QPR sacks sparky
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] QPR sacks sparky

33 Posts
18 Users
0 Reactions
119 Views
Posts: 0
Full Member
Posts: 5484
Full Member
 

Pep?


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 11:21 am
Posts: 56564
Full Member
 

De Matteo?


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 11:21 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Coyle?


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 11:23 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

As a QPR supporter, I am most pleased this has happened. 😀 😀


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 11:23 am
 MSP
Posts: 15473
Free Member
 

Is this fake?

They had an all day meeting on Monday and didn't sack him then, seems odd to then swing the axe without another game being played and without another manager being immediately announced.


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 11:28 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
Topic starter
 

MSP - taking time to secure the services of a successor?


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 11:30 am
Posts: 56564
Full Member
 

I thought they'd have waited for him to take the flak for losing at Old Trafford first?


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 11:34 am
 MSP
Posts: 15473
Free Member
 

Losing at OT was (virtually) inevitable, maybe sacking him now just lifts a little bit of pressure off the players.

Its a surprise that it's taken so long to be honest, every interview given he harps on about how good he is, his ego is far bigger than his results, he always thought he was bigger than the team and it appears just they got sick of it and stopped performing.


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 11:39 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Rednapp will be in before dawn


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 12:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What never fails to amaze me is the amount of money pissed away hiring and firing footy managers. I don't know about anyone else, but in my line of work if I selected and recruited a key person into any of the organisations that I've run over the years and then routinely had to off them after a year or so, I’d be the one with the marching orders. What I also know without fear of contradiction is that takes time to properly facilitate change in any organisation. I would say 3 years minimum before real results become apparent.


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 12:11 pm
Posts: 0
 

But the chairmen are only answerable to themselves, they won't sack themselves for making a poor choice?


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 12:13 pm
Posts: 56564
Full Member
 

If you own the company, you can do whatever you like. Got to agree with you though. The present set up is madness. Fergie would have been out on his ear in the present climate


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 12:16 pm
 MSP
Posts: 15473
Free Member
 

What I also know without fear of contradiction is that takes time to properly facilitate change in any organisation. I would say 3 years minimum before real results become apparent.

But there are signs of failure before that time period. If a manager loses his workforce then it just won't work, especially if its the skills of the workforce that are the business.


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 12:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They can have Colin W(a)nker back. In fact we'll pay them, with filthy Arab lucre, to do so.
MOT.


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 12:19 pm
Posts: 28680
Full Member
 

The present set up is madness. Fergie would have been out on his ear in the present climate

Was discussing this last night with a Manc mate, it's abolutely right, ignoring the fact he'd have been sacked 15 years ago, he'd deffo have been sacked a couple of years back when you won nothing at all.


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 12:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

MSP is right -- football management is almost exclusively man-management, and if the men are not responding ......well .....bye.bye


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 12:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm gutted. Was enjoying his work immensely.


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 12:27 pm
Posts: 56564
Full Member
 

Its absolutely crazy! look at De Matteo? He won the Champions league, something all his predecessors failed to manage, and an FA Cup. Yet a couple of poor results and.... close the door on your way out

The only club I can think of who have resisted this knee -jerk sacking instinct was Dave Wheelan, at Wigan last Season. Martinez had had an awful run of results, but he stuck by him, and look at the roll they went on. They beat United, Arsenal, and absolutely thumped Newcastle to finish the season safely


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 12:29 pm
 loum
Posts: 3619
Free Member
 

Football management may be all about man-management, but visible football results are more about chance than probably any other multi-million pound industry.
A season, as 38 lots of 90 minutes, is almost statistically insignificant. There's massive amounts of chance involved.
While it's not quite true, the phrase "more by luck than judgement" could have been invented for football management.

What i'm trying to say is that over the course of 57hours, good managers can have bad results and vice versa.


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 12:33 pm
 MSP
Posts: 15473
Free Member
 

But Sparky has had more than just a few blips, over a quarter of the season gone without one win, and recently they seem to be not even putting up a fight. There have just been no signs since he took over that anything has changed for the better.


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 12:42 pm
Posts: 56564
Full Member
 

Fair enough. They have looked absolutely shite when I've seen 'em. I hope they continue that on Sunday

But is a new manager going to change that. They're down already, I reckon


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 12:48 pm
Posts: 5245
Full Member
 

QPR were something like 8th highest spending club in Europe at one point. Sparky seems to do better on no money aka the Allardyce syndrome.
Twitcher is nailed on next manager.


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 12:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

if a team is performing well but having no 'luck' fair enough-- but if the performances are getting poorer , confidence goes and its downward spiral-- allied with the huge premier league financial pressures, its a job for appy arry innit 😉


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 1:03 pm
Posts: 233
Free Member
 

Well, as a Saints fan i'm very disappointed to hear this. Qpr actually made us look half decent.


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 1:06 pm
Posts: 4097
Free Member
 

They can have Colin W(a)nker back. In fact we'll pay them, with filthy Arab lucre, to do so.

This +1,000,000


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 1:10 pm
Posts: 496
Free Member
 

QPR were something like 8th highest spending club in Europe at one point.

the [i]point[/i] actually being a 30 second window on the 14th July 1974.


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 1:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The usual names of people who will largely make no difference to QPRs prospects will be bandied around not doubt. Talk about a closed shop looking after themselves.


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 1:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Here's Harry...........!


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 1:23 pm
Posts: 56564
Full Member
 

.....now if you could just deposit my signing fee into this Swiss bank account in the name of Tiddles, my cat.....

😆


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 1:25 pm
Posts: 1503
Full Member
 

He spent a load of money on every player he could and couldn't build a team, it was predictable.

He did relatively well with Blackburn and appears to believe that he's brilliant on that basis, maybe this will give him the reality check that he seems to need.


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 1:25 pm
Posts: 5245
Full Member
 

the point actually being a 30 second window on the 14th July 1974.

Actually it was in the last 12 months.


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 1:25 pm
Posts: 496
Free Member
 

sorry - a 30 second window on the 14th July 2012


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 1:33 pm
Posts: 5484
Full Member
 

He became City manager & he thought Roque Santa Cruz would improve team...he's still a City player (albeit on loan at Malaga....)


 
Posted : 23/11/2012 6:24 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!