[Closed] Speciesismtrackworld

No

What gives any animal the right to eat another animal?

Being the apex predator

Cos it says we can in the Bible.

EDIT: Nope.

What gives any animal the right to eat another animal?

Yep.

It's not as if we're the only species that does it.

Those nasty spiders eating flies
Those nasty birds eating spiders
Those nasty cats eating birds

And all started by that old woman.

What makes some feel that an animals life is worth more than plants life? Or those who will only eat an animal if it is aquatic and has no legs?
I'm doing my bit for equality. I will eat anything!

Those nasty spiders eating flies
Those nasty birds eating spiders
Those nasty cats eating birds

And all started by that old woman.

Any ideas as to her motive?

Any ideas as to her motive?

Not sure but I think she might die.

If God didn't want us to eat animals, why did he make them out of tasty, tasty meat?

It's something to do with evolution and shit...

It's not as if we're the only species that does it.

Never heard anyone say well animals do it so its ok for me to - crocodiles eat their young for example, Baboons eat others baboons young , dogs roll in and eat their and others shit the list is endless

two main reasons

1. conformity - brought up doing it
2. they value their taste buds above a sentient life

Because you can buy it?

It's something to do with evolution and shit...

Not heard the canine teeth explanation in a while. It's so stupid I was beginning to think even the insecure carnivores had stopped using it.

Look what happened to the dinosaurs..

‘Rights’ are a human social construct - they don’t have the ontological status you’re attempting to bestow on them. Why not discuss the phenomenon of inter-species predation without cluttering the issue with subjective morality.

I'm more worried/annoyed about why we chase/hunt/kill animals for fun/sport/'amusement' only.

‘Rights’ are a human social construct - they don’t have the ontological status you’re attempting to bestow on them. Why not discuss the phenomenon of inter-species predation without cluttering the issue with subjective morality.

Wow! WTF does that mean? 😯

‘Rights’ are a human social construct - they don’t have the ontological status you’re attempting to bestow on them. Why not discuss the phenomenon of inter-species predation without cluttering the issue with subjective morality.

Why 'clutter' any discussion involving humans with the issue of morality for that matter?

What gives humans the right to eat the flesh or drink the milk of another species inhabiting the Earth?

I think it’s less a right to do so and more of the ability to.

It’d be good if this didn’t descend into the usual cliched utter bullshit arguments from both sides.

Chances are minimal.

What gives humans the right to eat the flesh or drink the milk of another species inhabiting the Earth?

Because eating your own species is considered to be not cool.

Because eating your own species is considered to be not cool.

But other animals do it.

Humans are known to as well on a rare occasion!

Perchy Fillets with a nice Chianti

There are numerous theological and philosophical approaches to the OP’s question, and none of them are easily tailored to forum consumption.

Sorry OP. Just rest assured that it’s all natural. Unfortunate, perhaps, but natural.

Taste better than a chick pea

Taste better than a chick pea

That’s not an answer, the answer would be why it tastes better

Isn't the OP on some sort of vajanuary health kick thing?

Sweet Jesus on a Space Hopper dude, it's only been 5 days and you're going all meat-is-murder on us, calm down Morrissey!

[url= http://singletrackmag.com/forum/topic/veganuarytrackworld-1 ]Lambchop loves the meat[/url]

What gives humans the right..,

Starts from the assumption that the right must be given.

Looking at it the other way: what [i]should[/i] take away the right of humans to eat other animals?

compassion - thou shalt not kill oh and lets reword it

what should take away the right of humans to eat other humans?

the reality is we do many things to animals not even the nazis did to humans.

You can justify it how you like but no one could treat humans this way so its a speciest based argument

Whether you agree with their wider agenda is a different point but folk do think you can treat animals differently
Personally i think it goes further as its ok to boil a lobster alive to eat one but only a monster would do this to a kitten. Its not even consistent within all non human animals.

Eat animals or treat them as you wish but almost everyone [ myself included in some areas , though less than most] will do it.

Early Godwin.

crocodiles eat their young for example

Yeah, but they spit them out again afterwards.

if you change your answer its speciesism

Indeed it is. I have no problem with that and when I read the stuff about Speciesism that dazh posted on another thread I found the suggested equivalence of Speciesism to racism to be a bit of a stretch.

[i]Everyone[/i] is [s]speciest[/s] [s]specieistic[/s] speciesismists and anyone that says otherwise is a liar or not of sound mind.

the reality is we do many things to animals not even the nazis did to humans

Hitler woz a veggie.

Makes you think.

[s]Early Godwin.[/s] i am unable to counter your point so have a cheap shooting of the messenger

I found the suggested equivalence of Speciesism to racism to be a bit of a stretch.

Everyone

Junkyard, by the time we consider eating meat akin to slavery we will have nuclear holocausted ourselves or robots will be killing us for sports.

If eating meat is so bad though, shouldn't we be killing off all predators in the name of reducing suffering over the long term.

If humans stopped using animals for food/clothing, etc, what then do we do with all of those animals?
Who pays for their upkeep and housing? There are millions of animals that can’t possibly be left to their own devices, and there are human societies who’s entire existence depends entirely on having herd animals or on hunting to provide much needed protein to survive.
Who are we to condemn those societies to subsistence living on whatever handouts their governments bothers to dish out?

If God didn't want us to eat animals, why did he make them out of tasty, tasty meat?

Very much this.
See: Bacon.

If eating meat is so bad though, shouldn't we be killing off all predators in the name of reducing suffering over the long term.

Don't be daft. The whole point of speciesism, or any 'ism' for that matter is that humans have the unique ability to assess the rights and wrongs of certain behaviours based on the affect it has on others. Speciesism simply says that we arbitrarily suspend our normal moral decisions when applied to animals of other species, just like we used to for humans of different gender, race or sexuality. It's a uniquely human thing, so it clearly doesn't apply to other predators.

If God had meant for us all to be vegans he would have ensured we all had enough hair to grow a man bun.

Did I read correctly that it isn’t actually illegal to eat someone? It’s the murdery/assualty bit that normally precedes it that is the faux pas?

The whole point of speciesism, or any 'ism' for that matter is that[b] humans have the unique ability[/b]

Speciesist!

I have gone deep down the Human history reading rabbit hole recently and I think the prevailing thought is that we are designed to eat the marrow from the bones of better predators leftovers.

I dont have a problem with eating meat, industrial production of animals I am less keen.

Just sitting here scoffing these tasty little guys:

[img] [/img]

And wondered where they fit into the Speciesism argument?

Did I read correctly that it isn’t actually illegal to eat someone? It’s the murdery/assualty bit that normally precedes it that is the faux pas?

So roadkill human would be fine?

Only if someone else did the running over...

And wondered where they fit into the Speciesism argument?

As a straw man I would think.

GrahamS are you joking ?

As a straw man I would think.

GrahamS are you joking ?

Not particularly.

They are animals that were bred and killed for my consumption and I don’t even know that they were treated humanely while alive.

And I ate a couple of hundred of them in one sitting. Probably more, there isn’t a lot to them.

I also ate some pork, but that’s just one small part of a pig that probably fed around, I don’t know, forty people maybe?

Which is worse?

You’re [i]literally[/i] stealing food from a baby robin.

Is that better or worse than stealing food from baby rabbits? 😆

Junkyard - lazarus - Block User
Personally i think it goes further as its ok to boil a lobster alive to eat one but only a monster would do this to a [b]kitten[/b]. Its not even consistent within all non human animals.

Typical militant vegan bollocks. Everyone knows mammals that eat meat are not tasty and should be avoided in the food chain, and there's **** all meat on a kitten anyway.

As a farmer of animals for meat I could write an essay on this, and may well do one day. However, I imagine my views would be counter to what many would expect. Unfortunately it is late and I have a cold. 🙁

What gives humans the right to eat other animals?

Do we need to be given the right?

Plenty of animal species would eat us given the chance.

We can, so we do.

(as an omnivorous atheist, trying to ignore any moral angle here)

What gives us the right to eat vegetables or drink water?

GrahamS , which is worse? the pig , I'd eat crustations and fish and analids before a mammal or bird.

Is that not an example of Speciesism though?

GrahamS , which is worse? the pig , I'd eat crustations and fish and analids before a mammal or bird.

So what you're saying is prawn cocktail for the starter and pork chops for mains? I think you're going to struggle to find anything chicken based on the desert menu unless you go turkish - tavuk gö?üsü maybe.

Being the apex predator

humans have never been an apex predator really. (we can destroy shit on a massive scale, fo'shure, but that's not the same thing) example; put a lion* and a human in a room together, who d'you think will walk out? Interestingly, there are some skulls of Australopithecenes that show signs of predation (two canine holes at the back of the neck) showing that we had perhaps a species of big cat that preyed on early humans specifically.

*needn't in reality be an actual apex predator, any large mammal will do.

You’re taking away the human’s main advantage there though nickc: the ability to invent, manufacture and use tools.

You could equally argue that a great white shark isn’t an apex predator because it’s crap on land.

It does make me wonder... if we're evolved to the point where we are the dominant species on Earth, and we can get all of the nutrients we need from plants, why we cause unnecessary suffering to animals. I know that someone will/ has come forward to say that animals taste better, which may be true, but for me that's not a good enough reason. Thinking about the process of how we get dairy milk is really horrible and it opened my eyes to how exploitative this industry is.

It does make me wonder... if we're evolved to the point where we are the dominant species on Earth, and we can get all of the nutrients we need from plants,

You're making a big assumption there - that [i]everyone[/i] is in a position to get all their nutrients from plants. Sizable chunks of the world population struggle to get the nutrients they need at all, let alone pick and choose where they come. Its only really been for a matter of decades that the richest populations get to be that picky (our parents had ration books - I've got a Womans' Weekly recipe book from the 60's and the only 'Diet Recipe' in it is one for gaining weight) and we're in an extremely privileged position to be discussing what foods we're prefer not to eat on the basis of an ever more complex matrix of conflicting ethical criteria.

You can get all the nutrients a human needs from a vegetarian diet - but only in the context of global markets and industrialised production and the petrochemical-fuel Haber-Bosch process along with various preservation processes providing a secure supply of a variety of fresh food throughout the year. You'd struggle to feed yourself through the year, year in year out, with fruit and veg you can grow in your back garden- only being one bad harvest away from famine.

You could equally argue that a great white shark isn’t an apex predator because it’s crap on land.

You've not seen that well known documentary "Shark-nado", I presume? 😆

Apex predators aren't going to be eaten by something else within it's particular environment. Are there animals that would eat a human given a chance to do so? Yes. Does that happen despite humans obvious and clear technical and mental superiority even today? Yes it does, all the time. We have some clear advantages, but it's only been the last few hundred years or so that industrialisation has tipped the playing field to our advantage, but "mano-a-mano" (so to speak) we're still at a massive disadvantage against a "real" apex predator"

I know that someone will/ has come forward to say that animals taste better, which may be true, but for me that's not a good enough reason.

This is nub really, I'm told bacon sandwiches are yummy, but think about how the process that animal has been through to get to your table. A slave would be super useful right now in my life, but y'know..?

We have some clear advantages,

Our greatest advantage in evolutionary terms has been our partnership with animals. We don't need the teeth and claws, the speed or acute senses of highly specialised predators if we train animals to hunt for us and we don't need to hunt if we domesticate our prey so that they don't run away. And also theres cats for some reason.

Lions and sharks maybe more efficient killing machines - but they have to spend weeks searching for something to eat.

Maccruiskeen, you're quite right - I was referring to the fortunate people who do have a choice in what they eat! That's still a lot of people >300mill in USA, 65mill in UK, same in France etc. The list goes on... That's still a lot of people choosing their tastebuds over animals suffering. It just seems quite uncompassionate and I'm hoping things are gradually changing away from this. You're right that if you eat a plant based diet you do rely on imported food, my tomatoes and aubergines from Southern Europe for example. However, animal agriculture is not free from this. In intensive farms, which are needed if people keep eating the same amount of meat as they currently do, the animals aren't fed grass, often grains or Soya that have been imported from abroad.

curve ball. how many of you new age vegan man bun hipsters are using your phone or laptop on this forum? The factory used to manufacture it is probably doing more damage to the planet than the methane coming out of cattle. Not to mention all the environmental factors such as pollution going into the water system etc. etc. etc.

your electric car still needs a power plant to charge it and a factory to produce it.

your man bun oil is made from baby kittens tears, after which they are ground down in quorn patties.

That's still a lot of people choosing their tastebuds over animals suffering.

Obviously I’d rather that any animals that I eat suffer as little as possible. I think most people (in the UK at least) would agree with that. But I’m still going to eat them.

Likewise I’d rather massive areas of natural habitat weren’t being destroyed for agriculture, fishing, mining, oil, gas, housing, transport etc but like most people I enjoy the fruits of those industries and put my own comfort over the animals suffering.

GrahamS, I'd also prefer if massive areas of natural habitat weren't being destroyed. The leading cause of Amazon rainforest destruction is animal agriculture [url= http://www.rainforestfoundation.org/agriculture/ ]Rainforest[/url]

However, animal agriculture is not free from this. In intensive farms, which are needed if people keep eating the same amount of meat as they currently do, the animals aren't fed grass, often grains or Soya that have been imported from abroad.

We'll this is more the issue really - we eat far too much meat in the west and that problem is being compounded by the developing areas of the world adopting our tastes. For the typical UK omnivore a vegan diet is probably much closer to a sensible level of meat /dairy / omelette consumption than their own.

But you can live in a way where they don't suffer at all - by not eating them! So to say you'd like them to suffer as little as possible isn't quite true (in my opinion but of course I don't know you!)

https://www.rainforest-rescue.org/topics/palm-oil

humans have never been an apex predator really. (we can destroy shit on a massive scale, fo'shure, but that's not the same thing) example; put a lion* and a human in a room together, who d'you think will walk out? Interestingly, there are some skulls of Australopithecenes that show signs of predation (two canine holes at the back of the neck) showing that we had perhaps a species of big cat that preyed on early humans specifically.humans have never been an apex predator really. (we can destroy shit on a massive scale, fo'shure, but that's not the same thing) example; put a lion* and a human in a room together, who d'you think will walk out? Interestingly, there are some skulls of Australopithecenes that show signs of predation (two canine holes at the back of the neck) showing that we had perhaps a species of big cat that preyed on early humans specifically.

The fact we can 'destroy shit' on a massive scale proves we are the Apex predator.

there is no guarantee that the human would be killed in every single encounter with a Lion. Predators still get killed from time to time by their prey or in pursuit of their prey, the key is in most encounters the predator wins. In most encounters between humans and lions, lions lose.

And your point about Australopithises is incorrect. The fact we evolved beyond australopitises proves they were the apex predator of their time.

Ironically in the context of this debate, the key to our evolution from clever ape to intelligent human was the point when we started eating meat. Our earliest Ape ancestors were vegetarian, and like most vegetarian animals in nature spend most of their time grazing and eating. When we started eating meat, we suddenly had time on our hands therefore time for our brains to start developing and that was the difference. Our evolutionary key was that we had capable brains, that were being constrained and held back by our leaf eating diet, but once we broke free from that there was nothing stopping us.

But you can live in a way where they don't suffer at all - by not eating them!

Yup, but that only prevents the suffering of the animal I’m not eating. And then only if enough of us don’t eat it that it never exists in the first place.

Unfortunately though other animals will still suffer to produce whatever else I put on my plate and eat in my nice warm house with all the other comforts of modern living.

The uncomfortable truth is that nature is competition and humans “win” by putting their own needs before other life. Not a particularly happy thought 🙁

The fact we can 'destroy shit' on a massive scale proves we are the Apex predator.

In most encounters between humans and lions, lions lose.

The uncomfortable truth is that nature is competition and humans “win” by putting their own needs before other life.

* in general we are not trapped in some scenario where its us or them to be alive tomorrow. Humanity makes choices to breed it, to kill it to make food in the least efficient manner[ plant matter to make meat matter] with poor morality, mass slaughter,suffering and with a huge environmental costs [ 1/3 of CO2 for eg] just because its tasty- this is a choice you make Graham. Saying nature makes you is just not true its YOUR choice.

But you can live in a way where they don't suffer at all - by not eating them!

Animals we eat don't have to suffer. Most in this country don't. They live a very nice life, get pampered by vets whenever they need to be, get regularly managed in terms of deseises and parasites, and are killed an a humane way. So I don't consider the animals I eat as having suffered as I make sure I buy good quality meat from non intensive producers with the highest possible welfare standards...and we have the highest standards in the world. Far better than any European country (European farmers think we're bonkers I the lengths we go to for animal welfare) and certainly better than the US/Americas, and certainly a better life than an animal in the wild that has to keep a constant eye open for a predator that could be jumping out at them at any time.

There is a double benefit for people and animals in spending more on meat that has not been reared in an intensive way. It tastes much nicer so therefore you need less of it.

The best thing for animal welfare is to encourage a market for it. Look at Veal for example. Due to the animal welfareists 'success' in destroying the veal industry in this country just leads to thousands of male cows being shot in the head within seconds of their birth as they have zero value. The Veal we have in this country is rose veal (not sure we ever had domestic white veal in the UK did we?), so not the cruel white veal where animals were kept in small boxes in the dark in rural France. So want a better life for male cows? then eat more rose Veal.

Of course welfare standards can always be improved, and I'm all for that. But the non-intensive standards in this country are pretty good.

Having said all that, we eat far too much meat anyway. There is no need to eat meat every day.

his does not prove we are the apex predator not least because we dont then eat the lion - do you have any knowledge of what you are discussing? I gave up reading.

Evolution. 99.9% of species that have ever lived are extinct. So we've not done too bad and proves on balance we have been more successful than our predators.

^^. The Gish gallop. Let's address them one at a time.

I think i am able to cooperate to get a win win situation for me and other things who share the planet with me*.

Maybe you [i]could[/i], but you don't. Your existence, like the rest of humanity, causes animal suffering.

All humanity could do this.

I seriously doubt that. At least not without massive slashing the population to a fraction of the current size and giving up on pretty much all modern comforts.

graham I have no idea what the point of your post is you seem to have ignored my points

The uncomfortable truth is that nature is competition and humans “win” by putting their own needs before other life.