New Porridge show
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] New Porridge show

30 Posts
23 Users
0 Reactions
127 Views
Posts: 20
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Why oh why oh why oh why? Rubbish, and a complete waste of money.


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 8:35 pm
Posts: 6219
Full Member
 

I'll give it a few more minutes before I switch over. It is dire at the moment though.


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 8:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Already turned it off. Was just some bloke doing a Fletcher impression.


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 8:40 pm
Posts: 20
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Already turned it off. Was just some bloke doing a Fletcher impression.

I was just going to say that same thing. I could possibly excuse them wanting to update it for a new generation, although I would still see it as a pointless waste of money, but to have someone just do a bad impression of one of the most iconic British TV characters of all time is nonsensical.


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 8:42 pm
Posts: 2258
Full Member
 

Turned it over after 2 minutes - a desecration of one of the great comedy series, and paid for by our TV Licence fee.


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 8:45 pm
Posts: 20
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Turned it over after 2 minutes - a desecration of one of the great comedy series, and paid for by our TV Licence fee.

Bingo!


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 8:46 pm
Posts: 8849
Free Member
 

Even the preview/ ad / trailer or whatever it's called informing you it starts Friday, made it look utter utter tosh.


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 8:51 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50352
 

Yup trailer was enough.


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 8:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I was on another forum earlier today and they were moaning about it too, “why don’t they just show the old ones, they were perfect”. Which I can’t really argue with, Porrige was pretty much Sit-Com perfection, but we’ve seen them all before.

It got me to thinking, in the past Hollywood has recreated actors in CGI when they’ve passed away mid-filming. Given the original writers are still with us (they wrote the new one I hear). Could we technically write new episodes and CGI in the original actors - how cool would that be?!


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 8:53 pm
Posts: 20
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Even the preview/ ad / trailer or whatever it's called informing you it starts Friday, made it look utter utter tosh.

I don't really watch BBC 1 much, so I must have completely missed the ads as I had no idea it was even on the cards. A shocking waste of the licence fee.


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 8:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

New? It's been on before hasn't it? This "new" version I mean, or am I imagining how absolutely dire it was?


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 8:54 pm
Posts: 4097
Free Member
 

My first reaction was similar, this isn't looking good but tbh I'm glad I gave it a few more minutes, it's growing on me. Not sure about some of the performances, but the writing's not bad imho.


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 8:55 pm
 chip
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yep was on a couple of years ago I think.


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 8:56 pm
Posts: 20
Free Member
Topic starter
 

That's even worse: They thought i was good enough to repeat? Jesus....


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 8:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

We are still struggling through just so we catch the start of the 10 o/c news. It’s really dire


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 8:58 pm
Posts: 15907
Free Member
 

Come on people actually watched it ?

These re makes never work, and why mess with something that wasn't broken


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 9:01 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50352
 

Yep was on a couple of years ago I think.

So it was, i caught a few minutes of it then and now hae flashbacks of how awful it was.


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 9:09 pm
 km79
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Turned it over after 2 minutes - a desecration of one of the great comedy series, and paid for by our TV Licence fee.
Well if you keep paying it they will continue to pump out shite like this.


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 9:17 pm
Posts: 8849
Free Member
 

Surely, if this's what it's now come down to, there's others that had real potential in the 60's/70's/80's but fell by the wayside against such competition as Porridge/Rising Damp/Good Life/Steptoe etc, that could be rewritten for 2017 and wouldn't be put up for comparison against it's former self?.


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 9:17 pm
 WTF
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Pilot episode was good.
But so was the Fox Force Five pilot.


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 10:30 pm
 WTF
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Points of View making a comeback also?

mikey74 - Member
Why oh why oh why oh why? Rubbish, and a complete waste of money.


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 10:32 pm
Posts: 20
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Haha you saw my cunning reference. You win tonight's internet.


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 10:34 pm
Posts: 77347
Free Member
 

Is this a new series? They did a one-off a little while ago, same cast or unrelated?


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 10:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Drac - Moderator
Yup trailer was enough.

as far as i got too.


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 11:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

RIP BBC.


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 11:07 pm
Posts: 10567
Full Member
 

I tried to like it. I felt the writing was good, the Fletcher guy was good and so were some of the other characters; some familiar, some new. But the production values were atrocious. Real ITV spoon fed and see it a mile off, unsubtle and rushed.


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 11:13 pm
Posts: 56564
Full Member
 

I saw the trailer for that and it immediately went in the box marked 'things that I will never ever ever watch - not even for a second - as they will just needlessly sully the original'.

It's next to the re-make of Reggie Perrin with Martin Clunes. Just why? Seriously.... how could it be anything other than a third rate impersonation?

On a positive note it did make me revisit all the original Rise and Fall, and Fall and Rise, which were as surreal and stupefyingly brilliant as ever, and they gets more and more relatable the older I get


 
Posted : 07/10/2017 7:11 am
Posts: 30093
Full Member
 

The Martin Clunes thing was actually pretty good.

Kind of the BBC to have a trailer warning me not to watch this one though. There must have been at least one funny moment that could have been used to create a smile raising trail?


 
Posted : 07/10/2017 7:22 am
Posts: 1308
Free Member
 

Sometimes they work in the spin off situation. I like Cheers and I love Frasier.
Love Only Fools and Horses and Green Green Grass was excellent
(Does anyone believe the second one?)


 
Posted : 07/10/2017 7:24 am
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

This thread is sponsored by the word overreaction.


 
Posted : 07/10/2017 7:28 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I didn't catch the 'special', but yeah this is a new series it seems. Didn't know it was on, just caught it while flicking around so gave it a go.

Yeah, bloke doing a Fletcher impression. I gave up after a few minutes.

Sure he's supposed to be offspring or whatever, but just identical mannerisms and rapid sarcastic quips, but no where near as good or funny as the late great Ronnie. Would have been far better to make him a chip off the old block but has his own identity rather than just doing impressions.

Though all kind of pointless to make.

Still Open All Hours is not so bad as while David Jason takes on Ronnie's role, he's still Granville but has morphed into Arkwright a bit, and kind of works. It's flogging a dead horse though. Cast is far too old. It's like Last of the Summer Wine which dragged on way too long, replacing cast as they died with more people just about to die.


 
Posted : 07/10/2017 10:07 am

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!