New Mad Max film???...
 

[Closed] New Mad Max film????? -= Now with spoilers =-

89 Posts
55 Users
0 Reactions
203 Views
Posts: 293
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Wow Tom Hardy as Mad Max 😯 oooh wonder how this will pan out.

Anybody got any more info.

 
Posted : 29/07/2014 8:05 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Saw the trailer yesterday and read a bit about it, apparently Gibson was approached but outright turned down the role, half way through filming changed his mind but obviously too late. I think Hardy should do it justice.

 
Posted : 29/07/2014 8:12 am
Posts: 23244
Free Member
 

as with most remakes/sequels/prequels, I want it to be good but I don't think it will be.

 
Posted : 29/07/2014 8:13 am
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

looks like the return of Bane

 
Posted : 29/07/2014 8:15 am
Posts: 14554
Free Member
 

EDIT: Doh! too slow.

Looks very Mad Max 2, though in hi-def

 
Posted : 29/07/2014 8:15 am
 Drac
Posts: 50284
 

Saw the trailer yesterday and read a bit about it, apparently Gibson was approached but outright turned down the role, half way through filming changed his mind but obviously too late. I think Hardy should do it justice.

George Miller has been trying to do a fourth for over 20 years now, finally got one going which seems to be another story between 1 and 2. Least the original director is behind it and with a big budget a mix of real time and CGI effects it may prove to be a good old fashioned action film or it might just fall on it's arse.

 
Posted : 29/07/2014 8:18 am
Posts: 6009
Free Member
 

Looks ace. I hope it is as good as the trailer predicts.

Read about it on Wikipedia. Apparently they were filming it near Broken Hill, NSW, where some of the previous films were made, but had to relocate to Namibia due to torrential rain causing an eruption of wild flowers, making the desert look far too pretty!

 
Posted : 29/07/2014 8:26 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

The buzz from Comic Con is very positive, apparently the film is essentially one long chase (again) and the scale of some of the set pieces is a lot larger.

It's been on my radar for a while, Miller is being given the time (principal photography finished about two years ago) and money to do what he wants.

 
Posted : 29/07/2014 8:26 am
Posts: 6381
Free Member
 

I know it's only a trailer, but am I the only one that thinks that that looks like glossy shit in comparison to
these two?

 
Posted : 29/07/2014 9:40 am
Posts: 6009
Free Member
 

that looks like glossy shit in comparison to
these two?

With an additional 25 years of film-making technology, you'd hope it would be produced to modern standards...

 
Posted : 29/07/2014 10:16 am
 Drac
Posts: 50284
 

With an additional 25 years of film-making technology, you'd hope it would be produced to modern standards...

And with another 10 years on top of that even more so. 😀

 
Posted : 29/07/2014 10:18 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Damn.. now this I am looking forward to. I remember my dad sitting me down to watch this and Terminator when I was about 15/16 - proper film education 🙂

 
Posted : 29/07/2014 10:27 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I agree with Vinnyeh.

The 3rd movie was over produced balls and this looks no better.

Waterworld anyone?

 
Posted : 29/07/2014 10:34 am
Posts: 17349
Full Member
 

It's actually a documentary on Australian drivers... 🙂

 
Posted : 29/07/2014 10:38 am
 Drac
Posts: 50284
 

The 3rd movie was over produced balls and this looks no better.

3rd went for the bizarre theatrical theme, this is back to the raw of car chases and explosions. But yes it could be a disaster.

 
Posted : 29/07/2014 10:40 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I like the look of it. I hope it's as brainless as it looks

 
Posted : 29/07/2014 10:51 am
Posts: 6009
Free Member
 

And with another 10 years on top of that even more so

Doh!
Maths hey, over-rated....

 
Posted : 29/07/2014 11:03 am
 Drac
Posts: 50284
 

I prefer age denial.

 
Posted : 29/07/2014 11:07 am
Posts: 3550
Full Member
 

Looking at that trailer it looks to me like Mad Max 2.5, what happened in between...

 
Posted : 29/07/2014 11:08 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"Contolini wants his hand back"

 
Posted : 29/07/2014 4:04 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50284
 

Looking at that trailer it looks to me like Mad Max 2.5, what happened in between...

*cough* ^^

 
Posted : 29/07/2014 4:09 pm
Posts: 3394
Free Member
 

I thought it was supposed to be between 1 & 2. But in the trailer it looks like the Interceptor gets written off, and he still has it in 2?

 
Posted : 29/07/2014 4:21 pm
Posts: 92
Free Member
 

Can't wait, although could be the death knell for tom hardys career, meaning he'll be doing massive blockbuster from now on...

 
Posted : 29/07/2014 5:08 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50284
 

I thought it was supposed to be between 1 & 2. But in the trailer it looks like the Interceptor gets written off, and he still has it in 2?

Hmmm! Can't recall now I thin you're right now you mention it. Not seen them for ages but I bet they're on TV soon now the trailer for 3 has been announced.

 
Posted : 29/07/2014 6:23 pm
Posts: 33017
Full Member
 

vinnyeh - Member
I know it's only a trailer, but am I the only one that thinks that that looks like glossy shit in comparison to
these two?

Yeah, well, considering you can shoot an HD movie with a DSLR and edit on a laptop these days, which will give results at least as good as the first MM movie, while the new one will probably be shot in 4k on RED cameras, I'd bloody well hope it looks glossier, otherwise all that tech is really going to waste!
Or should they have shot it all on Super 8?

 
Posted : 29/07/2014 6:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"Ain't nobody beat the snake before, who are you?"

 
Posted : 29/07/2014 7:05 pm
Posts: 3550
Full Member
 

"If it's all the same to you I'll drive that tanker..."

 
Posted : 29/07/2014 7:10 pm
Posts: 7829
Full Member
 

"And how do you plan to do that? Look at yourself. You couldn't drive a wheelchair."

 
Posted : 29/07/2014 7:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think it should be good, looks styled similarly to the first 2. The shame is the leading ladies, Charlize Theron and Rosie Huntington-Whiteley. Charlize maybe, but Rosie is only in it for the pouts across the desert. I would have picked Maggie Gyllenhaal.

 
Posted : 30/07/2014 6:45 pm
Posts: 1617
Free Member
 

Official trailer now out:

Looks alright to me.

 
Posted : 11/12/2014 11:22 am
 Drac
Posts: 50284
 

Shit! That in iMAx with D-Box has to be worth it. 😯

 
Posted : 11/12/2014 11:33 am
Posts: 65805
Full Member
 

As it went on the crashes/explosions got a bit too mad for me- carnado! I [i]love[/i] mad max 2 but it had a brilliant real world solid thump to it and this one, not so much, it's a bit too fast and furious, everything seems to be made of CGI and dynamite.

But still, excited. Tom Hardy could be just the man.

 
Posted : 11/12/2014 11:55 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Didn't need doing IMHO but might be OK as it seems close to the feel of the 2nd one which was the best by miles. Frankly 1 is really dated and a bit dull and 3 was a joke.

A fella, a quick fella, might have a weapon under there. I'd have to pin his head to the panel...

Shame he's not in it.

 
Posted : 11/12/2014 11:57 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Some films should be left alone - looks like a film version of the game RAGE

 
Posted : 11/12/2014 12:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's a shame they've fallen into the trap of using loads of CGI and way ott action.
The great thing about Mad Max films was the real driving and crazy stunts!

I don't mind CGI being used to create things that don't exist, but it's unconvincing as an easy way to do big action scenes.

 
Posted : 11/12/2014 12:14 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50284
 

Some films should be left alone - looks like a film version of the game RAGE

Is that RAGE the Mad Max inspired game?

 
Posted : 11/12/2014 12:17 pm
Posts: 14
Free Member
 

apparently the film is essentially one long chase (again)

that's me sold then

 
Posted : 11/12/2014 12:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

franki

It's a shame they've fallen into the trap of using loads of CGI and way ott action.
The great thing about Mad Max films was the real driving and crazy stunts!

I don't mind CGI being used to create things that don't exist, but it's unconvincing as an easy way to do big action scenes.

With the amount of money they are spending It looks like they are trying to create an entirely new action movie franchise. I'd say they are trying to develop an individual look to differentiate it.

Mad Max was such a hugely influential film in terms of post apocalypse/future dystopian look and it's action sequences that it's been rehashed a thousand times over. I don't like cgi in car stunts particularly but at least this looks visually strong and distinct. Hopefully they can use it to supplement physical stunts, not replace them. The vast majority of the trailer looks to be using physical effects, with only the last few seconds (presumably from a big set piece) being cgi heavy.

 
Posted : 11/12/2014 12:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

apparently the film is essentially one long chase (again)

that's me sold then

...and me

 
Posted : 11/12/2014 12:51 pm
Posts: 12847
Free Member
 

It's a shame they've fallen into the trap of using loads of CGI and way ott action.
The great thing about Mad Max films was the real driving and crazy stunts!

I don't mind CGI being used to create things that don't exist, but it's unconvincing as an easy way to do big action scenes.

Couldn't agree more. Most of the time big CGI set pieces look so fake that they're just boring to watch no matter how spectacular they're supposed to be - and what's the point in a boring action film?

 
Posted : 11/12/2014 12:52 pm
Posts: 197
Free Member
 

Why's everyone going on about all the "CGI"?

It's mostly physical "old school" FX

 
Posted : 11/12/2014 12:59 pm
Posts: 1048
Free Member
 

Charlize Theron?

I'm out.

 
Posted : 11/12/2014 1:04 pm
Posts: 27
Free Member
 

yeah but Tom Hardy. come on. I'd endure anything, even Sigourney Weaver, to watch Tom Hardy.

 
Posted : 11/12/2014 1:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

yeah but Tom Hardy. come on. I'd endure anything, even Sigourney Weaver, to watch Tom Hardy.

+1
He's ace.

 
Posted : 11/12/2014 1:18 pm
Posts: 76786
Free Member
 

Looks good, but I'm getting a bit bored now of Yet Another Film Shot Entirely In Orange And Teal.

 
Posted : 11/12/2014 1:34 pm
Posts: 76786
Free Member
 

Evidence for the prosecution,

http://theabyssgazes.blogspot.co.uk/2010/03/teal-and-orange-hollywood-please-stop.html

 
Posted : 11/12/2014 1:37 pm
Posts: 27
Free Member
 

to be fair, it is set in a desert landscape, which is pretty much orange and blue.

 
Posted : 11/12/2014 1:45 pm
Posts: 7100
Free Member
 

and what's the point in a boring action film?

opium for the masses

 
Posted : 11/12/2014 1:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I see the aussies are butthurt about the whole thing.

 
Posted : 11/12/2014 1:52 pm
 rone
Posts: 9030
Full Member
 

3D can piss right off.

 
Posted : 11/12/2014 1:54 pm
Posts: 27
Free Member
 

butthurt

say what?

 
Posted : 11/12/2014 2:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

He means *ed in the *.

 
Posted : 11/12/2014 2:41 pm
Posts: 904
Full Member
 

A lot of the first one was shot near Geelong in vic, and there really is an 'anarchy road' although it's spelt anakie!

 
Posted : 11/12/2014 2:46 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

No new ideas? rehash an old franchise!
Can't think of a decent story? EXPLOSIONS. Lots of explosions.
Looks bloody stupid.

 
Posted : 11/12/2014 7:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Turns off the BBC music awards and rummages in DVD box for Mad Max 2

 
Posted : 11/12/2014 8:13 pm
Posts: 65805
Full Member
 

Cougar - Moderator

Looks good, but I'm getting a bit bored now of Yet Another Film Shot Entirely In Orange And Teal.

Not disagreeing with the general principle, but you have seen australia before? The entire continent's orange and teal

[img] [/img]

 
Posted : 11/12/2014 8:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

ButtHurt
An inappropriately strong negative emotional response from a perceived personal insult. Characterized by strong feelings of shame. Frequently associated with a cessation of communication and overt hostility towards the "aggressor."

 
Posted : 11/12/2014 9:20 pm
Posts: 65805
Full Member
 

Saw this on another forum...

 
Posted : 06/01/2015 7:39 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

Forgot I'd posted that ^^^
[i]Looks bloody stupid.
[/i]

Saw the "extended trailer" yesterday and my god it really does look stupid. 6 minute trailer had me bored silly.

 
Posted : 10/04/2015 10:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

New one looks better and Hardy is a better actor than Gibson ever was.

 
Posted : 10/04/2015 11:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Acting NEVER came into how cool the first MAD MAX films were.

This new one will be shit but probably quite pretty and ultimately harmless since Thunderdome ruined MAD MAX already.

 
Posted : 10/04/2015 11:28 pm
Posts: 65805
Full Member
 

I hated Thunderdome when I first watched it, but I watched it again just recently and loved it. Absolutely cracked, mind, and maybe works better if you forget it's a mad max film but still.

Thought Gibson's performances in the first 2 were perfect though... Kind of like Matt Damon in the Bourne films, the script said he had to look concussed and confused and he delivered.

 
Posted : 11/04/2015 12:18 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yeah.. as a stand alone hollywood action movie thunderdome ticks all the boxes as will this new one no doubt.

Thunderdome just isn't really in the same genre as the first two MAD MAX films. that's all.

 
Posted : 11/04/2015 12:33 am
 Drac
Posts: 50284
 

There's more.

 
Posted : 16/04/2015 7:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

just 2 hrs of lazy cgi rubbish. will not ruin my teenage memories sitting in the cinema with my mates wearing our crash helmets then riding home afterwards like mad things
when they made paddington they got real bears to play the parts so it can be done.

 
Posted : 16/04/2015 9:08 pm
Posts: 90742
Free Member
 

I liked the first one far more than the others.

 
Posted : 16/04/2015 9:15 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50284
 

just 2 hrs of lazy cgi rubbish.

The car scenes aren't using CGI. 😆

 
Posted : 17/04/2015 12:18 pm
Posts: 357
Free Member
 

Woohoo. Not shit

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/mobile/m/mad_max_fury_road/

 
Posted : 11/05/2015 11:07 pm
Posts: 2802
Full Member
Posts: 293
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thats promising from Rotten Tomatoes 😀

 
Posted : 12/05/2015 6:47 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Saw it premiere on Channel4 at 21:00 last night, the post-apocalyptic scenes were very well done.

 
Posted : 12/05/2015 6:52 am
Posts: 4356
Full Member
 

Hmmm, it does look good, now all I need is a rainy evening with no childcare commitments...

Better start negociations.

 
Posted : 12/05/2015 8:29 am
Posts: 293
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Anyone seen it yet? scores 9 on IMDB which is pretty good.

Colleague from work going tomorrow, will give it a few days to let the crowds die down a bit.

 
Posted : 15/05/2015 2:56 pm
Posts: 42
Free Member
 

saw it last night

2 hours in total - about 1:45 of that involves cars being blown up

Basic plot is

Max gets caught
Charlize does a runner in a tanker
Car chase
Car chase
Chat
Car chase
Car chase
Where are we going to go
Car chase
Car chase
oh we've got to our destination
Credits

all in all it's pretty ace

 
Posted : 15/05/2015 3:01 pm
Posts: 42
Free Member
 

forgot to add

'BOOM' in between each line

 
Posted : 15/05/2015 3:02 pm
Posts: 293
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Spoiler alert 😆

 
Posted : 15/05/2015 3:07 pm
Posts: 56206
Full Member
 

We're off to see it tomorrow. It looks bloody brilliant!!! It's been ages since I've really looked forward to seeing something on the big screen. I notice the absense of any complicated sub-plots in chomps spoiler 😀

 
Posted : 15/05/2015 6:52 pm
Posts: 65805
Full Member
 

I don't think I've ever seen such positive reviews for a film I actually want to see.

 
Posted : 15/05/2015 7:02 pm
 rone
Posts: 9030
Full Member
 

This is good cinema. Visceral, exciting and a great update to this sort of genre. Bay should watch this and take lessons in the craft of directing , editing and cinematography.

Surprisingly engaging plot which unravels to serve a satisfying climax. Wasn't expecting how it was all going to pan out - especially as the masterstroke is to start in full on confusion.

Minor criticisms; some of the grading and compositing ( in terms of scenery) was so bonkers and a little unconvincing I started to yearn for a more naturalistic and consistent tone.

But as a whole to keep everything rattling along of what is effectively a chase film, this is very impressive as are the few quiet moments.

It's also nice for once to know an update , reboot or sequel at least delivers despite the hype. You just need the talent.

 
Posted : 15/05/2015 7:33 pm
Posts: 33017
Full Member
 

The bloke from [i]Empire[/i] magazine was [i]very[/i] enthusiastic about it on 6Music this morning, and generally speaking, if he likes a film, I know I will, the caveat being it has to be a subject I'm actually interested in seeing.
This film was supposed to be made years ago, but 9/11, and the financial climate stopped it, so the director went and made a penguin movie instead! ([i]Happy Feet[/i]). 😯
As far as CGI goes, it's pretty much all physical shots, things really fall down, go 'BOOM!', it's completely nuts, and looks like an outstanding amount of fun!
Looking forward to using my Meerkat Movies code in the near future. 😀

 
Posted : 15/05/2015 8:00 pm
Page 1 / 2