You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more
She doesn't do details does she?
Good interview. She’s the one announcing all this stuff, yet she can’t answer questions about her own initiatives any better than a random down the pub.
^^^
She doesn't have to because these so-called policies amount to little more than virtue* signalling to a nasty tendency in our society. It is all designed to disguise the failure of this nationalist experiment and push Starmer into a pronouncement about international law and thus out himself as a supposed woke lefty.
This is the level, folks. A sad indictment of a first world nation.
*where hatred of foreigners is considered a virtue.
FFS she is really doubling down on the demonisation of desperate people from overseas;
“I think that the people coming here illegally do possess values which are at odds with our country.
We are seeing heightened levels of criminality when related to the people who’ve come on boats related to drug dealing, exploitation, prostitution."
It's not illegal to claim asylum in the UK. The previous Tory Home Secretary's parents did precisely that.
And aren't there laws concerning inciting hatred and hate crimes, how is she getting away with it? Surely she must be on the very edge of what is legal?
Would I get away with publicly declaring that people of East African Asian heritage don't share British values and have heightened levels of criminality?
I am fairly certain that would be classed as a hate speech. I don't know why no one is testing the legality of Braverman's public statements.
Minister yesterday was making it clear that there would be checks needed to make sure we were only allowing people with the right documentation onto the rescue flights out of Sudan.....
I also genuinely wonder where some of her comments stand with regard to promoting hatred. I would love someone to test it....
I'm tempted to call the cops and report her for hate speech. After all, if you witness a crime then it's your duty to report it to the police. British values and all that.
And aren’t there laws concerning inciting hatred and hate crimes, how is she getting away with it? Surely she must be on the very edge of what is legal?
If we wait patiently, the current Home Secretary is sufficiently over-confident that she will make a mistake and stray across the line.
I see 'Honest Bob' Jenrick has also been weighing in with similar inflammatory language to Braverman, that not too long ago would have been the exclusive territory of the BNP, Tommy Robinson and Britain First
https://twitter.com/CarolineLucas/status/1651169481828229121?s=20
If we wait patiently, the current Home Secretary is sufficiently over-confident that she will make a mistake and stray across the line.
Judging by the way that she keeps ratcheting it up it does seem that way.
According to the Crown Prosecution Service a hate crime is defined as :
'Any criminal offence which is perceived by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by hostility or prejudice based on a person's race or perceived race; religion or perceived religion; sexual orientation or perceived sexual orientation; disability or perceived disability and any crime motivated by hostility or prejudice against a person who is transgender or perceived to be transgender.'
Talking of people not sharing British values and being guilty of high levels of criminality must be getting very close to the definition of "hostility or prejudice".
This is the line that Burnham took in the mayoral election - not as extreme but the same sentiment.
Burnham said, or implied, that refugees from overseas do not share British values and are guilty of high levels of criminality?
Got a link?
‘Honest Bob’ Jenrick
Presumably accepted British values include conspiring with a tory donor to illegally evade tax on a housing development? Then admit to the illegality (only after being caught, obvs) whilst retaining your seat as a MP and remaining in ministerial positions?
Right you are Bob. If you don't mind, I'll be the judge of what I consider British values.
I think Burnham saying that while it's an overall good, recognising that immigration has different effects in different places is a world away from the Tories and Braverman's current outpourings isn't it?
I read those comments from 2016 and honestly it's like a glimpse into a forgotten calmer more pleasant place when compared to now, and I remember how upset folks were back then about what Burnham said.
I can't find it in the mainstream media now. It was obvious at the time. This from the independent is clearly slanted but even so
Claiming immigrants undermine communtity cohesion and wanting to refuse asylum seekers to come to manchester.
Clear dog whistle racism
Sunak, Patel and Braverman represent the most agregious example of gaslighting we have ever seen, they're a UK version of Clayton Bigsby (Dave Chappelle character).
Mirror, mirror, on the wall, whose the fairest, of them all.
And if anyone thinks that I am implying that they adhere to a hierarchy of complexions then let me be clear, I am not implying it, I am stating it. Let's be clear their ancestors went to Africa to administer a regime based on exactly that.
Perhaps that's how they see their role in shaping a post Brexit Britain?
And Jenrick? He's basically just described Sudanese refugees as 'canibals'.
<div class="bbp-reply-content">
I think Burnham saying that while it’s an overall good, recognising that immigration has different effects in different places is a world away from the Tories and Braverman’s current outpourings isn’t it?
I read those comments from 2016 and honestly it’s like a glimpse into a forgotten calmer more pleasant place when compared to now, and I remember how upset folks were back then about what Burnham said.
</div>
Much milder yes but the same sentiment Ta for remembering tho that it happened. too many folk try to deny Burnham ever did this
He thought he might lose the mayoral election and blew his dogwhistle to attract more votes. Pure cynical move.
tj, Since learning that the phrase 'mainstream Media" was introduced into the lexicon by Joseph Goebbels it try not to use it anymore.
Except when the opportunity arises to point out that the phrase was invented by Joseph Goebels!
TJ first of all Labour governments have always supported immigration controls, certainly in modern times, which is completely reasonable imo.
And secondly Labour governments have always supported racist immigration and nationality laws, which in contrast is totally unacceptable imo.
https://novaramedia.com/2019/03/03/no-labour-hasnt-always-been-an-anti-racist-party/
However I have never seen equal comparison of racism within the Labour Party with racism in the Tory Party. Which helps to explain why so many brown and black people tend to vote Labour rather than Tory.
I don't think that the level of bigotry from ethnic minority Tories has an equivalent in the Labour Party. I think that a racist ethnic minority Tory politician is a very special kind of creature.
and wanting to refuse asylum seekers to come to manchester.
Hmmm, I remember him saying that it was time to spread the load more evenly, as the local effects of immigration were having on small, poor communities with little resource, and that Manchester had shouldered much of the burden already. I don't remember him actual saying he wanted to refuse them, although I do remember people suggesting that's what he'd said. Again though, still a world away from the hateful rhetoric of Braverman which @ernie rightly says is as close to hate speech as I've ever heard a Home Secretary saying in my lifetime
Edit; I'm happy to be proved wrong though if you remember different?
I agree with what you say Ernie.
However I have never seen equal comparison of racism within the Labour Party with racism in the Tory Party.
I clearly said a milder version of the same thing. Not that it was equal.
However the rhetoric from Burnham whilst much milder was for the same purpose - as a dog whistle to racists to get them to vote for him. Carefully said so as to be deniable but it was very clear what he was doing. it was in the mayoral election and the polls showed he might lose. It was clearly calculated as a dogwhistle IMO
Same sentiment for the same purpose as Braverman but much less extreme ( Actually Braverman might believe it.) I don't think Burham is actually racist but he clearly made a conscious decision to make that statement to get support from racists - and it worked
Nickc - it was the timing that made it obvious and he used his words carefully for deniability but IMO it was clear what he was doing
anyway - back to the delightful Braverman
"Claiming immigrants undermine communtity cohesion and wanting to refuse asylum seekers to come to manchester."
Someone on here was posting about a school teacher from North Manchester saying that since African refugees and migrants had moved to the area, school open days had been jam packed with parents demanding to know how well their offspring were doing? demanding that their maths skills were up to scratch no doubt..
If you are making schools better then how can you be damaging social cohesion?
Likewise in Ordsall (Salford) near to where I live, a once feral, almost whites only sink estate, (that you couldn't cycle past without having things thrown at you) has become a far more civilised (and prosperous) place since arrival of immigrants from overseas.
Perhaps the fear on Burnhams part was that Manchester has always been a red castle protected by a red wall and as tthe red wall had just crumbled, he was looking to prop up the castle's foundations by appealing to the lowest common denominator.
I don’t think Burham is actually racist but he clearly made a conscious decision to make that statement to get support from racists – and it worked
So you don't think Andy Burnham is a racist but you think the voters of Manchester are!
I have just checked and in the last two Manchester mayoral elections and the combined UKIP/Reform UK/English Democrat vote was about 4% or less.
That's not what I expect from a hardcore racist city. Although as Andy Burnham won so easily maybe he got all the racist votes?
the phrase ‘mainstream Media” was introduced into the lexicon by Joseph Goebbels
Sounds like bobbins to me. I can't see a plausible source for the claim, beyond a couple of guys in Twitter saying that Ian Hislop said it.
Ian Hislop was the source for me too, I saw him interviewed and he cited a specific quote Goebbels. I took a punt and trusted him.
"So you don’t think Andy Burnham is a racist but you think the voters of Manchester are!"
Sorry to butt in but I moved to Manchester from Oxfordshire when I was 20 and he lived here for the last 35 years.
I'd ask you to name a black politician or council member or people in prominent positions but I know you're politicaly well informed so could probably furnish me with an answer but for the rest of us, if they do exist they are invisible.
As invisible as white people were at the BLM protest in Manchester. One of the characteristics of the protests worldwide was that they were supported by people of all races. Not in Manchester they weren't.
I'll take those voting figures you've mentioned and give you similar from a Red Wall seat a decade ago. I don't think the high turn out for Labour in Manchester signifies a lack of racial prejudice within the population, I see it as a case of things being swept under the carpet and it only takes a Dominic Cummings type character to come along and lift up the corner of that carpet for things to begin to turn.
I'm not in the least bit complacent about this. Minorities don't have anyone to speak for them in Manchester, they don't even have a voice to drown out.
I am fairly sure that the term "mainstream media" is quite a recent development and previously it was referred to the "mass media".
I have no idea if German term more closely resembles mainstream or mass but whatever it is I would be surprised if it hadn't existed before Joseph Goebbels's elevation to reichministry of public enlightenment and propaganda.
I’ll take those voting figures you’ve mentioned and give you similar from a Red Wall seat a decade ago.
In the mayoral elections two years ago the combined Reform UK/English Democrat vote was a touch above 4%, Andy Burnham received about 67% of the vote.
Manchester might well be a deeply racist city which explains the alleged lack of black politicians, I don't know. But I suspect that it isn't vastly different to other UK cities and the poor electoral support for fairly racist parties doesn't suggest that it is. The BNP don't even stand candidates.
But that is all irrelevant to the point, with two thirds of the votes it doesn't suggest that Andy Burnham needs to scrape the gutter for the racist vote.
Unless of course it is being suggested that he enjoys that level of support precisely because racists so enthusiasticly vote for him.
Which doesn't sound like a very convincing scenerio to me. TJ seems convinced that Andy Burnham isn't a racist, do the people of Manchester really think that he is?
It's not about wether Burnham is racist or not (he isn't).
One of the reasons that far right parties struggled to get a foothold in the City over the last few decades is that they would have been shot if they had tried. Seriously...
South Manchester streets (and club doors) were run by a notorious family with Irish heritage and republican sympathies. They also attended anti fascist events and fought toe to head with the far right. When the BNP tried to open an office in Whalley Range they were alegedly invited for a drink and told they were welcome to open an office there if they wanted but...
Similarly in Salford, the gang leaders there were quite influenced by left wing politics so also had an anti fascist stance.
Manchester having such a large Irish poluation probably influences things a bit as well, some other towns around the North West with less of an Irish influence have become home to some Unionists from NI and have always been more fertile ground for the far right.
Well it's good to hear that despite South Manchester being run by a notorious Irish gangster family that they are at least violently anti-fascist, and won't let people vote for racist parties. Gawd bless them. And the leftie left-footer gangsters in Salford.
Quite how they check up whether people in Manchester have voted for the English Democrats, for example, I don't know - presumably Manchester still has secret ballots for elections.
Edit: I am assuming it's a shoo-in for Andy Burnham and that he doesn't need to rake the gutter for votes? Which was my only point.
https://www.gbnews.com/news/suella-braverman-sudan-news-migrant-asylum-uk
Questioned over the possibility of Sudanese people being “turned away” upon reaching the UK, she said: “If you’re suggesting people might get on a small boat and come here, that would be totally unacceptable.
“There are safe and legal routes that are on offer".
Suella Braverman has ruled out introducing a safe and legal route for asylum seekers in Sudan to seek refuge in the UK.
The tories just seem to be getting worse and worse the longer they go un-punished.
I'm more naturally a Lib-dem than Labour, but in my area, I think I'll have to hold my nose, yet again in the local elections, and vote labour as the best chance of sending a message and hopfully kicking a tory or two out.
These sub-human, frankly evil people need to be stopped.
Manchester is racist now?! Good lord, what will be racist next? The M25? Rutland Water?
I look forward to the day when everything is racist. Then it might reset and we can go back to being normal. You know, when actual racists were racist rather than just anything and anyone you don’t like or agree with.
Manchester is racist now?!
Apparently not thanks to Irish gangsters. Otherwise yes. Apparently.
Ian Hislop was the source for me too, I saw him interviewed and he cited a specific quote Goebbels.
Are you sure he wasn't referring to lügenpresse, "the lying press", which was a term often used by the Nazis and Goebbels in particular, and repopularised by MAGA fans?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lying_press
Quite - agree with Ernie here:
And aren’t there laws concerning inciting hatred and hate crimes, how is she getting away with it? Surely she must be on the very edge of what is legal?
There's a reason why Braverman is doing this.
You'll see Nikki Haley doing it very soon too.
I think "I hear you're a racist now Father" is one of the greatest comedy lines ever written.
I can't imagine ever tiring of watching that clip.
Those gang leaders are mostly dead now but did have an influence on keeping the BNP out of Manchester throgh the 80's and 90's. I was trying to be serious with you ernie but there's not much point really.
Growing up down south, the north always had a reputation for being racist and when I moved here it didn't dissapoint. There's lots of things I like about living here but the fact that it's markedly more racist up here is something I've just had to price in.
So I was less surprised than many on here when the red wall crumbled and I'm not complacent about the possibility of the right wing getting the footing up here that was denied to them in previous decades.
I know you're only allowed to mention racism on here if you're using it as a stick with which to beat the Tories so I'll shut up about it.
And no, I'm not calling anyone racist either. (Though if thats what you were about to type, then you might want to take a good look at yourself in the mirror.
I was trying to be serious with you ernie but there’s not much point really.
Well I have got to admit that I was struggling to take seriously the claim that Reform UK/English Democrats had remarkably few votes in the Manchester mayoral elections two years ago because of the actions of left-wing Irish gangsters who are 'mostly dead now'.
And no, I’m not calling anyone racist either.
Well it is very difficult to figure out what you are saying inkster. This very much suggests the opposite:
I’d ask you to name a black politician or council member or people in prominent positions but I know you’re politicaly well informed so could probably furnish me with an answer but for the rest of us, if they do exist they are invisible.
As invisible as white people were at the BLM protest in Manchester. One of the characteristics of the protests worldwide was that they were supported by people of all races. Not in Manchester they weren’t.
Why are you saying all that if you aren't calling anyone racist?
Ernie, I said that the BNP couldn't get a footing in the city 20 years ago because they had been threatened with being shot, That actually happened. (Allegedly).
You read that as:
Me claiming that Reform UK/English Democrats had remarkably few votes in the Manchester mayoral elections two years ago because of something that happened 20 years ago?
Are you dumb?
"Why are you saying all that if you aren’t calling anyone racist?"
I referenced that there were less white people at the BLM protest in Manchester than say.... the one in Guildford, a city one tenth the size.
And you construed that as me saying people on here were racist? The people of Manchester? Well quite possibly when you compare those numbers.
Again ernie, are you dumb?
And you construed that as me saying people on here were racist?
Again, are you dumb?
On here? No. I took it that you were talking about racism in Manchester. The following certainly sounds as if you are talking about that:
I’d ask you to name a black politician or council member or people in prominent positions but I know you’re politicaly well informed so could probably furnish me with an answer but for the rest of us, if they do exist they are invisible.
As invisible as white people were at the BLM protest in Manchester. One of the characteristics of the protests worldwide was that they were supported by people of all races. Not in Manchester they weren’t.
Frankly I don't know what you are saying. But maybe I am just dumb as you suggest.
Well as a Manchester resident of Irish catholic heritage, this is fascinating trying to work out if I’m a racist, a gangster, or both. Hmmmmmmm
Anyway… back on topic… sort of…
This weeks episode of beautifully-written, American-made Apple TV fluff, Ted Lasso, featured an interesting if quite surprising story arc
*spoiler alert if you’ve not seen it*
A Nigerian Premier League player gets into a Twitter spat with the UK Home Secretary, who is referred to as ‘the devil’ and ‘pure evil’ because of the dehumanising language she keeps using to refer to refugees and asylum seekers
He then gets the restaurant he owns trashed, presumably by far right thugs, who spray the Home Secretaries dismissive words to him on the wall after they’ve wrecked the place
Quite a bold comment about politicians language inciting violence
In other unsurprising news, the claims she made yesterday about migrants and criminality are based on absolutely no evidence whatsoever.
If you were being generous you could refer to her claims as ‘purely anecdotal’ but more than likely she just made them up for a bit of scaremongering and demonising.
She says she has spoken to ‘senior police sources’ but won’t actually name anyone and nobody from any police force will go on the record backing up those claims/made-up nonsense
https://twitter.com/guardian/status/1651285241787449344?s=46&t=1lK7Dw1b6RqGJyvufO-trQ
Actualy, no, can we just set her on fire and burn the body in a ditch?
You know that this is a thread mostly about the effects of hate speech, right?
Can we ship Suella off to africa?
If that happened I would expect her to play every 'card' to avoid it, including an appeal to the ECHR.
Actualy, no, can we just set her on fire and burn the body in a ditch?
I can't condone that - not acceptable given that a lot of the context around Braverman is the on the ground effects of her hate speech.
What is also unacceptable, though, is the notion that Braverman obviously has that all this nasty to foreigners stuff is a vote winner. It doesn't reflect at all well on us as a country. Obviously culture war bigotry is all the Tories have left to deploy, but someone is obviously advising them that this is the way to go to pull in Labour's lead.
Sad times.
@moimoifan - There was a good article in the Guardian this week by Rafael Behr saying exactly that, but a good summary generally of what the Tories are now doing. These aren't even remotely workable policies, just campaigning for the next general election by appealing to Little Englanders and racists
Reality is Sunak’s enemy in this endless Tory campaign to defy political gravity
This sums it up....
The illegal Migration Bill is conceived more as a campaign aid than a workable policy measure. It flouts international law and mandates detention and deportations on a scale that couldn’t practically be achieved even if they were legal.
But the function of such a law is to demonstrate ferocity of intent to stop boats and to solicit opposition from the Labour leader, Keir Starmer, which can be narrated as softness on an issue where target voters want toughness. Once enacted, the law’s secondary function kicks in: provoking a culture war skirmish with any judicial authority that dares to insist that the British state meet its obligations to respect refugees’ human rights. If that authority is European, all the better.
This is what the the official Tory Party social media was putting out yesterday, across the board. It is literally all they've got left, but this is where the politics of this country presently is. Utterly depressing.
https://twitter.com/Conservatives/status/1651291835984125952?s=20
I was going to link to that Raphael Behr article yesterday. The last few year have clearly demonstrated that there is fertile ground for politicians willing to pander to prejudice and bigotry as well as disregarding reality as Project Fear or a woke conspiracy by The Blob - as Liz Truss characterised it.
There was another article earlier in the week about how Meloni is normalising the far right in Italy. That is unquestionably what the Tories are doing now too.
The likes of Braverman should be being laughed at, ridiculed and kept away from high office at all costs. Nowadays it seems the more sensible voices come from the backbenches whilst the nutters are in the ascendancy. And this will not go away - there will be a significant number of previously mute racists and bigots permanently emboldened by the actions of this government.
Disgraceful.
I have some to the collusion that not only is Braverman using small boats and dog whistling racist ideas as a culture war to try to gain votes but that she actually is racist in that she believes this nonsense
I think that what we're seeing - and we've got Boris and the Brexiteers to thank for this - is the political process as a permanent election campaign, with little interest in actual policy. They seek to prolong their time in office for reasons that seem to have little to do with serving the interests of the country.
If theres any consolation of this, is that this lot don't seem to actually DO anything. They just shout 3 word slogans and sit on their hands while their mates line their pockets. The only policies they carry out are the ones to further corrupt our democracy in their favour
The Rwanda deportation flights and new detention centres will join the 40 new hospitals and a nuclear power plant a year in the list of Tory fantasies/lies that will never happen.
But in the meantime they debase everything they touch and this adoption of the language and rhetoric of the far right is genuinely dangerous in what it is tacitly legitimising and endorsing. I think there are going to be far reaching consequences in the way it toxifies our culture with division and hatred.
Not that they care.
They are truly despicable and what makes it worse is seeing how many of them are the first generation children of immigrants/refugees. What does that say about them as people?
The Rwanda deportation flights and new detention centres will join the 40 new hospitals and a nuclear power plant a year in the list of Tory fantasies/lies that will never happen.
And that can, in turn, be blamed on a woke/remainer/lefty/unpatriotic fifth column - aka The Blob as Thick Lizzy tried to characterise it. And a lot of people swallow this nonsense as it feeds some internal narrative of theirs.
The Tories have become Rich Energy! A brand with no product.
Oh, they have a product. Its just not one they want anyone to see.
They want to further entrench and widen inequality and facilitate the transfer of wealth from the poor to the rich. They want to further deregulate and privatise, impoverishing the public realm and further solidify their own powerbase
All this other stuff is just noise to distract people from that. There will never be any flights to Rwanda, any more than there will be 40 new hospitals and in the grand scheme of things the 'small boats' are an irrelevance.
But they get to create an imaginary enemy - the other - here to destroy our way of life (whatever that is?). Then they use this enemy to do what they have done so successfully since the Brexit campaign... divide and rule. They do this by harnessing peoples irrational, basest fears. This is now an orchestrated campaign to make all immigrants out as rapists and murderers (which is what Farage did so successfully during the Brexit campaign and Braverman and Jenrick were both doing yesterday) and exploiting ignorance, prejudice and racism.
What has become very apparent is that where some were prepared to give Sunak the benefit of the doubt, thinking he was indulging the nutter part of the party by appointing Braverman, its obvious now that it was because he agrees with her/them. He's as nasty as the lot of them, behind his patronising smile and demeanour
I can’t condone that – not acceptable given that a lot of the context around Braverman is the on the ground effects of her hate speech.
I agree, theres enough pollution in the world.
Im sure there's a more environmentally friendly method
As I pointed out on another thread I still believe we've a problem with immigrants not adopting the 'British Values' I and many other multi-generational Brits have.
The folk I see/hear are all 2nd generation immigrants such as the MP's Braverman, Sunak, Patel and Kruger to name a few.
Why are 2nd generation immigrants like this?
Wandering a bit off topic now, but this is what the modern tories want us to be - a nation of philistines governed by philistines.
From the article:
It wasn’t always like this. The opening ceremony of the 2012 London Olympics depicted a capacious British culture, accessible to all and appealing in multiple registers. That’s disappeared now.
How very true - on many levels.
And depressing.
mattyfez
Full MemberCan we ship Suella off to africa?
Now That’s a policy I can support.
Actualy, no, can we just set her on fire and burn the body in a ditch?
Why is it okay to call for a woman to be murdered on here? How come this is the one post on the thread that doesn't have a "report" button next to it? WTAF?
How come this is the one post on the thread that doesn’t have a “report” button next to it? WTAF?
The button goes when someone uses it.
On the culture one. I have no issue with elitist culture like opera losing subsidy. However popular culture needs support. Theatres, gig spaces, etc
"Well as a Manchester resident of Irish catholic heritage, this is fascinating trying to work out if I’m a racist, a gangster, or both. Hmmmmmmm"
You surprise me binners, seeing as you worked at the nightclub who's door was run by the people I was referring too (and played their part in its' demise) and you cycled past the pub where the threats to the BNP were threatened on your commute. I thought you'd be familiar with the local folklore.
I'm not so sure it's off topic either.
An assertion was made by our resident pollster that because the turn out for the far right in Manchester was so low, the city was somehow immune from the kind of rhetoric the Tories are pumping out. I'm sure similar was said in Scotland, as it was in the Red Wall seats. I think that perspective is complacent. Turkeys voting for Christmas you might say.
Andy Burnhams comments a couple of years back were directed at the same constituency that the Tories are now targeting, so he obviously recognises that Labour's hegemony in the city is vulnerable to this type of thing, even if some posting on here don't.
Why is it okay to call for a woman to be murdered on here?
Because people get carried away spending too much time in an echo chamber. There isn't anything to keep them in check.
An assertion was made by our resident pollster that because the turn out for the far right in Manchester was so low, the city was somehow immune from the kind of rhetoric the Tories are pumping out.
Well that's bollocks.
I said that I couldn't see much evidence from actual recent election results that Andy Burnham needed to scrape the gutter for racist votes to win.
You came out with some really weird stuff about left-wing Irish Catholic gangsters, who are now mostly dead, being the reason why people in Manchester don't vote much for Reform UK and the English Democrats in what are secret ballots.
I don't know whether you agree that Andy Burnham really needs to scrape the gutter for racist votes to win or not** But apparently that might be because I'm dumb.
Edit: ** Receiving two thirds of the votes in mayoral elections strongly suggests that he doesn't.
You surprise me binners, seeing as you worked at the nightclub who’s door was run by the people I was referring too (and played their part in its’ demise) and you cycled past the pub where the threats to the BNP were threatened on your commute. I thought you’d be familiar with the local folklore.
@inkster - it wasn't meant as a serious remark 😉
As you pointed out, I've been fully immersed in it all enough to be well aware of the folklore (i could tell you some truly terrifying stories about witnessing the reality of it), but I don't think it makes Manchester any inherently more or less racist than anywhere else in the UK. Some people are racist, most aren't. Its an incredibly multicultural city with all the advantages and tensions that brings.
I don't think for a second that Andy Burnham is racist and I don't think for a second he was trying to appeal to racists. Can you name me another politician in the country who has a more decisive mandate than 67% of their electorate? He doesn't need to be courting racists.
He was voicing a perfectly legitimate point that places with already severe issues with severe deprivation and massively overstretched public services, like Rochdale for example, were being effectively used as dumping grounds for large numbers of asylum seekers, with no additional funding or support. Particularly as large, more affluent areas of the country were housing no asylum seekers at all.
That isn't racism! IMHO what he was doing he was highlighting something that was being exploited by the far right. The massive underfunding of areas where demands on public services is most severe leads to tensions, particularly when people want to stir things up to suit their own agendas
For anyone to be putting Andy and his political instincts into the same category as Braverman and this shower is absolutely preposterous
I have no issue with elitist culture like opera losing subsidy. However popular culture needs support. Theatres, gig spaces, etc
I'm no fan of opera,but I'm not sure you or I should be deciding arts funding because we think something is elitist
All for fair funding, of course.
Fair funding? Opera gets far more than its share for its audience and the audience is generally affluent.
Compared to grass roots music venues
Binners. You can deny all ypu want and Burnham used his words carefully to give that room for deniability but it was obvious dog whistle as you agreed at the time
Same sentiment as Braverman. Much less extreme
I have never agreed with you on this TJ. That only exists in your head along with your weird take on the matter. I have always vehemently disagreed with you on it and I find your obsession with the subject absolutely bizarre.
I've explained above what my take on it is and whenever you're asked to provide evidence of his racism, you can't.
Now for gods sake will you leave it? You regularly derail threads with this utter nonsense and whataboutery.
This is a thread about the monstrous policies of this government who are demonising immigrants and using foghorns not dog whistles for their racism and you're banging on, once again, about the mayor of Manchester and your misguided interpretation of one thing he said years ago 🙄
From the article:
It wasn’t always like this. The opening ceremony of the 2012 London Olympics depicted a capacious British culture, accessible to all and appealing in multiple registers. That’s disappeared now.
How very true – on many levels.
And depressing
I think that, from time to time - how far we've fallen in little more than a decade. 🙁
Forgotten have you? I put the direct quotes to you and you agreed. Disgraceful was what you said. Years ago mind you.
But yes its a diversion but that does not let him off the hook
I think that, from time to time – how far we’ve fallen in little more than a decade
It truly is a tragic waste of a decade.
I think that, from time to time – how far we’ve fallen in little more than a decade. 🙁
I don't think we even live in the same country any more.
Its difficult to think of any nation who's public face to the world and political culture has changed in such an extreme manner in such a short space of time.
When we were all watching the 2012 Olympics could you imagine that only ten years later we'd be seeing our own government openly, proudly even, break international law so they could deport refugees to Rwanda?
It really is utterly depressing and people like Sunak and Braverman are driving us further and further down this far right road
"it wasn’t meant as a serious remark 😉"
No worries, I didn't take it as such.
Let's just say Andy Burnhams words were unfortunate, the very real problem of where people are placed is a problem imposed on him largely by the government and as you say, it puts him somewhat between a rock and a hard place.
Wether Manchester is more or less racist than anywhere else is hard to say, though I think the overwhelming support for Labour may mask what lies beneath the surface and as I said, lead to complacency.
It's easy taking the government and the knuckle draggers to task but the more they move to the right, the easier it is for us not to examine ourselves and maybe look a bit closer to home.
I work in Manchester's very middle class, right on and virtue signalling Arts sector these days and when I look around me, do I think the sector is Racist?... Hell yes. More so than in other cities? Well from experience I'd have to say yes and could cite examples that satisfy me that it is the case. It doesn't think it is but I put that down to complacency, well meaning but nevertheless, somewhat ignorant.
I don’t think we even live in the same country any more.
Its difficult to think of any nation who’s public face to the world and political culture has changed in such an extreme manner in such a short space of time.
You maybe do not. I do. My nation has not followed that path.. Scotland has remained in more or less the same place as can be seen by the way this right wing and racist rhetoric gains no traction. The big difference being that we have political leadership both prepared to call it out and refusing to play the game. Even the Tories here so not try playing the race card
Its mainly the Tories fault of course but timidity and inaction from labour has not helped
The likes of Braverman should be being laughed at, ridiculed and kept away from high office at all costs. Nowadays it seems the more sensible voices come from the backbenches whilst the nutters are in the ascendancy.
absolutely!
The lunatics took over the asylum on June 24th 2016 and its been downhill at a rate of knots ever since
I have no issue with elitist culture like opera losing subsidy.
Arts Council England gave the ENO (English National Opera) £11.5M for this year, and I think a £18M funding package over the next 3 years, but it must relocate I think. I agree that the folks that normally go and see opera are affluent, but the people that perform it often aren't, and that's what the subsidy is for. I don't think setting one art against another in a a competition to see which has more worth does anyone any good.
I'd rather be in an environment where all arts are funded properly and available to as wide a group as they can be.
I have no issue with elitist culture like opera losing subsidy.
Who gets to decide where the line is that tips something into your elitist category?
Bleedin'ell, even another right-wing bigoted MP now feels that Braverman has gone too far with her bigotry!
The more Braverman opens her mouth the more I believe that she is consumed by the same mentality as the "Coopers" in Goodness Gracious Me.
Who gets to decide where the line is that tips something into your elitist category?
TJ of course! 🙂