It's "fro...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] It's "from", you pleb

20 Posts
19 Users
0 Reactions
95 Views
Posts: 5787
Full Member
Topic starter
 

"My generation was no different than any other," Armstrong told Cyclingnews' Daniel Benson.

[url= http://www.bikeradar.com/news/article/exclusive-lance-armstrong-interview-on-cyclingnews-36315/ ]report here[/url]

Sod the drugs, the cheating, the bullying, it's *from*, not *than*.


 
Posted : 30/01/2013 5:43 pm
Posts: 25815
Full Member
 

"to", I'd have said but then I'm a bit like that bloke off of shameless


 
Posted : 30/01/2013 5:51 pm
Posts: 3
Free Member
 

'from' and 'to' are both correct, but he's an American so what do you expect?


 
Posted : 30/01/2013 7:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's when Americans say "I could care less" when they meant they couldn't care less that really winds me up.


 
Posted : 30/01/2013 8:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Nope, all of these are beaten by "I could of" instead of "I could have" literally grinding my teeth as I type!


 
Posted : 30/01/2013 8:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

fun fact: "could of" comes from a misunderstanding of "could have" > could've. 😀

"could care less" is worse because it means the opposite... 🙁

Armstrong is the worstest, of course. for realz.


 
Posted : 31/01/2013 12:01 am
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

Pedants posting in the wrong forum..... 🙄


 
Posted : 31/01/2013 12:02 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

At least he didn't say 'off of'. I'd punch Scott Mills in the face all day long for that.


 
Posted : 31/01/2013 12:26 am
Posts: 5787
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Pedants posting in the wrong forum.....

Nope, it's related to bikes. I mean, with the doping, it's only [b]related[/b] to biking (in the same way that motorbikes are related to cycling), but still...


 
Posted : 31/01/2013 1:50 am
Posts: 14711
Full Member
 

I agree with him to a certain extent that he's being singled out, but on the flipside he brought it on himself with his past behaviour.

There's no doubt that people were after him because of his profile. Had he admitted it years ago then I imagine the punishment would have been less, but no doubt his head in the sand stance, coupled with his arrogance, surely made it a mission for people to nail him to the cross


 
Posted : 31/01/2013 2:05 am
Posts: 3190
Free Member
 

Try explaining the difference between "Alternate" and "Alternative" to somebody that's absolutely convinced that they mean exactly the same thing....


 
Posted : 31/01/2013 2:12 am
Posts: 65918
Free Member
 

Miriam Webster lists among the definitions of "alternate":

4 : constituting an alternative <took the alternate route home>
5: alternative

I'd say it's an americanism but I reckon it's only a matter of time til the OED caves in.


 
Posted : 31/01/2013 2:18 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

on the flipside

his head in the sand stance

nail him to the cross

BoardingBob. You have a job on News of the cliches.


 
Posted : 31/01/2013 3:30 am
Posts: 14711
Full Member
 

I love a buzzword 8)


 
Posted : 31/01/2013 3:36 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

'Than' instead of 'from' I can live with but 'off of' deserves a public stoning. At the beginning of this year I asked for a date stamp which went up to the year 2013, the stationary girl replied "I've got some on order, some other secretary's have . . . ". Child, the plural of secretary is secretaries. Tsk.


 
Posted : 31/01/2013 5:50 am
Posts: 18073
Free Member
 

Even if "secretary's" and "secretaries" mean different things they are homophones. Did you forget the smiley, Karin?


 
Posted : 31/01/2013 6:25 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Karinofnine - Member
'Than' instead of 'from' I can live with but 'off of' deserves a public stoning. At the beginning of this year I asked for a date stamp which went up to the year 2013, the stationary girl replied "I've got some on order, some other secretary's have . . . ". Child, the plural of secretary is secretaries. Tsk.

A stoning offence for me is when people use 'station[b]a[/b]ry' when they mean 'station[b]e[/b]ry' 😉

Apologies if you were just referring to a girl who was not moving. 😛


 
Posted : 31/01/2013 6:39 am
 Pook
Posts: 12677
Full Member
 

edit: beaten to it


 
Posted : 31/01/2013 7:04 am
 IHN
Posts: 19694
Full Member
 

[i]At least he didn't say 'off of'. I'd punch Scott Mills in the face all day long for that[/i]

You'd have to get to him before me...

I'd also like to add

- "can I get" instead of "can (or, even better, may) I have"
- "off" instead of "from"
- "of" instead of "have"

Grr.

EDIT - oh, and this

http://singletrackmag.com/forum/topic/singletrack-subscription-offers-did-anyone-get-their-free-charge-spoon-yet


 
Posted : 31/01/2013 9:17 am
Posts: 7670
Free Member
 

@BP 😀


 
Posted : 31/01/2013 9:24 am
Posts: 14233
Free Member
 

I agree with him to a certain extent that he's being singled out

Pish, he's a big fat fish. And gets the coverage a big fat fish warrants. Which in itself is determined by what value the media place in the story.

Which it seems is greater that that of some fat bloke in Switzerland who deserves an awful lot more scrutiny that he's getting.

I can't comment on the grammar as I'm a barely literate imbecile.


 
Posted : 31/01/2013 9:32 am

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!