You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more
Is pleased.
Looks great apart from will smith .
Looks great apart from will smith .
Racist
Have to say it's one of the better movie trailers I've seen for a while.
There doesn't look to be any major plot reveals (I'm looking at you Batman vs Superman!) and visually it's stunning
Oh, looks great.
Racist
I bet he gets an Oscar nomination .
that
looks
awesome
Queen helps, but this sells it to me much more than the earlier footage
(will smith IS shit tho)
+1
Why do they keep giving Will Smith a job FFS he is utter 'parsnips'
August? Jeez!
Ouch
Warner Brothers just can't get it right
http://www.darkhorizons.com/suicide-squad-gets-panned-will-open-huge/
Hmm, I was kinda looking forward to this.
[url= http://io9.gizmodo.com/movie-review-suicide-squad-is-as-messy-and-weird-as-th-1784666704 ]http://io9.gizmodo.com/movie-review-suicide-squad-is-as-messy-and-weird-as-th-1784666704[/url]
[url= http://themuse.jezebel.com/the-reviews-for-suicide-squad-are-in-and-they-arent-pr-1784708757 ]http://themuse.jezebel.com/the-reviews-for-suicide-squad-are-in-and-they-arent-pr-1784708757[/url]
I reckon it's going to be bad.
It has potential, but there are so many bad super hero movies, and so few good ones..
Why does anyone pay attention to the opinion of some random bloke with a blog site? They earn money from clicks, they get clicks by being controversial.
The only source who's opinion I give any credence to is Empire Magazine, and I don't always agree with them.
This looked awful when I caught a trailer in the cinema last week. That Vanity Fair review, oof!
a dull chore steeped in flaccid machismo, a shapeless, poorly edited trudge that adds some mildly appalling sexism and even a soupçon of racism to its abundant, hideously timed gun worship.
jimjamBased on the directors previous films it will not be good. By which I mean it will be crap. And when I say crap, I mean shite.
Posted 9 months ago #
"I've not seen it, but I know all about it and feel qualified to comment."
AKA the Ghostbusters Reboot Law.
Superhero movies are in the doldrums at the moment. Problem is they are now seen as cash cows by the studios.
1. Get hack to direct
2. Sign big stars rather than suitable actors/stars. (I like Will Smith - but really not suited for this role)
3. Michael Bay the shit out the explosions.
4. Profit
🙁
Last decent superhero film I saw was Darknight....although my memory is terrible so there might have been something else.
Why does anyone pay attention to the opinion of some random bloke with a blog site?
Which site is that then?
Cougar"I've not seen it, but I know all about it and feel qualified to comment."
AKA the Ghostbusters Reboot Law.
Actually it's called the Michael Bay law.
I watched that expecting to see something really bad from Will Smith.
I saw him for maybe 20 seconds?
What about this trailer makes cheezybeanz and mrsfry hate the fresh prince so much? Did he steal their boyfriends?
On a side-note, I have still not forgiven David Ayer for U-571.
Ayer wrote the submarine thriller U-571, a fictionalized account of the capture of the German Enigma machines during WWII. The film depicts the effort as being led by United States forces when in reality the bulk of the Enigma work, vital to Allied victory, was done by members of the United Kingdom military. The furor that surrounded the film's release led British Prime Minister Tony Blair to claim that it was an "affront to the memories" of those involved and U.S. President Bill Clinton to write a letter emphasizing the film's fictional nature.Ayer has said that U-571 distorted history by this assertion and that he would not do it again. "It was a distortion", he said, "a mercenary decision to create this parallel history in order to drive the movie for an American audience. Both my grandparents were officers in World War II, and I would be personally offended if somebody distorted their achievements."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Ayer#Controversy