SLX M7100 spindle t...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

SLX M7100 spindle too short?

12 Posts
9 Users
6 Reactions
1,429 Views
Posts: 48
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Bear with me as I've not used Hollowtech components for nearly 10yrs, but current bike build is with a SLX group, so have now gathered numerous new tools (another story).

So, cranks are in place, one spacer on drive side. LH crankarm sits happily on the spindle. RH crankarm is a lot closer to the chain stay than the LH crankarm. So much so that the crankarm boot catches.

Tried with two spacers but the LH crankarm has less to grip. Doesn't seem right. Cranks are M7100 for 52mm chain line, frame is a NP Mega also 52mm chain line.

Are there different spindle lengths for M7100? Bought as a SLX 12sp bundle from Cotic.

Time for a brew

Ta, Hoj1718273835323429760636604803122317182738907513731977087026434096


 
Posted : 13/06/2024 11:19 am
Posts: 30093
Full Member
 

Is the BB shell 73mm ?


 
Posted : 13/06/2024 11:25 am
Posts: 405
Free Member
 

Check the part number of the drive side crank.


 
Posted : 13/06/2024 11:52 am
Posts: 8177
Free Member
 

Is it a new frame? Last time I had something like that it was the frame that was out of whack


 
Posted : 13/06/2024 12:01 pm
kelvin and kelvin reacted
Posts: 826
Full Member
 

There are quite a few different models...  https://bike.shimano.com/en-EU/product/component/slx-m7100.html but I'd say the 'standard' is the FC-M7100-1 , that's what I've got. The FC-M7120-1 looks like it might be better for you - but I'd be blaming the frame here, I can't see any special notes on here  https://nukeproof.com/products/07e7-mega-290-alloy


 
Posted : 13/06/2024 12:05 pm
Posts: 405
Free Member
 

Shimano sell their cranksets in 3 variations of chainline, and each one has a different Q factor.

172mm Q factor 52mm chainline M7100

178mm Q factor 55mm chainline M7120

181mm Q factor 56.5mm chainline M7130

You probably need a M7130 for your bike.  It seems even on the Shimano Megas, nukeproof never speced a Shimano crankset.

My Canyon spectral came with a M7120 - with a 73mm bottom bracket shell and 2 24mm spacers on the crank axle


 
Posted : 13/06/2024 12:15 pm
Posts: 6980
Full Member
 

It seems even on the Shimano Megas, nukeproof never speced a Shimano crankset.

"Shimano Deore M6100 12 Speed Crank, 175mm, 32T, 52mm Chainline" was specced on the Comp a few years ago. Just to further muddy the waters.

Odd that it was then dropped for future specs, so wonder if it was a mistake to spec that one


 
Posted : 13/06/2024 12:21 pm
Posts: 4846
Full Member
 

My tuppence worth ( for what its worth) is that the frame or more specifically the rear triangle may be the culprit. Presuming 73mm BB shell the NDS looks good clearance wise - presumably better (by the width of a spacer) when using just one DS spacer as should be the case* with a 73mm shell and Shimano.

Does the chainring catch on the chain stay with just a single spacer (let alone the crank arm)?

A 55mm chain line crankset may work "better" presuming (again) that not just the chainring moves over.

Was the frame from Chiggle?

*there are always exceptions 🙂


 
Posted : 13/06/2024 12:22 pm
kelvin and kelvin reacted
Posts: 48
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks for getting back to me folks, shell is 73mm and both crankarms are M7100.

As far as I could find, NP used to spec m6100/ 52mm chain line on their base spec 290, so not quite sure why this is wronk.

No worries, sounds like I may need a different chainset, which is annoying.

Ta


 
Posted : 13/06/2024 12:30 pm
Posts: 853
Free Member
 

I had a similar issue on a road bike, the frame was out, it was replaced


 
Posted : 13/06/2024 12:34 pm
kelvin and kelvin reacted
Posts: 48
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Yes it's a Chiggle special,  no, there is zero chance of frame replacement so I'll have to make it work!


 
Posted : 13/06/2024 12:39 pm
Posts: 18073
Free Member
 

put a long straight edge on the chainring, is it parallel to the down tube? It might be the angles the pic is taken at but the BB shell doesn't look perpendicular to the frame to me.


 
Posted : 13/06/2024 7:01 pm
Posts: 18073
Free Member
 

Well ? Have you sawn it in half and binned it yet?


 
Posted : 16/06/2024 8:34 am

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!