You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more
@TiRed the last part is why most of the old farmers i know build a granny anex and work part time on other farms or rent back stables for storage.
Farming is a rubbish job with great benefits if you like being outside.
Massively underrated and taken for granted.
If my pad is worth £1m+ (no hope) my kid will get hit with inheritance tax. Even though my work has brought foreign money into the economy and helps (a tiny bit) to offset the mahoosive negative balance of trade. I've not been paid massive subsidies each year for 50+ years, unlike them.
I didn't see any of them protesting when the ship yards, steel mills or 1000 other British industries were decimated. We import most other things, we can import food if needs be - because we're so dependent on other countries already, one more step will male ****all difference.
They need to paying their share of tax rather than just sponging off the rest of us.
Anyway not sure in the timing of the announcement of this new venture,but here’s a cycling related theme with farms ,gcn,inheritance etc
And never forget- ‘their’ land was land stolen from the masses
Given the ability and competence of "the masses", not sure we want it returning, tbh
Well, I imagine the proper farmers who went down to London trudged back last night in the cold and have now woken up and are going to work, in the cold, with not a single thing changed.
Meanwhile, Farage, Tice, Clarkson et al are probably still tucked up in nice, warm, London hotel suites - having had a lovely evening meal with some fine wines. Probably a brandy or two as a nightcap in some big armchairs to round off another successful day (for them).
This letter from the FT seems to sum up the position for me. These farmers should be turning their anger onto to the parasitic folk who have inflated the notional value of their land to such an extent that they are now classed as millionaires and taxed accordingly.
Also, Clarkson really is a revolting individual, he's just good at projecting bonhomie in controlled situations, stick him in a street interview with some awkward questions from the likes of Vic Derbyshire and the switch flips instantly.
but here’s a cycling related theme with farms ,gcn,inheritance etc
Saw that last night, spent five minutes trying to work out if it was a skit where they ended up racing CX around the grounds of a stately home. And I can't believe he's not actually called Hank.
In one infinitesimally small 'victory' I see that my local rural police force have removed their post on FB where they changed the profile picture to a "We Support British Farmers" banner.
It was pointed out to them by me and others that the police are supposed to be apolitical.
I started out from the perspective of the changes being a bad thing and this thread, being largely a load of shouting down and the usual, had done nothing to convince me otherwise. The video has me now considering the opposite viewpoint.. at they say – it’s all in the delivery.
I don't as a rule object to paying taxes, but I do when others don't have to pay the same ones as me - but maybe the mistake Reeves made was that she should've announced that landowner estates would pay the same as the rest of us, and then gave them 10 years (with no interest and benefitting from inflation) to pay as a concession?
on stage he was absolutely brilliant though, much as you’d expect.
Yup, very much what I would expect. What is less expected though is how shite he is when challenged.
The video posted on the previous page is an excellent analysis of the modern farming conundrum.
The problem with Labour’s approach in this and things like the winter heating grant is that they don’t offer a carrot with the necessary stick. The winter heating grant should have been tapered rather than a sharp cut off and the farmers should have been promised some form of price protections for their products to make farming worthwhile. The subsidies we pay them now are really just free extra profits to the food industry.
Both policies are perfectly reasonable and needed as we try to wriggle out of the decades long low tax economy experiment that has enshittified the public realm, but for heavens sake Labour need to do better to explain it and say why it’ll make us all happier, healthier and wealthier in the long run.
I have a family business (Tech) my business is based from my home I don't get reduced council tax, I don't get grants for fencing, hedges, trees, hardstanding, never had a single farm payment, the only benefit I had was a double cab pickup, I don't get inheritance tax reduction I can't claim back vat on anything for my land or property. I don't travel first class, I don't drive £70k landrovers, I can't build an 'agricultural workers cottage" - yet I am surrounded by Farmers who in my 60 years of watching seem to have had a good run.
Tice, Farage, Truss, Clarkson and Badenoch speaking against an increase of taxation on millionaires.
The Daily Mail has twisted a family tragedy to blame a suicide on the tax increase when a quick review of the facts shows that the tax changes would of had zero impact on his estate.
Why are normal working people taken by this absolute nonsense?
If it's about our nation's food, what about the bakers, butchers, grain mills etc. Why do they not have different IHT rules?
What about the farmers destroying butchers businesses by opening farm shops and cutting them out of the loop? Basically profiteering by shortening the established supply chain?
**** the multi millionaire farmers and land owners and get them to pay what they owe.
Given his “help” to the fishing industry, I just don’t get why Farage was welcome within 20 miles of that protest yesterday.
Its like Brexit, innit? These snake oil salesmen have managed to convince the hard of thinking that they’re on their side, in order to get them to behave against their own interests
The idea that piano-tinkling squillionaire landowner ‘Lord’ Lloyd Webber has the remotest interest in some hill farmer in Penrith is absolutely laughable.
This is the man who took a first class flight back from New York specifically in order to vote through benefit cuts to the poorest in society in the House of Lords.
Farage and Clarkson are the same. Shysters just on the grift
It was pointed out to them by me and others that the police are supposed to be apolitical.
Nice that they did, as loads of farmers get their livestock and machinery stolen. Maybe they should put their thoughts back up online today now that the general public have moved on from their 5 minutes of fame.
Clarkson: I hate him
It is, I think, the totally transparently self-serving nature of it that seems invisible to the community who are lending their support to him whining about having his tax dodge removed, becasue he's "one of them" I can understand why Clarkson is angry, that the farmers back him him up is unfathomable. He literally made his money from the public purse through working for the BBC, and sought to protect having to pay anything back through buying a farm - which he now claims was a lie, so can anything he says be trusted? Faced with actual questioning yesterday he fell apart. As for his speech, well he spoke well enough but he made a joke of the air and river pollution that some farmers are guilty of, so I don't think he won over that many folks to the cause.
I get that for many farmers this is just the latest of many things that seem to be piling up to conspire to make their businesses unprofitable, but given the wholly unsustainable cost of land, the wholly unsustainable nature of modern farming, the wholly unsustainable tax breaks and subsidies they've had for the last 50 years, did they really think the money would roll in forever from the public purse?
As one post on Threads put it yesterday "Yeah you put food on our tables, but we empty your bins, and clean your streets, we teach your kids, we drive the ambulance, and staff the hospital that look after you".
This is the man who took a first class flight back from New York specifically in order to vote through benefit cuts to the poorest in society in the House of Lords.
Remarkable! Never had a high opinion of LW, but that’s a jaw-dropper.
Oh come one they all do stuff like that no matter what the colour.
Why are normal working people taken by this absolute nonsense?
Because they aren't very bright
Oh come one they all do stuff like that no matter what the colour.
My bar of what justifies eight hours sitting on a plane and eight hours back is clearly way too high!
they all do stuff like that no matter what the colour.
They really don't all do stuff like that. Andrew Lloyd Webber has never been a politician and he gave up his attempt to be one when that flight to London from New York specifically in order to vote through benefit cuts proved that he totally lacked any qualities to be one.
Before that specific vote he hadn't attended any sitting of the House of Lords for an extremely long time. He obviously thought that benefit cuts for the poorest in society was an issue of vital importance to him.
Why are normal working people taken by this absolute nonsense?
Because the public are tired of experts.
Because of Rupert Murdoch.
Because of the Barclay brothers
Because of BBCs impartiality rules.
The list is long, but essentially, rich people are doing whatever they can to keep their money, and that means keeping you and i as poor and badly informed as possible. And they've been making dirty tricks legal to do it for as long as i've been alive.
Those who try and point these things out are then discredited in the media, which is owned by rich people.
It takes *real* brainpower to cut through all the rubbish that the media are allowed to (or made to) spout about stuff that affects your daily life and work out what's really going on.
Nice that they did, as loads of farmers get their livestock and machinery stolen. Maybe they should put their thoughts back up online today now that the general public have moved on from their 5 minutes of fame.
They can (and will obviously) continue to post up with appeals and information about successful prosecutions that demonstrably back British Farmers when they are victims of crime. Like any police force should.
But stating that they 'back' one group of people as a matter of general principle is not a good look for a UK policing team. They can advertise that they have the specialist knowledge, networks and skillsets to combat rural crime. What they cannot do is say they 'back' one group. What will they do if a farmer assaults a walker who has accidentally strayed off of a footpath, for example?
It was pointed out to them by me and others that the police are supposed to be apolitical.
Why is supporting british farmers political? Are you careful to make sure you don't buy british meat or vegetables at the supermarket in case you are (mis?)construed to be making a political statement?
Fighting the good fight as usual Fenderextender
I can understand why Clarkson is angry, that the farmers back him him up is unfathomable.
But, but, but, Clarkson s Farm has done "more for farming" than any other programme.
I now can't stand the man, he makes good watchable TV, but he's a weapons grade idiot.
As someone who runs a village shop and used to do alot of retail planning within a previous career, everything he's publicly done in recent years makes him look like a tw*t imo. His best move was buying the pub recently, but he should have done that 3 years ago, except that wouldn't have made good TV.
Why is supporting british farmers political?
Because of the timing and the context that they posted that it during a significant political protest involving farmers.
Why are normal working people taken by this absolute nonsense?
Because they aren’t very bright
This.
Because of the timing and the context that they posted that it during a significant political protest involving farmers.
Exactly.
For those that like a read rather than a watch of the tax issues Byline Times has a good analysis of who will owe what in future
And a further analysis of farm acreages.
https://bsky.app/profile/andrewt500.bsky.social/post/3lbd22wy6b22s
^^^
Yeah but actual facts will never beat an image of a tractor with a Union Jack tied to the back.
Or a big red bus with lies printed on the side.
He literally made his money from the public purse through working for the BBC, and sought to protect having to pay anything back through buying a farm – which he now claims was a lie, so can anything he says be trusted?
He was also paid "by the taxpayer" to not grow anything on his farm for many years..
What I’m getting sick of is the patronising twoddle from farmers, landowners, Tory MPs and their media cheerleaders is how we ‘don’t understand’ the ways of salt of the earth countryside types. As if they’re some kind of separate (and superior) race, blessed with attributes that none of us could ever aspire too.
And that apparently they’re the only profession that ‘works hard’.
I’ve never heard anyone pleading a unique case for scaffolders or car mechanics or any other trade or profession that would exclude them from paying tax like everybody else
I’ve never heard anyone pleading a unique case for scaffolders or car mechanics or any other trade or profession that would exclude them from paying tax like everybody else
Yes, but they're less able to (emotively at least) hold the country to ransom.
Let's face it - the government has got this one right. They'll hunker down on it and it will go away when the vast majority of genuine, hard-working farmers do not see any effect at all. There'll be the odd flare-up, but it'll basically go away, leaving the likes of Clarkson, Dyson, Farage et al looking like exactly what they are - tax dodging, selfish crooks who are rich beyond the dreams of avarice and (hopefully) will stress themselves over trying to avoid having £800m in the bank rather than £825m (made up figures, obvs).
It's a good time for the protests too - folk are starting to think about Xmas dinners etc. This wouldn't be half as effective in January when lentil sales are through the roof again.
https://bsky.app/profile/bladeofthes.bsky.social/post/3lbdcbst6rk2g
Because a little bit of a reminder of why we should be engaging in class warfare not culture warfare! How Hamilton gets by on 'only' 822 acres is anybody's guess!
I’ve never heard anyone pleading a unique case for scaffolders
Don't mess with scaffolders they're all of their tits on gak - there you go unique case pleaded 🙂
I also think the government has got this right - the tax rules should apply fairly to all. If it means some very rich people now need to pay more tax then that is a good thing.
I'm sure they will be finding various loop holes to avoid paying -
I found the winter fuel decision much more troubling - that will hit many people who were genuinely on the border of hardship. Didn't see thousands of pensioners in their zimmer frames out protesting (if we did I missed it).
If the government didn't move on winter fuel, I can't see them moving on this, however its a real test as its influential and rich people being hit this time
It's really interesting reading this thread.
My job is farming adjacent and so my LinkedIn feed, and that chat of my colleagues is how terrible this decision is, how badly thought out it is and how much damage it'll do. This thread seems to very much lean in the opposite direction.
Really interesting seeing how someone who only sees one side of the view point can think that everyone thinks like them when in reality that's not the case.
I’m hoping (probably naïvely) that this might mark a shift towards taxing people on wealth and assets instead of purely on income from doing frightful things like actually working for a living.
Its been skewed in the wrong direction for far too long. It’s now far more financially beneficial to just own stuff - in this case large swathes of the countryside - as the rich know that unearned wealth won’t be taxed at anywhere near the same rate as earned income. Even now the rate they’re being asked to pay is only 50% of what anyone else would have to stump up
Why is supporting british farmers political?
Supporting farmers is fine. I'm totally happy for them to do that. But posting a cretinous message directly aligning themselves against something that a political party is currently doing...
is wrong.
They're not supporting farmers. They're supporting a rich, manipulative, powerful subset of the country which is using warped messages to try to get the herd on their side to prolong the status quo of inequality.
Inheritance tax should apply to all or none. No one type of business has more or less right to family continuity, in this case it does start to look like the fight of the landed classes and that list of Dukes is telling.
Farms are vital businesses with an impact on the countryside, tax them like businesses and offer support/benefits for them to do things that benefit the countryside.
If those businesses aren't profitable they need to put prices up. Supply and demand will take care of it if they are all as vital as they say they are (I don't doubt it btw). We then pay more for our food. But if they're quoting 1% profitability, costs won't need to rise that much to benefit farmers - the impact at supermarket price would be within general fluctuations we've seen before.
If supermarkets (etc) aren't paying enough, focus blame on supermarkets - they also get to pay staff low wages that can be topped up by in-work benefits - i.e. a big business subsidy. Supermarkets seem to be disproportionately profitable in this relationship.
My job is farming adjacent and so my LinkedIn feed, and that chat of my colleagues is how terrible this decision is, how badly thought out it is and how much damage it’ll do.
Many of those will be following the herd and won't have done the sums that Dan Neidle has showing that it's only the very well off, single farmer that will hit the £1million limit quite quickly. Like Clarkson yesterday they're bandying around un-calculated nonsense because 89% of those statistics are made up on the spot (even I'm not immune). 🙂
What I’m getting sick of is the patronising twoddle from farmers, landowners, Tory MPs and their media cheerleaders is how we ‘don’t understand’ the ways of salt of the earth countryside types. As if they’re some kind of separate (and superior) race, blessed with attributes that none of us could ever aspire too.
Makes a change* from the patronising twaddle a century or two or twenty back about how The Poor 'dont' understand' the ways of The Royalty and The Gentry (Who Are Appointed by God Himself to Rule Over The Poor, God Save The King). As if they were some kind of separate (and superior) race, blessed with attributes that none of us could ever aspire to.
* it doesn't.
Why are normal working people taken by this absolute nonsense?
Because they aren’t very bright
Or maybe because they don't have the information to know what they should believe because the news outlets are giving a very skewed set of opinions. Most people don't know any farmers at all. Most people don't need to know about any sort of inheritance taxes. Most people don't know how big a 'farm' is, or who owns them, or how food gets to their tables, or indeed which country it is actually from.
And as if to illustrate the point
You shouldn't call people who ask you a question thick, its very unbecoming
I bet you wouldn’t think the same if a police force had put a slogan on their FB site stating that they ‘back’ asylum seekers in general after they were being threatened with having buildings burned down around them.
What is your obsession with asylum seekers?
What is your obsession with asylum seekers?
I haven't got one. You had a bee in your bonnet about Muslims in general, though. If anyone on here wants to see your views then they can refer back to the Southport Stabbings thread (I think it was).
But this is a thread about the far-right co-opting a farming protest movement.
I don't think it needs derailing by going over old ground.
It would probably be worth the Gov or even an independent body putting a few ads on the telly setting out some simple facts around key policy decisions that affect citizens to counter the huge swathes of deliberate misinformation that is put out by vested interests.
I don't think having a minister trying to hold a defensive line on BBC breakfast is really going to cut through the noise.
ads on the telly
Unfortunately that's not where the action is.
Just ask Musk, Farage, Trump etc.
If supermarkets (etc) aren’t paying enough, focus blame on supermarkets – they also get to pay staff low wages that can be topped up by in-work benefits – i.e. a big business subsidy. Supermarkets seem to be disproportionately profitable in this relationship.
They have been conspicuous in keeping out of this argument. Probably because they've been busy trying to convince everyone that the NI rise will lead to job losses rather than smaller profits/dividends.
As with most things at the minute this has clearly become very polarised (as the thread title I guess predicted). It's quite hard to argue that the tax loophole shouldn't be closed, but I think the issue is that it's been brought in quite fast. A proper consultation and developed policy should be able to address the tax issues whilst maintaining or improving viability and quality of farming. Most of this thread has descended to calling all farmers sponging tax avoiders which is hardly constructive, and is drawing drawing attention away from the likes of clarkson, Dyson and all the dukes.
It’s quite hard to argue that the tax loophole shouldn’t be closed, but I think the issue is that it’s been brought in quite fast.
April 2026 isn't it? Is that quite fast? I suppose it is in farm timescales.
April 2026 isn’t it? Is that quite fast? I suppose it is in farm timescales.
But the policy is already being set in absolutes. It would perhaps have been wise to state that they would be reviewing how to introduce this with mitigation, then there might be fewer people out on the streets
I don’t think it needs derailing by going over old ground.
Dont bring it up then.
If anyone on here wants to see your views
You are bizarrely obsessed with my posting history, I would be flattered if it didn't come off stalkerish. A glance at yours reveals your nonsensical rants, often addressed to the third person and always about the same thing. Odd, predictable and boring.
Most of this thread has descended to calling all farmers sponging tax avoiders which is hardly constructive, and is drawing drawing attention away from the likes of clarkson, Dyson and all the dukes.
Not really. A few people have chucked generalisations about farmers in, but the majority (who think the policy is a good thing) are specifically saying that it won't affect 'real' farmers too much at all. As such, comments about the farmers who chose to go to London yesterday might be expected to veer towards disparaging in some cases because they are being manipulated to varying extents. Manipulated by the same people who have made fortunes out of manipulating people based on their unfounded fears.
When these measures come into effect, they will not have any impact on 90% of farms. These small-medium sized farms where the farmer farms (as opposed to subcontracts) will actually continue to have very generous exemptions from taxes that the rest of us have to pay.
Their instinctive anger should be focused on:
Supermarkets who screw them over but still pay huge dividends and Exec bonuses.
Wealthy tax avoiders like Dyson whose tax avoiding activity inflates land prices so possibly pushes a few more genuine farms above threshold.
The liars who promoted Brexit with its loss of subsidy and export markets.
Funnily enough, though, the last two of those are exactly the people who are Pied Pipering the real farmers - and some can't see it.
but I think the issue is that it’s been brought in quite fast.
But won't effect the vast majority of them, so it doesn't really matter how quickly its enacted. I mean if you got told that tomorrow the subsidy for Bently's costing over £200,000 was being withdrawn and as motorists Bentley drivers were insisting that fellow car drivers come out onto the streets to protest, you'd laugh at them, right?
Most of this thread has descended to calling all farmers sponging tax avoiders
The problem is - through design - that people keep using the term ‘farmers’ instead of the actual term that should be being used… landowners
As has been pointed out numerous times, actual farmers, who get up at 5 in the morning to milk cows and stuff, won’t be affected. Sponging multimillionaire tax dodgers like Andrew Lloyd Webber and James Dyson who just bought vast swathes of land to avoid tax will be
So ****’em! We’ve been subsidising them for long enough
It would perhaps have been wise to state that they would be reviewing how to introduce this with mitigation, then there might be fewer people out on the streets
Messaging Fail Innit.
"Labour's progressive policies will continue to economically empower the families of hardworking farmers to benefit from an effective inheritance tax break, whilst simultaneously clamping down on the rich landowners making a mockery of Britain's working countryside folk by dodging tax when they claim that growing three potatoes and a turnip on five hundred acres makes them a farmer."
They have been conspicuous in keeping out of this argument. Probably because they’ve been busy trying to convince everyone that the NI rise will lead to job losses rather than smaller profits/dividends.
TBF the independent convenience trade is absolutely up in arms about the changes to NI (and vaping regs). luckily my shop is too small to be affected, but I know many small independent shops who are talking about laying off staff or reducing hours.
The ACS (association of convenience stores) are talking about a seven billion cost to the independent sector alone.
It's a far far bigger economic issue than the farming iht changes which will affect every consumer directly.
You know,
I cannot comprehend how the [superlative]-rich can bring themselves to care. Like, you're worth twelvety billion dollars, a law is changed when means you owe a billion in tax, you're still worth eleventy billion. Would you even notice? What are you going to do in order to make ends meet, sell one of your yachts? There are poorer countries for ****'s sake, you could buy Madagascar and still have enough in loose change for the flight home.
I'm reminded of Rhod Gilbert:
^^^
Exactly.
Wishing harm on another person is a slope I don't want to start on. But if someone who is worth, say, £850m stresses themselves out and has a heart attack because that might become £825m - then death by greed is not something I have much sympathy for.
TBF the independent convenience trade is absolutely up in arms about the changes to NI
Sorry, yes, I wasn't specific enough, but I've posted in defence of small retailers elsewhere. Is having Tescos lead the campaign for convenience stores like having Clarkson lead the campaign for small family farmers?
I think for many people, the accumulation of wealth is the whole point. That’s certainly what seems to be the case. I agree it doesn’t make much sense to me.
It still doesn’t explain why someone owning a farm worth 10 million would continue to work 70 hours a week for pocket money rather than sell up to some other fool and enjoy their retirement. If they were really devoted to their job, well fine, but quit whining.
Is having Tescos lead the campaign for convenience stores like having Clarkson lead the campaign for small family farmers?
Basically yes. For the win it is Clarkson + Farage.
And look who turned up yesterday!
I'm starting to realise the 'Far Right' influence here (or at anti Palestine marches etc), the real influence rather than the Tommy-supporting oiks, isn't about race. We're made to think FR politics is about race but it's not the main aim. Not anymore? It's about power and money. The ultra-libertarian freedoms that the wealthy and powerful like that are an easy sell to down-trodden 'hard working people' who don't want to be controlled, yet we all are. The ultra-libertarianism that just beats most of us down for the benefit of people who can profit most then hide the wealth in various ways. They manage to make it about your rights vs their rights in a way that race etc comes into it but really it's all about the idea of 'rights' as in libertarian attitudes, deregulation etc and that's where they get their support. So yeah, they'll support the farmers and feed them with misinfo about how Stamer-steals-from-farmers etc. Suits the aims of the richest 0.5%. People get played, same old story.
Wishing harm on another person is a slope I don’t want to start on.
I didn't understand my own reference in that case!
jamesoFull Member
I’m starting to realise the ‘Far Right’ influence here (or at anti Palestine marches etc), the real influence rather than the Tommy-supporting oiks, isn’t about race. We’re made to think FR politics is about race but it’s not the main aim. Not anymore? It’s about power and money. The ultra-libertarian freedoms that the wealthy and powerful like that are an easy sell to down-trodden ‘hard working people’ who don’t want to be controlled, yet we all are. The ultra-libertarianism that just beats most of us down for the benefit of people who can profit most then hide the wealth in various ways. They manage to make it about your rights vs their rights in a way that race etc comes into it but really it’s all about the idea of ‘rights’ as in libertarian attitudes, deregulation etc and that’s where they get their support. So yeah, they’ll support the farmers and feed them with misinfo about how Stamer-steals-from-farmers etc. Suits the aims of the richest 0.5%. People get played, same old story.
This is exactly right.
Is having Tescos lead the campaign for convenience stores like having Clarkson lead the campaign for small family farmers?
A little - Tesco is absolutely only campaigning for it's own interests.
It still doesn’t explain why someone owning a farm worth 10 million would continue to work 70 hours a week for pocket money rather than sell up to some other fool and enjoy their retirement. If they were really devoted to their job, well fine, but quit whining.
Because they're not doing it for "pocket money" - IMO they're either outright lying or they're thinking about 'net pay' like a child would in regard to their pocket money.
^This.
i also wonder why so few seem to be Limited Companies?
Is it due to the much stricter rules on accountancy etc? How it's all in the public domain and everyone can see what the true figures are?
There is still no clear explanation of how a business asset can be worth so much, yet generate so little profit?
i also wonder why so few seem to be Limited Companies?
Had this discussion in the shop earlier with a customer. 7 year rule, ltd company and other methods to get around the iht. He reckoned it's because if they created a ltd company it would have to pay corporation tax on profits and tax on company dividends etc which would be higher than the current self employed set up.
There is still no clear explanation of how a business asset can be worth so much, yet generate so little profit?
Because since the introduction of no inheritance tax in 1984 for farm land, wealthy people, who have had no prior reason to invest in land, started buying up land left right and centre. So farmers have ended up assets heavy as the demand for land increased.
There is still no clear explanation of how a business asset can be worth so much, yet generate so little profit?
In a snide little moment earlier, I did think HMRC had missed a trick with so many farmers needing to park up in and around London. A good opportunity to dip a few fuel tanks of personal vehicles too see how many were being run on red...
But obviously fine upstanding farmers would never do anything like that.
Well exactly.. No sane person would 'hold hold onto stock' or invest millions into something that might make you a 1% return*.
The current debit account with my bank is competitive with that! Lol!
*unless there's a few advantages in doing so... Looking at you Jeremy Clarkson!
In a snide little moment earlier, I did think HMRC had missed a trick with so many farmers needing to park up in and around London. A good opportunity to dip a few fuel tanks of personal vehicles too see how many were being run on red…
But obviously fine upstanding farmers would never do anything like that.
I can understand that view to an extent..
But some battles are not worth fighting, etc.
Let the Nigel garage /tommy Robinson types shout all they like.