To be honest Bazz, your coming across as bitter left wing now
http://www.firebrigadedispute.co.uk/
Worth reading. I fully support these guys, they do a good job only to be treated like sh|t by pen wielding idiots.
Lol, trust me i'm a moderate, but i do hate the bitter and rancid right wing that choose to only ever see the worst of everthing.
Wow i'm surprised it took this long for the rancid bitter right wing to leap on the "sleeping at night" bandwagon.
Well rather than insult the poster why dont you explain why the FBU wont move to 12hr shifts when you claim there to be so little impact?
His point was perfectly valid - during a 24hr shift there needs to be time for firefighting and then sleeping and "useflu" standby time. During a 12hr shift there doesnt need to be any sleep time (since that is done in off time), so the useful standby time makes up a greater proportion of the shift period. What feature of this do the FBU disagree with?
As for "wedded to 24hr" Im referring to the FBU response to the contract change demands made by the employers. The ONLY response (other than call a strike ballot) to the contract proposals by the LFBU has been to put a business case for 24hr shifts.
nickname - Member
> http://www.firebrigadedispute.co.uk/Worth reading. I fully support these guys, they do a good job only to be treated like sh|t by pen wielding idiots.
Good find, it's all true and well worth a read.
Isn't the core of this dispute down to the timing of when shifts start? The peak time for calls is 6pm?
The shift change over time is also 6pm which results in a significant overtime cost for any crews sent out just before 6. By changing the shift start / finish time, a greater proportion of the calls would be resourced in normal paid time rather than overtime.
I can't be sure on this as the "facts" on firebrigadedispute don't have anything about the timing of shifts or the times for peak calls.
His point was perfectly valid - during a 24hr shift there needs to be time for firefighting and then sleeping and "useflu" standby time. During a 12hr shift there doesnt need to be any sleep time (since that is done in off time), so the useful standby time makes up a greater proportion of the shift period. What feature of this do the FBU disagree with?
Re read my post, there has always been a stand down period at night because simply put there are some hours of the day generally 0100hrs to 0500hrs where there is no other work other than emergency calls that can be done, and it has generally been accepted that a rested firefighter is more efficient than a tired one. The 12 hr shifts proposed by the LFB management still contain a stand down period, the 24 hr shifts proposed by the union is simply 2 12 hour shifts bolted together.
so do you mean in a 24hr shift an FF will sleep from 01:00 to 05:00 and at no other time?
Farmer_John - Member
Isn't the core of this dispute down to the timing of when shifts start? The peak time for calls is 6pm?
No it is not, the core of this dispute is that rather than negotiate a settlement to a change of contracts the management would rather sack the entire workforce and impose new terms and conditions.
Bazz - do you have a copy of the ballot question btw?
Stoner - Member
so do you mean in a 24hr shift an FF will sleep from 01:00 to 05:00 and at no other time?
I believe the actual proposed stand down period is midnight to 0500hrs, and there would certainly be no sleeping outside of these hours, we simply have to much to do. But it's all academic now as the proposal was turned down completely.
Stoner - Member
Bazz - do you have a copy of the ballot question btw?
Sorry no i don't.
so then, a FF working a 12/12 shift pattern would work 12 day hours, go home for 12 hours, kip, come back for 12 day hrs. Fire Brigade gets 24hrs solid graft from the day shift. The night shift work 12-5 hours so that's 14hrs in two days. Tot it up and you have 38hrs of graft in a 48 hour period.
on a 24hr shift you have day one guys working 20hrs solid, then home to kip when the next lot come in to do another 20hrs giving 40hrs total.
All sounds good for 24hr shifts so far but there's no way a FF is going to work 20hrs solid is there?
The nature of our work is that the really hard graft bit generally only lasts for 3-4 hours i.e. at a large incident before your relieved, the rest of our time is spent carrying out inspections, visits and community work, all slower paced and there would be meal breaks as there would be on the 12 hour day shift. So your right it does, from a productivity point, make better sense to have 24 hr shifts. Makes you wonder why they rejected them so quickly doesn't it?
were are only paid for 42hrs not 48hrs
A quick google of news reports suggests these negotiations have been going on 5 years so I can (almost) understand why the Brigade is loosing patience with the Union and moving to the end game.
However, the Union can't reject the Brigade's suggestion on shifts (and also their compromise plan) and at the same time moan about how bad the Brigade is for not adopting their 24hr shift plan!
Seems some heads need banging together.
were are only paid for 42hrs not 48hrs
fair enough, but you can see why the cynic would say that a 24hr shift is designed to be the cushtiest for the FF? Complete your weekly hours obligations in two days = 5 day weekend for other jobs (after a bit of a kip, naturally)
Not 5 years at all, read the link that was posted earlier plenty in there, but to clarify there has been suggestions that it was changed but the councillors that make up the London fire and emergency planning authority had failed to reach a consensus up until 14 months ago, last August they voted on the changes and the vote failed, at this time the authority was made up of 5 tories, 3 labour, 2 lib dems, and 1 green, the tories voted for and the rest against stating they didn't think the given reasons were good enough, the brigade were given up to 18 months to re think and re draft the proposal. Then a couple of weeks later one labour councillor defected to the tories and the tory leader of the authority called an emergency meeting where the vote was taken again and not surprisingly passed by one. They then spent the winter and spring drawing up their battle plans presumably as there were no negotiations, before stalling through the start of the summer because they didn't want to talk to some of the union negotiators. Finally negotiations started in June 2010. So nearer 5 months than 5 years.
Then a couple of weeks later one labour councillor defected to the tories
I blame Labour.
😉
I couldn't give a toss if a fire fighter does sleep for 8 hours of a 24 shift, I'd still rather they were 10 minutes closer to the appliance when the shout goes up.
Hampshire were apparently trying to reduce crews from 5 to 4. I'm no genius, but I can't see that that's going to make anyone safer including the fire fighters themselves.
this will make you laugh (well some it may) of the 12 stations we are dropping to day cover night call they have a cunning plan to help reduce turnout times
the plans are to block off the dorm doors which access the station and knock a new one to the outside of the building (thus bypassing the working time directive as you are away from your place of work)
you go to work as normal on the first day on at 8am then work til 7pm then you got to the dorm with your pager til 8am you then report for duty. you do this for 4 days and 4 nights and you are not allowed off station for the four days unless in the engine on work related stuff. you then have four days off and report again four days later.
as we are loosing 11 stations already and 15 pumps all remaining stations will be clearly much busier, so in not too many days you will be tired out.
you are allowed a visitor to the dorm 8pm til 10pm but so is everyone else so not very private
they plan on manning this by forcing everyone who joined after 2003 to do it as they have it in there contract that they will do any shift system enforced on them. they also as they wont have enough still plan on offering to pay the other people 9000 a year extra (non pensionable) if they cant supply the manpower no doubt they will just sack and re-employ us all
this is neither fair to new or old contract workers or family friendly one bit. but its what they are doing
also as of this year we are told when we are on leave , no if's or but's but when they tell you. ive got for kids at home and not one bit of leave during the school holidays at all this year. im also non too keen on missing out on half my kids lives for my remaining time in the job
Firestarter - is your complaint that you're still going to be allowed to receive visits from family and friends during working hours? And that you'll continue to work roughly the same number of hours?
This will probablly seem pretty bizarre to the many people who do shifts but can't invite friends and family round during their paid hours. Why is it that firefighters should be treated differently?
no the complaint is i will go to work on monday at 8am and not get home til friday at 8am
which by my working is 96 hours rather than the current 42 hours
djglover - MemberTo be honest Bazz, your coming across as bitter left wing now
Clever tactic.
You see Bazz as the least militant firefighter on here, so you level that accusation at him in the belief he might respond by posting stuff to try to counter the allegation, eg, "no I'm very critical of the FBU leadership, they pressurised us into voting in favour of the strike" etc etc.
Clever, but unfortunately for you djglover, it didn't work.
"no the complaint is i will go to work on monday at 8am and not get home til friday at 8am
which by my working is 96 hours rather than the current 42 hours "
You're out of touch. Sorry.
Plenty of people work away from home in the week - they certainly don't get paid on an hourly rate from the time they leave home to the time they get back - they get paid for the hours they actually work.
John he is not working away from home he is not leaving work for that entire period. I suspect you can tell the difference.
Stoner - Member
Then a couple of weeks later one labour councillor defected to the tories
I blame Labour.
Lol, so do i, apparently they were investigating her for corruption so she jumped before she was de selected. The tories happily gave a her a home, people of Brixton weren't to pleased as they never wanted a tory councillor, thats why they voted labour.
as junkyard says also for those on the newer contracts since 2003 they will be on the exact same salary that they are for 42 hours but there for 96. for the newer so called lucky ones its a 9 grand increase for being there an extra 54 hours cover
also ive worked away , ive also done years in the army but ive never worked somewhere where they said oh by the way you know that shift you do well we are ingoring it and making you work what we fancy and where we fancy
anyway our brigade arent striking as its happening and thats it. but i can see why london are
you go to work as normal on the first day on at 8am then work til 7pm then you got to the dorm with your pager til 8am you then report for duty. you do this for 4 days and 4 nights and you are not allowed off station for the four days unless in the engine on work related stuff. you then have four days off and report again four days later.
Do you have a link to this as I can't find any mention on the link above. Do they really propose that you are 'confined to barracks' for 4 days solid ? If so that's quite staggering!
woody thats our brigade not london. we signed up to the hours change about two years ago but since then they have changed our leave this year and all this to come
thats why london and other brigades are fighting the proposals as we were promised lots of protections when signing up for the new hours but it was basically a blank contract we ended up with (thanks in no small part to the union as it happens)
firestarter
that makes sense unfortunately and confirms my worst suspicions re union ineptitude. I think my lot will have the same problem in the not too distant future and management will have the upper hand. I'm afraid my experiences with unions and their 'reps' has not been good and I have no faith in their abilities (or the morals of many of them, which I will not go into here) and I speak as a union member 👿but it was basically a blank contract we ended up with
......confirms my worst suspicions re union ineptitude
And yet for me it just confirms what I already know, which is that trade unions, despite the media bollox, have no power or influence. Funny that.
[b][i]"management will have the upper hand"[/i][/b]
Yes they will. What did you think..........that the trade unions would have the "upper hand" ? 😕
In this particular case, the London FB management has been planning for the strike, and investing vast amounts of money, for over a year.
Wow i'm surprised it took this long for the rancid bitter right wing to leap on the "sleeping at night" bandwagon.
That was a mature and well thought out response. I did state I didn't understand the situation and was looking for clarification of why fire fighters could be expected work 24hr shifts because obviously there would be need for rest in that period (and if there was't surely that puts anyone your serving at risk). From everything above I still can't see why fire fighters can't work 'normal' shift patterns be it 12 or even 8 hours like everybidy else does. There seem to be very few jobs that might require the same person being on call for a 24hr period or greater, one of the few roles I can think of would be a doctor where maybe continuity of care may be compromised. Instead I got the usual defensive knee jerk left wing everyone's having a go at us response.
To me it sounds like the whole current situation is a right mess, which is obviously down to the management team to great extent. However it does appear the union is more than culpable in propagating the situation. Neither side seems prepared to talk sensibly and as a result every solution is a half baked hotch potch of compromnises and mini victories born out of point scoring. Seems like a lot of public sector negotiations are like this. Ironic really when most people in the public sector pride themselves on serving the public.....
which is that trade unions, despite the media bollox, have no power or influence.
....because of their ineptitude?
I would disagree with your statement anyway, as unions do have power and influence if used correctly.
Just a thought...
The life of a firefighter is no longer as appealing as it apparently once was. If we believe the propaganda its a wonder any of them stay in the service at all. [There are very few careers where people who have been "in" for 15 years think life is better now than it was.] However given that everyone in the brigade is apparently on the brink of leaving anyway - are the union missing a trick? Play bluff - ok then fire service terminate everyone's contracts - union members won't sign the new contract and then you have a problem on the next day with no (or nearly no) staff. Or actually are the new T&Cs and the Union "Solidarity" not that strong?
It has struck me for a long time that the problem in many heavily unionised public services is that the management were promoted from within the "ranks" and therefore actually clueless about management (and in a "disciplined service" like the firebrigade this is worse as the masses are expected to follow instruction from above with little question). I suspect this is also exacerbated by the "characters" who end up as the union reps - and some sort of horrendous power struggle which has been going on for years/decades. The answer is of course to fire all the managers and put in some professionals (who no nothing about fighting fires but are good at managing and motivating people) of course that might not suit FFs who's career paths have just been wiped out...
Poly we now do that you can join and start right at station manager
C4 news tonight shhould be on c4 player, Jon Snow interviewing the Fire bod and the union bloke they agreed to talk tonight at 21.00hrs and then altered it to 09.00 hrs tomorrow morning, good argument, no or little eye contact between them.
the problem in many heavily unionised public services is that the management were promoted from within the "ranks" and therefore actually clueless about management
Oh excellent, the fact that management is crap is all down to the unions as well.
Stumpyjon - my apologies if my response was a little harsh, i seem to remember a thread from a while back where you had little sympathy for some dispute or another and came across imo as very right wing, it is very possible, with hind sight, that i made an assumption. My bad.
I largely agree with your second paragraph.
💡 if i was a terror wrist i'd be looking to make 05/11/10 go with a B A N G 💡
[url= http://www.fbu.org.uk/newspress/pressrelease/2010/10_27.php ]http://www.fbu.org.uk/newspress/pressrelease/2010/10_27.php[/url]
PEACE TALKS AT LONDON FIRE BRIGADE BREAK DOWN
Last night on national television, the leader of the London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority (LFEPA), Brian Coleman, invited us to conciliation talks at 9am this morning. It’s dreadfully disappointing that after four hours there was still no sign of him or the Chief Fire Officer, Ron Dobson. Regrettably, the brigade representatives in attendance had nothing new to say to us.
Where was Councillor Coleman at 9am, having said that he would be here in talks with us? He is not taking this issue with the seriousness that firefighters and Londoners expect of the leader of the LFEPA.
The LFEPA proposals on new working hours would seriously disrupt firefighters’ family lives and lead to cuts in fire cover. All the same, the LFEPA does not have to reach agreement with us on shifts to get us to call off the strikes. They just have to withdraw the sacking notices that were sent out on August 11th.
Our message is that we will cancel all planned strikes if the brigade agrees to lift the mass sackings. We can then negotiate a fair settlement as equal parties.
ENDS
As has been mentioned above, winning public support is crucial here - especially for the govt to take any notice. Striking over bonfire night hardly seems the best way to do it - fireworks displays will be cancelled - bonfires torn down etc as Heath & Safety officers declare them too dangerous without adequate fire brigade cover.
Sounds like a PR own goal no matter how sound the motives behind it.
I've never ever been called to an organised bonfire or firework display so I can't see that happening.
During the 2002 dispute we were meant to strike bonfire night but decided not to after being fed lies. Then the employers laughed at us as they had won , and I mean high rank officers actually came to stations and took the pi55. as they hadn't had to sort bonfire night cover
The only problem I can see in all this is the employer / govt are always going to win all lfb can hope is some kind of comprise
[i]PEACE TALKS AT LONDON FIRE BRIGADE BREAK DOWN[/i]
I watch John Snow last night arranging that 🙂
I wonder if there will be any mention on tonight's news.
Our message is that we will cancel all planned strikes if the brigade agrees to lift the mass sackings.
Since that hasn't happened, you can be sure that this : [i]"Brian Coleman, invited us to conciliation talks at 9am this morning"[/i] was nothing more than a totally meaningless PR exercise.
It is very clear the employer has no intention of negotiating, despite the demand by some, that the Fire Brigades Union should negotiate.
.
fireworks displays will be cancelled - bonfires torn down etc as Heath & Safety officers declare them too dangerous without adequate fire brigade cover.
Why ? Why would a out of control bonfire present a danger to human life ? Just walk away from the bonfire ........simply really. When was the last time a bonfire killed a load of people ? Most injuries on firework night occur because of fireworks. Which is hardly an issue for firefighters - what do you want them to do exactly ?
Actually the fact that many people will be out of their houses watching firework displays, means that there will be less people at home which need rescuing.
Anyway, don't any of you believe what the FB management says ? Brian Coleman chairman of the LFEPA has publicly said that FBU strikes will do [u]nothing[/u] : [i]"the only losers in all of this will be firefighters"[/i]. According to him the public will not suffer. Don't you believe him ?
And if you really [b]are that worried[/b] about firefighters not going to work, then why the **** aren't you worried about every firefighter in London getting the sack ? ffs.
It isn't a joke, they really are going to sack them all.
Apparently my boss, the commisoner for London fire brigade, has personally given the LFB press office orders to "leak" details of employees home addresses to the press so that a smear campaign can be run against us. Thats nice. Is that even legal?
This email was sent last night. It's on the radio so is common knowledge now.Hi
Me again. You may have read my previous emails which provided confidential info and predicted various events in the dispute - all of which came true. As I have said previously I have pretty good sources.
Here's something you ought to know. It made my blood boil and I hope it does yours too.
Assetco are struggling. One of its directors resigned in mysterious circumstances a few days ago, several strike breakers have pulled out and there are whispers at Union Street that the company may not be able to deliver for the 47 hour strike on 5 November. All of this has been relayed to Dobson who went loopy and told them they had no choice but to come up with the goods.
When the FBU announced it would strike on 5 November there was a top level meeting involving some senior members of the Brigade's Corporate Management Board and the media/communications department. Because of their concerns over Assetco, senior Brigade managers came to the conclusion that they must win this dispute before the 5 November strike starts...and they are investing their hopes in winning a media war by turning the pressure on the FBU.
I have it on the best authority that it was agreed at the top level meeting that the Brigade's media department was instructed to "unleash the forces of hell" on the FBU. That's how Dobson sees himself winning the dispute. It was no coincidence that within hours we saw highly personal attacks against Matt Wrack in tabloid papers as well as false claims that the Union is demanding a £10k pay rise. Matt Wrack's ex-wife has been doorstepped by the Daily Mail. There were also lurid stories planted in today's papers about how firefighters used violence against Assetco. All this stuff was fed to the press by the Brigade's media department.
But this is the worst thing. The Brigade's media department today released confidential info to the Sun and Daily Mail regarding the addresses where firefighters live. These newspapers will shortly run stories about how nearly 3000 firefighters live outisde of London in places like Newcastle, Dorset, Scotland and Spain. The line will be "How can firefighters claim they have it so bad when they live in these far flung places? They must have a wonderful shift system." The newspapers will also attack us for receiving London Weighting when we don't live in London.
The Brigade will obviously deny that they released these details, but wait and see if the stories appear. Trust me they will, over the next couple of days. THEN YOU CAN DECIDE WHO'S TELLING THE TRUTH.
[url= http://www.uk-fire.net/london/media/James_O_Brian.mp3 ]James O'Brian.mp3[/url]
This topic makes my blood boil. The amount of lies in the papers is beyond a joke.
My brother especially enjoyed the 'firemen can earn upto 50k with overtime' one.
The real joke is why Brian Coleman still has any say in the matter.
50k where where lol
50k where where lol
[url= http://www.****/news/article-1324378/Firemen-striking-Bonfire-Night-want-10k-pay-rise-time-off.html ]Why its right here in the Daily Mail, so it must all be true...........[/url]
**** me I'm lucky to be held back an hour or so a month and that's strangely increased since our hours changed as we get more calls between 6-7 than we did between 5-6 our brigade even acknowledge the change in hours was for the worse for them but can't be seen to backtrack. Which really does make you wonder about the whole London situation
Well theyre now out for another few hours,
A DAY OF VIOLENCE AGAINST FBU MEMBERS
Three London FBU members were injured two seriously on picket lines yesterday, after separate incidents in which strikebreakers drove their vehicles directly at picketing firefighters.
In the first incident, a striking firefighter at Croydon fire station suffered serious pelvic injuries, after a car being driven by a strikebreaking brigade manager appeared to accelerate recklessly towards the picket line. The injured firefighter who was not attempting to impede the vehicle struck the windscreen and was thrown several feet.
The London Air Ambulance was called, and the firefighter was removed to hospital. His enraged colleagues later slammed the strikebreaking crew, employed by the firm AssetCo, for refusing a request for a first aid bag and blanket as the firefighter lay injured on the ground. The driver of the car was arrested at the scene.
Later that evening, during a protest called by the FBU at Southwark training centre, the union's executive council member for London , Ian Leahair , was struck by a fire appliance being crewed by strikebreakers. Witnesses watched in horror as the AssetCo driver approached the official picket line and, as striking FBU members walked towards his vehicle in an attempt to speak to the crews, hit the accelerator, injuring Ian Leahair and also knocking a police officer to the ground.
Ian Leahair lay prostrate for several minutes before an ambulance arrived. He was removed to hospital with suspected broken ribs. Police later confirmed that the AssetCo driver had been arrested on suspicion of grievous bodily harm.
In another incident at the Southwark protest, a firefighter from Dagenham suffered a hand injury, after an AssetCo driver sped mindlessly towards the picket line. This incident was reported to police, who took a statement from the injured firefighter and are currently investigating the matter.
Commenting on these events, FBU regional official Paul Embery said, "What we saw yesterday was shameful and brought disgrace on the brigade. I saw several incidents where strikebreaking AssetCo crews mindless thugs and cowards with their faces covered by firehoods showed a callous disregard for their fellow human beings by driving at high speed across lawful picket lines. It was almost as if they had been instructed to hit the accelerator whenever they encountered an official FBU picket.
"It's ironic that, as part of its smear campaign against its own employees, the London Fire Brigade claimed last week that AssetCo crews were subjected to 'violence and intimidation' during the first strike. Well, now we can see who the real hooligans are. The only people to have been injured and hospitalised during this dispute have been FBU members and a police officer.
"Yesterday, our members were guilty of nothing more than establishing strong, peaceful and lawful picket lines. Yet, they frequently found themselves at risk of injury, owing to the reckless actions of AssetCo crews.
"Our thoughts are with those who were injured, and we will be doing everything we can to assist them and their families."
A full and separate report on the events of yesterday's strike will be issued shortly.
🙄 😯
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-11663993
Video footage there of the LFB members not being intimidating at all and of course I wish those injured well and investigation reveals what happened soon.
Anyway I'm not sure how LFB copes with 20 calls in 8 hours, that's almost 1.5% of what LAS gets in the same period.
As a serving firefighter in Surrey I find many of the comments posted on here somewhat misguided, ignorant, offensive and somewhat disappointing to say the least. This strike is not about money or interfering with second jobs etc etc. Believe everything you read in the papers by all means but don't be surprised when people respond with the facts. There are some really ignorant people on here.
The problem is soup it's not made to clear to the public what it's about. It seems to be that LFB members were told they'd been having shifts changed to 11 hours and 13 hours. The Union didn't like this and management Said it's the way it is and new contracts will be drawn up. This has then gone to industrial action as no agreement could be met.
So the summary seems to be striking due to new contracts being needed to introduce a shift change. Is that about right?
Believe everything you read in the papers by all means but don't be surprised when people respond with the facts
'cause they read the Daily Fail
I support the firepeople, but didnt they know that a 12 ton vehicle is going to do them damage if they get in the way of it,any large vehicle is best allowed plenty of room to manouvere.
Thankfully they where not on strike this morning in Irlam near manchester.
I support the firepeople, but didnt they know that a 12 ton vehicle is going to do them damage if they get in the way of it,any large vehicle is best allowed plenty of room to manouvere.
The 2 FF's and policeman were hit by a car driven by a station manager who was arrested.
It's the shift change that will allow further cuts to night cover that has not yet been made public but is common knowledge within the service and the union. This will involve closure of stations and less cover at night. The Bonfire night date is a crafty move by the union to stir it up. I have friends in that brigade who are not happy about the date either but cannot do anything about it now.
Some of them may or may not be firefighters
There seems to be quite a few reasons why the strike is going ahead, but i'm confused now what the official reason actually is. One minute is purely the fact that mass sackings have been threatened, then the other its actually the slight shift pattern changes which would amongst other things "seriously disrupt firefighter's family lives". Obviously form a PR point of view the former is more of a heavy hitter which most would have sympathy for. Doesn't help that from what i've seen this is hardly making the national (tv) news.
Later that evening, during a protest called by the FBU at Southwark training centre, the union's executive council member for London , Ian Leahair , was struck by a fire appliance being crewed by strikebreakers. Witnesses watched in horror as the AssetCo driver approached the official picket line and, as striking FBU members walked towards his vehicle in an attempt to speak to the crews, hit the accelerator, injuring Ian Leahair and also knocking a police officer to the ground.
It's the shift change that will allow further cuts to night cover that [b]has not yet been made public but is common knowledge within the service[/b] and the union.
Ah right could explain why people are ignorant if the FBU hasn't bothered informing the public the reason behind it. Seems odd though it wasn't mentioned in the ballot either and that they voted on being 'sacked' according the FBU website.
The other day lfb employers replied to the fact they brought nothing new to the table by saying 'we have removed some of the new terms and conditions in the proposed new contract to try bring an end to the dispute'
So clearly they are now admitting there are other things as well as the hours for the first time
A fire brigade manager has been arrested after a car ploughed into a picketing firefighter outside Croydon fire station.
Stunned firefighters rushed to help Red Watch colleague Tamer Ozdemir, who screamed out in pain after being struck by the car.
Station manager Chris Young who is believed to have been in the car at the time was arrested by police.
Mr Ozdemir, believed to be in his 40s, was taken by ambulance to St George's Hospital in Tooting as a priority suffering from a serious injury to his pelvis.
Enraged firefighters, who had been protesting since 10am against changes to shift patterns, began hurling abuse at strikebreakers leaving the scene, banging on the side of the fire engines shouting "scabs" and "traitors".
Mick Shaw, president of the Fire Brigades Union (FBU) was with the protesters when the incident happened at about 3.20pm.
He said: "A fire engine returned from an incident and drove into the fire station, its crew refusing to wind down their windows and talk to the pickets.
"It was followed by a car driven by the officers, and as the pickets tried to talk to the driver of the car, it accelerated suddenly and one of the striking firefighters was thrown up and into the windscreen."
Police cordoned off Mitcham Road outside the fire station as the London Air Ambulance hovered overhead, blocking traffic along Old Town.
Firefighter Mick Andrews was one of the first to reach Mr Ozdemir, helping give him first aid before running to nearby strikebreakers to get a blanket for the casualty.
He said: "I've never seen anything like it.
"I asked for a blanket because someone had been run over and was completely blanked.
"I went around to the officer in charge of the appliance and asked him for a blanket and he told me to get it off another appliance."
The strike was called off after police arrested Mr Young, telling firefighters the station had become a crime scene.
Strikebreaking crews from private company Assetco had been responding to emergencies since crews began their picket at 10am, and were being supported by senior brigade staff driving cars.
A spokesman from the London Fire Brigade said: "During demonstrations at Croydon fire station one person believed to be demonstrating has been injured after being hit by a car.
"London Ambulance was called at 3.20pm and a man has been taken to hospital with pelvic injuries.
"Due to a large number of protestors at the station and that incident, we have suspended the use of that station."
A spokeswoman for London Ambulance Service said: "We were called at 3.18pm to reports of a road traffic collision involving a car and a pedestrian.
"We sent an ambulance crew, a single responder and the air ambulance.
"Our staff treated on patient, a man reported to be in his 40s, for pelvic injuries.
"He was taken as a priority to St George's Hospital in a ground ambulance.
"Another patient was treated at the scene for minor injuries but not taken to hospital."
Station manager Chris Young has been arrested by police.
[url= http://www.yourlocalguardian.co.uk/news/topstories/8488277.Fire_station_manager_arrested_after_car_ploughs_into_striking_firefighters/?ref=rss#commentsList ]http://www.yourlocalguardian.co.uk/news/topstories/8488277.Fire_station_manager_arrested_after_car_ploughs_into_striking_firefighters/?ref=rss#commentsList[/url]
Anyway I'm not sure how LFB copes with 20 calls in 8 hours, that's almost 1.5% of what LAS gets in the same period.
Drac, that would just be the ones that Asset co. are responding to, they are only going to respond to confirmed fires and road traffic collisions where persons are confirmed trapped, not the multitude of calls that we usually respond to. The LFB usually responds to over 3000 calls a day and any where up to twice that during for example periods of heavy rain when a lot of flood calls are made.
Oh and i'm reasonably sure the LAS has more ambulances than we have fire engines, and they are over stretched and could in all honestly do with more resources.
Ah thought it might be the case as 20 seemed a bit mad. Yeah sure LAS do and if anything like up here could do with a lot more. I wish them all good luck in their case but I seriously don't think it'll make much difference. Winning public support when you provide essential services is also extremely difficult.
for all those that are unaware of the real reason for the strike and think its just about money or trivial issues, heres a site that explains the real issues.
[url= http://www.firebrigadedispute.co.uk/ ]fire brigade dispute[/url]
It's all still a bit unclear to me, I agree the right-wing media is misrepresenting things but I still don't think it's a reason to strike. Even assuming the long-term goal is to close certain stations at night, it's not really up to fire-fighters whether it's workable or not, that's what management is there for (rightly or wrongly). Lets be honest, I bet most fire fighters are more worried that the closures would mean loss of jobs, yet that web-site just implies the downside would be more deaths/risk to the public so clearly trying to play the PR game as well (and muddying the issue in the process).
An independent , although admittedly left leaning, journalists observations. http://www.francisbeckett.co.uk/
HSE to investigate Asset Co
[url= http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-11690392 ]http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-11690392[/url]
Letter sent to White Watch, obviously LFB have no intention of negotiating at the next meeting on Thursday
[url= http://staff.london-fire.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/White-watch-letter-03-Nov-2010.pdf ]
http://staff.london-fire.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/White-watch-letter-03-Nov-2010.pdf [/url]
Seems as if its off, the governmnet has given way and the firemen win.
Possibly not won yet, they've (LFB management) agreed that they will go with the union to arbitration and that will suspend the termination of contracts until after the scheduled authority meeting on the 26th January, so hopefully a negotiated settlement can be reached by then and there will be no more strikes, but, last time something like this happened the authority leader Brian Coleman decided he didn't like it and reversed the decision.
Reading news so may not be accurate looks like the FBU are swaying toward the new shift pattern. So plenty achieved there then.
aye, from what i understand theres certainly no 'winner' yet. union have called off the strikes as they think that london will be unsafe over bonfire night with a poorly trained assetco looking after them.
but the union certainly havent got what they want, which is the threat of the sack being lifted from them, and no station closures etc after the olympics.
this is just what i understand from news filtering down to the 'shires'
have we been told right bazz?
Sadexpunk - yes that is essentialy correct, i think the union were getting quite a few phone calls from fire fighters to put off this weekends strike, and i think the management were eager to have us on duty as well.
Drac - We (union members) have always been well aware that shift change was unfortunately inevitable, what we didn't want was for insincere negotiations followed by being sacked and having worse conditions imposed, if we wanted our jobs back, we want a negotiated settlement that pleases both sides and doesn't leave the public at long term risk. from cuts to the service.
Cheers Bazz that explains it better. I'm not a believer of strike action by essential services so pleased to here there was some sensible members asking for it to called off, even more so for Union to listen to it's members for once. I'm not a fan of unions at the minute but that's personal reasons.
Good luck hope the negotiations work out the best they possibly can for you.
"Bonfire Night 05 November 2010
The Brigade's 999 Control Centre took 527 x 999 calls in the period between 4pm-11pm.
On Bonfire Night firefighters expect to be called out to a number of small fires (rubbish fires, bonfires etc). This evening firefighters dealt with 89 small fires, with 27 of these believed to be bonfires that got out of control."
[url= http://www.london-fire.gov.uk/LastestIncidentsContainer_05nov22.asp ]http://www.london-fire.gov.uk/LastestIncidentsContainer_05nov22.asp[/url]
"A number of fire engines which were to be used to provide emergency cover in the capital during a threatened Bonfire Night strike are being withheld from service, it was learned.
The Fire Brigades Union (FBU) said it was a "disgrace" that the London Fire Brigade was not releasing the 27 fire engines, which were going to be used by staff at a private firm before the strike was called off.
FBU general secretary Matt Wrack said: "We were abused by Government ministers and the London Fire Brigade for proposing to strike on Bonfire Night.
"We cancelled the strike and now the fire brigade is withholding 27 fire engines from London's firefighters and the people of London. It is disgraceful and hypocritical."
A fire brigade spokesman said: "The 27 fire engines that were being used to provide a contingency level of fire service during strike periods will not be released until the industrial dispute is fully resolved.
"Many fire engines are used each and every day for training purposes while others are taken out of service to undergo maintenance. The capital still has the cover it needs to deal with emergencies."
The union has held two eight-hour strikes in a row over new contracts and were planning a two- day walkout before announcing it had agreed to attend a meeting of the Resolution Advisory Panel, an independently-chaired body that can make recommendations to resolve the dispute.
The panel will meet on November 16 and, if an agreement is reached, the brigade said the process of re-engaging firefighters on new terms and conditions would be withdrawn."
[url= http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5h2h0XsPjkCeyzJxEcy_YaEwAQWOA?docId=B38004881288974154A00 ]http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5h2h0XsPjkCeyzJxEcy_YaEwAQWOA?docId=B38004881288974154A00[/url]
Hmmm, typical spin, what they didn't say was how many fire stations were completely shut because the appliances had been taken away or there were not enough officers to ride in charge of them, half of LB Southwark's stations were shut as was Deptford.