How does language e...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] How does language evolve

36 Posts
25 Users
0 Reactions
117 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Seriously as I lie in the bath pondering.

For example

When we lived in caves there was no such thing as a door...didn't exist so who decided ....we will call that a door lots of things never existed we'll they did but at that point in time they didnt or we invented them so how do they get names


 
Posted : 14/01/2019 8:58 pm
Posts: 463
Free Member
 

HOW STONED R U?


 
Posted : 14/01/2019 9:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I'm not I'm just looking at my toes which are next to a tap....I lived once with some Argentinians and they don't have a word for toe....then I wondered who decided that was a tap


 
Posted : 14/01/2019 9:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

A wee guy called frank from the ministry of naming things sorts aw that oot. François sorts out the french, Franco does the spanish.


 
Posted : 14/01/2019 9:04 pm
Posts: 656
Full Member
 

Latin. All Latin!


 
Posted : 14/01/2019 9:04 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gate
Just one little example how things move along, uses, evolution, shortening etc,etc though I reckon there are probably some longer versions in a few PHd's that cover it better 🙂


 
Posted : 14/01/2019 9:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ancient Greek was the roots of modern English. Check it out.


 
Posted : 14/01/2019 9:07 pm
Posts: 15068
Full Member
 

In Spanish, foot is 'pie' and 'deda' is finger.

Foot finger? But I'm thinking literal translations here. There doesn't seem to be a literal word for word, word for toe.

Disclaimer: I'm not good at Spanish.


 
Posted : 14/01/2019 9:12 pm
Posts: 28475
Free Member
 

What did we call etymology before language existed?


 
Posted : 14/01/2019 9:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

In Spanish, foot is ‘pie’ and ‘deda’ is finger.

Foot finger? But I’m thinking literal translations here. There doesn’t seem to be a literal word for word, word for toe.

That's exactly what they said....I remember saying something about toes and they were like what's a toe....


 
Posted : 14/01/2019 9:20 pm
Posts: 17779
Full Member
 

There are new things all the time which someone has to make up a word for - helicopter for instance.


 
Posted : 14/01/2019 9:25 pm
Posts: 15068
Full Member
 

That's the thing with modern English, there are lots of precise words for very specific things in very specific contexts who's meaning can change a lot.

A lot of languages are a lot more organic and descriptive.

That said, we don't have to grapple with masculine and feminine, if I got caught using puta instead of puto in Spain, I'd never live it down. 🙂


 
Posted : 14/01/2019 9:26 pm
Posts: 2231
Free Member
 

The French missed a trick when naming bats, they called it a bald mouse when they should have called it an aero mouse 😋


 
Posted : 14/01/2019 9:33 pm
Posts: 33325
Full Member
 

Ancient Greek was the roots of modern English. Check it out.

Sure about that? There are the Indo-European roots, from Sanskrit, then there are the early British/Celtic languages, Anglo-Saxon, Roman...


 
Posted : 14/01/2019 9:35 pm
Posts: 17779
Full Member
 

The French missed a trick when naming bats, they called it a bald mouse when they should have called it an aero mouse

The Germans got it right. Die Fledermaus.


 
Posted : 14/01/2019 9:38 pm
Posts: 22922
Full Member
 

In some instances its also as if some things don't exist until we name them (rather than having to create a name for something newly created or discovered)

Different languages see or fail to see certain colours for instance. In the UK we didn't have a work that distinguished between red and orange until we started importing oranges. Up to that point we'd have described anything that colour as 'red' and we still have names for things where 'red' is used for something we now see as orange 'red hair' 'red squirrel' 'red deer' - non of those things are red as we now see it and yet the colour we now call orange was always there.

In other languages theres no distinction between blue and green.


 
Posted : 14/01/2019 9:40 pm
Posts: 3747
Free Member
 

Mattyfez, you'd likely be in trouble for puto anyway!

Bat is sagu zaharra in Basque, ie. Old mouse


 
Posted : 14/01/2019 9:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Evolve?

I think "devolve" would be a better description if my Year 11's are anything to go by.

Amongst others:

1.... The inability to pronouncing the "Th" sound. Apparently the hench bloke from Asgard was actually called "For." Equally, "free" is the number after two and before four and "deaf" is what you experience when you shuffle off this mortal coil.

2..... Not understanding that the thing you stand on when outside is NOT the floor. (It's the ground, stupid!)

3..... Using phrases such as "Can I go toilet?" instead of "Can I go TO the toilet?"

4..... "Do you like my new jacket? I BROUGHT it from Primark"......ahhhh!

5.... "Off of the telly" etc (I blame Bloody Chappers!)

etc etc


 
Posted : 14/01/2019 10:27 pm
Posts: 2231
Free Member
 

The French missed a trick when naming bats, they called it a bald mouse when they should have called it an aero mouse

The Germans got it right. Die Fledermaus.

Very descriptive, the Germans are very good at descriptive names. See also the DSG gear box!

Luftmaus would would be good 😃


 
Posted : 14/01/2019 10:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yup.... Always liked the Greman word for "submarine."

Unterseeboot.


 
Posted : 14/01/2019 10:39 pm
Posts: 22922
Full Member
 

Amongst others:

1…. The inability to pronouncing the “Th” sound. Apparently the hench bloke from Asgard was actually called “For.” Equally, “free” is the number after two and before four and “deaf” is what you experience when you shuffle off this mortal coil.

The difference between 'Th' and 'F' is easy to feel in the mouth but its extremely subtle to the ear. Although in the case of your kids it'll probably be an adopted/culturally learned mannerism for people who are speaking a second language and especially people who are illiterate the difference is very difficult to hear - you need to back up of having seen and 'felt' the words to easily hear the difference.

But perhaps the real question is - can the kids not pronounce 'Th' or are you not hearing it? They presumably understand each other - theres no confusion as to which movie character they are talking about. Maybe your ears are out of date.:-)


 
Posted : 14/01/2019 10:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

5…. “Off of the telly” etc (I blame Bloody Chappers!)

Scott Mills.


 
Posted : 14/01/2019 10:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's ironic when the title is 'how does language evolve' and we have a teacher decrying language evolving.

The fact is that language is fluid, and many commonplace words today have a very different meaning from the same words a few hundred years ago. Grammatical rules change as well; in Chaucer's time it was perfectly acceptable to use a double negative as a means of adding emphasis:

"He nevere yet no vileynye ne sayde / In all his lyf unto no maner wight"

In response to the OP's question, the origins of language are keenly debated. From a philosophical point of view, the necessity of language to map to private mental states and ideas causes issues with its fairly obvious social function.

English has its origins in Indo-European, as do most European languages. Its relationship with Ancient Greek is much more distant than its relationship with Germanic languages; the most commonly used words in English are generally derived from German (blame the Saxons). Greek and Latin made their way into the language through scientific and technical terms (mainly from the Enlightenment onwards, when Classical civilisation and ideas were rediscovered).

JP


 
Posted : 14/01/2019 10:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Simon_Semtex

Member
Evolve?

I think “devolve” would be a better description if my Year 11’s are anything to go by.

Amongst others:

1…. The inability to pronouncing the “Th” sound. Apparently the hench bloke from Asgard was actually called “For.” Equally, “free” is the number after two and before four and “deaf” is what you experience when you shuffle off this mortal coil.

2….. Not understanding that the thing you stand on when outside is NOT the floor. (It’s the ground, stupid!)

3….. Using phrases such as “Can I go toilet?” instead of “Can I go TO the toilet?”

4….. “Do you like my new jacket? I BROUGHT it from Primark”……ahhhh!

5…. “Off of the telly” etc (I blame Bloody Chappers!)

etc etc

In fairness to the weans, you're the teacher. So, where should the blame lie? 😆


 
Posted : 14/01/2019 10:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Maccruiskeen....... Sorry to hear that your ears don't work properly.

I'm away to help my Uncle Jack off his horse.


 
Posted : 14/01/2019 10:56 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

The devolution has gone a long way....

SIR ANDREW
But it becomes me well enough, does ’t not?
SIR TOBY BELCH
Excellent; it hangs like flax on a distaff; and I
hope to see a housewife take thee between her legs
and spin it off.

Doth thou not speak as we should?


 
Posted : 14/01/2019 10:57 pm
Posts: 22922
Full Member
 

in Chaucer’s time it was perfectly acceptable to use a double negative as a means of adding emphasis:

and in Glasgow you have the Double Positive

[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 14/01/2019 11:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There are some excellent books about how the English language evolved.
The Adventure of English Bryson
The Stories of English by David Crystal
Mother Tongue by Melvyn Bragg


 
Posted : 15/01/2019 4:59 am
 Drac
Posts: 50352
 

What did we call etymology before language existed?

Ug!


 
Posted : 15/01/2019 5:26 am
Posts: 794
Free Member
 

According to my dad (retired English teacher), English peaked around 1980, and NO new additions, changes, or adoptions of americanisms are allowed. It was incredibly satisfying when 'text' as a verb was added to the dictionary and I could correct him out when he called me out for using it.

His favourite lingual beef just now is 'good' used in place of 'fine' or 'ok'. As in 'would you like a drink?', 'no thanks, I'm good'. Invariably an argument ensues. He knows exactly what I mean, as would anyone else, so it's only a matter of time before it becomes technically acceptable. Can't wait.

Edit: reading this back, he'd likely have something to say on this post too. 'I'm not an English teacher, I'm from Wick. I'm a teacher of English'.


 
Posted : 15/01/2019 6:12 am
Posts: 338
Free Member
 

There are some excellent books about how the English language evolved.
The Adventure of English Bryson
The Stories of English by David Crystal
Mother Tongue by Melvyn Bragg

The Adventure of English is Melvyn Bragg too, unless Bryson did one as well?


 
Posted : 15/01/2019 6:19 am
Posts: 91000
Free Member
 

Grammatical rules change as well

There aren't actually any rules. Many of the things we consider rules were just style guidelines published by some chap in the 19th century, many of which were taught as rules by teachers on the basis they were essential if you didn't want to sound fick.

I found out recently that the Dutch have a governing body for their language, and they periodically change the rules so what you learned in school may not be correct anymore. Of course people continue to use what they were taught so there ends up being many versions in use.


 
Posted : 15/01/2019 8:21 am
Posts: 12072
Full Member
 

and in Glasgow you have the Double Positive

Only in Glasgow? Yeah, right.

And the Spanish for toes is "dedos de pie", foot fingers. They don't have a word for "thumb" either, it's the "dedo gordo" (fat finger)...

Goes both ways of course, for example there's no English word for "sobremesa", that time spent chatting at the table when you've finished your meal.


 
Posted : 15/01/2019 8:31 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There are some excellent books about how the English language evolved.
The Adventure of English Bryson
The Stories of English by David Crystal
Mother Tongue by Melvyn Bragg

The Adventure of English is Melvyn Bragg too, unless Bryson did one as well?

Bryson wrote Mother Tongue I believe


 
Posted : 15/01/2019 11:19 am
Posts: 16025
Free Member
 

…. The inability to pronouncing the “Th” sound. Apparently the hench bloke from Asgard was actually called “For.” Equally, “free” is the number after two and before four and “deaf” is what you experience when you shuffle off this mortal coil.

Which, along with glottal stops, was how my grandparents spoke. I bet you're a riot at parties.


 
Posted : 15/01/2019 11:26 am
Posts: 17779
Full Member
 

I fancy a pint with kenneththecurtain's dad.


 
Posted : 15/01/2019 11:57 am
 Nico
Posts: 4
Free Member
 

Language "evolves" by someone going on the internets and finding out what the Merkans use and then using that. Hence people going to the bathroom "slash" restroom to take a comfort break. When I were a lad* we went to the bog to have a slash (no quote marks). As you can see, the new way of speaking has empowered us to reach out to ourselves. Or something. IANAT.

* not long after Chaucer would have been "havynge a slashe".


 
Posted : 15/01/2019 12:08 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!