Prescription charge...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Prescription charges abolished in Scotland...

42 Posts
22 Users
0 Reactions
75 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

but rise in England by 20p... how is that fair?


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 1:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

how is that fair?

You get to vote, that's how it's fair.


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 1:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Somebody has to pay for my free prescriptions 😉


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 1:42 pm
Posts: 496
Free Member
 

You get to vote, that's how it's fair.

The people i voted for didn't say anything about doing that 😕


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 1:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Also free in Northern Ireland and Wales.

Devolved Parliament for England 😯 Where should it be located?


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 1:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Devolution for England??

Devolution for England is no solution to prescription charges. The Tories would almost certainly win the English elections. The only solution is not to vote Tory, or their New Labour counterparts. That's if you don't like prescription charges of course, but if you don't mind a government which taxes the sick, then carry on voting Tory.


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 1:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The only point I was making is that all of the parts of the UK that have no prescription charges are devolved.


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 1:51 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

Is it because of the arc of prosperity?


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 1:52 pm
Posts: 91000
Free Member
 

a government which taxes the sick

🙄

Wipe the foam from your mouth mate.


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 1:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Actually, 90% of prescriptions in England are also free.

However, the reason that they are [i]all[/i] free in the other countries is that those devolved governments have made cuts in other areas of spending in order to make this possible.


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 1:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Oh of course it's not a tax on the sick ?

So how do you account that prescription charges bear no relationship to the cost of the prescription
then ?

It is a fixed sum charged by government, whatever you get back. In other words what is commonly referred to as a "tax".

Stop being such a sucker for Tory propaganda.


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 1:57 pm
Posts: 151
Free Member
 

Not getting stuff for free is a tax?

No wonder this country got broken.


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 2:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

People who need free prescriptions already get them, this is a huge drain on public resources, reckless politics.


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 2:02 pm
Posts: 77347
Free Member
 

Given the choice of paying for prescriptions or paying the actual price of medicines, I'll pay prescription charges with joy in my heart and a spring in my step, if it's all the same to you.

Tax on the sick? Do you actually believe this stuff Ernie, or do you just post wild inflammatory comments in order to start debate?


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 2:02 pm
Posts: 56564
Full Member
 

LOL @ Bimbler. 😀

I blame TJ! Ultimately its the English taxpayer who's footing the bill for his HRT. Its a disgrace!


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 2:02 pm
Posts: 7100
Free Member
 

Actually, 90% of prescriptions in England are also free.

I think this what a lot of people don't realise.

but if you don't mind a government which taxes the sick, then carry on voting Tory.

So only 10% of them are taxed then, and I didn't really see much change to that after 14 years of Labour.


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 2:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'd say people who don't need free prescriptions already get them too.

I get all my prescriptions free, it's nice but I can't honestly say I need it.

I'd be in favour of an overhaul of the current exemptions.


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 2:05 pm
 j_me
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's the thin end of the wedge, whatever next ? Free eye tests ? Free University tuition fees? Free personal care for the over 65s ?


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 2:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Tax on the sick? Do you actually believe this stuff

Of course it's a tax on the sick, for precisely the reasons I gave.

Thatcher refused to call the Poll Tax the Poll Tax, preferring instead to call it the Community Charge. Does that mean that the Poll Tax was just a "charge" and not a tax......because the Tories said so ?

Prescription charges are a tax collected by government, simple as.

If the prescription charges were removed and the cost raised instead from income tax, for example, would it suddenly, and "magically" become a tax ? ffs

Some of you geezers live with the fairies


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 2:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

See my thread on saving the NHS.
Just as an after thought how about we stopped dropping bombs on other countries. We could probably have free prescriptions...and some.


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 2:14 pm
Posts: 77347
Free Member
 

It's the thin end of the wedge, whatever next ? Free eye tests ? Free University tuition fees? Free personal care for the over 65s ?

A child's face?


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 2:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Oh look what I've found molgrips, the British Medical Association calls prescription charges a "tax on the sick"

[i]The BMA accepts that these are financially difficult times, said Dr Meldrum but, he added: "[u]this is a tax on the sick[/u] that contributes only a modest amount to the NHS budget and does not offset the unfair disadvantage of asking the ill to pay for their medicine."[/i]

[url= http://www.mstrust.org.uk/news/recentstories/article.jsp?id=4535 ]Doctors slam UK prescription charge "lottery"[/url]

So do you think the doctors in the BMA need to '[i]wipe the foam from their mouths[/i]' too ?


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 2:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

ernie_lynch - oh dear, it's not a tax, it's a charge, if you're ill and need medicine then you pay for it, a logical transaction if you're able to afford it, and a lot of people in Wales and Scotland can afford it. Obviously a additional contribution has already been made in other taxes or NI, but the prescription charge itself is not a tax. It's important to be clear on that.

Poll Tax has become the Council Tax and on the whole seems fair, although the valuation bands need an update.

I'm off to have a beer with some fairies.


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 2:29 pm
 D0NK
Posts: 592
Full Member
 

Bleeding hell ernie, bit melodramatic! Whilst technically you may be correct in calling it a tax I consider it more of a standard flat fee for medicine to make you better (if you can afford it/should pay for it) you know so your medium to low income earners can afford those pricey drugs they need. Admittedly you're getting short changed on the 20p cheapo antibiotics the doc gives you to make you go away when he can't figure out whats wrong but I'm happy with a prescription charge (and that was before I knew it was only 10% of people who had to pay)


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 2:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm off to have a beer with some fairies.

You might as well mate


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 2:32 pm
 toab
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"Prescription charges are a tax collected by government, simple as."

When I worked in retail pharmacy I seem to remember that the prescription charge actually goes to the pharmacy as payment for [i]dispencing[/i] the medicines (hence the prescription charge having no relation to the cost of the actual drug).

The returns procedure for prescriptions that are exempt from payment was completely seperate because of the extra process of getting the payment for the pharmacy.

This was a while ago mins so might have all changed


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 2:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Dr Meldrum! - [b]I DON'T BELIEVE IT[/b]


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 2:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bleeding hell ernie, bit melodramatic! Whilst technically you may be correct in calling it a tax

So suddenly its "melodramatic" to call a spade a spade is it ?

The language used by me is the same language as used by the BMA. I'm sorry if that upsets a few Tories on here and makes them feel uncomfortable.

Actually I'm not really ........... I love winding up Tories 😀


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 2:36 pm
Posts: 77347
Free Member
 

the British Medical Association calls prescription charges a "tax on the sick"

The can call it what they like, it doesn't make it fact.

More relevant however is "... that contributes only a modest amount to the NHS budget" - is this right, do we know where the money goes? Will this 20p increase go towards paying for medicines, or does it get handed over to the government to pay for HD TVs and hookers?


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 2:37 pm
Posts: 890
Full Member
 

Those people in England who actually have to pay prescription charges can afford them. Those who can't get them free.

As part of devolution those in Scotland can choose where to spend their money. They have chosen to spend it on free prescriptions. This means that they will have less money for other choices.

Note: Just because the Scottish assembly makes something free does not mean that it can be paid for. There is supposed to be free personal care, but the budget allocated for it is not big enough. Everybody sees the headlines but not the realities in delivering it.


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 2:38 pm
Posts: 77347
Free Member
 

I love winding up [s]Tories[/s] [b]everyone[/b]

FTFY.


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 2:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It does appear an odd system at times with who gets what free etc.

I need to take 1 drug on a daily basis so I get free prescriptions, not just for that condition but for any other prescription item I need, for any other condition or ailment


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 2:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That's me Cougar.

Thanks for fixing that for me btw 8)


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 2:44 pm
 D0NK
Posts: 592
Full Member
 

So suddenly its "melodramatic" to call a spade a spade is it ?
calling it a tax is, as I said possibly correct - i don't know i'm not an expert on tax, calling it a "tax on the sick" is melodramatic
IMHO of course.

oh and I'm not a tory 🙂


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 2:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I don't understand how some treatment like diabetes medicine is free yet my inhalers are 7 quid whatever each and they only give me one for 7 quid. So 2 inhalers is 15 quid.

I keep fit etc to help it but I can't Keep it at bay without my purple inhaler. Surely I have a right to breath for free? Or should I just not bother, drink, smoke and overeat and get all the treatment from the nhs include free nicotine patches!


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 2:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

It's a National Health Service the 'Nation' should pay equally.


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 2:53 pm
 D0NK
Posts: 592
Full Member
 

carbon I was not aware of that, I thought lifelong things like diabetes (and asthma I'd have thought) qualified for free stuff.
That's starting to sound more like a "[b]tax on the sick[/b]"
😳

edit I think nicotine patches used to be standard charge but you could get several weeks supply per script so quite a bit cheaper than rrp, might have changed tho.


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 3:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

rewski - Member
It's a National Health Service the 'Nation' should pay equally.
You mean that children, the elderly, the poor and the terminally ill should also pay?


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My partner's brother is diabetic - without his medication his life is at risk. He gets free prescriptions. Yay!

But she is asthmatic - without her medication her life is at risk, but she pays £7.40 prescription charge per inhaler and she needs two different ones. However, you can buy them over the counter in most of continental Europe; where they are cheaper.

This does not seem just.


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 3:21 pm
Posts: 1672
Full Member
 

I dunno how I feel about prescription charges - I have to buy my asthma medication, but then I got more free healthcare when I was a kid than some people use in a lifetime (and of course all of my medication until I started working was free). Now, the NHS subsidises the cost of medicine here - a quick Google suggests that if I lived in America my inhaler would cost between $30 and $100 a pop.

Not sure if I would call it a "sick tax" either earnie - I'm no Tory, but I ain't sick, and it isn't a tax.


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 3:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How does that work uplink?

dunno, it just does

I think it's a case of if your condition is on the list you get it, if it's not, you don't


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 3:25 pm
Posts: 17366
Full Member
 

What we have spent "liberating" Libya would probably have cost more than giving free prescriptions to all with a free circumcision and tonsillectomy thrown in.

But seeing as there is this inequity, which way will STW swing?

Drag everyone down to the same level and prescription charges all round while denigrating those who have been getting their prescriptions free.

Or,

campaign to get all prescriptions free?


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 3:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

You mean that children, the elderly, the poor and the terminally ill should also pay?

Of course not, and neither should women during pregnancy and people who have to take daily medication. In an ideal world all prescriptions would be free, as originally intended when the NHS was started back in 1948.


 
Posted : 01/04/2011 4:21 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!