[Closed] How many letters are in the answer to this question?

Is it 1 or four?
Actually not 1, of course.

23?

DrP

6?

DrP? Or DrNP?

23?

DrP

Neither of those answers

I can see the thinking with four so I'll jump on that answer.

I think it should really be 'riddle' rather than 'question'

four

I have a feeling that 23 is going to be about as valid an answer as whatever smart-arsery the originator intended.

I can see 3 questions so three well 5. what do i win?

I'll go with 13

I have a feeling that 23 is going to be about as valid an answer as whatever smart-arsery the originator intended.

Indeed. It looks like the sort of vague meme that pops up on Facebook, multiple answers = lots of clicks.

23 is valid as it's the literal answer to the question, How many letters are in "the answer to this question"? It was the first thing I thought of when I saw it.

"Four" is equally valid as it's the first (only?) number I can think of with the same amount of letters as its value.

There's probably other solutions you could make fit as well. There is (I think) 13 different letters in "the answer to this question" for instance.

I didn't see 23; I suppose putting "answer to this question" would make it too obvious.

I'll go with none.

9

16 ..... different letters

But 6 looking at it again

5!

What’s the answer to the question? That’d be a fine place to start

None - so, four. Or Zero, also four.

None – so, four. Or Zero, also four.

As I see it, number and the number of letters have to match, so it's four. But it could be 0, as it has no letters, and the question says letters not characters.

All the answers have been written on postcards, so there's no letters, zero or none, so four.

Four

12

11.. the original answer is 23 I think, and twenty three has 11 letters. This is assuming that you ask the question twice, which is a bit of a stretch. You can then answer the question again which would be 6, and then 3, and then 5 and then 4.. so 4 would be the final answer if you took that approach.

10111

either 12 or wot joeydeacon said

😀
[url= https://i.postimg.cc/bvccWbfD/69-EDEB02-8-E1-A-42-EF-8124-CE2-BD36-A3592.jp g" target="_blank">https://i.postimg.cc/bvccWbfD/69-EDEB02-8-E1-A-42-EF-8124-CE2-BD36-A3592.jp g"/> [/img][/url]

How many letters in a postman's bedroom?

Millions mate

23 makes sense.

It's great that 4 has 4 letters in it, but how is the riddle asking for that? At what point does it say 'think of a number that has the equal number of letters to it's numerical value'?

500 plus VAT so 600

@shermer75 I was mulling this over on my ride home last night and no matter how I picked apart the question, I couldn't find any logic that would suggest the "4/four" answer, maybe only for smartarse value. I've googled the question and a few forums throw up that four is correct, but I still hereby withdraw the four.

I went with 4, the logic being "how many" is asking for a number and we aren't provided with any further information to suggest a specific number so it's logical to assume you are writing a number as a word as the answer and the only number which has the same amount of letters in it as the value of the number is four.

That said I can see why 23 works now others have mentioned it - that's seems a bit more cheesy though :p

0

I went with 4, the logic being “how many” is asking for a number and we aren’t provided with any further information to suggest a specific number so it’s logical to assume you are writing a number as a word as the answer and the only number which has the same amount of letters in it as the value of the number is four.

If you don't overthink it - the answer is a number so there are no letters in the answer

the answer causing controversy is 'four'

ie. four has 4 letters in it so answers the question accurately.

no matter how I picked apart the question, I couldn’t find any logic that would suggest the “4/four” answer

This is the argument being given here against it.

But also (my) logic dictates that the number of letters in the answer is also the answer, hence the disagreement.

lim x->(infinity), n = 4 where x is the number of iterations.

If you don’t overthink it – the answer is a number so there are no letters in the answer

That's bobbins because a numeric answer can be written in letters.

Four is also a bobbins answer. The question does not make semantic sense. It may come as a surprise to learn that it is possible to write a sentence that is syntactically correct but has no semantic meaning. So there's no point in looking for one; likewise focusing on one possible interpretation of something and claiming that as 'the answer' is folly.

Four may be a 'bobbins' answer, but given the question as written, and without adding any additional punctuation, is 'four' a correct answer?

23 is valid as it’s the literal answer to the question, How many letters are in “the answer to this question”? It was the first thing I thought of when I saw it.

I didn't see this at all, but now you've said it, seems a completely valid one (I would call this the smartarse approach though).

My immediate thought was - the answer is an integer (and expressed in written, not numerical form)... making a grammatically correct answer. ie "bananas" would not be ok at all. "seven" is grammatically correct but mathematically incorrect.

And then, the answer must reference itself, and therefore we can deduce that it must be a number that contains the number of letters - so this is where:

At what point does it say ‘think of a number that has the equal number of letters to it’s numerical value’?

you have to think it up for yourself.

Anyone know if there are any other answers that follow this logic? and what answers are there in different languages.

we can deduce that it must be a number that contains the number of letters

We, over here, can't. 🙂

I got 11, and I'm neither right nor worng.

We, over here, can’t.

I see the challenge as "think of a valid answer to this question". The question says "How many..." so the answer has to be a number. Try some numbers as see if they fit:

one, that must wrong, as 'one' has 3 letters, not 1
two, (ditto)
three, has five letters
four - has 4 letters - yay!
five, only has 4 letters
etc, until it become obvious that the number is higher than any spelled out number.

I can see why 23, but don't understand 11?

what answers are there in different languages

German would still be 4 (vier)
French and Japanese, I can't find an answer.
Traditional Cumbrian sheep-counting would be 6 (hovera)

There are thirty-six letters in this answer.

is ‘four’ a correct answer?

No, there aren't any correct answers* because it's not a correct question. It's like asking someone to add up 1+ 4 + fish + blue. That's why there is argument over it - different people are coming up with different reasoning to try and make it make sense.

* unless you argue 23, which is pretty peurile along the lines of 'how do you spell 'it' joke we all loved aged 9 or so.

Makes perfect sense to me, sure it's contrived but you can deduce the answer with logic. You can't deduce an answer to 1 + 4 + fish + blue, it's not a comparable question.

*You* think you can deduce the answer with logic.. but it's logic you've chosen, which backs up my claim.

OK, you're right, it's 42 - happy now?

All logic is based on your initial axioms if choice. That's the entire basis of logic