Maxwell, guilty.
 

[Closed] Maxwell, guilty.

87 Posts
57 Users
0 Reactions
379 Views
Posts: 13761
Full Member
 

https://epsteinsblackbook.com/


 
Posted : 31/12/2021 11:43 pm
Posts: 13218
Full Member
 

He is a senior member of the royal family. He has close protection officers, people he spends time with will be vetted to ensure they are no threat to him or his parents through him.

The code names for the senior royals are interesting (according to PopBitch):

The Greek - Prince Philip
Purple - HM The Queen
The **** - Prince Andrew


 
Posted : 01/01/2022 12:52 am
Posts: 9153
Full Member
 

I dont think there will be further prosecutions in this. She has been found guilty etc etc, so the public have their guilty party and it will quietly disappear from the public sphere.

Anyone printing direct accusations(ie the papers) will quickly find themselves in court, and with no actual testimony to back up their stories, there is no chance of winning, so the crux of that is no stories or accusations will be published.

The black book holds no damning evidence, no more than any other personal telephone directory that you or I may have.


 
Posted : 01/01/2022 1:46 am
Posts: 3351
Free Member
 

The luminaries...KIssinger...Ivanka...and Toby Young.


 
Posted : 01/01/2022 2:29 am
 LeeW
Posts: 2119
Free Member
 

Anyone printing direct accusations(ie the papers) will quickly find themselves in court, and with no actual testimony to back up their stories, there is no chance of winning, so the crux of that is no stories or accusations will be published.

It's great that the facilitator of the abuse has been found guilty, but there's no chance the people who abused those trafficked will be prosecuted.


 
Posted : 01/01/2022 9:16 am
Posts: 17368
Full Member
 

martin hutch
I’m still cringing about the BBC fronting Dershowitz, sans context, to pour scorn on one of the victims. Did no-one on the useless production team even google him?

Wouldn't it be interesting if the person on the production team turned out to have had a connection with the BBC's celebrity paedophiles?


 
Posted : 01/01/2022 12:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The idea that a Fleet Street editor didn't know about Savile's proclivities is laughable. Surely, someone must have hacked the auld fella's phone, at some point?

Makes one wonder why he never ran a story about him, during his tenure?


 
Posted : 01/01/2022 7:33 pm
Posts: 32499
Full Member
 

The idea that a Fleet Street editor didn’t know about Savile’s proclivities is laughable. Surely, someone must have hacked the auld fella’s phone, at some point?

The same reason fleet street editors don't run stories about each others affairs, illegitimate children, drug habits etc.

Though I can imagine Saville being the kind of dinosaur that didn't have a mobile, tbh


 
Posted : 01/01/2022 8:04 pm
Page 2 / 2