote sums it up for me 🙂
—
Senior figures told HSJ that it had been hard to assess the app because the government was “going about it in a kind of a hamfisted way. They haven’t got clear versions, so it’s been impossible to get fixed code base from them for NHS Digital to test. They keep changing it all over the place”.
That’s what I was referring to earlier, but I couldn’t find the article anywhere, I’d forgotten to save it.
Track and trace isn't really going to help these poor elderly people in care homes is it, and how would they spot a breakout of the virus in a prison? or any other establishments that require you to hand your mobile in at reception when you visit or go to work.
As many have already mentioned, NHS have often been handed shoddy IT solutions over the years and with this gang of second rate circus jugglers running the show I don't see anything changing.
Although it might be very successful on Aer Lingus flights from Belfast.
Some interestImg detail here based on facts. I know right..
NCSC inside knowledge
It’s a long read but goes into the right amount of detail.
TL/DR it’s fine, I’ll be using it.
I’m more concerned about the tone of the NCSC article than the Government surreptitiously harvesting my data. I expect the NCSC to write balanced content not, “well the medical benefit is potential so high it outweighs the disadvantages - but everyone has promised to play fair so it will be ok.” The article is so in favour of the adopted solution I conclude it was written drafted by the NHSX team themselves!
I’ll not be using it (in part because Scotland doesn’t seem to be going that way) but also because without >50% of people I interact with using it, it will be pointless and there’s no way there is that much trust in government harvesting the data; IF that means people will die it’s the fault of either government for destroying trust or the app development team for living in a bubble where this crisis overruled public perception.
FWIW I don’t accept that not having a contact tracing app means more people will die. It might slow down an exit from lockdown. It might mean that social bubbles are harder to create or manage (or fall back on some much simpler technology), and it might even mean we end up in a second lockdown - but a smartphone app telling you you were close to someone unknown who might have got the virus doesn’t stop you getting it, not indeed you passing it to others (you think the third time someone gets one of those they are still going to be responding enthusiastically to quarantine pending test results?).
It does seem darkly hilarious that the contact tracing app is reliant on herd i-phone-ity. The background running issue just seems insurmountable tbh.
Ffs, I was going to put aside my concerns with the government and Cummings etc and install this to be honest.
If it ends up not even working?!...
Can't this bloody shower do anything right?
Say wut bluetooth coronavirus
Some interestImg detail here based on facts. I know right..
NCSC inside knowledge
It’s a long read but goes into the right amount of detail.
Thanks @peterno51. The CoronaVirus Podcast touched on some of the pros and cos of each method, good to have the real detail of it.
So if you don’t like the idea of the NHS app, the next best thing is this.
I don’t get people’s concerns about privacy (unless you do dodgy stuff) This is a world crisis, and one of the ways to end it is using technology, but if people want to prolong lockdown/limitations then choose not to adopt.
I don’t get people’s concerns about privacy (unless you do dodgy stuff) This is a world crisis, and one of the ways to end it is using technology, but if people want to prolong lockdown/limitations then choose not to adopt.
Exactly this.
Oh noes the government, who already knows who I am has data to say I think I'm infected.
It then has data to tell them I was near some other phones for a prolonged period of time.
What do people actually think they're going to do with that? Google/Apple already follows you constantly, it knows where you are (seen the daily coronavirus slides where it showed journey types and locations data for individuals to see where we are mostly spending our time).
It's a national crisis, it's part of a toolkit to reduce the risks and it may help us get the **** out of this ridiculous lockdown.
Now whether it will produce meaningful results is another matter but that is why I suspect they have the 18k trackers to use this data as part of the tracing, to try and verify its validity and to try and get the true contacts.
I'm confused by the trial. Are they asking people who are trailing it to keep a note of who they were close to and for how long and then sampling a number of these "paper" traces to compare to the app? Therefore getting an idea of its effectiveness. Or........
I think on the issue of trust there are some pertinent questions here about why they have taken the route they have. It's incredibly sad that we've reached this point where we're not trusting our own government on such an important issue, but unless these questions can be answered reasonably, the entire project seems to be somewhere on a scale between incompetence and corruption, and it's difficult to believe they're that incompetent.
@larrylamb @funkydunc
I don't think people are against an app, but what does the NHSX app do that the G-A app won't do? (take aside not work as a feature)
So why do we need a Gov developed app and (much) more than that why does it have to be developed by Cummings, Warner, CA, et al
Unless you've had your head in a hole for the last 4 years aren't you a teeny bit suspicious of what they're up to? Do you recognise that as soon as his name appears near it it stinks of being another con, so why even take that risk?
Yes - it's a national crisis, so do what is needed, rethink your priorities and do what's right for the country rather than use this as another opportunity. That comment's aimed at the Government BTW
Unless you’ve had your head in a hole for the last 4 years aren’t you a teeny bit suspicious of what they’re up to? Do you recognise that as soon as his name appears near it it stinks of being another con, so why even take that risk
Or, you're exceptionally cynical ?
What are 'they' looking to steal/do ?
Just spitballing here, thinking aloud, grabbing stuff out of the air - steal a referendum result perhaps?
This is the issue. I'm pro using tech for contact tracing, and put some effort into explaining to friends and family how it doesn't track your location with GPS, uses a clever Bluetooth LE method (my raffle ticket analogy) and this is what you get when you install it on Android. As the wife just said 'it's like someone having a front door key but promising not to use it.'
So why do we need a Gov developed app and (much) more than that why does it have to be developed by Cummings, Warner, CA, et al
It can highlight Covid breakout hotspots.
That putting the first part of your postcode in bit.
The decentralised is fine in theory but you really need a bit more data to give you more of a view of the infection to help with track an tracing.
Someone need to access to an overall map view.
I’d not be surprised if the nhsx app ends up using the Apple api (as they’ve got control over the Bluetooth in background issue) the api will probably end up with tweaks to t&c to allow for this.
Or, you’re exceptionally cynical ?
What are ‘they’ looking to steal/do ?
Don't think about it from an individual point of view, its about all the data and big picture that data can create. This was and has been abused in the past.
I highly recommend anyone who's interested in 'what can they do with my data?' to watch this:
https://www.netflix.com/gb/title/80117542
I don't think you have to be exceptionally cynical. Just a bit savvy to think that Cummings is toxic and anything associated with him has a good chance of having some kind of ulterior motive. Do you think he's OK then? You're not even a bit suspicious of this path vs the G-A one?
As to what they could steal. I don't know, it's not my area of expertise. But like I said previously, when I don't have expertise in an area I try to find out or I get advice from others that know, and this site is a magnificent (if argumentative} resource for that. When i want advice on all sorts I come here and I use my network of friends elsewhere to advise. And then I make up my mind.
So, convince me that Cummings and co are essential to this app working, otherwise given their record I don't want them anywhere near it.
And don't do the 'good of the country' bit, they don't need to be involved for that and as above, them being involved immediately limits uptake ergo it's not for the overall good.
Is That screenshot real or someone stirring it up ?
Jamze- do you use google maps, Amazon, Strava ?
We are all happy to let these companies stalk us, but something that could help save life isn’t ok ? 🤷♂️
I highly recommend anyone who’s interested in ‘what can they do with my data?’ to watch this:
https://www.netflix.com/gb/title/80117542
/blockquote>Be aware some have said these reports on what CA did/were capable of doing were vastly exaggerated. The reporters basically believed the CA publicity material. They didn't actually deliver. They did misuse Facebook data and try though.
Im not sure that any data that could be gathered from the app would be that useful for the nefarious purposes suggested.
This would be fine in normal times when peoples movements and activities are normal and therefore the data may have some value but I wouldn't expect anything useful for the rest of this year so struggle to see how much use knowing where you are and who you have been in contact with is a massive issue.
If it helps to ease restrictions then I cant see an issue. I always assume someone is watching anyway.
What are ‘they’ looking to steal/do ?
Cummings (as you know) uses data to manipulate results of important national decisions, he's done it in the North East Mayoral elections, and again for Brexit. He will use data to bend results by targeting specific communities that can heavily influence decisions in a way that he and the the people that pay him feel will benefit them the most. This is not democracy in action.
Cummings (as you know) will use highly controversial data to misdirect and confuse. He's done this twice now, the £350 million for the NHS on the side of a bus, and the 100,000 test a day for COVID19. He does this using information from data to distract people from what the people who pay him actual are trying to do, by confusing and distracting from the actual purpose of their plans. This is not democracy in action.
These are the people who want your data. They want it from 28 days if you test positive, and regardless they want to keep it forever after this pandemic is finished to perhaps do "research" in the future. Like many on here I don't think of myself as a tin foil hat wearing conspiracist, but given that there is a workable solution that doesn't need a data mining company run by friends of Cummings anywhere near it to work, I'd rather have that than this.
Do you think he’s OK then?
MAte i don't even know who he is 🙂 I don't do politics... but i simply cannot comprehend what people have to worry about with a location tracing app. As i say, even if it went in and saw i looked for giant dildos on a wednesday morning, so bloody what ? Who cares... Sure, i'd be slightly worried if it started stealing my bank account login information, but i don't see that.
Whether it can see my google history, my ebay preferences, or even whether i have Strava installled and did a cycle ride, i simply do not care... not a little teensy tiny weeny bit.
We are all happy to let these companies stalk us, but something that could help save life isn’t ok
You keep presenting this as the only option and still no-one's yet answered......
Why does Cummings and Co have to develop this app that will save lives. What is their involvement? The concerns me and many others have will limit the uptake and limit effectiveness.
There might not be an issue but as soon as he's near it it's tainted. Avoid that risk, it's for the good of us all - if there's no ulterior motive what have the Gov got to lose; if there is then tough titty, you reap what you sow.
Cummings (as you know)
Or not... As i say, i don't even know who he is... nor do i care.... I very much doubt he's an expert at compiling Google Apps though?
This is not democracy in action
These are not normal times either.
Vilify me as you wish but there is no way that app is going anywhere near my phone.
The fact that it’ll barely work anyway makes me feel a whole lot less bad about this decision.
Is That screenshot real or someone stirring it up ?
Real. I've just installed the app on my phone, it says it needs location priv all the time to work.
Jamze- do you use google maps, Amazon, Strava ?
We are all happy to let these companies stalk us, but something that could help save life isn’t ok ? 🤷♂️
As I said, I'm pro using the tech. Yes, I use all those and am happy to trade the benefits I get for them getting my data.
I might be happy to do the same with the Covid app - but why have all these designs and articles saying it uses Bluetooth LE, doesn't use GPS to track location etc. and then this is the first priv it asks for?
Just tell me why you need it. The app at the moment just says we promise not to use it (but they need it anyway.)
Gut feel is they'll switch to the Apple/Google implementation pretty quickly. Most folks I know won't say yes to that priv request, irrespective of if they make the code open, publish lots of info on how it works etc.
These are not normal times either.
said every proto-autocratic state ever. Just because COVID19 is bad, doesn't mean that we should set aside hard won (and easily lost) rights freedoms and democracy. Have no doubt, that Dominic Cummings absolutely thinks he knows better than you about what's best for you, and he's working damned hard to make sure he has the tools to manipulate the Tory party into making those decisions.
@weeksy - then do a favour and either find out, or don't accuse people of being exceptionally cynical when by your own admission you don't know what / who you're discussing. Your position has no weight without. Sorry if that's harsh.
I very much doubt he’s an expert at compiling Google Apps though?
No, he (his colleagues) are the experts in big data harvesting and manipulation, with a strong suspicion (you may say exceptional cynicism) of doing so for nefarious ends. Yet he's the go to for the Gov to develop an app THAT BASICALLY ALREADY EXISTS ELSEWHERE.
Something about looking like a duck and sounding like a duck I'm afraid, and even if it isn't even the suspicion it's a duck makes me run away.
Senior figures told HSJ that it had been hard to assess the app because the government was “going about it in a kind of a hamfisted way. They haven’t got clear versions, so it’s been impossible to get fixed code base from them for NHS Digital to test. They keep changing it all over the place”.
That has a real death-march project stench to it - I can only imagine the pressure the developers are under to get the solution out the door, then they find yet another bug, another version out the door following yet another all-nighter, and should we be ordering pizza with pineapple tonight to stave off scurvy?
then do a favour and either find out, or don’t accuse people of being exceptionally cynical when by your own admission you don’t know what / who you’re discussing.
Not knowing who he is doesn't make me thick. We happen to disagree on a subject, that's fine, that's OK. I doubt me reading about him would being the same levels of emotion in me that it does in you, but i'm far more laid back and have no political affiliations or agenda. People who have an agenda see things how they want to and already go into any subject with a particular level of disdain/hatred before the topic even begins.
Don't worry about being harsh, this is a passionate subject, as long as you're not nasty, it's all good 🙂
put another way weeksy
if it was announced that Mike Ashley was about to take over Liverpool and sack Klopp and install Alan Pardew as manager. Would someone saying they have no interest in football and don't even know who Mike Ashley is but they're sure it'll be OK convince you 😉
Not knowing who he is doesn’t make me thick.
But it does make you ignorant (not in the pejorative sense) You can't be expected to make a decision without all the information you need. People here are trying to give you the information you need.
It's like you trying to influence a mate about which bike to buy when he knows **** all about bikes. You could play it straight and help him, you could play it crooked and use his ignorance to your benefit. Cummings is in the second group...Every Single Time.
From a government that was won on the back of dodgy data practices, no thanks.
I’m all for a tracing app but not something that has cummings finger prints on it
This.
If this is developed as well as other NHS IT projects, I think we can expect something with a minimum functionality bang on time for the next pandemic at the end of the decade.
As i say, even if it went in and saw i looked for giant dildos on a wednesday morning, so bloody what ?
They don't have the slightest interest in what dildos you're looking at, or you as an individual, so you can carry on with that. The developers might have a giggle, but in a database of tens of millions of people, it's unlikely anyone is going to be looking at your individual data at all.
The concerns are on a collective level and how that data can potentially be used to manipulate society as a whole, and we know the people working on this app have a past history of doing this.
Real. I’ve just installed the app on my phone, it says it needs location priv all the time to work.
We've just had a message at work about our staff who work on the IOW. Due to some of the contracts we have we are not allowed to have personal phones on us during work hours, we're issued with a company dumb phone with no GPS chip, camera damaged (we did have camera-free phones but they're hard to get hold of these days) and Bluetooth is not allowed to be switched on. We've been told under no circumstances are we allowed to install it as the app logs far too much location information. If a Google/Apple app appears they'll look at that as we use Google for our delivery HHT's and they are secured by Google to our agreed standards, maps doesn't work on them but it can log location when we do a delivery/collection. This means that we can prove where we were to customers but there's no data log of our routes.
I'm all for using technology to help us get over this and find a new normal but the current solution has far too many question marks over it's safety, effectiveness and implementation.
The concerns are on a collective level and how that data can potentially be used to manipulate society as a whole, and we know the people working on this app have a past history of doing this.
Go on, i'm curious.... how can they manipulate society with this data ?
I could push all the privacy concerns to one side for the greater good for an app that works. This one won't.
Or not… As i say, i don’t even know who he is… nor do i care….
Then you should probably go and find out.
It really is rather depressing that we have good reason to trust huge multinational corporations like Google and Apple over a democratically elected government. I won't be using the app.
Real. I’ve just installed the app on my phone, it says it needs location priv all the time to work.
We’ve just had a message at work about our staff who work on the IOW. Due to some of the contracts we have we are not allowed to have personal phones on us during work hours, we’re issued with a company dumb phone with no GPS chip, camera damaged (we did have camera-free phones but they’re hard to get hold of these days) and Bluetooth is not allowed to be switched on. We’ve been told under no circumstances are we allowed to install it as the app logs far too much location information. If a Google/Apple app appears they’ll look at that as we use Google for our delivery HHT’s and they are secured by Google to our agreed standards, maps doesn’t work on them but it can log location when we do a delivery/collection. This means that we can prove where we were to customers but there’s no data log of our routes.
I’m all for using technology to help us get over this and find a new normal but the current solution has far too many question marks over it’s safety, effectiveness and implementation.
Did a bit of digging, the location priv is necessary for Bluetooth LE. They should just be more transparent about it.
'BLE permissions
In order to use Bluetooth features in your application, you must declare the Bluetooth permission BLUETOOTH. You need this permission to perform any Bluetooth communication, such as requesting a connection, accepting a connection, and transferring data.
You must also declare the ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION permission, given that LE beacons are often associated with location. Without this permission, scans won't return any results.'
Go on, i’m curious…. how can they manipulate society with this data ?
Cummings (as you know) uses data to manipulate results of important national decisions, he’s done it in the North East Mayoral elections, and again for Brexit. He will use data to bend results by targeting specific communities that can heavily influence decisions in a way that he and the the people that pay him feel will benefit them the most. This is not democracy in action.
From my earlier post. In the pre-Brexit run up, Cummings was employed to try to make sure we left, He was funded by groups with common interests in making sure that we left because those groups don't like the heavily regulated (towards consumers and away from industry) world that the EU are trying to create/enforce. Cummings did that largely by getting data (probably illegally) from the biggest source of data he knew at the time; Facebook. He then used that Facebook data to determine who in the electorate could be manipulated into thinking that Brexit would be in their interest, or vote to come out through a sense of jingoism or patriotism. This was hugely targeted, unregulated and hidden (ie he pretended that it had come from other sources than his own campaign group; this is probably illegal)
Cummings now is at the heart of this Tory administration.
Seriously, how the **** does having location data (which already exists) on someone influence an election.
Your likes, interest and how you think etc I understand but locational data? Think theres a bit of over thinking it going on here.
To be fair although I dislike Cummings a lot he has the brains for this sort of thing as has been highlighted. Sort of like the criminal using his abilities for good.
Next you'll be telling me 5G spreads Covid19.
Just to add we're not the only country not adopting the A&G API... so does Cummings work for those countries too?
FunkyDunc
Member
So if you don’t like the idea of the NHS app, the next best thing is this.I don’t get people’s concerns about privacy (unless you do dodgy stuff) This is a world crisis, and one of the ways to end it is using technology, but if people want to prolong lockdown/limitations then choose not to adopt.
i report on the joizoe app, why hasnt this been more popular and/or interated into what .gov are [trying] doing?
Go on, i’m curious…. how can they manipulate society with this data ?
Did you hit the snooze button through the whole Brexit/Trump/Cambridge Analytica thing?
If google want's to know that I visited a shop and then send me adverts for similar stuff that's one thing. If it want's to go next level and infer that I might be interested in something else as a result because it can now guess my demographic, then that's also fine with me. No a million miles removed from the billboard adverts on the Hammersmith flyover for IBM servers and corporate lawyers, and the adverts at Moorgate in Bury for a pet crematorium.
That data available to a politician is downright dangerous though. We've seen time and again that a little data, on a lot of people lets them target those on the margins very specifically. Do that better than the opposition and you can win elections without 90% of the population ever seeing your election adverts which is both cheaper and helps you avoid scrutiny.
A bit like the (is it an urban myth, IDK) story that Boots rewards card system can tell if your pregnant with a higher degree of accuracy than pissing on a stick by the subtle changes in your shopping habits.
Seriously, how the **** does having location data (which already exists) on someone influence an election.
Because the whole point of "big data" is you don't need much detail to find the patterns.
It could be something random like people who ride bikes but also go to Burger King are more likely by 0.3% to Vote one way than people who don't ride bikes but got to BK. But people who ride bikes but also go to Primark are 0.05% more likely to vote the other way. Add in enough of those correlations and you can start to make some remarkably solid predictions.
Given that is Cummings day job, do you not find it in the lest bit suspicious that he want's to collect way more data?
At least with the Apple/Google system even if the data was collated then it's by an independent-ish third party that I'd imagine wouldn't want to lose it's reputation in a data breach or using it for nefarious purposes. And they've developed a system that from the ground up doesn't centralize that data in the first place.