[Closed] Hobbit trilogy- worth watching?

It'll be quicker reading the book.

No.

Not that I've seen it, but the book is bad enough - spinning it out for 3 films has tedium written all over it.

The first one is good, the second one is dull, the third one is the best of the bunch so I'd watch 1/3; you won't really miss much.

Not really, particularly not the 3rd, I was so bored by the end....why wouldn't anyone just die?!

I'd have to say no. I loved the LOTR books, and enjoyed the films but the Hobbit is just arse ripping to the extreme. They are well made films. But it's so painfully obvious that they've just shoehorned extraneous scenes IN to make three films I just got angry watching.

It took me two sittings to watch the first one, three sittings to watch the second, and I have no compulsion or interest to watch the third.

I was disappointed. If I was picking one to watch it would probably be the first though.

If they ever try to make the simarillion I reckon it'll be 24hr job.

Yeah, thought it was better paced than lord of the rings, but the third film in particular had too much extra stuff crammed in

Also billy connoly on a pig

The films are way too long, no where near as good as LoTRs. I found them quite tedious.

Cheers. Sod that thrn. I'll refund

It's alright. Yeah worth watching if you like this sort of thing. Not worth getting a tattoo.

There's an awful lot of utter shite in it mind. Just proper "Why would they even think that was a good idea" bollocks.

"Why would they even think that was a good idea" bollocks.

Just to drag it out to three films. Simple as that. Like the extended dwarf singing and dish washing montage. What the actual f***.

But the washing up bit is in in the book.
Along with the song that goes with it.

Hora - just read the book - it's miles better.

That's neither here nor there. The question is does it enhance the film, or add to the narrative. At all. The answer is no.

For example, take the entire "Tom Bombadil" aspect of LOTR. Fanboys were up in arms when word got out that Tom Bombadil wouldnt be in the film. Completely irrelevant to the films, and the films were much better without them. Pretty much 30% of The Hobbit films were Tom Bombadil scenes.

jimjam - Member

Just to drag it out to three films. Simple as that

Yeah, but they didn't have to pad it out with shite. Some of the padding is actually alright.

Walk
Fight
Bloke from The Office
Orks
Wizard
My precious
Elves
Bloke from The Office
Walk
Fight
Walk
Walk
Bloke from The Office
Fight
My precious
Walk
Orks
Fight
Elves
Bloke from The Office
Wizard
Fight
Big final battle
Fall asleep
Films still going
Final final battle
Filler
Bloke from The Office
More filler
Orks
Elves
Wizard
Pointless scene to drag it out some more
Bloke from The Office
End

No. We watched them just to get "rid" of them.

The 3rd is marginally better. You will decide to do a time check, and disappointingly you will still have an hour of walking to go...... Sweary word. Sweary word.

https://tolkieneditor.wordpress.com/

I would watch Withnail & I; 3 times instead.

Try the drinking game 3rd time.

Just watched the last one, enjoyed it despite it being quite so long. Too long, too much other stuff and all that but fighting and adventuring all the way. Good to kill an evening and much better than a lot of TV.

I would watch Withnail & I; 3 times instead.

I'd rather remove my own testicles with a rusty spoon than watch Withnail & I a second time...

As for Hobbit; loved LOTR, was really looking forward to the Hobbit films, saw the first, thought 'meh', haven't watched the other two.

If the 20 quid is burning a hole in your pocket give it to a charity instead.

Should I also post my leftovers to starving children in Africa?

Watch 'it' once, just cause there a dragon in it & Martin Freemans great, then forget about it. (& I love LoTR)

yes please but only if it's organic

My nephews thought they were great, but they are 10 and 7.

They were kind of weirdly pitched I thought, the plot and narrative were definitely aimed at 10 year olds, but the monsters were a bit too scary for kids. Looked like they started off making kids films then got scared and tried to market them for adults.

The last one just went on and on.

I'd rather remove my own testicles with a rusty spoon than watch Withnail & I a second time

Are you a sponge or a stone?

I haven't watched any of The Hobbit films yet but will no doubt give them a go when they're on the telly. Failed when trying to watch LOTR films again even though I mostly enjoyed them the 1st time.

I've watched Withnail and I dozens of times though. 🙂

I'd say that they're decent enough films, just about worth watching. There are a lot of good bits, along with a lot of filler. If they were cut down to two films they'd probably be brilliant.

I'm concerned - urge to remove own testicles with a spoon, may have nothing to do with Withnail and I.

We need to know: Would watching Space Cowboys a 2nd or 3rd time have a similar testicle lopping response?

I've been preparing myself to forgive you. I think it's time to release you from the légumes, and transfer your talents to the meat.

Oh! you little traitors. I think the carrot infinitely more fascinating than the geranium. The carrot has mystery. Flowers are essentially tarts. Prostitutes for the bees. There is a certain je ne sais quoi - oh, so very special - about a firm, young carrot...Excuse me...

needs someone to cut it into one film, remove all the inferred scenes from LOTR appendices and bits of the simarillion. Axe the white orc crap... the dwarfs are far too "serious" and a faster paced film where they go from one calamity to another "frying pan to fire" would help them back to the bungling buffoons of the book. the Elf love bollox can go too.

is tom "bladdy" bombadil in it (with his awful verse).

as someone else on this forum said about him a while ago,he can "bleep" off 🙂

I love LOTR and adored the Hobbit films too.In fact I just purchased the last one on 3d blue ray so that's my afternoon sorted . Now where's the popcorn..........