Project managers to...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Project managers to workers ratio

20 Posts
14 Users
0 Reactions
116 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I have just prepared a resume of the project I am working on showing who has worked on it and what they have done.

There are 17 people who are currently or have previously worked on this 12 month project.

7 are Project Managers, 2 other are simply Managers


 
Posted : 11/06/2010 11:45 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

And the rest are consultants 🙂


 
Posted : 11/06/2010 11:49 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

2 solution architects
2 product specialists (consultants)
4 coders (doing the actual work)


 
Posted : 11/06/2010 11:54 am
Posts: 6382
Free Member
 

Do you think that's a poor ratio considering the nature of the work and any staffing problems?
A lot of work can generate ratios similar to that, as can something as common as staff churn.


 
Posted : 11/06/2010 11:59 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

In a project, there can only be one project manager. Study PRINCE2 if you don't believe me.


 
Posted : 11/06/2010 12:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I liked Purple Rain, but I can't recollect any project manager related lyrics.


 
Posted : 11/06/2010 12:08 pm
 br
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

are we confusing job title with actual work?


 
Posted : 11/06/2010 12:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

4 of the project managers were PRINCE 2 project managers. Most the time there was only one or two at a time but we had 4 on site simultaneously one week as both of the existing PMs were breifing their replacements. Great meetings that week.


 
Posted : 11/06/2010 12:08 pm
 DT78
Posts: 10064
Free Member
 

Depends on the size of the project, number of suppliers and stage it's at. I have worked on many projects in the past with multiple pms. For instance, a business pm, an IS pm, a pm representing outsourced development and a pm representing outsourced infrastructure

At the moment my project has the current full time team -
1 pm
2 biz reps
1 analyst
2 testers
1 asm
5 developers
1 designer
1 infrastructure rep
1 architect
many 'hanger's on'

Does that help!?


 
Posted : 11/06/2010 12:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Just been quoted for a £40k managed server installation.
28 days labour @ £850 / day
6 of those days are for "project management"
Who are they trying to kid ?


 
Posted : 11/06/2010 12:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Funny how people can get paid so much for not really doing anything.


 
Posted : 11/06/2010 12:45 pm
Posts: 91000
Free Member
 

We've got about 50-60 people here, and I think there are about 5 coders. What do the others do? I can honestly only account for maybe 1/3 of them.


 
Posted : 11/06/2010 12:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's all nominal, though, isn't it?

I liked Purple Rain, but I can't recollect any project manager related lyrics.

[i]Raspberry Beret[/i] has some excellent discussion of the McGee Method of Labour Productivity Analysis.


 
Posted : 11/06/2010 12:54 pm
 Xan
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

In a project, there can only be one project manager. Study PRINCE2 if you don't believe me.

I agree. In my project at the moment there is

1 Project manager
3 Senior analysts
4 Analysts

We also have a programme manager that Micro Mananages a number of projects.


 
Posted : 11/06/2010 1:00 pm
 juan
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

Funny how people can get paid so much for not really doing anything.

Did I missed something??? When did UK stopped having politicians?


 
Posted : 11/06/2010 1:07 pm
Posts: 0
 

McGee Method of Labour Productivity Analysis

Genius 🙂


 
Posted : 11/06/2010 1:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

sofatester - Member

Funny how people can get paid so much for not really doing anything.

Must have been a good PM! (I assume you are referring to a PM).

Try being a part of a project whaere there is no PM. I have been on one or two of those, where telepathy is the assumed form of communication and everthing is expected to organize itself! The cock-ups came thick and fast and these projects were farcical at times. One overan by 40% in time and budget. In terms of budget, it was beyond viability and the client was not pleased! Someone was too tight to employ a PM, they assumed everyone would try and work things out together, but without them knowing what was expected of them.

A proper PM is a vital asset when a project exceeds a certain value.

Sure, proper PM's don't have to roll ther sleeves up, but I can assure you their job is far from easy!


 
Posted : 11/06/2010 1:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Depends on the size of the project, number of suppliers and stage it's at. I have worked on many projects in the past with multiple pms. For instance, a business pm, an IS pm, a pm representing outsourced development and a pm representing outsourced infrastructure

I think you'll find, under project management methodology jargon, these guys are actually categorized as suppliers.


 
Posted : 11/06/2010 1:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Of course, if you watch numpty TV shows like The Apprentice, it's evident that "super hot shot" Mr Sugar doesn't even know what a project manager is!


 
Posted : 11/06/2010 1:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

During the 4 year development phase:

1 Project Manager
1 Lead Engineer / Architect / V&V Manager
4 Developers
5 other part-time Developers and Testers
1 part-time Product Assurance + Safety Officer


 
Posted : 11/06/2010 2:11 pm
 DT78
Posts: 10064
Free Member
 

Spongebob - they maybe referred to as "suppliers" in the jargon but I can assure you the person you speak to who is organising the suppliers work is normally a project manager.

Now what do you call a group of project managers?

My favourite is 'an arguement of project managers'


 
Posted : 11/06/2010 2:28 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!