Most of the matter ...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Most of the matter in "Space" is wasted.........

18 Posts
13 Users
0 Reactions
63 Views
Posts: 2601
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Apparently. >90% dark matter.

And we can't even see the frikin' stuff! Although it does apparently bind the whole universe together, stop entire galaxies pinging off to who knows where..

Which is nice.

Or... is 'dark matter' a simply convenient [i]deux ex machina[/i] used by current physics to explain away the inconveniently unexplainable. Will developments in theoretical physics eventually make it disappear - like phlogiston was - before oxygen was discovered?


 
Posted : 20/06/2016 10:53 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

upto a point, you're right:

- Spiral galaxies spin too fast, stars at the outer edges should fly off into deep space. They don't, so galaxies are heavier than we can account for with stuff we can see. we don't know what this 'stuff' is, so it's been called dark matter. naming the problem, isn't the same as understanding the problem. To a point, there's a little bit of [i]deux ex machina[/i], or what-you-said, going on.

But, there is actual evidence for this-stuff-we're-calling-dark-matter, beyond galaxies being seen to spin faster than Newton/Einstein can explain. There's lots of different things we can see, that can't be explained without a LOT of invisible mass.


Will developments in theoretical physics eventually make it disappear...?

we're talking about dark matter because we've seen things that can't be explained properly, those things won't dissappear...


 
Posted : 20/06/2016 11:02 am
Posts: 17779
Full Member
 

Makes you think.


 
Posted : 20/06/2016 11:04 am
Posts: 13192
Free Member
 

This thread doesn't matter 😡


 
Posted : 20/06/2016 11:10 am
Posts: 2601
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Yeah.. but what if it's simply ordinary gravity from ordinary matter operating across multiple dimensions in some sort of weirdly integrated way that we haven't figured out yet?


 
Posted : 20/06/2016 11:17 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

well that would be cool.


 
Posted : 20/06/2016 11:20 am
Posts: 91000
Free Member
 

Or... is 'dark matter' a simply convenient deux ex machina used by current physics to explain away the inconveniently unexplainable.

Well not quite like that.

As awhiles says - what we observe, and what our equations predict don't match - so there must be a lot of mass that we can't see. Hence the term 'dark'.

It could be that our equations are wrong, so that's why it's just a theory.. but a lot of work was done and the best guess was extra dark mass. Doens't seem too unreasonable to me - why would we expect to be able to see everything with mass?


 
Posted : 20/06/2016 12:11 pm
Posts: 2006
Full Member
 

It's a bit like the term "UFO"; you can't point at a specific UFO because then it wouldn't be U, it would just be an FO. Until we know what it is, or what causes the effect, we just give it a name that says "we don't know what this is". Hopefully we'll find out sooner or later...

You never know, maybe phlogiston might actually come back. Aether sort of managed it; I love that the experiment that pretty much put paid to the idea of aether is basically the same experiment as more recently used to demonstrate the existence of gravity waves...


 
Posted : 20/06/2016 12:43 pm
Posts: 91000
Free Member
 

Aether came back?


 
Posted : 20/06/2016 1:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Given that we have not the faintest idea what dark matter actually is (or even if it is matter at all), the explanation is absolutely deus ex machina. The observations are correct and won't go away, but the explanation is entirely speculative.


 
Posted : 20/06/2016 1:02 pm
Posts: 17779
Full Member
 

Aether came back?

Certainly:

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 20/06/2016 1:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Most of the matter in "Space" is wasted

I'm sure it doesn't matter.


 
Posted : 20/06/2016 1:27 pm
Posts: 2570
Full Member
 

I read a news article last week that said one theory is that dark matter is comprised of primordial black holes that cluster around the edges of the galaxies. These are "primordial" as if they exist they were created early on in the life of the universe from collapsing gas clouds.

Apparently the recently observed collision between two black holes lends some credence to this theory as the masses of the black holes in question are too big for them to have been created from collapsing stars and too small to qualify as the supermassive black holes that hang about at the centre of galaxies. Their masses do however fall into the range suggested as possible for primordial black holes.

Presumably black holes could work as dark matter as unless they are interacting with something else black holes are very hard to spot. And if they're sitting outside of galaxies there isn't that much for them to interact with.


 
Posted : 20/06/2016 2:51 pm
Posts: 33325
Full Member
 

This brought to mind a quote from a scientist on some programme that I saw a while back, may have been Horizon:
"You find dark matter, which you can't, by definition, see. You discover it by not seeing it"
Which sums it up, I think.


 
Posted : 20/06/2016 5:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Remembering of course that the observer changes the reality and so therefore, what we observe, or predict through our human construct/s and point of perspective, is just that. Our observable aspect of the Universe may or may not be the absolute truth.

But then the truth is also relative in this instance.

Personally, I reckon this unobservable stuff is the Zero Point Field, the web of energy that connects everything and is much faster and more reliable than the Internet. 😀


 
Posted : 20/06/2016 5:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

CountZero - isn't that how they find submarines? They look for the silent spots in the ocean?

Just goes to show how much we don't know. It's all theory at this stage, but there are some clever buggers around so it's only a matter of time till they crack it.


 
Posted : 20/06/2016 5:16 pm
Posts: 45504
Free Member
 

So we don't know what we don't know - and name that dark matter?


 
Posted : 20/06/2016 5:26 pm
Posts: 2601
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Personally, I reckon this unobservable stuff is the Zero Point Field, the web of energy that connects everything and is much faster and more reliable than the Internet.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 21/06/2016 8:14 am
Posts: 2006
Full Member
 

Aether came back?

[url= https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/LIGO ]LIGO[/url] is basically a really really really really [i]really[/i] accurate [url= https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson–Morley_experiment ]Michelson–Morley experiment[/url], used in 1887 to show the lack of evidence for Aether.

I wonder what direction physics would have taken if they had been able get more accuracy back then...


 
Posted : 21/06/2016 9:57 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!