Not sure who to tru...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Not sure who to trust....... may contain science (but not much)

23 Posts
18 Users
0 Reactions
65 Views
Posts: 798
Free Member
Topic starter
 

As work on my time machine progresses, I've got to thinking about the moral dilemma of changing things in the past, and the possible affects this may have on the future
So after doing a bit of research I now present the two main views,

as we all know one of the first people to ever successfully invent a time machine was Doc Emmett Brown, he was rather impressed by his invention, but soon discovered a few pitfalls of time travel and felt that it causes great risk to the fabric of the space time continuum.
Although as far as we know he's still gallivanting around in his!

And at some point in the future it becomes necessary for humanity to come back in time to help a couple of high school kids with their history report, giving them full use of a time machine without any warnings whatsoever, even going and removing s pair of royals from history in order to complete the line up of their band
All of this is done without any obvious changes to the present day, yet ensures a happy utopia in future

So who's right, crazy old scientist who seems to just be guessing?
Or Rufus, a man from the actual future who seems to think its fine?


 
Posted : 22/02/2013 12:45 pm
Posts: 6275
Full Member
 

rufus,just because he can play mean guitar also 😉


 
Posted : 22/02/2013 12:47 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 22/02/2013 12:48 pm
Posts: 8
Free Member
 

I wouldn't worry about it - Rufus is most probably right.

Remember that time is a bit wibbly-wobbly.

The Doctor


 
Posted : 22/02/2013 12:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Your forum name is an anagram and I claim my £10


 
Posted : 22/02/2013 1:05 pm
Posts: 798
Free Member
Topic starter
 

you claim your £10?
thats a new game to me, plus its not an anagram


 
Posted : 22/02/2013 1:11 pm
Posts: 8613
Full Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 22/02/2013 1:14 pm
Posts: 349
Free Member
 

If both the future and past exist as reachable constructs then surely anything you do in the past is something that you've already done and as such the present is only present because you've already made that change?


 
Posted : 22/02/2013 1:16 pm
Posts: 77347
Free Member
 

its not an anagram

No, it's a spoonerism.

Now, where did I put the ban hammer...?


 
Posted : 22/02/2013 1:29 pm
Posts: 7540
Full Member
 

If time travel to the past is possible then where are all the people from the future?


 
Posted : 22/02/2013 1:30 pm
Posts: 77347
Free Member
 

If you lived in the future, would you want to come back to now?


 
Posted : 22/02/2013 1:31 pm
Posts: 7540
Full Member
 

No but it would be a laugh to go back to Dallas in 1963 and shout "DUCK"


 
Posted : 22/02/2013 1:34 pm
Posts: 41642
Free Member
 

If time travel to the past is possible then where are all the people from the future?

There's an argument that you need 2, one at each end therefore as soon as we've invented one then it'll all kick off.


 
Posted : 22/02/2013 1:36 pm
Posts: 12072
Full Member
 

If you lived in the future, would you want to come back to now?

Unlikely, late 90s Sydney was in fact pretty much the highpoint of human civilisation. I'd go back there.


 
Posted : 22/02/2013 1:36 pm
 IHN
Posts: 19694
Full Member
 

[i]No but it would be a laugh to go back to Dallas in 1963 and shout "DUCK" [/i]

Nah, what actually happened was conspiracy theorists travelled back in time from the 1980's and lay in wait on the grassy knoll...


 
Posted : 22/02/2013 1:37 pm
Posts: 1002
Full Member
 

Stephen King suggested that (more or less) in his book 11/22/63. His view was that time doesn't like being changed and will try to stop you from doing so...


 
Posted : 22/02/2013 1:38 pm
Posts: 811
Free Member
 

No idea - but bagsy a go in your time machine when you get it finished.


 
Posted : 22/02/2013 1:46 pm
Posts: 77347
Free Member
 

No but it would be a laugh to go back to Dallas in 1963 and shout "DUCK"

Thank you, Kryten.


 
Posted : 22/02/2013 1:49 pm
Posts: 77347
Free Member
 

Stop the presses!


 
Posted : 22/02/2013 2:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Your all missing a very valid point......

When sky net tries to take over humanity many years from now we will have to send a state leader back in time so there.


 
Posted : 22/02/2013 2:30 pm
Posts: 1070
Full Member
 

Your forum name is an anagram and I claim my £10
That's inflation for you.
If both the future and past exist as reachable constructs then surely anything you do in the past is something that you've already done and as such the present is only present because you've already made that change?
I think something in my brain just burst.

OP - Rufus FTW


 
Posted : 22/02/2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 798
Free Member
Topic starter
 

There's an argument that you need 2, one at each end therefore as soon as we've invented one then it'll all kick off

isn't that why you build one with wheels, so you can just take it with you?


 
Posted : 22/02/2013 4:52 pm
 ojom
Posts: 177
Free Member
 

Time is not linear and as such you can't go back or forward in it.

Also, it is relative, there is no external clock outside our universe to sync with therefore you cannot go back to a precise time in our universe as there was never a precise time to start with.

All there ever has been is now. Everything and every 'time' exists all at once.


 
Posted : 22/02/2013 4:56 pm
Posts: 91000
Free Member
 

Rufus is most probably right.

You need to listen to this guy Rufus. He KNOWS what he's talking about.

Also see Red Dwarf 'Future Echoes' for a proper treatment of time travel.


 
Posted : 22/02/2013 5:09 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!