I've got 15 tabs op...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

I've got 15 tabs open in Chrome and....

46 Posts
34 Users
38 Reactions
208 Views
Posts: 13916
Free Member
Topic starter
 

The average memory usage of 14 of them is around 70-150Mb each (BBC is 70Mb) .......... this forum, 700Mb!!!

😳

Just sayin'


 
Posted : 13/10/2023 12:37 pm
Posts: 14410
Free Member
 

Been like that for ages ....


 
Posted : 13/10/2023 12:38 pm
Posts: 17915
Full Member
 

There's a tab?


 
Posted : 13/10/2023 12:38 pm
sboardman and sboardman reacted
Posts: 13617
Full Member
 

STW is 135mb for me in Chrome.


 
Posted : 13/10/2023 12:42 pm
Posts: 13601
Free Member
 

There’s a tab?

This is funny!


 
Posted : 13/10/2023 12:47 pm
Posts: 13601
Free Member
 

The average memory usage of 14 of them is around 70-150Mb each (BBC is 70Mb) ………. this forum, 700Mb!!!

That explains a few things


 
Posted : 13/10/2023 12:48 pm
Posts: 7857
Full Member
 

Running at around 135MB in Brave (Windows 11) for the STW tab.

Google Photos, Flicker and Gmail are my biggest memory hogs - around 200-225MB each.


 
Posted : 13/10/2023 12:51 pm
 nbt
Posts: 12381
Full Member
 

three STW tabs open here - 99, 101 and 111mb. I am a subscriber though and thus have no ads showing


 
Posted : 13/10/2023 12:55 pm
Posts: 356
Full Member
 

15 Tabs ? Those are rookie numbers ! 41 here 😀


 
Posted : 13/10/2023 1:05 pm
thols2, Cougar, nuke and 3 people reacted
 nbt
Posts: 12381
Full Member
 

I have 5 separate Chrome windows open, each with multiple tabs...


 
Posted : 13/10/2023 1:09 pm
Posts: 12993
Free Member
 

Does that mean when I open a thread on here or canes my data? 


 
Posted : 13/10/2023 1:22 pm
Posts: 8750
Full Member
 


 
Posted : 13/10/2023 1:33 pm
footflaps and footflaps reacted
Posts: 77347
Free Member
 

Chrome's taking up 2GB of memory and 12% of CPU on my desktop to do nothing other than sit there. And that's with Full Member STW status (so no ads) and extensions that we're not allowed to promote.

I'm increasingly of the mind that it's time to explore other browser options.


 
Posted : 13/10/2023 1:33 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50352
 

54.5 on Safari.

No Alpine, it’s memory not data. 


 
Posted : 13/10/2023 1:39 pm
Posts: 4397
Full Member
 

My STW tab is 160mb. It's been open for about 6 weeks though, so that's not too bad really.


 
Posted : 13/10/2023 1:41 pm
pk13 and pk13 reacted
Posts: 13164
Full Member
 

Is there a draft from all that fan action?


 
Posted : 13/10/2023 1:42 pm
Posts: 855
Free Member
 

STW gets my fan going like nothing else short of a big batch photo processing job.


 
Posted : 13/10/2023 1:43 pm
hightensionline, kelvin, kelvin and 1 people reacted
Posts: 4643
Full Member
 

150mb on Edge, but yes, fan is cycling away. Does more biking than me nowadays.


 
Posted : 13/10/2023 1:50 pm
kelvin and kelvin reacted
Posts: 1531
Full Member
 

Not just me then. Went off out the other day, leaving a couple of STW tabs open; came back to the sound of a Chinook landing in the office. One very unhappy fan, with an immediate response when I closed the tabs.


 
Posted : 13/10/2023 1:56 pm
kelvin and kelvin reacted
Posts: 9135
Full Member
 

I once clicked the 'open all in tabs' ,in my bookmarks folder(containing many hundreds of bookmarked pages) to see what would happen.

Im never doing that again 😆


 
Posted : 13/10/2023 2:19 pm
 Del
Posts: 8226
Full Member
 

firefox here with 12 tabs 900Mb and 3.2% of cpu

stw pages are ~ 100mb apart from classifieds which are ~ 1.5 times that.


 
Posted : 13/10/2023 9:18 pm
Posts: 8771
Full Member
 

Don't know what any of this means anymore!
Screenshot from 2023-10-13 21-24-36

Am I one of the few people alive who closes applications, files, windows, tabs when they're done with them? It's like turning off the lights shirly. But littering the desktop with icons I'll never ever use ever again? GUILTY


 
Posted : 13/10/2023 9:25 pm
Posts: 43345
Full Member
 

92MB and around 6% CPU to have this page open. Chrome on Win11.


 
Posted : 13/10/2023 9:35 pm
Posts: 4954
Free Member
 

I’m increasingly of the mind that it’s time to explore other browser options

Links -g for a full experience

Am I one of the few people alive who closes applications, files, windows, tabs when they’re done with them?

Htop?

I hate it when my partner asks me to check something on her phone, queue every single app is open and every single browser.


 
Posted : 13/10/2023 9:49 pm
Posts: 3231
Full Member
 

124MB logged in

400MB and rising logged out, laptop fan started up and going full speed

Must be the ads


 
Posted : 13/10/2023 9:52 pm
kelvin and kelvin reacted
Posts: 790
Free Member
 

I am beginning to think STW must have some revenue share agreement with my electricity supplier the way the fan kicks in when I am on here.


 
Posted : 13/10/2023 9:56 pm
hightensionline, kelvin, kelvin and 1 people reacted
Posts: 6581
Free Member
 

I am beginning to think STW must have some revenue share agreement with my electricity supplier the way the fan kicks in when I am on here.

They're probably using people's computers for bitcoin mining and will soon be retiring to the Cayman Islands 🙂


 
Posted : 13/10/2023 10:00 pm
Posts: 8771
Full Member
 

The way crypto is heading these days they'll be lucky to get to The Isle of Sheppey.


 
Posted : 13/10/2023 10:06 pm
Posts: 1070
Full Member
 

"This webpage is using significant energy. Closing it may improve the responsiveness of your Mac."


 
Posted : 13/10/2023 10:11 pm
kelvin and kelvin reacted
 igm
Posts: 11833
Full Member
 

I’ve got 15 tabs open in Chrome and

a beach ain’t one


 
Posted : 13/10/2023 11:25 pm
Posts: 6194
Full Member
 

Brave browser on Linux

STW is 63Mb and 68Mb for 2 tabs

Youtube 122Mb and 215Mb (both idle), and about 280Mb playing 1440p.
everything else around 40-50Mb each and basically idle (including stuff like Privacy Badger, Keepass and some other plugins). Snowheads is about half that when idle but jumps up to about 60 for a page load and then drops back to half again.

CPU is about 3% max total for all (and it's not exactly the most bleeding edge CPU) and up/down all over the place when playing youtube

basically don't worry about reported memory usage. memory is there to be used, not kept as reserve for something you're not running.


 
Posted : 13/10/2023 11:47 pm
Posts: 43345
Full Member
 

basically don’t worry about reported memory usage. memory is there to be used, not kept as reserve for something you’re not running.

This


 
Posted : 13/10/2023 11:50 pm
Posts: 7423
Free Member
 

23 tabs here, stw is 111mb.

also got 5 tabs on firefox and its coming up with 'memory full you need to close something' box every now and then (ageing macbook).


 
Posted : 14/10/2023 8:05 am
Posts: 1886
Free Member
 

scotroutes
Full Member
basically don’t worry about reported memory usage. memory is there to be used, not kept as reserve for something you’re not running.

This

Not this, it's nonsense. A few ads using almost a gig of memory is absolutely ludicrous!

To put it into context, a single tab of this website for a free Member uses more memory than an xbox 360 had in total.

Just think about the complexity of elder scrolls, forza or red dead redemption and think that a single forum page showing a few ads uses almost 50% more than that.

It's madness.


 
Posted : 14/10/2023 1:23 pm
kelvin and kelvin reacted
 mert
Posts: 3831
Free Member
 

Am I one of the few people alive who closes applications, files, windows, tabs when they’re done with them?

Nope, i do too. Hang over from the days when computers really *wouldn't* run two programs, and my first proper job where running a big operation locally would result in a 40kph headwind being generated, and loose papers being blown across the desk. Some colleagues even made cardboard ducts to divert the draught...


 
Posted : 14/10/2023 2:50 pm
kelvin and kelvin reacted
Posts: 6194
Full Member
 

Nope.
Browser will use whatever memory it can get. If it's doing nothing, then the browser can have it. Run a game, and the OS will give the memory to the game instead.

I have 32 gig, and STW usage is miniscule. Doesn't even register on the same order of magnitude. Unless red dead redemption only uses 30 odd meg?
9gig used, 7.5gig not used (basically being wasted - could have saved some cash on the DIMMs), 13gig cache and buffers (aka - freely available memory for anything to use, where the OS dishes it out, not Chrome/Brave/Edge "stealing" it)
if I pull out 1 of the 16gig DIMMs, reboot, and open the exact same apps and tabs, the OS will still report RAM spare, available and unused. and not one single byte of Swap used. Heck I could pull out all the RAM and put in a single 8gig and it'd still show free, spare unused RAM (I know this, because I used to have only 6 gig in the same machine, and the RAM still never filled up with 15 tabs open in Brave/Chrome, including 2 STW tabs, numerous Youtube/Gmail etc. tabs and other browsing)
If I double the RAM to 64gig, Brave et al will probably borrow more than 32 gig in total.

Not even a gaming rig, no dedicated graphics card, some of that RAM usage must be the built in APU.


 
Posted : 14/10/2023 2:53 pm
Posts: 13594
Free Member
 

Only 15 tabs, my wife has to have a minimum of around 50 to feel comfortable.


 
Posted : 14/10/2023 3:15 pm
Posts: 77347
Free Member
 

Not this, it’s nonsense. A few ads using almost a gig of memory is absolutely ludicrous!

To put it into context, a single tab of this website for a free Member uses more memory than an xbox 360 had in total.

Just think about the complexity of elder scrolls, forza or red dead redemption and think that a single forum page showing a few ads uses almost 50% more than that.

It’s madness.

No, you just don't understand memory management. Andy is absolutely correct.

RAM is there to be used. What's the point of pouring half a pint into a pint pot? What you're not seeing is that Windows is clever, it will hoover up free RAM for performance reasons such as guessing which file you might want to open next and preloading it, and then will dump that data in favour of more important stuff if there starts to be a shortage. Used memory is not a bad thing, quite the opposite, things are suboptimal if RAM isn't being utilised. That's literally what it's for.

An Xbox 360 and a modern PC are not directly comparable, no more than you could argue that your Amiga had 1MB or your Spectrum had 48k. They're different systems with different requirements doing different things in different ways. How many times did you play four games at the same time on your 360?


 
Posted : 14/10/2023 6:59 pm
Posts: 15068
Full Member
 

Agreed,

Windows will allow apps fill up the ram to a certain extent*, and once the RAM starts getting a bit full it will limit or remove idle stuff, or maybe Iv'e got that backwards, or maybe it's dynamic both ways, I'm not entirely sure.

*some apps just don't need or request 'all the RAM', especially when 'idle'.

My browser on my Desktop PC is currently using about 2gb out of 16gb total, (12 tabs inc. webmail and streaming a radio station.

The whole system is using about 4.8gb total RAM, but it's essentially idle other than the browser.

I've just checked my gaming PC out of curiosity, running nothing but windows and steam it's using 5.3gb out of 32gb.

Fired up a game: Hogwarts Legacy, and total sys RAM has jumped to about 18gb utilised out of 32gb.

So the game has immediatly hoovered up about 12gb RAM, lol


 
Posted : 14/10/2023 11:38 pm
Posts: 11292
Full Member
 

My previous MacBook (had the touch thing above the keys) would fire up the fan very quickly when I visited this site - the only time it did this constantly (I did some video editing where the fan kicked in twice while editing 2 out of 8 video files). The new MacBook doesn't do this at all (or then is incredibly quiet).

I close things down and I don't like more tabs open than I'm working on...very old habits - I get lost amongst them all if I leave them open!


 
Posted : 15/10/2023 7:42 am
 Drac
Posts: 50352
 

So the game has immediatly hoovered up about 12gb RAM, lol

Bloody hell that’s 24 times more memory than Xbox 360. 


 
Posted : 15/10/2023 9:07 am
Posts: 77347
Free Member
 

Again though, it's apples and oranges.

What's a big game storage-wise on the 360? Off the top of my head (I'll check later) Red Dead Redemption was something like a 6GB install. RDR2 was something like a 57GB patch when I had the discs. Anyone care to speculate what Starfield on the X|S might clock in at?


 
Posted : 15/10/2023 12:18 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50352
 

You know me better than that. 


 
Posted : 15/10/2023 12:50 pm
Posts: 1886
Free Member
 

Cougar
No, you just don’t understand memory management. Andy is absolutely correct.

I worked for the first 5 years of my career as a programmer in kernel and embedded development so I have quite an intimate knowledge about how memory management works on modern OS.

500MB just for adverts, over and above the requirement of the actual page is utter madness however you look at it. There is zero justification for it.

An example of the problem this causes is on phones where the memory is already full with applications running in the background. Opening a large tab like this causes all those the background applications and the disk cache to be unloaded, meaning a sometimes quite significant delay when you switch back to them.

I honestly have absolutely no clue why anyone why try and justify this completely idiotic waste of memory as being fine. It's not, it's lazy and it does cause problems.

However I want to be clear that I'm not moaning about STW because at least they give the option to remove the ads with a small payment. More the general laziness of ad providers (aside from the memory usage, this tab is currently using 99% CPU on a 16 core Ryzen).

These ads are crap, lazy programming written by people who either don't care about it or don't know what they're doing.

And the point about the XBOX 360 was just an example of the complete excessiveness of using over 500MB purely for ads. I've actually looked into this for some customers and sometimes this is because they've been absolute ****s and pulled in several entire megabyte JS framework minified into a single file, just to use a single function out of it which is about 4000 bytes! There is no argument that can be made to justify this, it is simply crap.


 
Posted : 15/10/2023 1:38 pm
footflaps and footflaps reacted
Posts: 6194
Full Member
 

(aside from the memory usage, this tab is currently using 99% CPU on a 16 core Ryzen)

This tab is using 40Mb now, and flickering between 0.0 and 1.0% CPU on an 8 core Ryzen


 
Posted : 15/10/2023 1:53 pm
Posts: 77347
Free Member
 

Phone memory management is different again.

Prioritising foreground tasks over background tasks is (usually) desired behaviour, you want all that crap dumping in order to focus on what you're actually doing. If you've got memory starvation then slow task switching is a small price to pay over the task you're looking at being on its arse.

I can't comment on STW's adverts, I doubt STW can either given that they're served by a third party. It wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if optimal code is not at the forefront of an advert provider's mind, I agree with you 100% here. In any case though, "foo is using blah amount of memory" is a nonsense argument in isolation. Because, so what? What else are you going to do with empty RAM? If you've got a browser tab using (and not releasing) half a gig whilst your SQL server is choking and you're trying to get 120FPS out of Forza then that's a different story.

Memory usage and memory shortage are very different things.


 
Posted : 15/10/2023 2:17 pm
Posts: 15068
Full Member
 

Anyone care to speculate what Starfield on the X|S might clock in at?

On PC it uses 116gb disk space. Running it on my system, random spot check it's using:

About 10gb of 32gb system RAM

About 7gb of 16gb Graphics card RAM

I've only just started playing it though, so it may use more when things get a bit busy.


 
Posted : 15/10/2023 2:18 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!