Drone/Quadcopter wi...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Drone/Quadcopter with Go Pro (style) Camera

67 Posts
18 Users
0 Reactions
128 Views
Posts: 808
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I am looking for a reasonably priced quadcopter. As all the cameras on the sub £100 are pretty poor so I thought about using my SJ4000 instead.

Has anybody tried this and can recommend a copter & fixing options.

Thanks


 
Posted : 13/01/2016 1:02 pm
Posts: 808
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Anybody help??


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 12:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Look up the syma x8g if you want footage on the cheap, otherwise build your own from hobbyking parts, you could come close to dji phantom functionality for £200.


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 1:16 pm
Posts: 1751
Full Member
 

+1 to build your own; I've just built one of these bad boys;


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 1:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Nice footage.


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 1:32 pm
Posts: 808
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Cool, who can point me to what I need to get from Hobby King?


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 1:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Start here, I did.

http://myfirstdrone.com/build-your-first-quad/

Spend a bit more on a GPS flight controller, this will give you more stability and a return to home feature.

Make sure you get spares - landing legs, props, possibly arms, you will break things.


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 2:02 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Spend a bit more on a GPS flight controller, this will give you more stability and a return to home feature.

And learn how to set home correctly else it's a return to China / last known home feature!


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 2:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

One more thing, if you go for it remember that these things are dangerous. Anything that you self build will be significantly more powerful than a ready to fly machine, imagine bolting four hand blenders with carbon fibre blades to a frame and then throwing at someone. So stay away from people and pets with it, especially in the early days when you are learning to fly.


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 2:40 pm
Posts: 10340
Full Member
 

I had no idea I wanted one of these until I saw that 'Norway' video up there.
Just watched a video on how to build that Mini Tricopter.
All looks doable.
Shame there isn't a 'buy every part needed' button on the site, but it looks like it would be about £200 with GoPro/Mobius on top. Does that sound right?


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 2:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That's about right, but you can do it for less.

http://www.hobbyking.co.uk/hobbyking/store/__66873__S500_FR4_Glass_Fiber_Quad_Copter_480mm_PNF_Combo.html

plus a cheap radio, batteries and a charger would have you in the air for about 160 then add your own camera.

Although if you are not interested in mounting a camera then look at 250 class racing drones, you could probably put one together a little cheaper. (Smaller, so less expensive batteries and motors required.)


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 2:49 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

that Norway video! I must have one of those. Presumably they're using some kind of FPV camera/goggles?
Watched the build video, looks like an ace project to cheer up this shitty month.


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 3:04 pm
Posts: 41642
Free Member
 

How easy is it to add a feature to track someone/thing? I presume the function of the puck/tag/keyfob part of those drones could be done by a smartphone?


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 3:28 pm
Posts: 236
Full Member
 

Careful but the CAA is monitoring footage and actively seeking to prosecute anyone who violates the regulations regarding drone usage in the UK, get caught you'll get fined. They're really starting to clamp down, drones as toys will soon be a thing of the past.


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 3:46 pm
Posts: 22
Free Member
 

I've got a pair of NAZA lite (upgraded to NAZA) flight controllers which I've given up on since purchasing the Phantom.

Building your own is fun and I believe can have better more flexible results than an off the shelf machine. However since I got my phantom I have discovered the ease of flying it compared to the one I built. Perhaps more of a reflection of the constructor, but the phantom is way better. Lot on ebay now as people upgrade to the phantom 3.


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 5:33 pm
 iolo
Posts: 194
Free Member
 

Just don't fly it over skiers


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 5:37 pm
Posts: 22
Free Member
 

That was annoying. Just added to the Daily Mail article I know is coming titled 'drones cause Cancer'
Putting it overhead anyone is asking for trouble, it breaks one of the most important rules. These things don't glide back down when something goes wrong.
The fall.


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 5:53 pm
Posts: 2076
Full Member
 

I don't know what you're looking to spend / throw away ? 😀

If it's filming you're wanting to do then you'd be better off with something that can also lift a gimbal. (Phantom) The downside of this option is that it's really a filming platform and not going to go fast in any direction. 10 m/sec across the ground if there's no wind, 6m/sec ascent & a paltry 2m/sec decending. This catches a lot of people out. The footage is excellent though filming either through a GoPro or on the Phantom 3 through DJI's own camera.

2nd hand P2's can be had for a fraction of the original price on ebay as a lot of folks have upgraded to P3's Plenty options available to carry a gimbal and camera.

The other alternative if you want more flight performance is to buy a sport quad & fit a camera to it. Faster more exciting footage like the Norway vid.

In two years of ownership my Blade had 3 failures in flight all ending up in partial destruction & my Phantom's had one "fly off" Lucky to get it back as it decided to disappear into a massive field full of high crop.

You'll have fun for sure 😀

D.

Edited to say, The Phantom was a proper mess after its wipeout. Keep some dosh back for repairs 😀


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 6:02 pm
Posts: 22
Free Member
 

Is there ever a reason for the Fly off? Not had one yet but aware they can happen.


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 6:06 pm
Posts: 1751
Full Member
 

Careful but the CAA is monitoring footage and actively seeking to prosecute anyone who violates the regulations regarding drone usage in the UK, get caught you'll get fined. They're really starting to clamp down, drones as toys will soon be a thing of the past.
scaremongering. Stay away from people, buildings and aircraft and don't make money from it, no problems. Issue is only with perceived [i]dangerous[/i] use of drones, with a sly streak of protectionism of existing commercial air ops as an underlying theme.


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 6:29 pm
Posts: 4675
Full Member
 

Anything that you self build will be significantly more powerful than a ready to fly machine

I can confirm that. I built one a few years ago, before you could buy them as easily as you can now. I used an old 4 channel rc system I had, but something went wrong and all four motors turned on with my face not far from directly above it. Just missed me, went straight up for about 50m, then stopped and end up across the road in a few pieces. I haven't re-built it.


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 6:38 pm
Posts: 2076
Full Member
 

Is there ever a reason for the Fly off? Not had one yet but aware they can happen.

Never got to the bottom of this. The Phantom was repaired under warranty by DJI which is unusual I'm told. The gimbal froze and there was no control over anything. 15 seconds later it was buried in the ground. It took ages to find as the GPS distance on the display when it crashed was miles out.

The official line was that something ??? Stray Wifi signals etc overwhelmed the signals from the remote control. However I was in the middle nowhere when this happened and stray Wifi signals don't make the gimbal freeze.

I'm assuming it was a problem of some sort either with the flight controller or the Inertial Motion Unit (IMU)All firmware was up to date & the compass calibrated prior to flight.

It's a mystery.


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 6:41 pm
Posts: 4675
Full Member
 

DJI are getting a lot of bad press at the moment on the rc forums about their no fly zone updates.


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 6:47 pm
Posts: 10474
Free Member
 

Why? If you're not supposed to fly there.

Suck it up as part of the price of owning a payload delivery system.


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 7:01 pm
Posts: 48
Free Member
 

scaremongering. Stay away from people, buildings and aircraft and don't make money from it, no problems. Issue is only with perceived dangerous use of drones, with a sly streak of protectionism of existing commercial air ops as an underlying theme.

No you are wrong

The CAA are looking at the use of drones with increasing interest due to the illegal operation and complaints they have received. Dangers ? well there are several for one the blades will shred flesh and one dropping from the sky due to a failure isn't good. Also I bet nearly all the people using them have no insurance or are aware of the law in operating an aircraft. Yes I said aircraft as that is what it is in the eyes of the law and how they and all model aircraft are regulated.
Hopefully the BMFA and the fledgling FPV association with the CAA can sort out some sensible rules and guidance.


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 7:12 pm
Posts: 4675
Full Member
 

Why? If you're not supposed to fly there.

I agree, but the first version of the software seemed to include most of the US, and that annoyed lots of people ('I paid for it, I can fly anywhere').


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 7:33 pm
Posts: 1751
Full Member
 

No you are wrong

No, I am not.

I did not assert that the CAA were not 'looking into it', but, if, as you state, they are looking into the [i]illegal use[/i] of unmanned aircraft such as, but not limited to, 'drones', then so they bloody should be; it's in their remit. DOESN'T mean that drones as toys are a thing of the past, quite the opposite.

However, to stay legal, and therefore not attracting the interest of the CAA, all you basically need to do is;

Stay away from people, buildings and aircraft and don't make money from it
As I said. There are other things, like staying within visual line of sight (common sense if you value your aircraft) and not flying near airfields (BLOODY obviously, although some people are stooooopid). Third party insurance is also sensible (but not [i]legally[/i] required, yet) which is available by being a member of the BMFA. Your cover would be void if you were daft enough to do any of the above, however.


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 7:37 pm
Posts: 48
Free Member
 

the you are wrong was in reference to your quote

scaremongering

There is no if the CAA are looking into the use of drones (quad copters etc) look at the BMFA website and their bimonthly magazine for more info.

You may not be aware but people are programming a flight path into the onboard autopilots and then sending them off. I have seen a clip of a drone being flown at Weston-super-mare which at some points must have been 3\4 of a mile from the operator defiantly not within visible line of site. Also to fly you need the landowners permission and if used frequently planning permission.

I have watched a guy fly a FPV racing quad and it looks to be lots of fun and have chatted to a coup!e of people who have the required permits to fly drones/quads commercially. They were all concerned about people flying illegally as it will end up on restrictions being introduced.

As for insurance useless flying in a remote location you would be stupid not to have any.

Raising people's awareness of the dangers and legal position and the fun is detailed here
https://bmfa.org/News/News-Page/ArticleID/2322/Drone-Aware-initiative-launches-at-the-Drone-Show

and hopefully there won't be a reoccurrence of this,where a young boy lost an eye
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hereford-worcester-34936739


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 8:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have built in the region of 40 multirotors over the last few years and have spent most of my life around RC aircraft ( and everything RC) as my father owned a model shop and is a renowned model builder.

I would look at the dji F450 Naza lite combo if you want to build something yourself.

Here is some of my fleet
[img] w[/img]


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 10:07 pm
Posts: 1751
Full Member
 

I don't want to decend into an argument about semantics, but a statement that includes "careful... Get caught you'll get fined" and concludes with "drones as toys will soon be a thing of the past" is clearly scaremongering. Neither are demonstrably true, and the fact that some more stringent rules are probably in the offing (the US has just commenced a compulsory registration of all UAVs over about 100grams) does not logically lead to the conclusion that the hobby is dead. That is [u]scaremongering[/u]. It is perfectly possible to operate model aircraft including drones both with a reasonable level of safety and within the current legal framework.


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 10:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I totally agree with the idea of registering as is done in the states, and find that most people who fly within the law have no issue with it either.

As the safety officer at our BMFA club we regularly see new members who arrive at field with no ideas of the laws that exist around model flying an in particular multi rotors


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 10:24 pm
Posts: 1751
Full Member
 

I totally agree with the idea of registering as is done in the states...
[i]Cautiously[/i] agree, so long as it is done right. It would be just like the government to thoroughly screw it up though, making it onerous and expensive for the hobbyists who are already responsible and safety conscious, whilst doing nothing about the pillock who buys a quad off eBay and buzzes people on the beach. But if done [i]exactly[/i] like the States have come up with; ie a $5 one off charge to register the pilot (free for early birds) and as many aircraft as you like, just having to be marked with your unique serial number, I could support that.


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 10:40 pm
Posts: 48
Free Member
 

nice and wordy reply but just admit it you are wrong

the CAA have prosecuted a couple of people so far and the following is a quote from the police

Chief Inspector Nick Aldworth, from the Met’s Specialist Operations Command, and lead officer on the misuse of drones, said the public should be aware of the regulations surrounding drone use.

“As drones become more widely available, it’s important that anyone using this type of small aircraft understands that there are strict regulations on how and where they can be flown and that police, in partnership with the CAA, will look to prosecute anyone who does not follow these rules.

there is more info on restrictions on drones here and the legal situation regarding filming people and the data protection act

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/11541504/Where-is-the-legal-line-in-flying-drones.html

https://www.caa.co.uk/Commercial-industry/Aircraft/Unmanned-aircraft/Small-unmanned-aircraft/

Drones are not and have never been toys other than the very small indoor ones.

Model aircraft have been flown for many years safely under the control of the BMFA unfortunately the vast majority of the drones are flown with no regard or knowledge of the law or of safe operation of their craft.

The status quo will not continue if there are more incidents.


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 11:37 pm
Posts: 48
Free Member
 

Have you tried FPV racing Pacemaker ? I have seen a couple of videos where they were racing through trees which looked like lots of fun.


 
Posted : 14/01/2016 11:41 pm
Posts: 1751
Full Member
 

nice and wordy reply but just admit it you are wrong
🙄 😆 Right back at you, bud. Telling me I am wrong is not the same as proving that I'm wrong. I'm not even sure what it is you think I'm wrong about anymore, but I stand by what I wrote.


 
Posted : 15/01/2016 12:26 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Have you tried FPV racing Pacemaker ? I have seen a couple of videos where they were racing through trees which looked

Yes, the smaller quads in the photo (Gravity 250 and Emaxx 250) are both used for racing , there are some multi story car park races in Halifax on a night and where our club is in York, we have an MX track on the land so use that with gates and hoops to fly through.

Great fun !!


 
Posted : 15/01/2016 7:31 am
Posts: 8613
Full Member
 

Out of interest are there any quadcopters available suitable for indoor use with a 20-30 minute flight time rather than the usual 6-8 minute? Preferably under £200...


 
Posted : 15/01/2016 8:56 am
Posts: 1751
Full Member
 

20-30 minutes is unrealistic for a wired in battery 'micro' sized quad, due to the tiny weight tolerances involved. If you go a tiny bit bigger, to the 180 sized quads you get to swappable batteries, which with a few spares means you can be constantly airborne (depending on your indoor piloting skillz, of course...)


 
Posted : 15/01/2016 9:08 am
Posts: 808
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Ace, lots to investigate

Glad I bumped the zero reply thread


 
Posted : 15/01/2016 9:26 am
Posts: 48
Free Member
 

if u read the links and have a basic ability to understand what is written you will see your scaremongering comment is wrong.


 
Posted : 15/01/2016 11:10 am
Posts: 48
Free Member
 

Pacemaker

what is the ball park figure for the 250 class setup excluding tx RX

racing in a multistory carpark sounds like a lot of fun although the crashes must be quite heavy and damaging.


 
Posted : 15/01/2016 11:12 am
Posts: 22
Free Member
 

I've reported a video which breached quite a few rules of Air charter quite to the CAA. Its still there 6 months later. Perhaps they're busy?


 
Posted : 15/01/2016 12:45 pm
Posts: 1751
Full Member
 

if u read the links and have a basic ability to understand what is written you will see your scaremongering comment is wrong.
Jeez. Are you hard of thinking, or what??? I'll have one last go. Answer this;

How is saying;

They're really starting to clamp down, drones as toys will soon be a thing of the past.
NOT scaremongering??? I'm not and never did suggest that the CAA aren't looking to tighten up on [i]illegal[/i] model aircraft usage, mainly due to the explosive growth of cheap quadcopter sales and the perceived safety issues thereof, but to suggest that this will lead to toy and hobbyist use of 'drones' being a thing of the past is [u]clearly[/u] scaremongering. Unless you have a different definition of scaremongering that I don't understand, that is.

On a seperate, less antagonistic note; you can build a 250 racer for as little as about £120 now, using stuff off hobbyking and RCtimer. You should factor in your goggles though; the cheapest hobbyking 'quanum' type work, but you'll soon be hankering after a pair of dominator V2s Which come in between £2-300.


 
Posted : 15/01/2016 2:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

As previously said you can build one for about £120 without the fpv stuff , the Gravity is a decent spec and is worth about £300.

You get what you pay for though.

Have a look at www.4props.co.uk or www.radioc.co.uk

Any questions , I will help you the best i can.


 
Posted : 15/01/2016 3:28 pm
Posts: 48
Free Member
 

Whatever

I can't waste anymore of my time arguing with an idiot


 
Posted : 15/01/2016 3:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I prefer flying the bigger stuff than the 250 sized stuff as I like to use for aerial videoing, I also fly fixed wing fpv for mapping.

[img] [/img]
[img] [/img]
[img] [/img]
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 15/01/2016 3:51 pm
Posts: 1751
Full Member
 

Whatever
I can't waste anymore of my time arguing with an idiot
what a delightful chap you are.

Pacemaker; do you mind me asking what vtx do have good experience with? I've bought a fair few different ones, and at least two have been DOA, some have been just rubbish, and some have been somewhat larger than I expected. FPV has been an entertaining but occasionally frustrating experience so far... 8)


 
Posted : 16/01/2016 2:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have various types, I tend to use Boscam now as they are reliable and are easily comparable in range as my Imersionrc ones for half the price.


 
Posted : 17/01/2016 4:47 pm
Posts: 2819
Full Member
 

I am completely captivated by the self build stuff expressed in this thread and the Norway video. The stuff from Hobbyking seems top value, but i really dont know what parts to buy.

Can anyone give me a prescriptive build thread/blog? Or a list of go here and buy this?

Thanks


 
Posted : 26/01/2016 9:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It depends what you want to do with it, it it's an aerial filming platform I would go with a 450 size upwards ,if you want to "drone" race (I hate the term drone !!) you want something 250-280 size.

The sizes refer to the measurement from one arm to the other diagonally.

I would recommend a dji 450 naza lite kit as a great starter, it's build your own and you will still need to buy a 6channel transmitter and reciever plus batteries and charger

http://www.quadcopters.co.uk/dji-f450-and-naza-lite-inc-gps-combo-1160-p.asp

All my stuff I have built myself and will offer any help I can,


 
Posted : 27/01/2016 8:09 pm
Posts: 2819
Full Member
 

Will that dji f450 kit carry a gopro? With a gimbal?

will the multichannel radio on Hobbyking be suitable for this kit? What battery and charger would work best?


 
Posted : 28/01/2016 7:51 pm
Posts: 1751
Full Member
 

I found the [url= http://blog.oscarliang.net/250-mini-quad-part-list-fpv/ ]Oscar Liang blog site[/url] really useful and informative. Regarding carrying HD cameras, whilst a go pro is very portable for these quads, a great deal of people use the möbius camera, which is lighter and has a form factor that is easier to strap to a quad. It's also a good deal cheaper, which is an important factor when you are considering strapping it to a prototype self built high powered aerial craft...


 
Posted : 28/01/2016 8:05 pm
Posts: 2076
Full Member
 

The F450 can easily carry a GoPro & Zenmuse gimbal. The Zenmuse for Phantom & the F450 are externally identical but not interchangable.

My lad's got a 450. Faster and more maneuverable than my Phantom 2 👿


 
Posted : 28/01/2016 8:29 pm
Posts: 2819
Full Member
 

Ok, Mobius makes sense to me. Can that be gimbal mounted?

any radio recomendations?


 
Posted : 28/01/2016 8:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The 450 will easily carry a GoPro on a gimbal, the zenmuse gimbal is plug and play although overly expensive for what it is.

There are plenty of other gimbals that will do the job for half the price,

On the Mobius camera subject , I have 2 and also 2 SJcams and a couple of GoPros , I wouldn't buy a mobius again, the footage quality isn't as good as the sjcam and they are about the same price.
The gimbals also don't seem to like mobius camera balancing as most are based on the go pro weight.


 
Posted : 28/01/2016 8:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I would go for these over the Mobius
http://pages.ebay.com/link/?nav=item.view&alt=web&id=351487989215&globalID=EBAY-GB


 
Posted : 28/01/2016 8:57 pm
Posts: 2819
Full Member
 

I have a gopro 3 black so the sj would give me some mounts and batteries etc...

What TX and Rx kit would you recommend?


 
Posted : 28/01/2016 9:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

http://www.hobbyking.com/hobbyking/store/__78394__Turnigy_9X_9Ch_Transmitter_w_Module_8ch_Receiver_Mode_2_v2_Firmware_UK_Warehouse_.html

On a budget this is a decent deal, plenty of people using them and very happy or if you want to spend and get the best for multirotors, this one

http://www.t9hobbysport.com/frsky-taranis-plus-2.4ghz-transmitter


 
Posted : 28/01/2016 9:52 pm
Posts: 2819
Full Member
 

The Turnigy is lots cheapeer, but needs battety and charger. The Taranis is 3x the price but comes with more. Why is it so much more? Is it features, or build quality?


 
Posted : 29/01/2016 12:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The taranis is awesome and will do anything you could want it to do, I have 22 different models programmed into mine, and it's capibiliities are amazing where as the turnigy is simple, cheap and will do what you need it to do.


 
Posted : 29/01/2016 3:47 pm
Posts: 808
Free Member
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Dji 3 standard has been slashed all over the place. Think you can pick one up rtf for 350 quids which is a fair bit of kit for that money.


 
Posted : 17/03/2016 8:37 am
Posts: 808
Free Member
Topic starter
 

How easy is the Dji to fly?


 
Posted : 17/03/2016 12:52 pm
Posts: 4675
Full Member
 

How easy is the Dji to fly?

Very.
But there's a lot to learn. What happens when the battery gets too low, what happens if it looses the control signal.


 
Posted : 17/03/2016 1:01 pm
Posts: 808
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Richmars
ok cool, do you know anything about the xk detect 380 i link above


 
Posted : 17/03/2016 1:08 pm
Posts: 4675
Full Member
 

Sorry no. Just the DJI Phantom 3.


 
Posted : 17/03/2016 1:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The dji will return to home when the battery is low I believe. I'm still seriously tempted after somewhat borrowing/stealing my sons xc5 drone and flying it like Tom Cruise in top gun. Richmars do you rate the dji then?


 
Posted : 17/03/2016 1:39 pm
Posts: 808
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Richmars

Thumbs up or down for the DJI Phantom 3.


 
Posted : 18/03/2016 8:40 am

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!