I believe evidence relating to his conviction are to be released in America in a few days and there will be some "interesting" names released with links to him and "other things".
It than a certain royal I suspect some other bottoms might be puckering up soon?
"links"?
I truly hope that anyone implicated in wrongdoing is thoroughly investigated, up to and including our favourite prince who claimed to suffer from hypohidrosis. I'm less enamoured with buying into the JHJ school of "someone dodgy met someone else once, makes you think."
Can't imagine it will get worse for our Queenie's golden child. We already know that he's a 'friend of Epstein', and have a fair idea of what he got up to. Unless there are is more detail than just a list coming out.
Interested to see how many other big names pop up on the list though.
my money's on Farage & Aron Banks
It will be interesting to see if it turns out of Andrew invited any of the rest of his family to get to know his new friend.
Guessing this thread may require a full time moderator 🤣
Boris.
I truly hope that anyone implicated in wrongdoing is thoroughly investigated, up to and including our favourite prince who claimed to suffer from hypohidrosis. I’m less enamoured with buying into the JHJ school of “someone dodgy met someone else once, makes you think.”
This. Indeed, I often find myself agreeing with Cougar, but I make no comment as to whether or not this says anything complimentary about either of us...
Boris
I don’t think he’d do a very good job as a mod on here.
Whilst Farage would be funny I don't think he's ever been rich enough to feature on this list.
Trump however....
I often find myself agreeing with Cougar,
This Is The Way.
Incidentally,
What happened to JHJ? He could provide some interesting posts when he wasn't being a conspiracy theory nut.
What happened to JHJ? He could provide some interesting posts when he wasn’t being a conspiracy theory nut.
Keeping his head down before the documents are released?
*WINK*
*JOKING*
I think I read that most of the names are alrready public knowledge, and theres only a few that aren't.
But simply knowing someone doesnt infer guilt, and i expect everyone who is named will claim that exact same thing.
Having an arm around one of the abused girls might be more proof, but simply being named isn't
Trump will be on it for sure, thats his kind of thing and wile we can hope Farage is too, its unlikely. Farage is only interested in making money for himself.
I'm betting Trump will be top of the flight list to Peado Island
I'm equally sure his moronic supporters will say its a conspiracy and a stitch up and his poll ratings will go up as a result
Photos of Trump at Epstein parties have already been in the press, so nothing new to be revealed there.
Lots of big hitters on wall street are rumoured to be implicated, fingers crossed that Musk and Bezos are on the list.
Wouldn't be surprised if the names released were something of an anti climax though, with many of the "masters of the universe" successfully getting their names redacted quietly in the background.
with many of the “masters of the universe” successfully getting their names redacted quietly in the background.
My understanding is that the only names being redacted are those of victims.
I suppose the conspiracy theory angle would be that the incriminating evidence has been destroyed, the necessary people have been silenced and that anyone named is just collateral damage.
I'm not sure I'd go that far, but I would bet £5 that Epstein didn't kill himself
Read this article yesterday. It looks like people have been made aware that they feature and have until Jan 1st to request removal/redaction. I'm not sure if removal is a given or has to be granted.
we know one person who's lawyers will be demanding a redaction
Boring answer: not every high profile chancer that accepted a flight from A to B is a wrong un. But it's amusing to see Noam Chomsky with his snout in the trough on this
I'm with @Cougar everyone is entitled to "due process" before we allow the torches and pitchforks out.
I’m with @Cougar everyone is entitled to “due process” before we allow the torches and pitchforks out.
But we're ok to start sharpening the points, yes?
The points can be used on someone in due time.
It's a very good point..
I’m with @Cougar everyone is entitled to “due process” before we allow the torches and pitchforks out.
I'm sure it will make for interesting reading.. But there's a legal system for a reason.
To make a comparison.. Take Harvey Wenstien.. He's been photographeed at glitzy events with pretty much all Holywood A listers.. Does that make them all guilty by association?
You basically couldn't make a decent movie without his name plastered all over it.. So by association, Tarrantino, Bruce Willis, Brad Pitt, Samuel L Jackson, Uma therman etc. Etc. Etc.
Were they all complicit in sexual exploitation? I'd guess no, were some of them peripherally aware of it, I'd say probably.
Take Harvey Wenstien.. He’s been photographeed at glitzy events with pretty much all Holywood A listers.. Does that make them all guilty by association?
A bit different being merely photographed at a public event with Weinstein and e.g. taking valuable gifts from him, staying at his mansion, being his close friend...
Whoa now, steady on, let's not rush to judgement!
😁
Yay! JHJ back in the threads...
Saville made sure he was known to pretty much everyone in the media, it was how he operated, same as Weinstein; and just appearing in a photo at a big glitzy event means bugger-all - I know, from personal experience in the industry just how easy it is to insert or remove people from photos using appropriate technology, because I did it.
Yay! JHJ back in the threads…
Pic of Savile with a royal? NOW it feels like Christmas can properly start. 🙂
I know, from personal experience in the industry just how easy it is to insert or remove people from photos using appropriate technology, because I did it.
That says more about your integrity than it does mine...
It's possible they were in a bunker cooking up kompromat against opponents of the World Bank or, more boringly, you want a picture of some tedious crossover SUV for a brochure but not some passerby in the background.
