You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-65308769
Well if we didn’t all know it, it’s official and it’s not going away as it’s now formalised that we’ve all been bumped down a social class. The days of the working class exodus to live in a conservatory shod house in a County village with a cheap mortgage and have two German cars financed with PCP are over.
Dig, in feed the kids and don’t expect that Christmas bonus for work plebs, those above us expect that you shore up GDP with red-eye’d overtime and minimal payback whilst enhancing your employers single digit profitability from the bottom up.
Welcome to 1950’s UK!
Oh, and good morning STW 😃
I said this yesterday to a mate in the car. "Welcome to the 50's" .
The Mogg types have got thier way :(.
Unable to deliver the Levelling Up agenda, the Tories have got Plan B over the line. Except I think we all know levelling up was never going to be delivered, ever.
relatively easy to argue and accept when there's an 'er' on the end. Hunker down and in time it'll pass......
The problem is that for far too many that 'er' won't be there and they are being dragged back into being poor full stop. Choices between heating and eating, etc.
Who knew voting to impose sanctions on yourself and putting a shower of shit in charge would end up like this.
https://twitter.com/sgfmann/status/1650972875225014274?t=8LH6TYlJ0Vpq_7DY2r2hpw&s=19
The Daily Mail has gone into apoplectic rage over this in spite of pushing so hard for Brexit in the first place and also consistently vilifying trade unions pushing for pay rises.
He's not wrong - lets just hope that the Lib Dems and maybe Labour paint, in vivid detail the exact reasons why and whom is to blame.
Given that in the 50s my working class parents got a 25-year mortgage on a new build semi that left enough over to run a car, pay for the new mod cons and afford holidays despite my mother giving up work when I was born I think you've chosen the wrong decade to compare with.
Given that in the 50s my working class parents got a 25-year mortgage on a new build semi that left enough over to run a car, pay for the new mod cons and afford holidays despite my mother giving up work when I was born I think you’ve chosen the wrong decade to compare with.
The 60's for my folks, but the same outcome.
Anyone reading this, if you've voted Tory ever and especially the last decade take responsibility, this is YOUR doing and I hope it's you that's impacted personally.
Next? Losing access to free-at-point-of-use healthcare, but, pretty sure as a 'sop' they'll bring in Capital Punishment for you - my prediction for the 2024 Tory Manifesto BTW.
think you’ve chosen the wrong decade to compare with.
Maybe, I grew up in the 70's with my parents having 4 jobs between them, a double digit % mortgage and a series of virtual non runners as family cars to get us to Tesco's once a fortnight. School summer hols was the freedom of playing in the street, my first bike at 14yo was a lucky find in a jumble sale which my grandad fixed up.
Its not that bad... yet.
Next? Losing access to free-at-point-of-use healthcare, but, pretty sure as a ‘sop’ they’ll bring in Capital Punishment for you
It's already been suggested that people could/should be charged for GP appointments or, the flipside of that, charged if they miss GP appointments.
Not come to anything yet but the seed has certainly been sown under the guise of "relieving the pressure on the NHS".
And you can tell the Suella Braverman would be all in favour of capital punishment!
That horrible Tory yob Gullis would probably volunteer to be hangman.
The problem is that for far too many that ‘er’ won’t be there and they are being dragged back into being poor full stop. Choices between heating and eating, etc.
This is the true story.
If I cannot afford a bigger house, nicer car or a foreign holiday, well meh, so what really.
The family down the road who are struggling to make ends meet on a couple of minimum wage jobs, it is going to be brutal. The in-work poverty levels are going to accelerate. 🙁
The inane stupidity of this remark (as discussed in the MMT thread.)
Can be summarised: "The BoE are adding to the price of money yet seek to blame everyone else for demanding more money because the BoE made money more expensive."
This is monetarism solving your problems folks - and an example of why the BoE being at arms length is not good for us.
No political party will push back on this.
I watched Children of Men again on Sunday (it's on the iPlayer for another week). Infertility mcguffin aside, it struck me how horribly prescient much of it seems now.
He’s not wrong – lets just hope that the Lib Dems and maybe Labour paint, in vivid detail the exact reasons why and whom is to blame
Nope. They're both are high on the BoE's response.
Huw Pill is on the best part of 200,000.
Take your ****ing medicine.
The middle classes are being lined up to have the same done to them as the working classes did in the 80’s and 90’s
Those at the top aren’t sharing any of the pain. They’re doing quite nicely out of it all, as usual, and corporations are enjoying unhindered profiteering at everyone else’s expense
Those at the bottom are truly ****ed. we have a government who don’t see why the poor should be provided with even a Dickensian level of existence
MattOAA nails it. Lots can handle being poorer. Those on lower incomes can't.
I watched Children of Men again on Sunday (it’s on the iPlayer for another week). Infertility mcguffin aside, it struck me how horribly prescient much of it seems now.
Is Mad Max Fury Road shortly after?
'Cos it looks like that around here now.
MattOAA nails it. Lots can handle being poorer. Those on lower incomes can’t
A constant point - there's just enough people that have done okay out of Neoliberal policies to keep this current system going.
For the time-being.
The middle classes are being lined up to have the same done to them as the working classes did in the 80’s and 90’s
For sure.
And there's no party currently offering a way to correct this.
Nope. They’re both are high on the BoE’s response.
What?
Huw Pill is on the best part of 200,000.
Again - so what? What he said was as much about (if not more) businesses as about individuals. He was talking about the continuing spiral of inflation. He was saying the profits should be lower, because they can't pass on all cost increases to the consumer because they're demanding higher wages, which in turn increases costs, which they then have to pass onto the consumer...
His wage is a distraction from his position and experience in the matters at hand.
The reasons for why we entered this spiral weren't explicitly stated (probably for good reason), but the results are evident. Energy prices will decrease (they should've already if it weren't for our backward system), food prices might not, unless businesses decrease profits, but almost certainly ALL other price increases will remain unless someone calls out the substantial profits that some people/businesses will be making at the end of this cycle.
Cheap money has masked the fact that as a population we've been getting steadily less well off compared to peers in countries we may have compared ourselves to previously such as Germany, France, Canada or Australia over the last 10 years. Now the music's stopped and cheap credit is being pulled the frogs are starting to think the water is getting a bit warm.
Again – so what? What he said was as much about (if not more) businesses as about individuals. He was talking about the continuing spiral of inflation. He was saying the profits should be lower, because they can’t pass on all cost increases to the consumer because they’re demanding higher wages, which in turn increases costs, which they then have to pass onto the consumer…
Sigh.
He said 'workers' asking for higher wages specifically.
And most importantly if he's speaking in defence of the BoE - and wanting inflation to come down why have the BoE raised the price of money 11 times?
Simple fact - wages lag the cost of living. Why do workers bear the brunt of policy decisions?
The man's an out of touch economically illiterate idiot.
The reasons for why we entered this spiral weren’t explicitly stated (probably for good reason), but the results are evident. Energy prices will decrease (they should’ve already if it weren’t for our backward system), food prices might not, unless businesses decrease profits, but almost certainly ALL other price increases will remain unless someone calls out the substantial profits that some people/businesses will be making at the end of this cycle.
So again, if that's the case they why are the BoE making people poorer by increasing the price level of money?
Such a silly take.
And there is no 'we' in a 200,000 wage.
Cheap money has masked the fact that as a population we’ve been getting steadily less well off compared to peers
If you're talking about low interest rates that's been a feature of our economy and has been encouraged.
The government seem to be banking on the fact that inflation will fall and all will be forgiven (I'm not even sure it will- brexit & war in Ukraine aren't going away anytime soon, it might even kick off in Taiwan, Sudan is looking to create a surge in refugees & fighting there has overspilled before)
But the damage being done here now will be long lasting, children growing up in poverty are affected for life
Debt is being racked up that won't be paid off soon and are high interest rates here to stay?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-64235996
Have to say I agree, with all the unavoidable cost increases due to external factors, then raising base rates to add to the misery seems the wrong approach. Its like sticking the knife in when people are already on their knees.
What did BOE give its staff as a payrise this year? Can't find the article but I think I read an average of 7%. I'll be lucky for 3% (been 1-2% in the last 5 years) so as far as I'm concerned I'm already taking one for the team.
Mates in the financial industry are doing ok, not inflation based rises, but close. Several seem to have been promoted to new job titles with extra pay but are infact doing the same role, otherwise competitors poach the staff with big pay increases. Seems its mostly the public sector thats expected to 'accept being poor'
Basically the BoE have got it all back to front and looking for someone to blame.
Truth is inflation is a blend of factors. And the BoE have only one tool and need to protect their decisions.
This was primarily a supply side inflation problem. The remit of monetarism is to encourage unemployment by increasing interest rates. To slow the economy and hope for the best. Trouble is you pass income to asset holders which can stoke inflation and effectively tax people who borrow. No secret who it benefits.
Does this seem a fair and rational approach to the failure of policy?
The burden of lowering inflation is being passed to the poorest. Shafted by austerity or low wages.
Time for it to stop.
I thought social classes had all but disappeared a long time ago. I don't think they're coming back either.
We might collectively be a little poorer but we're still doing very well overall.
Plenty of work for those who want it, which is the main thing.
I can't believe people still use that German PCP stereotype. Usually only used by green eyed monster type or terminally bitter snobs and reverse snobs alike.
Nicky Campbell with Richard Murphy on 5live now.
Basically the BoE have got it all back to front and looking for someone to blame.
It's got very little if anything to do with the BoE - and their remit is entirely defined by the Govt anyway.
But Tories gonna Tory, and the cult members aka useful idiots will find someone else to blame.
It’s got very little if anything to do with the BoE – and their remit is entirely defined by the Govt anyway.
That is true.
But they have a choice not to raise rates or cut rates.
The BoE are an agent of government. So yep they're one and the same in my book as they're unlikely to deviate from the way the government expects them too.
2% set by government.
Already accepted it.
Doesn't mean I'm happy about it, or the causes (mentioned repeatedly above).
If the cost of stuff sold was 95% salary costs then the theory might stack up, but its not, it can't be over 10-20% max (in terms of the UK labour force contribution to goods on the shelves). Inflation is measured in terms of real goods, and so if you add 10% to the salary base, real goods prices should only go up by around 1-2%. If you then add another 2% to the salary base to compensate, then its 0.2% and so on.
Wage inflation has very little to do with the price of stuff on which inflation figures are based, and so trying to use one as a lever to fix the other is pointless.
No, the BofE are not an agent of government, and you might want to reflect that if they were more tied to government things might be a lot worse. They're not responsible for austerity, other policies of deliberate underinvestment that have led to reduced productivity, Brexit and 10 years of economic policy and mismanagement that have led to this conclusion.
And bluntly , yes, the UK is poorer as a result of what people voted for and the government promised and delivered.
Plenty of work for those who want it, which is the main thing.
Doesn't mean that work pays the bills though. In work poverty is being normalised. This may not be the case for you, but that's the thing with this deliberate devaluation of wages... when you're already up to your neck in it, these changes happening to us "all" can destroy your life... where as others will just have to give up some "nice to haves".
Yep, the UK is in a shit position (economy and productivity) and people need to realise that. You generally don't get paid well and have a good standard of living in a rundown shit country.
It is noticeably worse than it was 20 years ago.
No, the BofE are not an agent of government, and you might want to reflect that if they were more tied to government things might be a lot worse.
Nonsense.
They are the fiscal agent of government and wholly owned by the UK government.
The BoE governor is appointed by the chancellor as is the majority of the MPC. Government sets the inflation target.
And an act of Parliament defines intervention by the Chancellor if necessary. But they won't because it's a handy way of the government appearing their hands are tied.
The idiotic idea that passing this process to a group of people you can't remove democratically - especially when effectively operating cruel and regressive policy is ridiculous.
Don't ever buy into centrist thinking that the BoE being 'independent' (to set rates) is somehow a smart move that is benefiting is.
Look around you.
They’re not responsible for austerity, other policies of deliberate underinvestment that have led to reduced productivity, Brexit and 10 years of economic policy and mismanagement that have led to this conclusion.
I'm not saying the BoE is responsible for that. We are saying raising interest rates is not a solution and makes things worse.
They are raising the price level of money with the intent of causing unemployment to slow demand. That's policy.
Side point: BoE Governor is a Brexit supporter and that might not feed into his role officially but what do you think his mindset might be?
The idiotic idea that passing this process to a group of people you can’t remove democratically
Why would it be a requirement that operators of a technical job are democratically elected / removable? Most people don't know much about economics, including most on here. I know a tiny amount but am not qualified to decide on the competency of the head of the boe.
As a self employed person I am now earning less than the minimum wage and that's trying to run a sole trader business.
But feeling grateful that I've got work and have had to take more on from an outside source (not just my own customers) to try and earn some money.
Too much stock tied up in the business and being old, so not in a position to try and change professions now.
Without all the peripheral stuff, the statement is true, a lot of people aren't living within their means, credit is easy, shiny stuff is always nice, but in a time like this, it's all about getting yourself into good financial order and not continuing to spend outside of your income.
As for the other stuff, yes, Brexit has cost us dearly, as most of us knew it would, yet nobody held to account for the destruction caused by all those lies, same with the interest rates going up and up at the same time as BoE/Government/etc telling us it's not like other inflationary crisis', so why stick rates up, why when we were in a financial mess in the late 2000s were we able to magic up hundreds of billions, yet can't come up with a couple of billion to give our teachers, doctors, nurses, etc a payrise in line with the inflation partially caused by UK PLC?
Yes, lots to whinge about, but also people need to be smarter over this period, i hear people complaining about low payrises, or inflation, yet they're off to Disneyland for a 12k holiday with their family, or rolling up in a new car with finance, you can't burn both ends of the candle!
i hear people complaining about low payrises, or inflation, yet they’re off to Disneyland for a 12k holiday with their family, or rolling up in a new car with finance, you can’t burn both ends of the candle!
Hang on, don't conflate these two things. There are certainly some people who are less well off than they were, but can still go on nice holidays etc. Just less nice than they could previously; which in itself is irritating because you expect your standard of living to go up, not down.
But, and this is crucially important, there are far more people complaining about being poor who are actually poor and cannot even heat their homes never mind go anywhere on holiday. PLEASE don't mix up these two situations.
people need to be smarter over this period
And this is an example. Who are 'people' in this instance? Sure, some people are bad with money (like me) but that isn't always the same people who are poor. By following this line of thought, and writing about it on social media, you are victim blaming and consequently letting off the hook the people who are really responsible for this colossal long term ****-up.
Just been in Australia for a couple of weeks - people over there generally shocked at the ‘poverty’ wages here, whereas in Oz A$30 (about £20) is the minimum and having to pay A$40 to get someone vaguely competent. Perfectly understandable why people are leaving the NHS in droves when they can double the pay.
In terms of company excessive “profits” there have been two factors at play. Firstly a reluctance to invest in technology or skills to improve productivity - it’s far easier to negotiate a pay rise when your output has increased. Secondly, a preference for execs to increase dividends through share buy-backs and thus increase their own bonuses and pay
credit is easy, shiny stuff is always nice.
I hate to bring her up again, but this was the policy introduced by Thatcher; to exchange liveable wages that kept in line with inflation with easy access to personalised credit, and has basically been the economic policy for every government since. The BoE can hardly blame then people for doing what they been encouraged to do for the last 40 years.
Is now a good time to start the REJOIN campaign in earnest...
Why not? what have we got to lose?
The man’s an out of touch economically illiterate idiot.
I'm fairly sure he's probably read the same MMT book as you.
And a few hundred more books on economics as well.
There is a shocking lack of optimism on this thread.
There will be a general election in less than 18 months time. Not one single opinion poll this year, nor last year, has given the Tories a lead over Labour, in fact you have to go back to 2021 before you see that. And we are talking about Labour leads way beyond any margin of error.
All the evidence points to the Tories not being able to form a government in a few months time, and Labour quite possibly having a large majority.
Indeed despite being previously very keen to call early general elections to give their new leaders a mandate from the people, as was the case with Theresa May and Boris Johnson, the Tories have steadfastly refused to seek a mandate from their last two leaders precisely because they knew that they would lose the general elections.
Yet despite all that this thread appears to be wallowing in doom and gloom and engulfed in pessimism about the future.
It is a measure of the complete lack of confidence in the Labour Party's ability to improve on the current situation.
If the current Tory government is anywhere near as bad as most people make them out to be then it should be relatively easy for the next Labour government to significantly improve the situation.
In fact so easy that most of the punters on here seem to feel that the primary problem is that all Tory politicians are "thick as mince".
However very few, if any, believe that getting rid of the Tories will make much difference. Sadly I agree with them.
The only way things are likely to change is when people stop believing that the Tories are the problem.
We are not all getting poorer. We are not all in this together. Money continues to move to the very richest and they have been doing very well
I’m fairly sure he’s probably read the same MMT book as you.
And a few hundred more books on economics as well
Doubt it. Monetarists don't represent MMT accurately. The believe the private sector funds the state.
Solid debating skills BTW.
Crack on with your own suggestions on how to fix the economy.
The support kicking around here for a totally failed system is breathtakingly stupid.
Meanwhile... Jenrick is telling us that it's all the fault of asylum seekers. Of course. That's the next election campaign... it's not the government, it's foreigners... again. And will it work... again? I wouldn't bet against it.
“Excessive uncontrolled migration threatens to cannibalise the compassion that marks out the British people”
It is a measure of the complete lack of confidence in the Labour Party’s ability to improve on the current situation.
This is presumably because no opposition party declares any good ideas close to election time as their opponents would just pinch it. Thus we have no publicly expressed motion of how Labour would make things better. In the meantime, the govt can keep on digging the hole ever deeper for another year.
Thus we have no publicly expressed motion of how Labour would make things better.
But surely based on the fact of how unpopular the Tories are on here, and the fact that all Tory politicians are thick, Labour will make things much better by not being Tories?
Edit: To be more precise whatever policies Labour adopts they won't be Tory policies, so shouldn't that be the reason for huge optimism? Why all the doom and gloom about the future?
It suggests a stunning lack of confidence.
Solid debating skills BTW.
Apologies, you took it down to an adhomien level and beat me with experience.
However very few, if any, believe that getting rid of the Tories will make much difference.
It'll make a massive difference. Even by Tory standards the current crop in power are particularly bad.
However very few, if any, believe that getting rid of the Tories will make much difference.
Labour will have a mountain to climb. But, we can moan about their lack of speedy mountain levelling skills rather than the Tories piling on more shit if you want.
Basically the BoE have got it all back to front and looking for someone to blame.
Truth is inflation is a blend of factors. And the BoE have only one tool and need to protect their decisions.
This was primarily a supply side inflation problem. The remit of monetarism is to encourage unemployment by increasing interest rates. To slow the economy and hope for the best. Trouble is you pass income to asset holders which can stoke inflation and effectively tax people who borrow. No secret who it benefits.
Does this seem a fair and rational approach to the failure of policy?
The burden of lowering inflation is being passed to the poorest. Shafted by austerity or low wages.
Time for it to stop.
This… But…
You can’t really blame the BoE when they have essentially had their policy dictated to them for many years now by an incredibly right wing, self serving government with no interest in its population. It’s all well and good people moaning about interest rates rising now being like sticking the knife in and turning it… Interest rate rises NEEDED to happen a long while ago, you can’t live on borrowing money on the cheap forever! But our govt wanted it to go on as long as possible, cementing their “I’m alright Jack, f*** you” voter agenda and thus their continued position of power.
It’s only when the bubble bursts (and my God this Tory government has been world class in drawing out the inevitable!!!) that the masses will turn… Fortunately for those of us with some sense of social conscience, the hard right in the Tory party decided to go full nut job and elected Liz Truss leader, which opened everyones eyes outside of the party as to just how bad this Tory govt is, and even though she was gone in a month the damage was done, and even the most die hard of wilfully blind Tory voters over the last 7 years is now hyper critical of their self serving agenda!
@ernielynch from where I'm sitting the trouble is the Tories have taken us so far down this road that even with a Labour government with a thumping great majority things won't improve overnight, it could take two terms of government to change direction for the better for the worse off, and that's a long time when you're struggling.
Inflation was low for a bit because we exported it to China (along with our pollution, carbon output and jobs). That dodgy book keeping tactic is no longer available.
Corporate and banking executives deluded themselves they were titans of industry off the back of the temporary increase in profits, using that to justify massively boosting their incomes (and inequality) but are now being shown to be hopelessly out of their depth.
While the STW demographic sat at home through lockdowns being paid handsomely by future generations, some people were out demonstrating that they could work harder for a bit (the same people that are getting hammered the most by the current economic reality). Their reward? To be expected to work at that same level of intensity. For ever. Work in teaching, health, retail, delivery etc? Plenty of jobs for people that want them, right?
What is there to be optimistic about?
As for the other stuff, yes, Brexit has cost us dearly, as most of us knew it would, yet nobody held to account for the destruction caused by all those lies, same with the interest rates going up and up at the same time as BoE/Government/etc telling us it’s not like other inflationary crisis’, so why stick rates up, why when we were in a financial mess in the late 2000s were we able to magic up hundreds of billions, yet can’t come up with a couple of billion to give our teachers, doctors, nurses, etc a payrise in line with the inflation partially caused by UK PLC?
Because rates have needed to go up for a very long time! The timing will never be good, but arguably it would have been better if rates had gone up say 8yrs ago (pre-Brexit) where maybe a 2% interest rate rise phased in might have dealt with things before they got bad enough for the position we are in now (it would probably have also impacted on the Brexit vote too, and kept us in the EU, which obviously the money men didn’t want).
As for why they can’t find the money…? The answer is sadly very simple… It’s because they don’t want to! They will find it for anything they deem important enough… Sadly our NHS at crisis point actually plays into their personal agendas, hence they’re actively underfunding it and allowing it to rot…
However very few, if any, believe that getting rid of the Tories will make much difference.
*sigh*
Sometimes I get the impression that our resident revolutionaries are willing any incoming Labour government to fail so that they can elevate the saddles of their equines yet further and tell us they told us so
This is the worst government this country has ever had, by a country mile, who have given up even the slightest pretence that they give a shit about anyone other than the top 1%
I look at the Labour front bench and while admittedly it doesn’t look particularly inspiring, they also don’t look like they’re eyeing up the chance to completely **** me over at every available opportunity to further line the pockets of their mates
a Labour government with a thumping great majority things won’t improve overnight, it could take two terms of government to change direction
What?? Two terms, 10 years, to "change direction"??
I would expect the very first King's Speech to represent a change of direction.
But well done for attempting to lower people's expectations to rock bottom and placing the bar on the ground.
It suggests a stunning lack of confidence.
Have you heard Keir Starmer…?
The guy is the next worst option behind our current government! He doesn’t fill me, nor I suspect many other voters, with confidence…
The problem is once he’s PM, he’ll believe he’s there because of his popularity and his policies, where the opposite is true… He was simply just not quite as bad as a rampant right wing Tory option!
Labour would do well to get rid of him ASAP… Angela Rayner would be far more popular, and dare I suggest it, a more unifying leader!
Sometimes I get the impression that our resident revolutionaries are willing any incoming Labour government to fail so that they can elevate the saddles of their equines yet further and tell us they told us so
And yet you seem to have absolutely no confidence that things will get better in the future. You appear to be by far the worse doom monger on here.
I cannot recall you ever expressing a word of optimism.
But surely based on the fact of how unpopular the Tories are on here, and the fact that all Tory politicians are thick, Labour will make things much better by not being Tories?
All depends how much not Tory they are I suppose. They are certainly falling for the "we can't afford it", "where's the money coming from" BS so that is why my hopes are not very high.
I would hope we wouldn't see the outright appalling shit the tories have got up to with say immigration but as we know that is not actually affecting anyone in UK anyway so even having a bit of kindness towards immigrants will not make peoples lives in UK better. SO Labour should have kinder/fairer policies and approach but what radical stuff do you think Starmer's Labour will do that makes you so positive it will all be great for people?
But well done for attempting to lower people’s expectations to rock bottom and placing the bar on the ground.
Every post you make on this site does the same Ernie. That's one thing you absolutely can't point the finger about.
but what radical stuff do you think Starmer’s Labour will do that makes you so positive it will all be great for people?
Well, with that mountain to climb, and the tories just walking down hill in a rather haphazard and ramshackle manner, I am sure SKS will be able to organise the walk in the wrong direction much better.
...wonders off to reread the ascent of rum doodle.
But well done for attempting to lower people’s expectations to rock bottom and placing the bar on the ground.
Every post you make on this site does the same Ernie
Well you obviously don't read what I post, which is fair enough I guess.
However if you did you would know that I am a darn sight more optimistic than someone like binners.
I post at least once a week the latest opinion poll showing a huge Labour lead over the Tories, something which I very much welcome. The only way forward, in a real and sustained way, is by the catastrophic collapse of support for the Tory Party.
A huge Labour majority would obviously be a massive step forward. First of all it mean that credibility in the Tories as a party of government had collapsed, and secondly it would put massive expectations on a Labour government - ensuring that it was far more likely to deliver.
Lowering people's expectations of a Labour government will achieve nothing. In fact it will guarantee that nothing will fundamentally change.
I have no confidence in Starmer as Prime Minister, I consider him to be a self-serving careerist with no political convictions, but that doesn't matter. With the Tories discredited the alternative will not be veering back to them.
Admittedly it might create a political vacuum which might benefit a party such as Reform UK but I am sufficiently optimistic to consider that to be unlikely. (See my views on Nigel Farage which you presumably didn't read)
I believe that Starmer's inevitable failure is more likely to push the Labour Party to the left than to the right. What would be the point of apeing a discredited Tory Party?
I am far more optimistic about the political future than most people on here appear to be. I believe that we are about to see a very significant shift in the logjam that is British politics.
The only way things are likely to change is when people stop believing that the Tories are the problem.
They are. The reason Labour is where it is politically and is doing what it's doing is in response to the Tories. Tories have set the tone that Labour have to respond to. As we've said before the Tories' main skill is getting people to vote agains their own interests and yes I think that's the main problem here.
Deleted
benpinnick
If the cost of stuff sold was 95% salary costs then the theory might stack up, but its not, it can’t be over 10-20% max (in terms of the UK labour force contribution to goods on the shelves). Inflation is measured in terms of real goods, and so if you add 10% to the salary base, real goods prices should only go up by around 1-2%. If you then add another 2% to the salary base to compensate, then its 0.2% and so on.
Wage inflation has very little to do with the price of stuff on which inflation figures are based, and so trying to use one as a lever to fix the other is pointless.
Sort of but not the entire picture especially if you take a wider view to "being poor" than inflation alone.
Ultimately the difference is in the 60-70's we had a positive balance of trade ... and we weren't obsessed with GDP
To (over) simplify if your balance if trade is positive then a higher GDP is positive... if the balance of trade is negative then a higher GDP is negative to COL.
In the 60's-70's (whatever) most people couldn't afford a faberge egg <insert luxury item of choice>.. so in that nothing has changed. Back in the 60's-70's (or post 1932) it was free to walk over Kinder Scout (or wherever) and that's still true.
In the 60-70's mobile phones** cost nothing... today many people seem to think having the latest mobile phone is a fundamental human right so much so that they support forcing people who don't want a mobile phone to buy/rent one.
**mobile phones are just an example of expensive items that have become to all intents and purposes "non optional", made outside the UK so negatively affecting the balance of trade and need to be frequently replaced
The UK hasn't been able to feed itself since long before this so food is always subject to currency and in actuality has been artificially cheap for a decade. It's an eye opener to watch an old "Open All Hours" and see how expensive food was compared to many other items.
The main issue seems to be that as food has gone up many are stuck also paying for non-optional luxury items so they need more money each month.
The only way things are likely to change is when people stop believing that the Tories are the problem.
They are.
Well if the Tories are the problem why all the doom and gloom about the future? The last time there was an opinion poll giving the Tories a lead over Labour was in 2021.
Things can only get better - the Tories are the problem and they will be gone in a few months time. Happy days!
As we’ve said
I'm sorry, how many people are you speaking for?
What would make things better if people stopped thinking we live in a real democracy, that Labour are going to make a blind bit of difference and realise we live in a technocracy, and the current state of our finances is deliberate, not accidental.
Wholesale reform of the economic system is the only thing that can help, but we're not up for it because it's not bad enough for us to get fighty.
from where I’m sitting the trouble is the Tories have taken us so far down this road that even with a Labour government with a thumping great majority things won’t improve overnight,
Except is was Blair that started this... (unless you believe in magic money trees)
ATTEMPT AT IMAGE
Just imagine helicopters had existed in 1912, and they’d flown a decent, competent captain onto the titanic at 01:00 on the 14th April to sort it all out….
That is pretty much where this country is now. Thinking that anyone can miraculously sort this shit out is naieve and stupid.
Ah yes, it's just like Titanic and the lack of helicopters in 1912.
This proves that firstly there is very little that the next Labour government will be able to do, and secondly that apparently I am "naive and stupid" to think otherwise.
👏
chevychase
What would make things better if people stopped thinking we live in a real democracy, that Labour are going to make a blind bit of difference and realise we live in a technocracy, and the current state of our finances is deliberate, not accidental.
Wholesale reform of the economic system is the only thing that can help, but we’re not up for it because it’s not bad enough for us to get fighty.
The current state of the economy is excellent though. Money is flowing (or now gushing) from the poor to the rich exactly as people seem to want.
and realise we live in a technocracy
It's equally a post truth democracy.
People can vote for whatever unicorn or magic money tree's they like so long as they don't question if either exists.