Project Folk Assemb...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Project Folk Assemble! (Particularly TOM and Design folk)

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
50 Views
Posts: 12329
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Bit of an interesting situation developing at work , and I've got a fair bit on my shoulders, so would appreciate some views to help formulate my case.

I'm heading up Design of a strand. I am an employee. We have consultancy heading up Op Model.

I have a Design 'considerations' spreadsheet, which essentially is a high level list of stuff we need to build..be it process or tech. We are in very early days, finding feet still and this is a massive project in the making. Like, massive.

They want to have an OP model column alongside each Design entry, which is entirely sensible, plus a process considerations column, which is equally fine being a layer of the Op Model blah blah.

Question:

How would you define the scope of their 'process' column? Particularly its distinction from the work that Design does?

I know what [u]I[/u] think, but would appreciate views from others.

Bit specific, so experience of those involved in either strand of work, or the scope definition, would be appreciated.

Thanks 🙂


 
Posted : 07/06/2016 7:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Que?


 
Posted : 07/06/2016 7:39 pm
Posts: 4397
Full Member
 

How massive? £100m? £500m? And I'm afraid from your description I really don't get any idea what you are trying to achieve, which makes recommendations tricky.


 
Posted : 07/06/2016 7:40 pm
Posts: 12329
Full Member
Topic starter
 

The question is how do would you define the scope of the 'process' layer of the OP Model strand, to be.

Edit: Additionally, how would you phrase it in a statement to make clear the difference from the process work of Design?


 
Posted : 07/06/2016 7:45 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!