Don't look up..
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

Don't look up..

48 Posts
30 Users
115 Reactions
1,134 Views
Posts: 4027
Free Member
Topic starter
 

...well not until 2032 anyway.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/jan/30/asteroid-spotted-chance-colliding-with-earth-2032

Still don't underplay 1.3% chance - can easily become higher.   Rated 3 on the Torino scale - so significant interest.

Its gonna happen one day


 
Posted : 30/01/2025 6:50 pm
Posts: 8318
Full Member
 

1.3% can start to seem like a big number in the context of annihilation.:-)


 
Posted : 30/01/2025 7:20 pm
Posts: 14233
Free Member
 

Well, if it puts an end to the STW politics threads it's probably for the best


 
Posted : 30/01/2025 7:32 pm
hightensionline, graham_e, sboardman and 41 people reacted
Posts: 13617
Full Member
 

The lottery is won regularly and the odds of winning that are massive compared to 1.3%!!

[insert shocked face emoji!]


 
Posted : 30/01/2025 7:33 pm
Posts: 1831
Full Member
 

1.3% can start to seem like a big number in the context of annihilation.:-)

hate to be the party pooper, but this asteroid isn’t big enough to annihilate the human race.


 
Posted : 30/01/2025 7:36 pm
funkmasterp, J-R, kelvin and 3 people reacted
Posts: 3066
Free Member
 

I think I'd have appreciated more warning in the thread title to make me not bother to read, something along the lines of *WARNING ANXIETY TRIGGERING* or even just something more obvious than 'don't look up'.


 
Posted : 30/01/2025 7:41 pm
pondo, matt_outandabout, matt_outandabout and 1 people reacted
Posts: 8669
Full Member
 

hate to be the party pooper, but this asteroid isn’t big enough to annihilate the human race.

Just America then? Please.


 
Posted : 30/01/2025 7:45 pm
fadda, Smudger666, Watty and 3 people reacted
 PJay
Posts: 4818
Free Member
 

But will there be anything left to annihilate? I gather that The Doomsday Clock has recently ticked closer to midnight than ever before.


 
Posted : 30/01/2025 7:53 pm
Posts: 8819
Full Member
 

Maybe it heard that the Gulf of Mexico got renamed and was sad because it's friend created it.


 
Posted : 30/01/2025 8:14 pm
fasthaggis, J-R, piemonster and 5 people reacted
Posts: 9136
Full Member
 

We visited the Space Guard Centre on the Welsh border a few years ago - I highly recommend it if you have even the slightest interest in space stuff, but definitely book! - so I know smart people are on the case. 🙂


 
Posted : 30/01/2025 8:18 pm
Posts: 22922
Full Member
 

I saw this high tech piece of equipment on the bridge of a ship used to transport nuclear fuel a few years back

Untitled


 
Posted : 30/01/2025 8:32 pm
fathomer and fathomer reacted
Posts: 9093
Full Member
 

1.3% is bloody close. Right folks, coke and hookers for the next few years ?


 
Posted : 30/01/2025 8:35 pm
Posts: 6219
Full Member
 

Why change the habit of a lifetime?


 
Posted : 30/01/2025 8:38 pm
ayjaydoubleyou, steveb, ayjaydoubleyou and 1 people reacted
Posts: 7167
Full Member
 

Even if it misses by a few thousand miles won't the gravitational pull cause massive flooding.
Be exciting if it hit the moon, be like pocket billiards on a intergalactic scal


 
Posted : 30/01/2025 8:45 pm
Posts: 4027
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I think I’d have appreciated more warning in the thread title to make me not bother to read, something along the lines of *WARNING ANXIETY TRIGGERING* or even just something more obvious than ‘don’t look up’.

You probably shouldn't watch the film then.....


 
Posted : 30/01/2025 9:04 pm
jezzasnr reacted
Posts: 10761
Full Member
 

Even if it misses by a few thousand miles won’t the gravitational pull cause massive flooding.

By 2032 it'll be getting hard to tell if the flooding is from climate change or the flyby of Dino Killer 2.0


 
Posted : 30/01/2025 9:17 pm
steveb and steveb reacted
 J-R
Posts: 1179
Full Member
 

Even if it misses by a few thousand miles won’t the gravitational pull cause massive flooding.

At 100m wide, much less effect than Box Hill in Surrey has on flooding in New Zealand.


 
Posted : 30/01/2025 9:21 pm
Posts: 6219
Full Member
 

Box Hill is static.


 
Posted : 30/01/2025 9:35 pm
Posts: 22922
Full Member
 

Can dogs look up?


 
Posted : 30/01/2025 9:51 pm
Poopscoop and Poopscoop reacted
Posts: 8318
Full Member
 

hate to be the party pooper, but this asteroid isn’t big enough to annihilate the human race.

I was more looking at it from a personal annihilation perspective, it's plenty big enough to give me a little more than mild concussion 🙂


 
Posted : 30/01/2025 9:51 pm
Posts: 9093
Full Member
 

Seven years, got shit to do starting this year anyway. Fun fun fun.


 
Posted : 30/01/2025 9:55 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50352
 

Can dogs look up?

Yes, dogs can loom up.

Top left.


 
Posted : 30/01/2025 9:56 pm
prawny and prawny reacted
 J-R
Posts: 1179
Full Member
 

Box Hill is static

It merely illustrates what a trivial gravitational effect such a tiny lump of rock would have.


 
Posted : 30/01/2025 9:56 pm
Posts: 3284
Free Member
 

Well, if it puts an end to the STW politics threads it’s probably for the best

Finally a big hitter worthy of the name


 
Posted : 30/01/2025 10:01 pm
angrycat, toby, MoreCashThanDash and 3 people reacted
Posts: 7433
Free Member
 

Wouldn’t be great if it fell on your house (or even anywhere close) but you’d have plenty of warning to get out of the way anyway.


 
Posted : 30/01/2025 10:18 pm
Posts: 32265
Full Member
 

it’s plenty big enough to give me a little more than mild concussion

Have we just settled the helmet debate?


 
Posted : 30/01/2025 10:28 pm
Posts: 22922
Full Member
 

Wouldn’t be great if it fell on your house (or even anywhere close) but you’d have plenty of warning to get out of the way anyway.

I wonder how accurately  - should it be definelty to be deemed to be on a collision course - you could predict where it would impact in the closing days /weeks. Given that your trying to calculate the speed and direction of an object that is headed more or less straight towards you* from a vantage point on a spinning object that itself is going round in a massive circle at 67,000 miles an hour.

Imagine throwing a dart at a spin bowlers cricket ball and trying to calculate where the dart would hit the ball using only observations you're able to make from a view point on the ball itself

* as I understand it the whole challenge of identifying objects on a collision course with earth is that objects heading straight towards you are the hardest ones to notice


 
Posted : 30/01/2025 10:35 pm
Posts: 9136
Full Member
 

I have little doubt these guys will know. 😉

https://spaceguardcentre.com/


 
Posted : 30/01/2025 10:45 pm
Posts: 2495
Free Member
 

“Keep watching the skies”


 
Posted : 31/01/2025 12:27 am
Posts: 855
Free Member
 

We got hit by something like that in 1908.  Took out a supposedly uninhabited forest in Siberia, although I expect there were some unfortunates under it.  Ocean or inhabited area and we have a big problem.

Oh well - chance to play snooker with if not planets, celestial objects.


 
Posted : 31/01/2025 9:29 am
 poly
Posts: 8699
Free Member
 

Wouldn’t be great if it fell on your house (or even anywhere close) but you’d have plenty of warning to get out of the way anyway.

Can you imagine the gridlock when they announce an evacuation zone?  Cyclists should be fine though!  Meanwhile presumably some would be complaining their phone was screetching alerts and it was probably a false alarm!


 
Posted : 31/01/2025 10:50 am
Posts: 1531
Full Member
 

What bike for armageddon? I'm assuming it'll need to be non-electric.


 
Posted : 31/01/2025 10:56 am
Posts: 8247
Free Member
 

I wonder how accurately  – should it be definelty to be deemed to be on a collision course – you could predict where it would impact in the closing days /weeks. Given that your trying to calculate the speed and direction of an object that is headed more or less straight towards you* from a vantage point on a spinning object that itself is going round in a massive circle at 67,000 miles an hour.

Imagine throwing a dart at a spin bowlers cricket ball and trying to calculate where the dart would hit the ball using only observations you’re able to make from a view point on the ball itself

Please tell me that you work for NASA.

Can you imagine the gridlock when they announce an evacuation zone?  Cyclists should be fine though!  Meanwhile presumably some would be complaining their phone was screetching alerts and it was probably a false alarm!.

Nobody's bike will be charged or ready to go, and everybody will be so obese that they won't be able to pedal unassisted. And people complaining about alerts on their phones would be quite right - how much warning do you need? It's already being talked about 7 years ahead!

😀


 
Posted : 31/01/2025 12:46 pm
Posts: 8035
Free Member
 

Isn't there a space force for just this kind of thing? MAGA, all is forgiven..


 
Posted : 31/01/2025 1:55 pm
Posts: 6603
Free Member
 

We will be fine. Just going to paint bits of earth high vis yellow and put some led lights on.


 
Posted : 31/01/2025 5:16 pm
Posts: 91000
Free Member
 

 as I understand it the whole challenge of identifying objects on a collision course with earth is that objects heading straight towards you are the hardest ones to notice

It's not heading straight towards us, it's heading towards where we will be in 2032.  It'll be in an elliptical orbit, not sure if it's bigger than ours or smaller, so it will be moving across the sky and even as it approaches in the final few days it will still be at an angle, like a car joining a motorway without looking and crashing into someone already on it.


 
Posted : 31/01/2025 5:38 pm
alpin and alpin reacted
Posts: 33325
Full Member
 

hate to be the party pooper, but this asteroid isn’t big enough to annihilate the human race.

No, but it would do a great job of urban renewal of the area around the White House.

We got hit by something like that in 1908.  Took out a supposedly uninhabited forest in Siberia, although I expect there were some unfortunates under it.  Ocean or inhabited area and we have a big problem.

No, we didn’t. There’s no crater, for starters, it was almost certainly a comet core coming in at an oblique angle and exploding above the surface, same effect as an airburst nuclear explosion. It flattened square miles of taiga forest, which is how we know it was an airburst explosion, because the flattened trees radiate outwards from the centre of the explosion. Photos taken afterwards clearly show this.

A solid object hitting the ground would leave a crater, like the one in Arizona, or the radiating damage to the crust like the Chixulub crater on the edge of the Gulf of Mexico, that one was big enough to cause a global extinction.

It would have looked a bit like this:

for comparison…


 
Posted : 01/02/2025 12:21 am
 J-R
Posts: 1179
Full Member
 

like the Chixulub crater on the edge of the Gulf of Mexico, that one was big enough to cause a global extinction.

Don’t be silly now. That was 100+ the diameter of the one just spotted and a million or more times the mass.

Back to reality: Yes a city like Washington could be substantially destroyed with a direct hit.  But as 1% or less of the world is urbanised, the most likely scenario is it hits the middle of the Pacific. And if it did strike land it hits somewhere nowheresville, like northern Siberia.


 
Posted : 01/02/2025 7:30 am
Posts: 4027
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Lol, when you google Chixulub you get a meteorite zooming across the screen and then the screen shakes on impact!


 
Posted : 01/02/2025 9:49 am
hightensionline, pondo, nuke and 5 people reacted
Posts: 33325
Full Member
 

Don’t be silly now. That was 100+ the diameter of the one just spotted and a million or more times the mass.

Yes, I’m fully aware of that, oddly enough. My point still stands, the 1908 object didn’t hit us, so no crater. But significant urban renewal as a result. Not unlike LA, but bigger.


 
Posted : 02/02/2025 12:35 am
Posts: 7433
Free Member
 

even as it approaches in the final few days it will still be at an angle,

At that point it would appear to be coming straight towards the earth but for the spin of the latter. Relative to sun and stars it would be the same place in the sky, just getting bigger and bigger…

Coincidentally, the mathematics underpinning much of my work was developed for estimating the trajectory of spacecraft based on limited and imprecise observations.


 
Posted : 02/02/2025 5:14 am
Posts: 12507
Free Member
 

Coincidentally, the mathematics underpinning much of my work was developed for estimating the trajectory of spacecraft based on limited and imprecise observations

Katherine Johnstone?


 
Posted : 02/02/2025 6:54 am
Posts: 7433
Free Member
 

Not quite, Rudolph Kalman. One is the analytical geometry of designing trajectories, the other is the estimation of what’s actually happening in real time. His technique is used in a huge range of fields including weather forecasting.


 
Posted : 02/02/2025 7:04 am
Posts: 4027
Free Member
 J-R
Posts: 1179
Full Member
 

What does it say? I don’t want to accept their advertising cookies. 


 
Posted : 11/02/2025 4:05 pm
Posts: 9093
Full Member
 

Was a one percent chance, not 2.3 percent ! Run for the hills.


 
Posted : 11/02/2025 6:28 pm
J-R reacted
Posts: 9093
Full Member
 

Was a one percent chance, now 2.3 percent ! Run for the hills.


 
Posted : 11/02/2025 6:28 pm
Posts: 855
Free Member
 

Posted by: fossy

Was a one percent chance, now 2.3 percent ! Run for the hills.

Don't - it will hit them earlier.

 


 
Posted : 12/02/2025 8:51 am
ossify reacted

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!