Honda FR-V - which ...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Honda FR-V - which engine to go for?

9 Posts
7 Users
0 Reactions
524 Views
 Earl
Posts: 1902
Free Member
Topic starter
 

After a new car. Family of 2+2

3 sitting in the front and a kid in the back, I think 4 bikes (29/26/24/24) could go in with wheels off.

Wife drove the 1.8 FR-V today and liked it. Will the 2.0 be worth it for the extra £80 tax and fuel cost?

Only 10k miles a year so I assume the 2.2 diesel is a no go area.


 
Posted : 29/04/2016 8:14 pm
Posts: 15068
Full Member
 

The 2.0 will be a lot nicer if you drive fully loaded often.. Guess it depends how often that is.. Only 10k per year I'd be tempted to go with the 2.0.. Petrol saving won't be much with the 1800


 
Posted : 29/04/2016 8:43 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

For a car of that age, pick one on condition, nothing else.


 
Posted : 29/04/2016 8:50 pm
Posts: 3223
Free Member
 

2 ltr petrol is 25-30mpg.
Lots of people go by what it costs over x amount of years etc, but for us (well wife) she felt it each time she went to petrol station. I'd rather pay more in one lump and visit the station less.
Diesel will be + 10 mpg and has no dpv


 
Posted : 29/04/2016 9:10 pm
 Earl
Posts: 1902
Free Member
Topic starter
 

The 2.0 ran up to 2006. From 2007 they went to the 1.8.

So for the best condition example its a 1.8. But I would prefer a 2.0 if the inc in power/drive-ability is significant.

Anybody driven both?


 
Posted : 29/04/2016 9:26 pm
Posts: 3991
Full Member
 

1.8 is ok but you need to rev it to go anywhere. I'd go for the 2.0 kn your mileage.


 
Posted : 29/04/2016 11:11 pm
Posts: 11605
Free Member
 

K20 engines will go on forever.
N22's are expensive if they go wrong.
Not too clued up on R18's, they were the successor to the D series though so can't imagine they would be a bad choice.

You need to rev the arse off any Honda to get it to move, on an FRV K series it'll be eco VTEC rather than fire breathing lunacy though.


 
Posted : 30/04/2016 3:22 am
Posts: 9440
Full Member
 

I get 34 mpg out of my 2.0 FRV, I've had it 11 years in August and it just keeps going. It's a fantastic engine - as above it needs to be given plenty of revs to get the best out of it but for a biggish engine I don't think the mpg is at all bad.


 
Posted : 30/04/2016 4:59 am
 Earl
Posts: 1902
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks folks. A hunt for a 2.0 is on.

Considering I almost never see a FRV on the road, there are lots of listing AutoTrader (twas my Friday Night curry/larger/Autotrader).

I do find the idea of VTEC baffling. I would have though most 'normal drivers' actually want power and torque to be delivered early as possible aka diesel style.


 
Posted : 30/04/2016 5:01 am
Posts: 15068
Full Member
 

The valve /cam timing with vtec makes a lot of sense if your racing, but as you said, if just pootling about then power delivery at the lower end of the rev range is far more useful.


 
Posted : 30/04/2016 1:44 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!