Myself and yourself
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Myself and yourself

66 Posts
46 Users
0 Reactions
145 Views
Posts: 13554
Free Member
Topic starter
 

just a weird observation that I’m kind of hoping others have noticed. At my place of work I’m receiving emails (both internal and external) where people have started using myself and yourself in place of me or you.

Is this a thing and if so I wonder how it started? I know language changes over time, but it just seems a bit odd, it annoys me for no apparent reason and I’ve only noticed it recently.


 
Posted : 29/08/2018 9:25 pm
Posts: 20675
 

It happens so often now I don’t even notice it...


 
Posted : 29/08/2018 9:26 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50352
 

Myself I've not noticed it.


 
Posted : 29/08/2018 9:27 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

longer words are betterer, they make you sound clevererer or something

Though as an observation on email we are moving from conversational to more professional, certainly with chat tools available outside of email.


 
Posted : 29/08/2018 9:28 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

I saw that the other day and I literally exploded! 


 
Posted : 29/08/2018 9:29 pm
Posts: 20675
 

I sometimes use big words I don’t understand to make myself sound more photosynthesis.


 
Posted : 29/08/2018 9:32 pm
Posts: 13554
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thank god it’s not just me that’s losing the plot. I wonder how it started though? Did one person do it and others thought “shit, Dave’s using myself there. It looks wrong, but Dave knows his words. Best follow suit” and it all just went wrong from there.


 
Posted : 29/08/2018 9:33 pm
Posts: 45504
Free Member
 

I saw that the other day and I literally exploded

Were you in the "10 items or less" queue at the time?


 
Posted : 29/08/2018 9:33 pm
Posts: 8771
Full Member
 

Though as an observation on email we are moving from conversational to more professional, certainly with chat tools available outside of email.

Just to clarify for myself, was that an observation of email based communication, or was it an observation expressed and sent within an email?

(6 hundredth edit)


 
Posted : 29/08/2018 9:34 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

<div class="bbp-reply-author">tomhoward
<div class="bbp-author-role">
<div class="">Subscriber</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="bbp-reply-content">

I sometimes use big words I don’t understand to make myself sound more photosynthesis.

</div>

I think we can forgive your contrafibularities.


 
Posted : 29/08/2018 9:35 pm
Posts: 9201
Full Member
 

yeah no, me personally I've not noticed that at this point in time.


 
Posted : 29/08/2018 9:35 pm
Posts: 45504
Free Member
 

make myself sound more photosynthesis

Leaf it out.


 
Posted : 29/08/2018 9:36 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

Just to clarify for myself, was that your observation on email based communication, or was it an observation expressed and sent within an email?

Yeah comma missing in there somewhere!! By reading and observing email 😉 perhaps we are now trying to differentiate when we are using a keyboard


 
Posted : 29/08/2018 9:37 pm
Posts: 27603
Full Member
 

 
Posted : 29/08/2018 9:38 pm
Posts: 34376
Full Member
 

I think it started in call centres as a way of speaking posh by low wage handlers in a warehouse office on an industrial site on a Liecester ring road

"how would yourself like to pay..."

Its bloody ubiquitous these days


 
Posted : 29/08/2018 9:41 pm
Posts: 13164
Full Member
 

Used by an accounts chap this afternoon to me to confirm his lack of competence. Tooth enamel started to itch in my mouth!


 
Posted : 29/08/2018 9:43 pm
Posts: 16025
Free Member
 

I think that abuse of reflexive pronouns must be taught on sales courses.


 
Posted : 29/08/2018 9:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Irish love using it - "awk it's himself it is"

Not saying that makes it ok. Just, you know, the irish are leaders in this type of thing.


 
Posted : 29/08/2018 9:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The use of “perfect” pisses me right off


 
Posted : 29/08/2018 10:03 pm
Posts: 4397
Full Member
 

It's at its worst when combined with the superfluous 'at all'. As in "would you like some dessert for yourself at all?".


 
Posted : 29/08/2018 10:07 pm
Posts: 33325
Full Member
 

I reckon it’s the influence of Father Ted...

“Hello, is that yourself there now?”


 
Posted : 29/08/2018 11:09 pm
Posts: 3590
Free Member
 

The use of “perfect” pisses me right off

Whereas it made myself tense.


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 12:07 am
Posts: 13554
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I reckon it’s the influence of Father Ted…

“Hello, is that yourself there now?”

If if that’s true then all is forgiven. Ted can do no wrong


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 6:34 am
Posts: 6071
Free Member
 

"I myself" who else would it be?

Joan Armatrading made it tuneful though, "Me, Myself, I"


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 7:12 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Can’t say I’ve noticed this trend.

Is it industry biased ?


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 7:56 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My favourite example of this is “If you have any questions, please contact ourselves”


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 7:57 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

It's rife where I work too.

to me to confirm his lack of competence

Very much this.

But I'm afraid it's been done (by me, but not by myself 🙂 )

https://singletrackmag.com/forum/topic/reflexive-pronoun-abuse/


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 8:16 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

Ooh, I've got one. One that has proliferogated itself into communications lately (even in the nice English magazine paper Singletrack! I know I know, he's a bloody Australian) - prefixing a word with SUPER. Oh I'm SUPER Excited oh that's SUPER interesting. Piss off! You're not from the pissing VALLEY. Use that nice word that begins with F like most normal ****ing Brits do. I'd be ****ing appreciative. Thanks.


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 8:24 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

(Bing-bong.)
ARTHUR (into cabin address): Ladies and gentlemen, as you can see, our onboard transit process today has now reached its ultimate termination.
CAROLYN: He means we’ve landed.
ARTHUR: Yes. So, as yourselves prepare for disemboarding, if I could kindly ask you to kindly ensure you retain all your personal items about your person throughout the duration of the disembarkation.
CAROLYN: He means take your stuff with you.
ARTHUR: In concluding, it’s been a privilege for ourselves to conduct yourselves through the in-flight experience today, and I do hope you’ll re-favour ourselves with the esteem of your forth-looking custom going forward.
CAROLYN: … No idea.

From  http://www.cabinpressurefans.co.uk/cabin-pressure-episode-transcripts/johannesburg-transcript/


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 8:26 am
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Cabin Pressure!

Bloody marvellous!


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 8:32 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

At my place of work I’m receiving emails (both internal and external) where people have started using myself and yourself in place of me or you.

It's a common turn of phrase around here (west Midlands). Often in conjunction with 'yourselves' when there's more than one of you lol

Now imagine the whole thing mangled up with the Black Country vernacular


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 8:34 am
 TomB
Posts: 1637
Full Member
 

Also see ‘gifting’ and ‘gifted’ instead of giving/gave. Piss boiling nonsense.


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 8:39 am
Posts: 10980
Free Member
 

"Myself and X" is up there with "Me and X" in shoddy use of English. It's also part of the trend for using three words where one would suffice and sits alongside "we are landing into Manchester" and "Reaching out" instead of "contacting" and a lot of other superfluity.


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 8:47 am
Posts: 932
Free Member
 

DezB - the use of super in that context has been going on for ages in motorcycle racing (probably other forms of motorsport/sport) also.

Mostly by Europeans who's first language isn't English, doing an interview in English. Although the Aussies and Yanks also like to have a go and are usually 'Super stoked' about it...


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 8:47 am
Posts: 660
Full Member
 

And, the use of "awesome" to describe anything remotely positive.

Me: "How was the pasty-looking chicken wrap-thing that was in the reduced section of the fridge at Boots?"

Other: "It was totally awesome!"

Me: "Pass me my baseball bat, would you?"


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 9:26 am
Posts: 26725
Full Member
 

I sometimes use big words I don’t understand to make myself sound more photosynthesis.

I is cleverer. I sometimes use did words I dont understand to make myself sound more non-cyclic photophosphorylation.


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 9:31 am
Posts: 4656
Full Member
 

Use that nice word that begins with F like most normal * Brits do. I’d be * appreciative. Thanks.

and

Mostly by Europeans who’s first language isn’t English, doing an interview in English.

my experience is the complete opposite. Exhibit A, my friend from university, and exhibit B, Amaury Pierron; having only used English in informal settings, they drop the F bomb in totally inappropriate situations not realising that its a 'bad word' in english.


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 9:38 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

the use of super in that context has been going on for ages in motorcycle racing 

So bleedin what? Let it stay in motorcycle racing thankyouverymuch!


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 9:44 am
Posts: 34376
Full Member
 

Uncomparable adjectives (those that shouldn't have -er or -est endings applied) and ordinarily cannot be intensified, are becoming more and more loosly defined, daily in print you can see:

The room is quite unique.

Largely impossible to prosecute

Of all the art forms, dance is the most universal.

and so on.

Copy editing, clearly a dying skill..


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 9:47 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've noticed that the same people no longer have a thought or an idea instead they have an epiphany.


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 9:48 am
Posts: 13594
Free Member
 

I’ve noticed that the same people no longer have a thought or an idea instead they have an epiphany.

Sounds painful 😉


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 9:55 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"somewhat Unique" - not acceptable

"almost unique" - passable but I would use the term "rare" instead.


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 10:41 am
Posts: 7544
Free Member
 

It's the mark of an absolute thickhead trying to sound more intelligent than they are. Despite it marking them out as even bigger thickheads than they think they are. It makes me want to pummel them in the face (despite being someone who's pretty relaxed with people's use of grammar and English), and I instantly lose any respect I may have had for supposedly intelligent people who use myself and yourself incorrectly.


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 10:49 am
Posts: 932
Free Member
 

DezB - I fully agree, just pointing out it's not a new phenomenon. It boils my... etc etc...

Edit:  Should I use myself in this context to sound more photochromatic? 🙂


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 11:15 am
Posts: 34376
Full Member
 

“almost unique” – passable but I would use the term “rare” instead.

Nah, it's just bad grammar. The definition of unique is "one of a kind" it either is or isn't.


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 11:43 am
Posts: 12072
Full Member
 

Me: “How was the pasty-looking chicken wrap-thing that was in the reduced section of the fridge at Boots?”

Other: “It was totally awesome!”

Me: “Pass me my baseball bat, would you?”

"Pass myself my baseball bat", surely?


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 11:47 am
Posts: 17273
Free Member
 

The definition of unique is “one of a kind” it either is or isn’t.

If there are only two of a kind are they binique?


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 11:53 am
Posts: 27
Free Member
 

I think the problem is that people generally don't fully understand grammar and therefore don't understand when reflexive pronouns can be used so they use them instead of normal pronouns.

(full disclosure - I had to look up the rules as I don't fully understand them, but I do know when not to use them)

As this is a problem perpetuated by office workers, and as office workers love a notice, perhaps someone should print out a copy of the OED definition of reflexive pronouns and put it up in the office kitchen.


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 11:58 am
Posts: 16025
Free Member
 

The definition of unique is “one of a kind” it either is or isn’t.

True, but definitions are changed by usage over time.


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 12:02 pm
Posts: 34376
Full Member
 

ransos, sure of course, but Unique has a meaning that hasn't changed, as surroundedbyhills qualifies, "rare" is correct. The problem isn't changing definitions, it's that lots of these sort of adjectives sound OK to the ear with an intensifier "more delicious" for example; combined with people not understanding the grammar rules. Ignorance (not in the pejorative sense) not the relentless modification of words is the problem here


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 12:18 pm
Posts: 3590
Free Member
 


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 1:34 pm
Posts: 8771
Full Member
 

Nah, it’s just bad grammar. The definition of unique is “one of a kind” it either is or isn’t.

It could be unique in some ways but not others.


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 1:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I just assume it's something people have picked up from watching The Apprentice.


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 2:06 pm
Posts: 16025
Free Member
 

ransos, sure of course, but Unique has a meaning that hasn’t changed, as surroundedbyhills qualifies, “rare” is correct.

Decimate also has a specific meaning - to kill or punish 10%.

It could well be the case that over time, just as "decimate" came to mean "devastate", "unique" comes to mean  "unusual" rather than "one of a kind". It does grate, though!


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 2:29 pm
Posts: 386
Full Member
 

Something which annoys me, frequently noticed in teenagers and young adults. A sentence is prefaced by 'To be honest,... Do I assume that everything else you say to me is lies?


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 2:37 pm
Posts: 34376
Full Member
 

ooohhh, grammar pedantry...

sirromj, still "just" unique, Say you have a bright orange diamond, it's the only bright orange one, but it's one of many diamonds, its not uniquer than any other diamond, or the uniquest among a subset of coloured diamonds.

Decimate has always had 2 meanings: To take a tenth, from Decimatus; to tythe, appearing some time after the Romans and applied retrospectively to their habit of punishing one in ten soldiers. Or to destroy over a wide area. Even Websters (the Ford Fiesta of dictionaries) puts the two meanings as emerging at about the same time (1530-1600). The first recorded mention of the word just refers to Tything and nothing to do with killing people.. I take your point though, it did just refer for a bit to the Roman practice (mostly because of dusty old classics scholars) and over time, the other meaning as become as common if not more so, but it was always there, hovering in the background.


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 2:50 pm
Posts: 16025
Free Member
 

 I take your point though, it did just refer for a bit to the Roman practice (mostly because of dusty old classics scholars) and over time, the other meaning as become as common if not more so, but it was always there, hovering in the background.

I suspect it was because it had a specific meaning in Latin, so as you say, classics scholars tried to apply it to English. See also: split infinitives.


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 2:54 pm
Posts: 167
Free Member
 

"if you would like to purchase any duty free items for yourselves, we will be passing through the cabin shortly.."  That really winds Mrs JBP up.


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 4:00 pm
 Nico
Posts: 4
Free Member
 

I think this happens when people feel that the shorter form sounds a bit blunt, particularly where they are trying sell you something. I first became conscious of this when a "flight attendant"/air hostess/trolley dolly said, "Would you like any Pringles at all?", then added "yourself" after the briefest of pauses. Obviously this is something they are encouraged to push and she wanted to sound casual rather than desperate.


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 4:39 pm
Posts: 77347
Free Member
 

Surely the word she was looking for there was "sir"?


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 4:58 pm
Posts: 27
Free Member
 

you should have replied and said - "how much would yourself charge myself for yourselves's Pringles?"


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 5:28 pm
Posts: 4985
Full Member
 

Anyway(s) headed / heading 🤬


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 7:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Have you been here before at all?


 
Posted : 30/08/2018 8:09 pm
Posts: 99
Full Member
 

“almost unique” – passable but I would use the term “rare” instead.

Nah, it’s just bad grammar.

Umm, it's bad diction - surely...


 
Posted : 01/09/2018 9:33 pm
Posts: 25815
Full Member
 

ransos, sure of course, but Unique has a meaning that hasn’t changed, as surroundedbyhills qualifies, “rare” is correct.

it troubles me that the OED offers (and cites precedent), along with chunterable entries for "literally" and "refute", the following for "unique":

Use in the comparative and superlative and with modification by words such as absolutely, fairly, quite, thoroughly, very, etc., has been criticized on the grounds that an adjective meaning ‘that is the only one of its kind’ should not be not gradable, but in many contexts this meaning is not readily distinguishable from the extended use.

With modifying expression and in the comparative and superlative.</h3>

1740   G. Vertue Descr. Four Anc. Paintings 3   As this Conceit is in some Measure unique, so the whole Appearance of their Apparel, and Richness of their Jewels, Furs, and Habit, bespeaks their Royal Dignity.


 
Posted : 01/09/2018 11:01 pm
Posts: 33325
Full Member
 

Sounds painful

Not if you use proper anaesthetic.


 
Posted : 02/09/2018 11:05 pm
Posts: 65918
Full Member
 

I use myself and yourself sometimes, quite intentionally- I know it's not correct but sometimes it just sounds really nice.


 
Posted : 02/09/2018 11:06 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!