Electronics resisto...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Electronics resistor network (or maths) problem

8 Posts
5 Users
0 Reactions
82 Views
Posts: 16346
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I am trying to make a simple variable resistor. My first thought was an actual variable resistor but it is high current so not ideal. New thought is a 'digital' resistor. If I put three resistors in series, each with a switch across it then I can effectively turn each one off. If the resistors are in the ratio 1:2:4 then I get a nice linear scale and can make 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. Perfect, except that is not quite what I want. I want a little more at the bottom and less at the top eg 0.6, 0.9, 1.4, 2, 3, 4.5, 7. So, is there a similar simple circuit and low number of resistors to achieve this? I'm thinking one in series one in parallel but I can't quite get it. Can this work or are there any other ideas?

This is the simple 1- 7 circuit:
[url= https://i.ibb.co/BLrVvNf/resistors.jp g" target="_blank">https://i.ibb.co/BLrVvNf/resistors.jp g"/> [/img][/url]


 
Posted : 30/04/2020 1:34 pm
Posts: 7932
Free Member
 

Add another in parallel across all three, or any two? Can't be bothered to do the maths to be honest. 🙁


 
Posted : 30/04/2020 1:38 pm
Posts: 7033
Free Member
 

My first thought was an actual variable resistor but it is high current so not ideal

What's the context?


 
Posted : 30/04/2020 1:57 pm
Posts: 16346
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Just need to drop a little voltage (a sort of clunky light dimmer) but it can't be switch mode so needs to be a resistor and its about 3 A, max resistance around 12 ohms. It is possible with a variable resistor but I can't find a suitable (except from china or crazy expensive) and I quite like the dip switch style solution so it can be set and forgotten


 
Posted : 30/04/2020 2:06 pm
Posts: 10474
Free Member
 

Wont a switchable 1 Ohm in parallel with the first drop it to a combined value of 1/2 Ohm?
EDIT Forget that. You couldn't get 1.5. Doh!.


 
Posted : 30/04/2020 2:21 pm
Posts: 7932
Free Member
 

I think you're going to need to re-think this. You're proposing to drop more than 100W though three or four resistors...


 
Posted : 30/04/2020 2:23 pm
Posts: 16346
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Add another in parallel across all three, or any two?

Well, yes. That is what I have been trying but I can't make any of the combinations I have tried work. They all lose a bit or two, which I can live with, but none give anything like the right curve. It is actually quite an interesting puzzle which I am happy to carry on with but I don't actually know if there is a correct answer waiting for me


 
Posted : 30/04/2020 2:23 pm
Posts: 16346
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I think you’re going to need to re-think this. You’re proposing to drop more than 100W though three or four resistors

Not quite. The current drops off very quickly with resistance so the peak is only 4 or 5 W, although I would like a bit of margin


 
Posted : 30/04/2020 2:26 pm
Posts: 906
Full Member
 

Is this for a fixed load or something with a variable power consumption. Does it run on a DC or AC supply?

If it is a fixed DC load (like a 12V light source), you could implement a constant current source using any old low power potentiometer (well perhaps not any old one but most out there would work), a low value, high current resistor, a beefy MOSFET and an op-amp (possibly throw in a couple of small resistors and caps too, just to make it nice and stable)?

If necessary/useful I can draw pictures (or find a suitable web link).

A bit like this:
null


 
Posted : 30/04/2020 2:37 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!