You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more
Germanwings airliner crashes in French Alps
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-32030270
Thoughts with all.
Not good at all, very sad.
Sounds pretty grim, looks like whatever caused it [url= http://www.flightradar24.com/data/airplanes/d-aipx/#5d42675 ]happened pretty quickly[/url], 9 minutes from normal flight to crash
Jeez, another AirBus down. 🙁 Hopefully not an iced sensor issue again...
Hollande is saying they there it is unlikely there will be survivors. 🙁
My wife's flying an Airbus over the alps today 😯
Plane took off 8.55 GMT, distress call issued 9.47GMT, looks to be way off course
Thoughts with those aboard and their families and friends, it seems there will be no survivors
Data and comments from flightradar says speed and rate of descent consistent with a normal approach for landing, also reported that an emergency call had been made
[url= https://twitter.com/flightradar24?original_referer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fworld%2Flive%2F2015%2Fmar%2F24%2Fgermanwings-airbus-a320-crashes-in-french-alps-live-updates&tw_i=580326370640818176&tw_p=tweetembed ]Flight radar on Twitter[/url]
[url= http://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2015/mar/24/germanwings-airbus-a320-crashes-in-french-alps-live-updates ]Guardian News Page[/url]
Few of my colleagues possibly on that flight. Hoping they all went yesterday, checking presence info now 🙁
My wife's flying an Airbus over the alps today
Is she well?
Is she well?
She's in the air as I type. She was fine when she left this morning. Her flight was scheduled to leave at about 8.30am. She's headed to Algiers so probably won't go directly over the alps on reflection but still, flying an airbus.
looks to be way off course
Planefinder says it was following the normal route.
🙁
brassneck, hope your colleagues are safe..
Lufthansa and Germanwings have established a telephone hotline. The toll-free 0800 11 33 55 77 number is available to all the families of the passengers involved for care and assistance.
The French interior ministry have tweeted emergency numbers put in place for those close to victims. From Germany call 0800 1133 5577. From Spain dial 902 400 012.
brutal, it's odd, I know, but I always associate plane crashes with Asia, bit close to the bone when it's in Europe.
RIP.
I couldn't care where a plane crashes. If it does it's always a tragedy.
I hate flying with a passion but am in a plane at least once a month. I'll be in a 320 Thursday. Vienna via Brussels.
I'll just have to double dose on the diazepam to get me through it.
On some flights, before I get on I'll make sure I'm nice to everyone I know. Make my peace with the world then as I get off I'm elated. I can't bloody help it. My missus's thinks I'm barking..
That's an odd descent. As mentioned, looks consistent with a landing, not dropping like a stone, and pretty much bang on flight path. Knew they were going down so decided to keep away from built up areas?
I had the alert on my phone this morning but get a lot every day so tend to ignore them now.
Poor souls.
brutal, it's odd, I know, but I always associate plane crashes with Asia
Anecdotally I've heard that there is a reason for this. It's related to their deference to authority; you have two pilots so that one can sense check and question the other, kind of like the buddy system. If your culture strongly discourages you from questioning authority then you only have one side of that equation working.
I honestly don't know how true this is but quite a few pilots have agreed told me this.
Looks my colleagues at least are OK (meeting in Monheim this morning, looks like they all got there last night for an early start) so my thoughts are with those not so lucky now.
It's almost surreal - I'm in and out of Dusseldorf all the time, just can't imagine hearing a disaster happening on something bound there, can't process it.
terrible thing
the flightpath is odd - straight on course, a regular descent rate, but in the alps. if they'd turned back toward marseille there wouldn't be any mountains to hit, it looked to be only just getting over the alps when descent began.
She's in the air as I type. She was fine when she left this morning. Her flight was scheduled to leave at about 8.30am. She's headed to Algiers so probably won't go directly over the alps on reflection but still, flying an airbus.
Cool. As an aside, there aren't many female airline pilots i wouldnt have thought.
On some flights, before I get on I'll make sure I'm nice to everyone I know. Make my peace with the world then as I get off I'm elated. I can't bloody help it. My missus's thinks I'm barking..
I do exactly the same...and then this....
double dose on the diazepam to get me through it.
Hate flying, and this kind of thing does nothing to calm my fears
RIP all in involved..
When I looked a couple of months ago Lufthansa were rated as the safest airline in the world very closely followed by BA.
I shall be on an airbus tomorrow. The flight path from here in Istanbul to Dubai usually routes over Syria and Iraq. I'm rather hoping we'll be diverting a little to the South!
does anyone know why they are called 'german wings', and not 'Deutsch Flügeln'?
Cool. As an aside, there aren't many female airline pilots i wouldnt have thought.
About 10%, there was an article on BBC News about it a few weeks back.
Nothing to add but RIP to all involved 🙁
I didn't say that they we're any lesser.iolo - Member
I couldn't care where a plane crashes. If it does it's always a tragedy.
Party of 16 school kids and two teachers as well...
so probably won't go directly over the alps on reflection but still, flying an airbus.
http://www.airsafe.com/events/models/rate_mod.htm
Terrible for the families of all those on board, until the flight data can be recovered, it's all speculation as to the circumstances.
With modern avionics, and GPS, flying into a cloud stuffed with rocks is much less likely to happen than back in the forties, fifties and sixties; thinking of an airliner that flew into the Boisson Glacier on Mt Blanc, and another that flew into a glacier in South America, which only came to light in recent years.
Personally, I'd be much more afraid of flying over certain unstable parts of the world, politically speaking.
rate of descent consistent with a normal approach for landing,
No it isn't.
let armchair expert battle commence
25 years an atco
About 10%, there was an article on BBC News about it a few weeks back.
We missed that, will have to look for it. Not sure why it's so low. Ruth has never said she's felt obstructed or prevented from pursuing her career in any way on account of her being female. Far from it. She started learning to fly at 14 and did her first solo (and thus got her PPL) when she was 17 (actually on the day of her birthday).
But as you say, it's an aside to the tragedy. There have been a few A320s go down lately. The last one before this was Air Asia flight 8501 last December.
Flightradar shows that the route was identical to that taken by the same flight yesterday (circle is the point of the crash)
[img] 
[/img]
does anyone know why they are called 'german wings', and not 'Deutsch Flügeln'?
English is the international Business language
Could it be a auto pilot/systems major issue that made the plane prepare for landing?
The big question is no matter what the root cause for a controlled descent into a mountain, why during the 8 minute descent was no radio transmission broadcast? It logically points to a incapcitation of the aircrew i.e oxygen starvation.
Major electrical issue?
It logically points to a incapcitation of the aircrew i.e oxygen starvation.
The wife always comments on this. They call it 'time of useful consciousness' and at 30,000ft it's about 15 seconds. The passengers all get drop down masks in the event of the sudden loss of cabin pressure but the pilots have to reach down and pull out their own supplies and then fit them because there is no 'overhead' compartment that you can fit them in on a flight deck.
There was a plane a few years ago that lost touch with air traffic and fighter jets were scrambled. They were able to visually confirm the passengers were all alive but the pilots were either unconscious or by that point dead. Plane ditched into the sea when it ran out of fuel.
Awful awful way to go. Nothing the passengers could do. They couldn't access the flight because it was locked.
maybe hora, but the airspeed was kept constant, which suggests to me that engines (and hence) electrical systems were all alive and working.
It logically points to a incapcitation of the aircrew i.e oxygen starvation
agreed, oxygen starvation leading to inability to fly the plane, maybe just about being able to get the autopilot set before collapsing - but with a horribly wrong path
@geetee. Got a friend who has spent the last 5 years as a "western" pilot flying out of Japan. He's employed on the basis that he is western and so won't simple do as the older pilot/manual says. He's one of 10 western pilots for the regional airline he works for - all employed for the reasons you alluded too.
Major electrical issue?
It's a aeroplane. Doesn't need electricity to fly.
They couldn't access the flight because it was locked.
@geetee - really ? Personally I'd give smashing the door down a really good go
It's a aeroplane. Doesn't need electricity to fly.
@flaperon, it's a modern aircraft and is so totally reliant on electricity. You don't have cables controlling things these days it's all electrical.
Very bizzare that the aircraft was absolutely on the correct flight path but just descended fairly rapidly. Seems like the automatic navigation/control systems where working partially at least. They flew past Marseilles so if there had been a major issue and the pilots where in control they could have turned back.
@flaperon, it's a modern aircraft and is so totally reliant on electricity. You don't have cables controlling things these days it's all electrical.
I may be wrong but I believe he flies one.
Just tragic. RIP to those on board.
I'm sure they'll resolve this quickly as they've found the FDR according to the Beeb.
@geetee - really ? Personally I'd give smashing the door down a really good go
Well since 9/11 they've largely made the flight deck a secure place.
Great. Nervous flyer here notices 2 days ago my holiday plane has changed from a 747 to an A330...
RIP. 🙁
RIP to all and condolences to all families especially for the 16 schoolchildren. Heatbreaking and chilling as I have flown in and out of Geneva today without any knowledge until I was back in London. Awful news.
(Actually saw first female BA pilot at LHR and flight back had lady First Officer)
Well given no-one yet knows what caused it let's all share what we reckon happened.
My sister was on an Airbus that had to make an emergency landing at Barcelona only last week...
[url= http://www.****/travel/travel_news/article-3002206/Ryanair-plane-makes-emergency-landing-Barcelona-fire-extinguisher-discharges.html ]http://www.****/travel/travel_news/article-3002206/Ryanair-plane-makes-emergency-landing-Barcelona-fire-extinguisher-discharges.html[/url]
...(and is the quoted expert in the Daily Fail article)
The cause of that one was an accidental discharge of a Halon fire extinguisher in the cockpit - the pilots had to go to emergency oxygen and the plane descended and diverted. I know from experience that Halon (used to be used by Police public order teams, but now banned...) is excellent at putting out fires - but horrendous when you accidentally breathe it in - almost as if you haven't inhaled at all, which makes you gasp but your lungs are already full, so you gasp etc etc.
I wonder if a similar thing happened today, but oxygen wasn't reached in time?
Kryton57
Fret not; I fly an A330 for a living and it's a very safe aeroplane. The 320 is too, in fairness.
Far more chance of getting killed on your daily commute to work on the UK roads, assuming you don't work at home!
Worth noting, for the more nervous flyers, that if you want to avoid dying on your way to your holiday, then statistically, you are much much better off deliberately taking more care as you drive to the airport, than you are worrying about your plane crashing.....
(i bet not one of those nervous flyers even thinks about crashing their car on the way to the airport......)
Terrible thing especially since there was a group of school kids on board. But air travel is safer now than ever though no consolation to the families involved. It was s very quick descent (5000ft/min so not typical - 8 mins from cruise altitude instead of around 30 mins according to Sky news) so clearly not a controlled descent into terrain, and pilots don't fly aircraft these days so not an issue of oxygen starvation - the aircraft would have flown on for a good couple or three hours on autopilot until it ran out of fuel as the Helios aircraft did. Whatever happened the pilots had no time to react or even get useful coms out. We must wait until the experts analyse the data.
We must wait until the experts analyse the data.
Ah, rationality at last.
Terrible news. A320 has an excellent safety record and I've always been impressed with germanwings pilots. Not enough info at the moment so only speculation.
Siwhite, Ryanair don't fly A320's. The dailyfail article correctly states 737.
With modern avionics, and GPS, flying into a cloud stuffed with rocks is much less likely to happen than back in the forties, fifties and sixties; thinking of an airliner that flew into the Boisson Glacier on Mt Blanc, and another that flew into a glacier in South America, which only came to light in recent years.
Personally, I'd be much more afraid of flying over certain unstable parts of the world, politically speaking.
Electronics have undoubtedly made airliners safer, however, many pilots can no longer fly by the seat of their pants so when the electronics go wrong the aircraft ends up spinning into the ocean - even when they have good visibility/a horizon.
16 minutes of largely inane twaddle in the BBC news coverage. Sad and inappropriate. Most of the detail (sic) is of no relevance to the general public.
16 minutes of largely inane twaddle in the BBC news coverage. Sad and inappropriate. Most of the detail (sic) is of no relevance to the general public.
+1
All we needed to know was that a plane had gone down, I didn't need to see images of crying parents. It's ****ing depressing, I'm hardened enough as it is.
condolences to all, Brassneck I hope your colleagues are safe.
The wife always comments on this. They call it 'time of useful consciousness' and at 30,000ft it's about 15 seconds. The passengers all get drop down masks in the event of the sudden loss of cabin pressure but the pilots have to reach down and pull out their own supplies and then fit them because there is no 'overhead' compartment that you can fit them in on a flight deck.There was a plane a few years ago that lost touch with air traffic and fighter jets were scrambled. They were able to visually confirm the passengers were all alive but the pilots were either unconscious or by that point dead. Plane ditched into the sea when it ran out of fuel.
Awful awful way to go. Nothing the passengers could do. They couldn't access the flight because it was locked.
I find it a little unbelievable that the likes of Boeing and Airbus can't redesign the flight decks, see how much crap Lockheed has managed to cut out of the F-35 cockpit.
Or just wear a flight helmet and mask all the time like the RAF heavy pilots. Then again, the airline pilots would mess up their hair up.
Or just wear a flight helmet and mask all the time like the RAF heavy pilots. Then again, the airline pilots would mess up their hair up.
I've Never seen any Hercules or c-17 pilots with helmet and mask for routine flight.(I'm only a plane geek no actual experience)
The plane in question had a routine service yesterday, in the Greek crash I remember it just having been serviced but some problem with a valve in the tail was missed/introduced.
Yeah thinking about, they do quite often forgo them. Whilst the fast jet and heli lot have to put up with them. I guess wearing them for extended flights day in and day out could cause serious neck issues.
If pilots passing out because they can't get masks on in under 15 seconds is a problem, I still can't see why they can't design a very lightweight strap and drill routinely so the masks are a couple of seconds away from being on at all times.
There's always room for improvement somewhere.
I still can't see why they can't design a very lightweight strap and drill routinely so the masks are a couple of seconds away from being on at all times.
They have and they do.
There was a plane a few years ago that lost touch with air traffic and fighter jets were scrambled. They were able to visually confirm the passengers were all alive but the pilots were either unconscious or by that point dead. Plane ditched into the sea when it ran out of fuel.
Are you thinking of [url= http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helios_Airways_Flight_522 ]Helios 522[/url]? The passengers all died too, except for one flight attendant, who gained access to the flight deck, but lacked the knowledge to fly the plane, it ran out of fuel and crashed into a mountain. I can't even begin to imagine how terrifying that would be.
I was reading this earlier the same day
[url= http://www.avherald.com/h?article=47d74074/0000&opt=0 ]Aviation herald[/url]
so clearly not a controlled descent
A real expert was on radio 2 yesterday and the decent rate matches a de-pressurisation scenario and he said it could well have been a controlled decent.
THou the pilot oxygen mask don't drop down, they are very easily accessible and to be fitted to over the head ONE HANDED. (pass one need two hands)
and have diff air flow rates.
Also the Pilots also have there own oxygen bottle, where passengers have a oxygen generator.
So de-pressurisation, set to rapid descent but maintain course, lost conciousness so no course deviation, mayday or levelling off, slammed into mountain?
Seems to be a safe bet at the moment. Not seen any mention of explosion/fire/fuel yet but the de-pressurisation scenario has to be more likely than a lack of fuel one, especially given previous history and lack of mayday.
Doesnt fit with stall behaviour (eg Air France pitot/stall crash) or massive structural failure (eg tail off)
Wonder if that plane has had a tail strike in the past?
So de-pressurisation, set to rapid descent but maintain course, lost conciousness so no course deviation, mayday or levelling off, slammed into mountain?Seems to be a safe bet at the moment.
No, it's not.
I find all these "opinions" distasteful.
There were probably Brits on that plane, their families or friends could end up reading this thread. Can you not find some other way of satisfying your engineering/aeronautical/know-it-all egos?
ElShalimo - Member
I find all these "opinions" distasteful.
There were probably Brits on that plane, their families or friends could end up reading this thread. Can you not find some other way of satisfying your engineering/aeronautical/know-it-all egos?
Let's hope they don't have any access to TV radio or newspapers then.
Are you thinking of Helios 522?
Yes that was the one. Truly a horrible thing; the only person left on board alive having to sit there while the plane went down.
That particular incident sparked a long conversation between my wife and I. Yes, pilots are drilled regularly for how to deal with a sudden cabin depressurisation but that's not what happened on the Helios flight (and this is in no way speculation on the German Wings incident, it's just discussion).
This was slow despressurisation. The passenger air supply is automatically triggered when the pressure drops too low. That doesn't happen on the flight deck and and as you can read from the account of Helio, there is no entirely unambiguous warning that you're losing cabin pressure. There were warnings, but the pilots mistoook them for something else. Hypoxia has a huge impact on congnitive processing so once it sets in, your decision making and judgement is impaired compounding the problem.
I only know about this stuff from my wife but I still don't understand why there isn't a very specific, unambiguous warning system on the flight deck that tells the pilots they are losing air pressure. Maybe some planes have them, but the 737 doesn't.
I find all the "opinion" heartening.
The fact people are interested, want to discuss, and actually care about what happens to other people in the world.
Discussing "what might have happened" is a natural human reaction, and part of the healing process.
The world would be a terrible place if the reaction to say a plane crash was "so what" wouldn't it.......
If I'd lost friends or family in a plane crash, a mountain biking forum is the very first place I'd be looking to for answers.
Good point. That seems to pretty much be the attitude to road deaths. About 3000 people have been killed on the roads since this plane went down.The world would be a terrible place if the reaction to say a plane crash was "so what" wouldn't it.......