You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more
Apologies if so. But not many 🙂
The hatemongering cow ought to be 'done'
No I haven't done her, I wouldn't touch the horrible cow...
[url= http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/05/04/nick-clegg-katie-hopkins-arrested_n_7206870.html ]14 year old boy asks Nick Clegg if he can have Katie Hopkins killed[/url]
Clegg needed to reply "Leave it to me son".
Actually government hit squad would be too good for the vile cow.
😆
beaten to it! ^
I sometimes think (of her and ilk) - is it just Narcissistic Personality Disorder (espescially the non-empathic trait) and greed that drives her or is there something seriously (sic) amiss that remains hidden? Or is it just a hollow cynical bullying husk of a human? Seems likely, but they are quite rare, especially outside of mainsteam consumer/media culture - but I suppose birds of a feather and all that....
No I haven't done her, I wouldn't touch the horrible cow
looks like the old guy behind her is doing her via the backdoor!! 😯
Just googled her- shes only 40? 😯
She's made a career out of offending people who want to be offended. Good on her, if she didn't exist she would have to be invented.
looks like the old guy behind her is doing her via the backdoor!!
Murdoch? he's behind more trash than most people know...
As a pretty chilled person who can see that Jeremy Clarkson is generally just out for a reaction, I do think it's pretty off for Katie Hopkins to have written what she did about immigrants risking their lives to cross the Med, in likening them to cockroaches.
I don't want to be offended...I just think she should shut up and think a little bit.
.I just think she should shut up and think a little bit.
I think she will continue to be as offensive as possible in order to make as much money as possible before her limited shelf life expires.
It's best to just ignore her, but unfortunately some people also share her thinking, which makes me sad.
She makes loads of money for online newspapers and content syndicators because of all the clickbait-style stories she forments ("OMG Click here to find out what Hopkins said next about Jews/Muslims/the disabled/your mum!!!!!!" style stuff). Ergo, we see endless stories about her.
*tries desperately to click something in what devash wrote*
[img] 
[/img]
^^^^^two really good reasons to bring back hanging.
[URL= http://i1370.photobucket.com/albums/ag270/iolotraws/katie-hopkins-sex-in-field-300x292_zps800cw1zz.jp g" target="_blank">
http://i1370.photobucket.com/albums/ag270/iolotraws/katie-hopkins-sex-in-field-300x292_zps800cw1zz.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL]
Yes thats her having sex in a a field.
The guy is married.
Not to her.
History tells us she may have had a point about Peaches Geldofs parenting skills mind...
Look, this taking the mickey out of people with mental health problems has gone far enough.
Drop it eh, she needs professional help.
Yes thats her having sex in a field.
Of all of the many things about Hopkins that people worry about, the fact that she was papped shagging someone elses' husband in a field has always seemed to me to be one of the more blameless. Also, she has quite a nice back. 🙂
she needs professional help
This isn't a "calling-out", but just as a matter of interest, [url= http://wehuntedthemammoth.com/ ]WeHuntedTheMammoth[/url], which I peer at most weeks, has a policy of not calling hideous people who are wrong about everything "crazy" or "mentally ill", which I've found quite interesting, and fairly relevant in thinking about Hopkins' ilk:
"[i]Specifically, calling MRAs/PUAs/garden-variety misogynists “crazy.” They aren’t crazy, they are morally- and ethically-challenged asshats...
Calling violent people “psychos” “sociopaths” “crazy” “insane” or any variation thereof is always ableist. It is harmful, it is factually inaccurate and based on deeply embedded ableist stereotyping and social beliefs about the mentally ill.
Avoiding the word “crazy” isn’t something we do because we’re the language police ... We do it because misogynists — whether or not they are mentally ill — are douchebags, and we’re not interested in making excuses for them, or in treating people with mental illness like we treat people who make poor ethical/moral choices. Misogynists deserve judgment & mockery; people with mental illness do not. It is harmful to people with mental illnesses to be compared to misogynists.[/i]"
She has promised to leave the UK if labour wins... So get voting,!
She has promised to leave the UK
I cannot think of a single person who has ever offered to flounce if an election goes a particular way where I've thought "[i]damn, that would be a bad outcome![/i]"
😀
She's a miracle of science - cloned from one of Clarkson's turds.
I cannot think of a single person who has ever offered to flounce if an election goes a particular way where I've thought "damn, that would be a bad outcome!"
I can't think of anyone who actually followed through with their promise to flounce.
I thank my lucky stars that I'm never likely to be in the position of being trapped in the hold of a ship trying to reassure my child that everything is OK whilst knowing they will very soon suffer the agony of drowning - and then someone calls you a cockroach for money.
Sorry to break the levity but having just read Escape from Sobibor I'd hoped the human race had moved on, even just a little.
She has promised to leave the UK if labour wins.
Where will she go and how will she travel? Will that country want her?
I can't think of anyone who actually followed through with their promise to flounce.
I'm pretty sure Michael Caine has form, but he comes back so it doesn't really count. 😉
I think she has some uses - gives all the old fashioned misogynists somebody to pile onto without outing themselves.
hora - Member
'She has promised to leave the UK if labour wins.'
Where will she go and how will she travel? Will that country want her?
It's actually very brave of her.
In the country she goes to, she is going to be an [b]IMMIGRANT[/b]! - or will it be La Cucuracha?
[i]Yes thats her having sex in a field.[/i]
He looks like a very caring lover.
I wonder how many "celebs" and for how long you have to follow them before you catch one having sex in a field. And then only manage to photograph her back... what a job.
DezB - Member
He looks like a very caring lover.
No, he's avoiding looking at the face. The rest is in reasonable shape. 🙂
The rest is in reasonable shape.
really?!?!
[img] 
[/img]
someone needs to book themselves an appointment at specsavers! 😯
FUGLY whether fat or thin and the exterior mirrors the interior, Vile oxygen thief.
I think she has some uses - gives all the old fashioned misogynists somebody to pile onto without outing themselves.
Nothing to do with hating women, she's just a loathsome human being, gender is utterly irrelevant.
Russell Brand stirs up the same emotion, as does Ed Balls.
I'm totally equal-opportunities; I hate all obnoxious people equally.
I think she has some uses - gives all the old fashioned misogynists somebody to pile onto without outing themselves.
Really 😯
You think the reason people dislike her is because she's a woman ?
Some people do embarrass themselves with their attempts at political correctness 😆
"You think the reason people dislike her is because she's a woman ?"
I think if you look at the abuse, insults and shaming on this thread, the fact that she is a woman is highly pertinent. Compare it to the tone of the Littlejohn or Clarkson threads - no-one ever complains about how ugly they are.
I would, but I don't bother going on Clarkson threads.
es thats her having sex in a a field.
The guy is married.
Not to her.
A quick google suggests it is her husband.
Compare it to the tone of the Littlejohn or Clarkson threads - no-one ever complains about how ugly they are.
Well I would if good looking men were important to me.
Personally I would be quite happy if the world was full of ugly men.
A quick google suggests it is her husband
He's her husband now. He was someone else's when that photo was taken
http://www.express.co.uk/news/showbiz/551555/Katie-Hopkins-affair-husband
I think if you look at the abuse, insults and shaming on this thread, the fact that she is a woman is highly pertinent.
Not "highly pertinent" to the reason she is widely disliked.
Not in the slightest
http://www.express.co.uk/news/showbiz/551555/Katie-Hopkins-affair-husband
Ooh god must have a thorough read of that article! [/sarky]
You see, that's exactly the kind of thing konabunny's cross aboutDezB - Member
I would
🙁
I cannot think of a single person who has ever offered to flounce if an election goes a particular way where I've thought "damn, that would be a bad outcome!"
I can't think of anyone who actually followed through with their promise to flounce.
Phil Collins springs to mind.... When labour got in under Blair.
I think if you look at the abuse, insults and shaming on this thread, the fact that she is a woman is highly pertinent.
Not "highly pertinent" to the reason she is widely disliked.Not in the slightest
I suppose hypothetically it's possible that her being a woman doesn't affect why she is disliked and how much, but only how she is abused...but it seems unlikely.
Either way, it's remarkable that comments on this thread week not just to slag her off for her (apparently reprehensible) statements, but also to humiliate and degrade her in a sexual/corporeal/gendered way.
seriously (sic) amiss
NPD is something seriously amiss.
This isn't a "calling-out", but just as a matter of interest, WeHuntedTheMammoth, which I peer at most weeks, has a policy of not calling hideous people who are wrong about everything "crazy" or "mentally ill", which I've found quite interesting, and fairly relevant in thinking about Hopkins' ilk:
There's a difference between "crazy" (emotional disorder) (i dislike the word crazy as well) and what Katie Hopkins could potentially be.
Misogynists deserve judgment & mockery
Just to out PC you, misogyny is probably based on emotional issues as well. So you shouldn't be taking the piss out of them either. 😆
Either way, it's remarkable that comments on this thread week not just to slag her off for her (apparently reprehensible) statements, but also to humiliate and degrade her in a sexual/corporeal/gendered way.
The pic/post needs removing, most on here dislike her because she's reprehensible though.
Gonzy's post needs to go as well.
Yeah, makes me feel ill.
Not being a follower of celeberity media "news" I hadn't really heard of Katie Hopkins until she was (repeatedly) mentioned here - guess that puts STW forum on the same level as Hello magazine 😆
Gonzy's post needs to go as well.
why?
apart from the fact that her half naked is as offensive to the eye as much as some of the bile that comes out of her gob...i was merely demonstrating to Epicyclo the errors of his ways when he suggested that the rest of her (body) seemed to be in good condition.
if she was a bloke i would still treat this in the same way.
if anyone is however offended by the pictures, i do apologise, but please avert your eyes and you wont be turned to stone by her looks
gonzy - Member
...apart from the fact that her half naked is as offensive to the eye as much as some of the bile that comes out of her gob...i was merely demonstrating to Epicyclo the errors of his ways when he suggested that the rest of her (body) seemed to be in good condition....
I must admit I haven't had the chance to scrutinise her body as closely as gonzy.
My comments were a reaction to her public persona which is totally odious, nothing to do with her looks or that she is a woman.
I regret commenting on the shagging in the field photo though. I didn't realise that the chap was now her husband. I initially regarded it as an example of her personal ethics. I would now happily have that comment deleted. Whatever you think of her, her personal relationship with her partner should be private. I feel a bit smutty now.
[i]I feel a bit smutty now.[/i]
Imagine if you'd Googleimagesearched, like Gonzy did... *shudders*
Imagine if you'd Googleimagesearched, like Gonzy did... *shudders*
i'm scarred for life now....no amount of counselling will help me now
So, in conclusion the odd one out is Tony Blair. He was the only Prime Minister to actually get a flouncer to flounce aka Phil Collins. That makes up for Iraq in my book.
Noel Gallagher...famously said ahead of the 2005 general election: "Vote Labour - if you don't and the Tories get in, [Phil Collins] is threatening to come back from Switzerland, and none of us want that."