Hangs head is speed...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Hangs head is speeding shame....

171 Posts
60 Users
0 Reactions
271 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Less than 15 mins drive from some of the best beach breaks in the UK? I doubt it. East coast often clean but often flat.

Needs to be Scarborough or above to be worth surfing.

TJ - why not move there then? And what about Wales? Much closer.


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 12:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Nah needs to be Coldingham or above to be worth surfing, or Machrihanish or above on the west coast. Not crowded you see. Ooops.


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 12:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Not crowded for a good reason - freezing cold + no groundswell window.

A nearby break at 9am on my Birthday - hardly crowded. You just need to know when to go in.

[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 12:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That is tiny. Freezing cold is just a state of mind and a crap wetsuit.


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 1:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Flat it might be, looks beautiful though. I could sit there all day just watching that view. 🙂


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 1:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Tiny? It was over head high - big enough for most and far far warmer.

My nearest break about a month ago:

[IMG] [/IMG]

Anyway enough of this - Jimmy - been surfing long? Travelled much (to surf)?


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 1:05 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

Edited - for my own sanity.


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 1:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Surf-Mat. Yes around 18yrs on and off and yes all over the planet.


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 1:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Recent barrel shot from my local - 95% certain it's me (I was in that day, it's the same board and stance as me, it was very quiet) from November, my mates think it's me.

[img] [/img]

And a poo stance "just before a barrel" that is 100% me at the same spot:

[img] [/img]

Honeymoon was 5 months of Oz and NZ - Byron was nice. I'm in this one (wife took it - she hadn't realised it's best to be able to see the subject properly when snapping barrel shots!!)

[IMG] [/IMG]

No more surf pics - a promise.


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 1:14 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

WOW!!!


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 1:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have a grand total of zero surfing photos. Spent a few months in Tahiti and Fiji a few years back which was grand.


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 1:22 pm
Posts: 91000
Free Member
 

I dunno... surfing just doesn't do it for me.


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 1:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Very nice - we were booked to go to Indo after Oz and NZ (NZ was outstanding for waves) but the East Timor war got a bit lairy.

Mostly done Europe - lots of France, Portgual and Spain and a lot of the UK.

Mol - it would if you tried it and liked it - Porthcawl, Llantwitt and the Gower all nearby and have plenty of waves.


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 1:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Surf mat my hero.


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 1:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Another fan to add to the list then... 😉


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 1:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

surfboard/keyboard warrior


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 1:58 pm
Posts: 49
Free Member
 

Surf-Mat - Member
And Bristol - good stuff a drive away but Bristol is hardly MTB heaven is it TooTall? And you WILL have your bike nicked very soon. Lived there for 8 years - Cornwall is about 1351351535 times better for MTBing.

The difference is that I'm not dissing other forum users for where they live and ride - just pointing out the irony in yet another of your Johnny Two-Sheds posts. For the last 15 years I've not lived anywhere longer than 2 years, so I make the most of where I am and learn to enjoy what is there. You, on the other hand, live in utopia and we're all poorer for not living there with you. 🙄


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 2:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

surfboard/keyboard warrior

Despite all the photo evidence?

Fail.

Too Tall - I'm rather glad none of you live with me.


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 2:07 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

WTF is going on?

I came in here expecting some proper childish-bickering about speeding and instead I find childish-bickering about who has the smallest hills and the most surfiest beaches!

It's not on I tell you.


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 2:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Despite all the photo evidence?

evidence of what? i know bugger all about surfing and for all I know you might be crap at it. if you want to show off your skills why not piss off to a surfing forum and wave your cock around there.


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 2:12 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Are you lot still arguing?!!!!!


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 2:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Surfboard warrior suggests I don't surf. I have just posted pics showing that isn't true - I do surf a lot. There are plenty of other surfers on here and I'm sorry you never learned to do it yourself - you are missing out.

Now will you get huffy every time someone mentions any other sport or is this just ill disguised green eyed rant?

Not hard to guess.

Now did you make that move to Wells? My sister lives there. Not a bad place but a complete ar5e to get to by any form of transport.


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 2:15 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

Jeez Mat you do take yourself a bit seriously, if you really were as awesome as you claim you'd not be getting drawn into nonsense like this and taking it seriously.

Hmm perhaps a "who's taken themselves too seriously this week?" thread on Fridays.


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 2:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Al - the thing I can't understand is why people like you think I take things too seriously. Why be "serious" on a forum like this? Hardly a useful way to waste time. What happens is, people take me too seriously while I'm not being serious. It then really gets to them so they start to get a bit stalkerish.

I then sometimes "check them out" (very easy to do) and without fail, always find out they are a bit sad/geeky/nerdy/insecure. The ones who aren't never bother getting all antsy over a few surf pics or a bit of banter.

So why not look at yourself?

This happens again and again.

It's rather odd.


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 2:19 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

Surf-Mat,

Perhaps people aren't jealous.

Maybe they

a) Are just wondering why you are so insecure.

b) Don't care why you're so insecure, but just enjoy winding you up anyway.


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 2:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Jeez Mat you do take yourself a bit seriously, if you really were as awesome as you claim you'd not be getting drawn into nonsense like this and taking it seriously.

+1

Thanks Mat, I enjoy watching your ever more frenzied attempts to appear cooler than everyone else.

oh and RS has it to a tee, I'm in the b group, just so you know 😉


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 2:22 pm
Posts: 91000
Free Member
 

Mat - if I said that Cornwall is indeed the best place in the UK, would it make you feel happy? 🙂


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 2:25 pm
Posts: 463
Free Member
 

Whenever there's multiple posts on a forum topic I now skip to the end to see who's being a knob, why they're being a knob, and what they're bing knobby about. Just in case I'm missing something vital, like.


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 2:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Now did you make that move to Wells

f-ck me, check out the stalker! 😀


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 2:27 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

what exactly happened to make everyone gang up on surf-mat I keep seeing it on threads but dont see him being any more trolly or keyboard warrior or sarcastic than anyone else.
Does anyne really think that Lincoln has better mtb that Cornwall? It is flat FFS how could it?
PS I cant see your photos at work and have no interest in your surfing claims so cannot comment


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 2:36 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

Most knobs on here know they are being knobs....Surf Matt however is better than all of them.

LOL @ the tag BTW.


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 2:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

As in 'real' life there are alwasy certain people who can give it, but not take it...


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 2:45 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

Edited because of pity.


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 2:45 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

I like him too, he just doesn't see he's no better than others on here.


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 2:48 pm
Posts: 49
Free Member
 

Rusty Spanner - Member
Don't care whether he means it or not, I find him quite funny.

Laughing at him, with him or near him?


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 2:48 pm
Posts: 39449
Free Member
 

one up man ship to a whole new level - he on-upped me once ...... it made me chuckle


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 2:49 pm
Posts: 91000
Free Member
 

I like him, but he seems to be insanely competitive.. he seems to have trouble seeing that some things are not a competition. You can't reduce everything to 'mine's better' - life's not like that.


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 2:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I like him too, he just doesn't see he's no better than others on here.

yep, he seems like quite a likeable chap when not running around with his fingers in his ears shouting insults at people who disagree with him. Its always possible his online persona is different to his real one 😯


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 2:53 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

I think he's unintentionally amusing, because like the rest of us, he's not half as clever as we all occaisionally think we are.

Seems like a pleasant bloke though and let's face it, unintended humour is better than no humour at all, as long as you have the ability to laugh at yourself as well as others.


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 2:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Did someone disagree with me - right, that's it:
[img] [/img]

Did someone speak?


 
Posted : 05/07/2010 4:51 pm
Posts: 91
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Just checked this thread again. Furthest relevance to OP of the week award goes to ......


 
Posted : 06/07/2010 12:47 pm
Posts: 31056
Free Member
 

I'd just assumed it was still arguing over speeding...

No idea it had got this much fun.


 
Posted : 06/07/2010 1:30 pm
Posts: 6513
Full Member
 

DirtyLyle - Member

Whenever there's multiple posts on a forum topic I now skip to the end to see who's being a knob, why they're being a knob, and what they're bing knobby about. Just in case I'm missing something vital, like.

wooooaaahhhh-a fellow Convoy fan?


 
Posted : 06/07/2010 10:55 pm
Posts: 91
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Court the morn. What suit?


 
Posted : 25/10/2010 12:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

birthday suit.

claim insanity.

sorted.


 
Posted : 25/10/2010 12:07 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 25/10/2010 12:08 pm
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

Whatever happens, good luck!


 
Posted : 25/10/2010 12:28 pm
Posts: 91
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I pled guilty by letter to the charges, the Procurator Fiscal's assistant said it would be better if I were to respect the authority of the court and the gravity of the charge and that I attend.

Only been in a court once for a civil divorce case. I feel a bit spooked going there as a crim'.


 
Posted : 25/10/2010 12:34 pm
 LHS
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Turn up late and say sorry but you "had to stick to the speed limit this time"


 
Posted : 25/10/2010 12:40 pm
Posts: 15
Free Member
 

"Court the morn. What suit?" dress like you are going to tea with your headmaster/vicar/with the in laws for the first time. Make a sober sensible effort to look smart and normal. do not dress to stand out . Do not go for bling and flash do not wear your disco suit.

Magistrates courts are very busy and relatively informal they will realise you are out of your depth and guide you through the process. You will stand out head and shoulders above the usual dross that come before them.

Do take the time to work out your income and outgoings you will be paying a fine and costs and a victim surcharge so you need to give them some financial info to fix the level and rate of repayment. Best of British.


 
Posted : 25/10/2010 12:44 pm
Posts: 15
Free Member
 

magistrates guidelines for 70mph in a 50 limit are 4-6 points on licence or disqualify for 7-28 days and a band b fine which is 100% of relevent weekly income,and costs and victim surcharge.


 
Posted : 25/10/2010 12:51 pm
Posts: 5936
Free Member
 

Brilliant.

Surf-Mat gets proven wrong in a discussion about speeding, says 'whatever'(I thought only middle aged fat women in America and 13 year old girls said that) and starts slagging people off for where they live, then posts a picture of a wave, with no person actually visible in the picture and uses this as proof he is a great surfer.

Genius.


 
Posted : 25/10/2010 1:05 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

I’d be ready for whatever gets thrown at you. A straight speeding offence would probably have got you 3 points; now that you’re going to court that’s very unlikely. So although the MOT offence is non-endorsable, the lack of valid MOT has probably led to your court appearance. Anyway, you’re going to court now, and there’s no getting out of it.

Do the sensible thing and take it seriously. Dress appropriately, speak (when spoken to) in a considered manner, and [b]do not attempt to justify your actions[/b]. Quite the reverse, you should state (again, only if asked) that you understand you shouldn’t have been speeding, and that you have no excuse. Point to your good driving record and lack of points. The lack of MOT you could perhaps position as a memory thing – you thought it was the following week etc - but make sure they understand that you’re fully aware that it’s your responsibility and are not offering excuses.

Contrition worked reasonably well for me in my court appearances – coming across as not giving a damn will just cause you more grief.

On the legal side of it, see if your insurance (or AA/RAC) provide for a solicitor. Many do (though you might have to pay something towards it) and it’s worth doing. Again, it shows that you’re taking it seriously, and that you’re trying to present your mitigation as best you can, whilst fully accepting blame.

Financially, make sure that you are very careful about what’s labelled as, effectively, discretionary expenditure. You may well get fined a large amount, so the more of your income which can be classified as non-discretionary (i.e. on mortgage, pension contributions, childcare etc), the better. Bear in mind that lying to the court is a whole new level of trouble, so don’t do that!

My experience of a similar offence (no MOT issues, but I was going just under 90 in a 50), again with a clean license, was 6 points and £1000 fine. That was a decade ago, and they’re a bit tougher on speeders now.

No chance of a ban for this, unless they hate you; I estimate that you’ll get 4-5 points and a £3-400 fine (depends on how much you earn, obviously).


 
Posted : 25/10/2010 1:22 pm
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

As nickf says, be smart, respectful and remorseful and take it well regardless. Dont embelish or try and justify your actions (from your original posting I doubt you will).
I had to go to magistrates court 5 years ago for a minor clash of wingmirrors (5 points and £185 fine, cheers then!). Mainly because i didnt report it to the police.
As i said good luck and hope it goes as well as it can for you!


 
Posted : 25/10/2010 1:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

You'll get off for sure 😆


 
Posted : 25/10/2010 1:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I reckon 4 points & £150-£200


 
Posted : 25/10/2010 2:03 pm
Posts: 91
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks for that folks. I was sent a form asking for details of my income etc. I work as a self employed artist. My income is sporadic. I can work for six months preparing for an exhibition with little or no income and no guarentee of reward. I therefore couldnt realistically complete the form as it didnt make provision for peculiar nature of my work. I sent a covering letter with my plea to outline this.

As I said in the OP I admitted responsibility on the day and when charged. I renewed my MOT a couple of days after I was stopped. It was a week or so out of date.


 
Posted : 25/10/2010 2:13 pm
Posts: 7167
Full Member
 

Good luck.
Be subserviant and say how awfully sorry you are alot.
If the Magistrate or Judge is an old duffer do not mumble . Think about what you are going to say and project it to the questioner. Do not look at the floor and mumble into your boots with your hands in your pockets. I dont think shrugs will go down too well either.
As your lack of ability to show income / expenditure you might get less in fines and more points.
Be prepared for 6 points and £200 in fines.

Let us know how it goes .

and turn your phone off before going in


 
Posted : 25/10/2010 5:56 pm
 Taff
Posts: 4
Free Member
 

Best of luck


 
Posted : 25/10/2010 6:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

NO bullshine excuses. They have heard it all before.


 
Posted : 25/10/2010 6:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Don't bother going, I'll phone em and tell them that you are exempt from prosecution as you're no longer on british soil but instead your riding the wave of awesomeness just off the south coast, forever, because you can.


 
Posted : 25/10/2010 7:13 pm
Posts: 91
Free Member
Topic starter
 

So, I'm not beind bars. But the penalty is to be deferred to do an insurance check.

When I was stopped by the Police they did a vehicle check. It showed I had no MOT and also no insurance. Which I knew was incorrect, either a computer error with the Police or the Insurance company.

I had a week to produce the certificate. I couldnt find it so telephoned the Insurance company. They sent a replacement certificate. However it was dated from the date of my call, not the date of my policy renewal, 6 months earlier. I took my renewed MOT certificate and the unopened letter from the Insurance company to the Police station. A police officer then 'called' the insurance company who then informed me that they had no record of it. At that point I was charged. I immediatly telephoned the insurance company and they sent another certificate confirming I was indeed covered at the time I was stopped. I took this certificate the next day to the Police who photocopied it and assured me it would be forwarded to the relevant officers etc. Somewhere along the line it wasnt. I submitted a second copy with my letter pleading guilty to the speeding and no MOT to the PF.

The Crown representative hadn't reviewed the file which they'd had for over a month, which had a copy of the certificate, so the case is to be deferred for couple of weeks. I do not have to reattend the court. I'll be informed of my punishment by letter.

The Sherriff and the Clerk of the Court were both very helpful and smiling. My choice of a Gieves and Hawkes suit in preference to a shell suit, a baseball cap and chewing gum may have helped.

Thanks for all the help and advice on this.


 
Posted : 26/10/2010 12:39 pm
Posts: 2874
Free Member
 

Typical. Public servant goes into court completely unprepared and wastes public time and money by having to have your case re-tried. If you'd gone in to court so unprepared they'd have hung you out to dry.


 
Posted : 26/10/2010 12:47 pm
Posts: 2801
Free Member
 

Blimey! What a farce!

Your insurance company does not sound too hot either 😐


 
Posted : 26/10/2010 1:02 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

Typical. Public servant goes into court completely unprepared and wastes public time and money by having to have your case re-tried. If you'd gone in to court so unprepared they'd have hung you out to dry.

🙄

If you knew anything about the workload of an average PF you'd rephrase that.

Oh hang on you'd also need not to have the views of a dyed-in-the-wool Daily Fail reader, so you wouldn't.


 
Posted : 26/10/2010 1:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

When I was 18 I was stopped for speeding, 45 in a 40, was asked to see my documents so handed everything over knowing everything was in order. Only for the PC to say do you realsie you MOT's expired by 4 months? Hmmm, that was news to me but it was certainly the case. I was let off for no MOT and speeding and was only given a fixed penalty fine for not wearing a seat belt (because I wasn't wearing one either). Not all coppers are bad, but booked in next day for MOT, and wore seatbelt & obeyed speed limits from then on!


 
Posted : 26/10/2010 1:37 pm
Posts: 53
Free Member
 

MOT for me was just a fine, no points.
It is the speeding one that I guess is the problem.
Still be surprised if that was more than 3 points..
J.


 
Posted : 26/10/2010 2:02 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

mcmoonter, if you are struggling post it over on pistonheads.com (speed and law section)- there are few like me over (****ing clueless) but also some traffic Police/serving officers and legal-types.

As for speeding, if its outside of a 30 limit its all fair game IMO.


 
Posted : 26/10/2010 2:05 pm
Posts: 91
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Hora, this should never have gone to court. I feel I should be (have been)served with a fixed penalty & points (at the time). I'd be happy with that.

I wouldnt like to be the guy who overtook me on the A9 on Sunday night in the 911. Exiting a stretch of dual carriageway at well over 100mph in the rain. An unmarked Police car with headlights out appeared from behind an obscured vantage point. It overtook me then caught up to the Porche who then overtook overtook another car on double solid white lines on a blind corner. I saw them parked up in a layby a bit further on with lots of blue flashing lights. Thats got to be an instant ban.


 
Posted : 26/10/2010 2:25 pm
Posts: 2874
Free Member
 

If you knew anything about the workload of an average PF you'd rephrase that

No I wouldn't. If they or their office had organised themselves properly they would have had a court date set for when they knew they would be prepared. From McMoonters comments it would seem that another couple of weeks would have been appropriate.

Oh hang on you'd also need not to have the views of a dyed-in-the-wool Daily Fail reader, so you wouldn't

Seems abuse is the typical lefty knee-jerk reaction to legitimate criticism of a public service.


 
Posted : 26/10/2010 2:26 pm
Posts: 2874
Free Member
 

McMoonter I don't know how easy it is for you to attend court but it might be wise to attend the re-scheduled hearing anyway to hear what the crown representative has to say in case you need to rebut any of it.


 
Posted : 26/10/2010 2:29 pm
Posts: 2814
Full Member
 

Thats got to be an instant ban.

No such thing as an instant ban. But it will probably result in a ban. Wish I had seen this thread earlier as I could have given you some sound advice.


 
Posted : 26/10/2010 2:32 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Just for a bit of balance I achieved 50mpg average on the motorway last night at a constant 60 in a 4WD subaru :mrgreen:


 
Posted : 26/10/2010 3:01 pm
Posts: 2814
Full Member
 

So you've done your bit for saving the planet hora - now go drive it like you stole it to re-address the balance... 😈


 
Posted : 26/10/2010 3:27 pm
 yoda
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Gieves and Hawkes suit?
I'd have had you strung up from the ramparts for this crime alone! 😆


 
Posted : 26/10/2010 3:30 pm
Posts: 1083
Full Member
 

Hora, this should never have gone to court etc...

The guidelines for roadside speed checks (not cameras, no idea about them) are (for a 50mph limit) 51-59 = warning, 60-69 = ticket, 70 and over = report to PF. So you were close!


 
Posted : 26/10/2010 5:30 pm
Posts: 91
Free Member
Topic starter
 

The guidelines for roadside speed checks (not cameras, no idea about them) are (for a 50mph limit) 51-59 = warning, 60-69 = ticket, 70 and over = report to PF. So you were close!

I've no idea how they 'calculated' my speed.

Does a Police car in a pursuit not have to have its blue flashing lights on if it is exceeding the speed limit?


 
Posted : 26/10/2010 6:00 pm
Posts: 113
Free Member
 

Just caught this thread.
Has anybody mentioned what is going to happen when you get your next insurance renewal?
I got three points this year (mobile phone) £400 per year went to £700. For same cover same company. Even allowing for the general increase in the cost of car insurance ,it put the £60 fine into perspective!


 
Posted : 26/10/2010 6:18 pm
Posts: 1083
Full Member
 

Me neither, I was just mentioning what the instructions are which might explain why you didn't get a ticket. The use of lights and sirens is at the drivers discretion, so not obligatory in these circumstances. It is for him to justify if it all goes wrong though.


 
Posted : 26/10/2010 6:32 pm
 poly
Posts: 8699
Free Member
 

McMoonter - you seem to have omitted the insurance details from the original story. I assume you pled not guilty to that offence. You presumably presented your defence to that case in court today (in the form of a valid insurance certificate). Presumably the crown had no actual evidence that you didn't have insurance other than you failed to present a certificate at the time. I'm confused why this requires a further "check". If the prosecution don't offer evidence beyond reasonable doubt you should be acquitted.

Was it really a Sheriff? I'd have thought the JP court would have dealt with this. However from their (Police/PF) point of view I can see that this did warrant a court case. Speeding at 20 mph over a 50, no MoT, no Insurance (and/or failing to produce documentation) are a fairly significant collection of charges. The fact you wouldn't plead guilty to the charges for insurance would mean it had to go to court anyway.


 
Posted : 26/10/2010 7:22 pm
Page 2 / 3

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!