Dumbing down answer...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Dumbing down answers to get A* grades

25 Posts
14 Users
0 Reactions
116 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

This is a story on the [url= http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-19731301 ]BBC's website[/url] based on a report by the Headmasters' and Headmistresses' Conference.

This comment in particular is very interesting:

"Heads will say our most able pupils who don't use the buzz words don't get the top grades - but they produce the most novel and insightful answers. The markers can't accommodate the originality of their answers.

"And the most depressing thing for a teacher with a high calibre of pupil is to coach the most able pupils on dumbing down their answers to get an A*," he said.

I think this has always been the case to a certain extent but the situation now, if it is true, represents the culmination of years of what I've always called 'the cult of mediocrity'.

It's not just schools where this is the case. The workplace is rife with it as well.


 
Posted : 27/09/2012 8:00 am
Posts: 12467
Full Member
 

Large section in Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance about the impact of studying for grades on the quality of learning.

Well worth a read. It's about 3/5ths through, I think.


 
Posted : 27/09/2012 8:03 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ned - and the rest of the book will do your 'ed in. Read it at least 6 times now, and each time something else stands out and provokes deep thought....


 
Posted : 27/09/2012 8:11 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

nedrapier - Member

Large section in Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance about the impact of studying for grades on the quality of learning.

Well worth a read. It's about 3/5ths through, I think.

The first 2/3 are worth a read. I didn't finish it.


 
Posted : 27/09/2012 8:14 am
 MSP
Posts: 15473
Free Member
 

I suspect there is a certain amount of truth that teaching to the exam is not the best way to teach a subject.

I also think there is a hell of a lot of fantasy about the state of education 30 or 50 or more years ago. The past is a false utopia that never existed.


 
Posted : 27/09/2012 8:15 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The first 2/3 are worth a read. I didn't finish it.
- IS that a very clever answer Aristotle?


 
Posted : 27/09/2012 8:15 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Schhool was never designed to produce independent minds - it's designed to create 'well adjusted' behaved citizens.

Think of exams and grades like teaching a puppy to sit for you using dog treats.


 
Posted : 27/09/2012 8:16 am
Posts: 166
Free Member
 

go see Alan bennett- the History boys

All about teaching for exams


 
Posted : 27/09/2012 8:17 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

lucien - Member

The first 2/3 are worth a read. I didn't finish it.

- IS that a very clever answer Aristotle?


Not particularly clever, but I got to about 3/4s before filing it in my bookshelf. I've never gone back to it.


 
Posted : 27/09/2012 8:25 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

In the book - There is a massive internal conflict (in the main characters mind) between Aristotle & Socrates, hence the comment and in light of your user-name.
You are obviously mega clever, you just don't know it! 😀


 
Posted : 27/09/2012 8:30 am
Posts: 31056
Free Member
 

represents the culmination of years of what I've always called 'the cult of mediocrity'.

Is this something that's going to be in the news soon? Only I've never heard of it.


 
Posted : 27/09/2012 8:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Is this something that's going to be in the news soon? Only I've never heard of it.

Yeah yeah, very funny 😀 I never said it was an original idea (just like sarcasm isn't an original concept 😉 ). People can come up with ideas of their own accord and find that lots of other people have reached the same conclusion as well. It's what gives ideas credence.


 
Posted : 27/09/2012 8:53 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think this has always been the case to a certain extent but the situation now, if it is true, represents the culmination of years of what I've always called 'the cult of mediocrity'.

How would you create a mark scheme which accommodates and rewards novel answers and still ensures that markers all over the country would mark it in the same way?

I suspect there is a certain amount of truth that teaching to the exam is not the best way to teach a subject.

Well, that would very much depend on what the test was wouldn't it. Teaching to the driving test works quite well.


 
Posted : 27/09/2012 8:58 am
Posts: 6690
Free Member
 

Teaching for exams isn't perfect, but its the best we've got given our limited resources. Like it or not, there needs to be some way of comparing people against each other. What great way of doing things is there to replace them?

If people are clever enough to come up with novel and unique answers in exams, i'm sure they can adapt to throw in a few buzzwords too. Its not just something that happens at school either, like it or not, it occurs in business and science too (and magazine reviews!).


 
Posted : 27/09/2012 8:58 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well worth a read. It's about 3/5ths through, I think.


The first 2/3 are worth a read. I didn't finish it.

3 marks to anyone who can work out whether or not Aristotle reached the part to which nedrapier refers.


 
Posted : 27/09/2012 9:00 am
Posts: 25815
Full Member
 

This grade inflation business ... my daughter's in yr 8 - she's turning out homework of a standard way above what I used to and also more useful in "real" life

I suspect she'll be doing great coursework by the time o-levels come round, assuming it's still required. Terminal exam suited me down to the ground - piss about for 3 years and then cram for a test - but I didn't learn many skillz

As far as regurgitating keywords to get the marks is concerned, always gone on IMO. "Par un beau journee de printemps", anyone ? Our entire class started every french essay with that (or possibly the correct version; it's been a while)


 
Posted : 27/09/2012 9:01 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"The Cult of Mediocrity and the Wako Kid" That sounds like a brilliant name for an album.


 
Posted : 27/09/2012 9:03 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

"The Cult of Mediocrity and the Wako Kid" That sounds like a brilliant name for an album.

Never heard of it


 
Posted : 27/09/2012 9:03 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"The Cult of Mediocrity and the Wako Kid" That sounds like a brilliant name for an album.

Meh, it's all right.


 
Posted : 27/09/2012 9:05 am
 MSP
Posts: 15473
Free Member
 

Well, that would very much depend on what the test was wouldn't it. Teaching to the driving test works quite well

You appear to have missed the winky face of the end of that statement, some may not realise it was irony.


 
Posted : 27/09/2012 9:20 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Teaching to the driving test is a horrendous idea. I dont know of a single instructor who does that and I sincerely hope that none exist who do.


 
Posted : 27/09/2012 9:23 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Teaching to the driving test is a horrendous idea. I dont know of a single instructor who does that and I sincerely hope that none exist who do.

That may be your view, however, it doesn't negate the prior statement.


 
Posted : 27/09/2012 9:28 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That may be your view, however, it doesn't negate the prior statement.

To be honest, given the lack of supporting evidence presented with the prior statement, there's not much to negate... 😉


 
Posted : 27/09/2012 10:20 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

To be honest, given the lack of supporting evidence presented with the prior statement, there's not much to negate

Now then, this is not the kind of statement which needs evidence is it? It's a logical argument.


 
Posted : 27/09/2012 11:06 am
Posts: 22922
Full Member
 

Exams are a measure of mediocrity though, school level exams give indications of basic grasps of subjects, there's no need for them to reflect sparkling brilliance, there's no need to have that certified.

The issue with grade inflation always perplexes me. Surely the point of an exam is to set a standard and the job of a school is to try and ensure all of their pupils can try and attain it. If they succeed in that ( and the tools they have achieve that are better than they've ever been) then the exam is criticised rather than the schools and pupils praised. There's a mind set that there has to be losers so that people who pass appear to have won.


 
Posted : 27/09/2012 11:21 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Now then, this is not the kind of statement which needs evidence is it? It's a logical argument.

*ahem* Many apologies *ahem*


 
Posted : 27/09/2012 12:27 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!