You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more
The 150 employees based in my office are now munching their way through 18kg of free sweets, provided by the company, each week.
Assuming an equal share of eating, and that it's in addition to normal daily intake... I reckon we can all gain half a stone per year for free!
*Heads back to talk to Tracy in Accounts about her Slimming World weigh in*
Six pages.
The 150 employees based in my office are now munching their way through [b]18kg[/b] of free sweets, provided by the company, [b]each week[/b].
😯
that's 120*gm of sweets each, it's not "masses" in a week
Unless Tracey from accts has managed to get in before the rush...
*edit, can't add
Do you work for Haribo?
Who do you work for, company making elastic for trousers or manufacturing false teeth?
120 grams each per week?
The greedy animals.
It's not actually that much a week, it's hardly anything a day, but over the course of a year...
Pah!
That's only 120g of sweets per week or 720 calories
I get through more Haribo than that in an afternoon
my Swedish father in law went to England and said 'why is everyone so fat'. I took a while to explain and I didn't think I covered it all.
if you had your share each week (assuming 46 week year) that'd be over 5.5kgs of sweeties...
that's actually quite a bit!
my Swedish father in law went to England and said 'why is everyone so fat'. I took a while to explain and I didn't think I covered it all.
Theres an element of tragedy to that statement. Because I genuinely think its become evident that the average Brit is a fatty in comparison to many European counterparts.
I regularly travel to mainland Europe, and im usually the biggest chap that I come across - in Oslo last summer I felt very concious of my size.
Indeed, for some reason us Brits have nmanaged to create an incredbile carb-laden landscape that is more prevelent than anywhere else i've travelled with perhaps exception of the US.
Every petrol station, supermarket, leisure centre, DIY store(!), virtually every premise you can think of has a row of crisps or sweets vying for your instant gratification purchase.
The amount of money we spend on presenting our 'food halls' as modern/clean/stylish/trendy is staggering also. Ie, visiting a supermarket in Spain, Italy, Germany is generally a much more low key affair.
It boils down to easy profit and great marketing - I wish we werent so darned good at making multipack toffee crisp offers seems so normalised.
Do you work for Haribo?
Not as an employee - more as a 'test subject'.
Its not consider PC to test your produce on animals anymore so initiatives like this are a work-around and keeps PETA and the like off your back.
Due to mounting consumer pressure I was told I had to stop testing our products on animals last year. I work in a dildo factory.
Possibly most surreal response I have seen on STW, yet.
For the old timers who don't understand this stuff 120g is approximate to a quarter of Kola Cubes
For the honed athletes who don't understand this stuff 120g is approximate to four or five gels
For the honed athletes who don't understand this stuff 120g is approximate to four or five gels
Which is approximately what finely honed athletes consume on a 1.5-2hour ride.
Theres an element of tragedy to that statement. Because I genuinely think its become evident that the average Brit is a fatty in comparison to many European counterparts
This.
Me and her spent six months travelling around Europe a few years ago. When we came home, our initial impression was how unhealthy the general public look in the UK. It's quite hard to describe, because it's not just about weight, but in general people just looked 'ill'.
You don't notice it when you're in it, but go away for a while and come back it's quite shocking.
I agree (obviously).
Try South Wales for a double eye opener.
Indeed, for some reason us Brits have nmanaged to create an incredbile carb-laden landscape that is more prevelent than anywhere else i've travelled with perhaps exception of the US.
Places in Europe are indeed thinner than we are, but not everywere is. Plenty of fatties in the rest of the world too.
If you go to a European capital, you'll find lots of public transport usage, which makes people thinner everywhere. Just go to London.
First time I noticed it 10 years ago coming back from Norway which is largely a land of fit healthy well educated folk to Britian which is largely a land of globular, wheezing bigots.
When I returned from Oz after 30 years, I thought all you Poms looked flabby.
Discovered it's contagious. 🙁
Very apt choice of words for what followed... 🙂maccruiskeen - Member
...Due to mounting consumer pressure...
Yep, our lifestyles have changed a lot in the last generation or so, to the point that it is now responsible for the majority of premature deaths.
http://www.nhs.uk/livewell/over60s/pages/the-top-five-causes-of-premature-death.aspx
The worst offenders being (in no particular order):
1. Smoking
2. Overweight
3. Inactivity
4. Diet (too much salt and/or sugar)
5. Booze
my Swedish father in law went to England and said 'why is everyone so fat'. I took a while to explain and I didn't think I covered it all.
Theres an element of tragedy to that statement.
yes as I mentioned the conversation lasted for most of the night. I mean as far as I am aware the general trend for obesity in Europe is on the up, but for some reason the UK has exploded. purely anecdotal, I don't have any stats to back it up, but just an impression.
A great deal of the stuff I mentioned to him happens in Sweden too, I mean they eat insane amounts of sweets and cakes, apparently they sit down the most in Europe or something, drink like fishes and so on.
There are two real differences that I see. one is the obsession in the UK with the cost (of everything actually) but especially food. Everything has to be cheap and ergo low quality to make it cheap. Here that isnt the case.
The other is sport and an general love of being outside. for example now it's half term. It's name is 'sportlov' and basically everyone goes sking. it's almost a social no no if you don't.
The other is sport and an general love of being outside. for example now it's half term. It's name is 'sportlov' and basically everyone goes sking. it's almost a social no no if you don't.
My sister has lived in Austria for 30 years and she says the same applies there. Everyone you talk to has a summer sport and a winter sport. They're nothing like as pasty looking as we are.
The worst offenders being (in no particular order):1. Smoking
2. Overweight
3. Inactivity
4. Diet (too much [s]salt and/or sugar[/s] junk carbohydrates)
5. Booze
Just go to London.
Yes people on average are a bit skinnier in London but a lot of this is down to the fact that there are a lot of tourists and recent arrivals from foreign shores who haven't quite caught up with the natives in the pie eating stakes.
Yes people on average are a bit skinnier in London but a lot of this is down to the fact that there are a lot of tourists and recent arrivals from foreign shores who haven't quite caught up with the natives in the pie eating stakes.
I don't think it's just that. You're also on foot a lot more, and generally at speed. London's fabled public transport system means that people don't generally walk very far, but when they do it's dashing between Tube stations, bus stops, home, work and leisure activities, and it adds up. I reckon your average Londoner easily gets half an hour of brisk exercise every day.
Compare that to your average town where people get pissy if they can't park directly in front of their house, or have to use the third row back in a car park when doing their monthly shop. Even when they do walk anywhere it's at a glacial pace, bimbling around a supermarket like a 45 record playing at 33. I'm not a huge fan of London but one thing it has going for it is I don't spend half of my life waiting for people to get out of the bloody way.
It's no wonder waistlines are expanding, no-one's [i]doing [/i]anything any more. You don't even have to get out of your car to buy your extra large Big Mac meal FFS.
isn't London slimmer as the inhabitants are by in large richer? I seem to remember Richmond and Chelsea being cited as being healthiest in the country
isn't London slimmer as the inhabitants are by in large richer?
But in london you can be rich and still barely able to afford to eat 🙂
I reckon your average Londoner easily gets half an hour of brisk exercise every day.
So, 400-500 cals burned?
Large mochachino on the train : 350cal
Cheese/ham croissant from Pret for breakfast : 450cal
A few cheeky office Haribo: 200cal
Pop down to EAT for lunch with colleagues for soup and sarnie and a Fanta: 1200cal
Nip to bar after work for quick artisan ale and peanuts: 750cal
Home for tea..
I don't think travelling around London has much to do with it, unless perhaps you're a bike courier. More likely the social constraints of trying to fit in with the beautiful people encourage the upwardly mobile to hit the gym/drop the carbs
Just been watching 'Further Back in Time for Dinner'.
This week set in the 1940's and the interesting point for me was that in the late 40's, after almost a decade of harsh rationing combined with scientific nutritional education the British people were the healthiest they had ever been.
Fast forward 80 yrs & look at us..
Anybody ever had the pleasure of a food industry product managers company?
Like any product manager their(well paid) role in life is drive down costs and increase profit and sales volume.
We usually recruit the sharpests types from our universities to do the job and work with equally sharp people in marketing, accounts, production etc to create the cheapest possible food and shift it by the ton.
Then the other side of the coin cars have become an extension almost a replacement for the human body which only realy needs thumbs now to update facebook. For lots of people moving outside under your own power is a totally alien concept.
So we got fat but before we got fat we had to thick or greedy or lazy or all three.
Gosh this is sobering reading.
Just 5 Weetabix for me in the morning methinks
People who don't eat sweets die, every day
sobering
Large mochachino on the train : 350cal
Cheese/ham croissant from Pret for breakfast : 450cal
A few cheeky office Haribo: 200cal
Pop down to EAT for lunch with colleagues for soup and sarnie and a Fanta: 1200cal
Nip to bar after work for quick artisan ale and peanuts: 750cal
Home for tea..
Holy crap - do people really do all that!?
Just reading it makes me feel a bit queasy.
Just reading it makes me feel a bit queasy.
Yes.
I inhaled two packets of Haribo reading this thread.
I imagine tonight, I will feel guilty, then drink 8 cans of some silly strong IPA, and eat all my kids sweets in the fridge, and look guilty tomorrow morning when she gets up to have her weekend treat
There's definitely a problem with people being sedentary these days. If you drive everywhere and have a sedentary job, a couple of gym sessions a week isn't going to cut it.
I started a debate on FB about how we might reduce car use, especially for short journeys and although some of my friends agreed, many others were outraged at the thought of a 1-mile each way walk to the shop, or made loads of excuses. You can make excuses all you like, but it's your health not mine.
A woman at work has been using a fit bit or something, which tells her what and when to eat, and she goes to some fancy exercise classes but struggles to walk up the small hill to our office.
I don't think travelling around London has much to do with it, unless perhaps you're a bike courier. More likely the social constraints of trying to fit in with the beautiful people encourage the upwardly mobile to hit the gym/drop the carbs
You really think only Londoners are vain and shallow enough for that?
There's definitely a problem with people being sedentary these days
Agree with this, you only have to see people driving their kids less than half a mile to school each morning to see how bad the problem is.
If kids start out like this, it will be normal for them and things will never change.
It's much much more complex than sedentary lifestyles (there no real evidence that we are significantly less mobile than our forefathers).
The Food industry has provided us with cheap plentiful and energy dense food, and eating habits have changed massively to take advantage of it. Hormonal changes make losing weight harder for people who've put on weight in the first place
It's society that will have to change, not just individuals
Large mochachino on the train : 350cal
Cheese/ham croissant from Pret for breakfast : 450cal
A few cheeky office Haribo: 200cal
Pop down to EAT for lunch with colleagues for soup and sarnie and a Fanta: 1200cal
Nip to bar after work for quick artisan ale and peanuts: 750cal
Home for tea..
But those are choices, I counter - and I've been travelling this week a lot:
Large Americano with a splash of semi skimmed - 20 cals
Pret Protien pot - 260 cals
Pret/Eat/Sainsburys Boiled egg with spinach pot + chicken & chorizo sandwich + crisps - 500 cals
Fruit - apple/banana 100 cals
...leaving over 1000 cals for dinner to get to a 2000 daily total, just make different choices.
FWIW the Spanish aren't much thinner than the British, looking around my office most people around my age (45) are overweight. Not quite as pasty looking though 🙂
As ever the cause won't be one thing but a combination of factors: easily available energy dense food; lazy lifestyle choices; more sedentary jobs (forty years ago who'd have thought that most men would spend their days in offices typing?); getting older; etc. Our bodies have had a couple of million years to develop, the modern lifestyle has been around less than fifty, it's going to struggle.
This comes from someone who definitely has a sweet tooth - any excuse to have a cafe stop on a ride 😆
Just been watching 'Further Back in Time for Dinner'.
This week set in the 1940's and the interesting point for me was that in the late 40's, after almost a decade of harsh rationing combined with scientific nutritional education the British people were the healthiest they had ever been.
Fast forward 80 yrs & look at us..
They were all working bloody hard too, don't forget. In the 40s you'd have been in a cotton mill or down t'pit, in 2017 you're more likely to be a marketing manager.
But those are choices, I counter - and I've been travelling this week a lot:
Totally agree, but retailers don't make it easy. Lardy food is the default, you can have a skinny cappuccino but it's a special order. I went to get a drink in a petrol station earlier on this week and struggled to find a sugar-free option, the only choice was Diet Coke (cos I'm ****ed if I'm paying two quid for half a litre of water). Why not have it the other way around, make Fat Bastard Coke the special order?
nickc- where is the evidence that we're not less sedentary?
One example from my childhood:
I walked to school from the age of 4, as did everyone else. Now the roads are clogged with parents doing the school run.
We had no computer games and kids TV only a couple of hours a day. I spent my childhood doing gymnastics and playing out - football in the street, riding bikes, roaming round the woods etc. As did everyone else! My parents live in the street I grew up in and although kids live there, you don't see them playing out.
Agree with this, you only have to see people driving their kids less than half a mile to school each morning to see how bad the problem is.
I'll point something out though - I don't disagree that people are sedentary, but they aren't any less intrinsically lazy than they used to be. People in the good old days walked around because they had no choice. Give them the choice and they would do what we do, because they are basically us.
Re the school run - when this comes up at our school, most peopel are taking their kids to school because they drop them off on their own way to work, and walking them in then returning to the car costs them an extra half an hour on their commute. And young kids may not be trusted to walk on their own.
So it's not necessarily productive to simply blame people for being idle. Whilst many are no doubt, I think we have a problem with modern lifestyles. If both parents are going to work, then we need decent support for that - it needs to be easy, so that people aren't stressed as hell all the time.
Lardy food is the default, you can have a skinny cappuccino but it's a special order.
Semi-skimmed is the default, not whole; and a sugar laden moccachino is not the default. If you ask for a 'coffee' you'll get americano in most places.
But otherwise yes, food companies do want us to eat the most yummy and moorish stuff of course they do. Capitalism has some serious down-sides.
Totally agree, but retailers don't make it easy. Lardy food is the default,
The mandate "Quality food, isn't expensive, its poor quality food that's cheap" comes to mind here, including our natural taste for sugar salt & fat. And then look at the manuafacturers profit margin in relation, and you'll see there's a much large turnover available for "shite, quick food"
vickpea. the evidence is mixed (if I'm honest) there is plenty to say that we are "fatter" however there's also studies that show as much as obesity is dangerous, being a little overweight could have a protective element. There's less heart disease. (less smoking mostly) there's more leisure time, and more people are filling that with activity and sport. We are living longer, chronic diseases that killed our parents and grandparents are less prevalent, statins have had a major impact on health and stroke is more understood and more people expect to recover from it.
These are population based observations, there are things that killed our forefathers in vast numbers that practically don't exist anymore, so yeah, chubby people everywhere, but it doesn't follow that those people are leading "less healthy" lives than our grandparents.
EDIT: It is true to say that we are "differently unhealthy" than our grandparents, but it isn't true to say we are "less healthy"
There's definitely a problem with people being sedentary these days. If you drive everywhere and have a sedentary job, a couple of gym sessions a week isn't going to cut it.
I started a debate on FB about how we might reduce car use, especially for short journeys and although some of my friends agreed, many others were outraged at the thought of a 1-mile each way walk to the shop, or made loads of excuses. You can make excuses all you like, but it's your health not mine.
A woman at work has been using a fit bit or something, which tells her what and when to eat, and she goes to some fancy exercise classes but struggles to walk up the small hill to our office.
Very nicely put.
Sedentry living is a massive killer, and is set to get muuuuuucch worse as the more current (and therefore more sedate) generation gets older.
One of the main issues is that people do not think that a little walking here and there will make a difference- they think that the only exercise that is worth anything is smashing it down the gym. Research is showing otherwise, and while going to the gym is certainly a good idea, it is the lack of daily moderate activity that is killing stupidly large amounts of people.
How to protect yourself from a whole host of nasty diseases by sitting on your arse for 23 1/2 hours a day:
We had no computer games and kids TV only a couple of hours a day. I spent my childhood doing gymnastics and playing out - football in the street, riding bikes, roaming round the woods etc. As did everyone else! My parents live in the street I grew up in and although kids live there, you don't see them playing out.
There's no room for kids to play out in the street as they're full of parked cars now.
We're increasingly trapped in a convenience bubble driven by the demands of modern life. People can't be bothered, or feel too tired or bereft of the time to make good food for an evening meal, prepare decent lunches or take the time to walk or cycle rather than drive.
As an aside, I've found that by rustling sweet papers in meetings I can get the larger individuals to eat almost on command. 😈
the demands of modern life
Modern life has been shaped by capitalism. Everyone's life ends up being on the edge of collapse, people doing the most they can possibly fit in without burning out.
people doing the most they can possibly fit in without burning out.
I sort of agree, but think that, for many, making the steps to eat better and exercise a little might mean they find they're not quite so close to collapse.
Presumably those who "don't have time to make proper food" do something useful with that time or do they then just vegetate in front of the telly watching "Britain's got F all Talent"?
Anecdotal evidence: my commute is roughly the same time whether I ride my bike, drive the car or use public transport(train)
But those are choices, I counter
Yes, but my point was eluding to the typical day in the life of a London worker, based on prevalence of availability and what I have observed when heading to our London HQ.
Do you think you are in the majority or minority with your dietary choices?
You really think only Londoners are vain and shallow enough for that?
Of course not, there are gym bunnies in every city - but we were using London as a large scale example of behaviour type were we not?
I think the people on the streets of London walk more... I can't comment on what the people who are sat in their cars look like.
I've found that by rustling sweet papers in meetings I can get the larger individuals to eat almost on command
Feeder!
Back to my original point, I don't see how 30mins of walking necessarily offsets the 'average' Brits' calorific surplus - i'd argue that an additional fitness regime would be required to maintain or lose weight. On average.
i'm amazed at the amount of treats/ special occasions people think it's normal to have.
it's my birthday, it's your birthday, i'm sure it's someones birthday. Christmas, Easter, The weekend. Monday, Friday, hump day. Coffee morning, Health and safety meeting etc etc.
I feel anti-social at times for avoiding cakes/ sweets but it's every other day in the office and everytime i see a family member!
I think the people on the streets of London walk more... I can't comment on what the people who are sat in their cars look like.
In central London there are hardly any people sat in cars, because there are very few cars. Thousands of pedestrians and cyclists though.
I sort of agree, but think that, for many, making the steps to eat better and exercise a little might mean they find they're not quite so close to collapse.
Hmm.. maybe for some. But I think for most people the pressures of modern life are mental, and sweet tasty comfort food actually helps the mental state - in the short term. For most, self-denial of delicious food is simply yet another stressful thing they have to deal with in their life.
Some years ago I watched a programme on the obesity crisis in the States. One of the case studies they highlighted was an insurance company in the mid-west who had a private health scheme and who were concerned at the large number of employees who were using it for "lifestyle" problems. So they got a consultant in.
The corporate headquarters was one of those sprawling campus style affairs that Americans seem to go for and covered about a square mile (probably a whole block). The consultants did three things:
1. Each employee had an assigned parking space so they moved these as far from that employee's desk as they could.
2. They disabled the lifts.
3. They removed all chairs from the meeting rooms.
Now the employees who were interviewed were still "big" (being extremely polite here) but said that in six months they'd lost over 100lbs.
As far as the company was concerned the changes cost very little: a couple of guys moving name plates around and printing maps showing someone's new parking space was the biggest expense. But the results were pretty good. Of course they'd do better if they'd removed the daily doughnut trolly 8)
sweet tasty comfort food actually helps the mental state
But so could exercise?
Or taking pride in cooking delicious food?
Comfort food gives only a temporary mental boost. In the long run it can be detrimental if scoffed every day, without compromise or exercise.
But so could exercise?Or taking pride in cooking delicious food?
Yeah but you are missing the point. You can grab a chocolate bar any time, any where, and eat it in minutes. You can exercise if you have time, you can cook a great meal at home, but that doesn't help during the day when you are stressed does it?
Plus, you can pridefully cook delicious and very unhealthy food quite easily.
Comfort food gives only a temporary mental boost.
Of course. Then when it runs out, you want more. Have you really never experienced anything like this?
sounds like you have quite the sugar addiction!
I might well do yes, but I'm not alone.
At least I'm trying to do something about it.
Chapeau to you Molly.
It certainly doesn't help the addicted to have huge jars of free sweets right next to the basket of free fruit in an office kitchen, does it?
You can't exercise away a bad diet, it's not really possible.
1000 surplus calories a day is going to take about 2 hours of exercise to cancel out.
Very few people have the time to do 2 hours of exercise. Lots of people put away 1000 surplus calories.
Exercise certainly helps with weight loss and helps a lot with general health but for weight loss on its own its a flawed idea.
But then we all know this.
EDIT.
I know this because I exercise plenty but have some shitty eating habits.
This bag of Dortios isn't really for sharing is it?.
I only lose weight if I cut out the crap. But sometimes its carby goodness is oh so tempting!
You can't exercise away a bad diet, it's not really possible.
1000 surplus calories a day is going to take about 2 hours of exercise to cancel out.
You negated your own point
it may not be easy but it is doable
Personally I eat both superbly well and then carb load with chips cakes and biscuits
Pretty sure i consume around 1000 extra calories of crap a day
It certainly doesn't help the addicted to have huge jars of free sweets right next to the basket of free fruit in an office kitchen, does it?
Exactly.
Of course alcohol addiction has terrible consequences and I'm not suggesting they are problems of the same magnitude, but I think there are parallels between the two. If you worked with a recovering alcoholic you wouldn't bring loads of booze into an office or have booze vending machines all over the place, would you? Eating tasty snacks is so normal, everyone does it, and it's self-reinforcing. One sweetie doesn't satisfy, it makes you want more sweet things. Both your brain and your metabolism start wanting more.
Plus it affects everyone differently. I know people who can eat a cake at a coffee break and are still skinny as hell. It looks like such a normal thing that it makes me feel like a freak. Which doesn't help of course.
And the fact that the other good behaviour, exercising, goes hand in hand. The more exercise I do the more carby food I want to eat.
You can't exercise away a bad diet, it's not really possible.
1000 surplus calories a day is going to take about 2 hours of exercise to cancel out.
You negated your own point
I guess i did
How about:
You can exercise away a bad diet but its not remotely practical for the vast majority of the population and reducing your calorie intake would be a much easier way to lose weight
Just been watching 'Further Back in Time for Dinner'.
This week set in the 1940's and the interesting point for me was that in the late 40's, after almost a decade of harsh rationing combined with scientific nutritional education the British people were the healthiest they had ever been.
Fast forward 80 yrs & look at us..
Sure, but the 1940s were an outlier. Go back to earlier in the 20th century, and the middle classes were gorging themselves on vast quantities of meat, while the working classes were getting whichever cheap calories they could find, such as bread and margarine.
Personally I eat both superbly well
Any bacon in that Junky?
Personally I eat both superbly well and then carb load with chips cakes and biscuits
Pretty sure i consume around 1000 extra calories of crap a day
I'd guess you have a genetic predisposition to be extremely skinny.
Sure, but the 1940s were an outlier. Go back to earlier in the 20th century, and the middle classes were gorging themselves on vast quantities of meat, while the working classes were getting whichever cheap calories they could find, such as bread and margarine.
That was kinda my point, when left to its own devices, the population (when it could afford to) ate massive amounts of unhealthy foods, the poor ate smaller amounts of extremely unhealthy foods in the main.
Rationing forced the population to eat better/more healthy by spreading the good stuff (veg etc) around to all sectors of society, resulting in a healthier population.
As for the earlier point about folk working hard, I have a physical factory job & im still slim at 9 stone & 49yrs old.
Most of my friends are somewhat 'challenged' in the waistlines in comparison - certainly those in office jobs.
When I worked for Lindt in Oloron we all had a kg a month free, and a factory shop where the prices were very reasonable if a kg wasn't enough. There was also no attempt to stop workers eating misshapes, products with damaged packaging etc. while working. It was only considered bad form to munch stuff that was perfect. The management was quite happy; regarding the constant tasting as quality control.
Despite all that access to free chocolate the workers weren't fat. If they had all walked along Hinkley high Street they'd have stood out as the slim ones.
@edukator I've heard similar tales before about chocolate factories - basically the first couple of weeks on the line people munch what they can then basically get sick of it and rarely touch the stuff after that.
Despite all that access to free chocolate the workers weren't fat.
My Mum had a summer job at Rowntrees of York as a student. Their policy on the production line was that you could eat as much as you wanted. After the first day she was so sick of sugared almonds she never ate anything off the line again. No-one did.

